Jon Stewart Calls Out Normalization Of Violence In The U.S., Says Our Sole Concern Is 'Whose Side The Perp Belongs To'
In a lengthy episode for The Daily Show, Jon Stewart waded through the sheer slog of violence over the weekend, including Israel's strike against Iran and the shooting of two Minnesota lawmakers.
'But let me just say this to start off: F—! Just to start off,' the host began. 'This weekend — terrible! Again. I'm so sorry.'
More from Deadline
Jury Finds MyPillow's Mike Lindell Liable For Defaming Dominion Voting Systems Executive
Donald Trump Takes A Dig At Tucker Carlson After Former Fox News Host Criticizes POTUS' Iran Policy And His Old Employer For War "Propaganda"
Terry Moran Defends His Trump-Stephen Miller Social Media Post That Led To ABC News Exit: "It Was Something That Was In My Heart And Mind"
Addressing the wildly differing responses by ultra-right-wing pundits against U.S. involvement in the Middle East and pro the 'invasion' of Los Angeles in the wake of (largely mild) anti-ICE protests, Stewart noted, 'The only problem with their posture — that I see with it — is their reluctance to commit the American military to fighting drawn-out and often pointless wars doesn't seem to extend to America.'
He added, 'The MAGA mindset appears to be: We didn't vote for foreign wars, we voted for civil war.'
'They are looking for any pretense to sic their robot dogs on Democrats, and the strategy that they're using is to inflate the threat that this country now faces, to so rile up their base as to make the left in this country — represented by over 75 million votes in the past presidential election — as a legitimate military target for the United States of America. It's a strategy that's been used before to gin up military conflict,' Steward continued.
The show then played clips of the likes of George W. Bush, Condoleezza Rice and John McCain using militarized language to justify the Iraq War, which a majority of Americans now view as a mistake, and their eerie similarity to those currently advocating for the 'liberation' of L.A.
'We must invade Los Angeles. We cannot have the world's most dangerous people, eating the world's most delicious tacos,' he said in faux-seriousness.
In the middle of the segment, Stewart proceeded to 'break form' by taking an intermission. He pulled out a lunchbox, unveiling the standard fare of a sandwich and bag of chips — and six miniature bottles of alcohol, one of which he hastily chugged and spit back out. After two seconds of mini stretches, the host packed up his half-eaten lunch and got back down to brass tacks.
While making a point about the disproportionate response by the GOP against crimes by undocumented immigrants versus homegrown gun violence, Stewart took a minute to list out the recent mass shootings that have left their indelible mark on U.S. history.
'Violence should never be accepted, it should never be tolerated — but that's for their issue,' he said. 'In the wake of Sandy Hook, and Uvalde, and Parkland, and El Paso, and Lewiston, and Aurora, and Buffalo, and Boulder, and Binghamton, and Highland Park, and Monterey Park, and San Bernardino, and San Jose, and San Francisco, and the Pulse nightclub, and the Colorado Springs nightclub, and the Little Rock nightclub, and the Borderline Bar in Thousand Oaks, and the Ned Peppers Bar in Dayton, and the Waffle House in Nashville, and Virginia Tech, and UVA, and MSU, and UCSB, and FSU, and NIU, and SMC, and the Sutherland Springs Church, and the Mother Emanuel Church in Charleston, and the Living Church of God, and the Tree of Life Synagogue, and the Allen Mall, and the Westroads Mall, and Fort Hood, and Lockheed Martin, and — what are we f—ing doing? What are we doing? By the way, that is a wildly incomplete list. We kept it to the last 25 years, and it's still not everything.'
He concluded, 'Why is it when a foreigner, or someone that shouldn't be here, kills one of us, we're gonna put $150 billion into border security, we're gonna militarize our cities, we're gonna spend trillions to bomb and destabilize foreign countries overseas, we're gonna ban people from random countries from ever f—ing visiting here, we're gonna take our shoes off at the airport forever — but when we do it to ourselves, nothing? Is it that the only acceptable deaths are those that are made in America? Our only response now is to tally-up the psycho scoreboard on whose side the perp belongs to?'
