'DHL has completely underestimated the resolve of our membership': UNIFOR President
UNIFOR's Lana Payne provides an update on the 2,000 workers on the picket line, key issues, needed concessions, and hopes for renewed talks.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
10 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
10 Stock Splits Investors Could See Happen by 2026
Few things garner attention for a stock as much as a stock split. Though a split does nothing to change the fundamentals of a stock or the business, it excites investors for a number of reasons. First, they're the primary tool by which companies can artificially lower their share prices, thereby making them more affordable to individual investors. Second, they act as a milestone for the stock, essentially resetting its growth path so it can rise again. Third, management chooses the timing of stock splits, and they generally signal confidence from management that the stock can keep going up. If management was not confident about the stock's ability to keep gaining, they would be less