Watch the full episode below:
Best of Deadline
'Bachelor in Paradise' Cast Announcement: See Who Is Headed To The Beach For Season 10
2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery
2025 TV Cancellations: Photo Gallery
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
16 minutes ago
- CBS News
Rubio says U.S. is ready to meet with Iran after strikes, warns closing Strait of Hormuz would be "suicidal"
Rubio says U.S. is ready to meet with Iran after strikes, calls closing Strait of Hormuz "suicidal" Washington — The U.S. is ready to meet with Iran following the U.S. bombing of three Iranian nuclear sites, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Sunday, while warning Iran that closing the crucial Strait of Hormuz would be a "suicidal" move for the regime. Rubio, appearing on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan," urged Iran to pursue diplomacy after the U.S. carried out what the Pentagon called the largest B-2 operation in U.S. history in an effort to cripple Iran's ability to develop a nuclear weapon. Rubio said the U.S. has no current plans for further attacks on Iran unless "they mess around." Rubio said the U.S. mission "was not an attack on Iran, it was not an attack on the Iranian people. This wasn't a regime change move. This was designed to degrade and or destroy three nuclear sites." "What happens next will now depend on what Iran chooses to do next," Rubio said. "If they choose the path of diplomacy, we're ready. We can do a deal that's good for them, the Iranian people, and good for the world. If they choose another route, then there will be consequences for that." President Trump continues to prefer the path of diplomacy, Rubio said, noting that the U.S. pushed Iran to make a deal to give up its nuclear weapons ambitions before the strikes. "We're prepared, right now, if they call right now and say, 'We want to meet, let's talk about this,' we're prepared to do that," Rubio said. The question of how Iran will respond has raised fears that the regime could seek to block ships from traveling through the Strait of Hormuz, a critical choke point between the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman that is used to transport about 20% of oil used around the world. Rubio declined to say whether the U.S. would take military action if Iran closes the strait, or whether the U.S. would consider attacks on oil facilities by Iran's proxy militias as direct acts by the regime: "I'm not going to take options away from the president, that's not something we're talking about right now in terms of being immediate." Rubio said closing the strait would affect the U.S., but it would have "a lot more impact on the rest of the world," particularly on China. "That would be a suicidal move on [Iran's] part, because I think the whole world would come against them if they did that," Rubio said. Retired Gen. Frank McKenzie, the former head of U.S. Central Command and a CBS News contributor, said the U.S. would be able to clear the strait if Iran lined it with underwater mines. "The Iranians do have the capability to mine the Strait of Hormuz. We have very good plans to clear that if we had to do it. We work on those plans all the time," McKenzie told Brennan later in the show. "It would be a blow to world commerce, for a period of time, but at the end, the strait would be cleared, and I'm pretty confident the Iranian navy would all be sunk at the end of that operation." The U.S. operation on Saturday, which the Trump administration named "Operation Midnight Hammer," bombed three nuclear sites in Iran, causing what the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said was "extremely severe damage and destruction." The Pentagon acknowledged that capturing a complete assessment of the operation's effectiveness will take time. Brennan pressed Rubio on what specific intelligence pushed the president to make the decision to strike Iran. In March, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard testified before Congress that Iran wasn't building a nuclear weapon, testimony Mr. Trump declared "wrong." Rubio said Iran, ahead of the strikes, had "everything they need to build nuclear weapons," and pointed to assessments by the International Atomic Energy Agency, or IAEA. "Here's what the whole world knows. Forget about intelligence," Rubio told Brennan. "What the IAEA knows, they are enriching uranium well beyond anything you need for a civil nuclear program. So why would you enrich uranium at 60% if you don't intend to use it to one day take it to 90 and build a weapon? Why are you developing ICBMs?" Brennan asked Rubio whether the U.S. will defend other nations in the Middle East if Iran launches attacks on their soil in response. Rubio said that's why U.S. bases — and about 40,000 U.S. troops — are positioned across the Middle East. "Well, that's exactly why they're there," he said, adding, "All those bases are there because they're afraid that Iran will attack them." Rubio insisted that the U.S. will defend Americans, including U.S. soldiers on military bases, from Iran and its proxies. "They'll attack us, is what they're threatening to do," he said. "So we'll defend our people, obviously. We'll defend our people. Well, they'll attack our bases. And those are our bases, and we're going to defend our personnel, and we're prepared to do that." Rubio said he didn't want to forecast what the U.S. might do if Iran retaliates. "There are no planned military operations right now against Iran unless they mess around and they attack Americans or American interests, then they're going to have a problem," he said. "Then they're going to have a problem, and I'm not going to broadcast what those problems are."
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Prison group stuck between local opposition and limited space
A crowd listens to a presentation on June 17, 2025, at Mitchell Technical College about the possibility of constructing a state prison near Mitchell. (John Hult/South Dakota Searchlight) On June 3 in Pierre, a gaggle of Mitchell city leaders delivered an unambiguous message to the state's prison construction work group. The city council, mayor, county commission, sheriff and various economic development officials were all in agreement: a patch of land south of Mitchell could easily host a new prison for 1,500 or more inmates, and their community would reap the benefits. That wall of official support has since cracked under the weight of fierce public opposition. A sea of people in red T-shirts – red for 'stop,' like a stoplight – have greeted city council members and county commissioners during the public comment portions of recent meetings in Mitchell. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX The Davison County sheriff withdrew his support within days. Mitchell's mayor pulled back shortly thereafter. Both men said their backing was provisional and subject to change by the will of the community. About 50 of the people on hand for an informational session Tuesday night at Mitchell Technical College wore red T-shirts. To hear Dwight and Barbara Stadler of Mitchell tell it, support for a prison in their town had never extended beyond leadership offices. Neither of them wore red T-shirts on Tuesday, but both are firmly in the anti-prison camp. 'They didn't tell us about it until after the fact,' Barbara Stadler said of Mitchell's initial pitch to the Project Prison Reset task force. The opposition in Mitchell mirrors what state officials already faced in rural Lincoln County – and are beginning to face in Worthing – as they try to find space for a men's prison. The facility would ease overcrowding in the correctional system and replace the oldest parts of the Sioux Falls penitentiary, a facility that dates to the late 1800s. Locations of the potential prison locations that remain in play, plus the location of the original rural Lincoln County site that's been ruled out. The selection of land for a new men's prison south of Harrisburg in late 2023 spurred the creation of a nonprofit organization whose activism contributed first to that $825 million project's legislative defeat in February, then to the removal earlier this month of the land set aside for it from the list of possible sites for any future prison. Neighbors Opposing Prison Expansion (NOPE) also sued the state in hopes of forcing it to abide by local zoning rules. A Lincoln County judge rejected that argument; the state Supreme Court is considering an appeal, though its ruling would now matter for future state-local disputes, not the dispute over that specific prison site. No one in Mitchell has sued – the state hasn't decided to do more than study the land as an option – but community members have launched a Facebook group called 'NO Davison County,' whose page is populated with skeptical dialogue about the prison idea. The group had 1,200 members as of Wednesday afternoon. That Mitchell became a focal point at all is an outgrowth of a choice made at the June 3 meeting in Pierre. The Project Prison Reset group, convened by Gov. Larry Rhoden to find solutions for overcrowding after the initial prison plan's legislative loss, left four locations on the table at the end of its meeting that day, culled from a list of more than a dozen: Mitchell, a separate Lincoln County site in Worthing, Springfield and Sioux Falls. Open process and publicity draw wide range of offers for state prison site The latter two options would involve building on land the state Department of Corrections already owns, even though no tract of that land would be large enough for a prison the size of the one shot down by lawmakers in February. The request for proposals sent in April sought potential sites with more than 100 acres. In Springfield, the state would need to build within the footprint of Mike Durfee State Prison, which is less than 70 acres altogether. In Sioux Falls, it could mean building another floor onto the penitentiary complex's Jameson Annex, on land adjacent to the penitentiary (less than 30 acres), or on land west of town currently used to house juvenile offenders (68 acres). In addition to its vote to narrow down possible prison sites, the group opted to cap the price of any new prison at $600 million – far less than the $2 billion a consulting group called Arrington Watkins had suggested the state would need to spend on new facilities to address overcrowding over the next decade. Members of the NOPE group were celebratory on social media over the removal of the initial Lincoln County site from consideration. Since then, the group has shifted the focus of its activism to Worthing, where task force members are considering a site off Interstate 29 that's not far from the original Lincoln County site. The NOPE group discussed the Worthing site at a meeting in Canton on Tuesday. Today, the group will participate in an informational session at Worthing Elementary School. Seven days ago, Worthing Mayor Crystal Jacobson came out against a prison near her city. Sioux Falls Mayor Paul TenHaken said in 2023 that he'd prefer a new prison be built outside the city. He was more measured at the first Project Prison Reset meeting in early April. At that point, TenHaken testified that he wasn't going to advocate 'for a specific location,' but predicted that the task force would face the kind of pushback that's since appeared from the neighbors to any site large enough to hold a new prison. 'No matter where you decide, you're going to have a fight on your hands,' TenHaken said. The second project prison reset meeting was in Springfield, and included testimony from residents who told the task force that the prison was a positive force for the town. Lt. Gov. Tony Venhuizen and Corrections Secretary Kellie Wasko both took time at the end of the meeting to assure residents that the state's commitment to the Mike Durfee facility is solid. South Dakota corrections work group formally backs need for new prison The mayor of Springfield, Scott Kostal, was on hand for Tuesday's meeting in Mitchell and told residents not to fear a prison. The medium security facility in his town, once a university, has been a good neighbor, Kostal said, hasn't forced the city to pay more for public safety or infrastructure, and hasn't affected property values. Kostal said he's been surprised at how much his town's property is worth. 'If there's a problem with property values going down because of the prison, will somebody please call the Bon Homme County Assessor's Office and let them know?' Kostal said Tuesday. Springfield can't address the state's full slate of needs though, Kostal told South Dakota Searchlight in a Wednesday interview. There isn't enough space on the Durfee campus to build a 1,500 or 1,700-bed facility, which is what the most recent consultant's report suggests is needed to address overcrowding. There is some green space inside the fence and a parking lot that could hold a few hundred more inmates, according to a previous consultant's report, but Kostal says anything more substantial would put vocational and educational programming at risk. 'The only way you could remotely do that would be to remove those buildings or eliminate those programs,' Kostal said EDITOR'S NOTE: This story was updated with a correction to accurately reflect the role of Neighbors Opposing Prison Expansion in a meeting at Worthing.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pope Leo laments 'alarming news' from Iran
STORY: :: Pope Leo urges diplomacy to prevent the 'irreparable abyss' of war :: June 22, 2025 :: Vatican City :: "Dear brothers and sisters, alarming news flows from the Middle East, especially Iran. // Every member of the international community has a moral responsibility: to stop the tragedy of war before it becomes an irreparable abyss. There are no distant conflicts when human dignity is at stake." U.S. forces struck Iran's three main nuclear sites overnight, joining an Israeli assault in a major new escalation of conflict in the Middle East as Tehran vowed to defend itself. "No armed victory can compensate for the pain of mothers, the fear of children, the stolen future," Pope Leo added. "Let diplomacy silence the weapons, let nations chart their future with peace efforts, not with violence and bloody conflicts."
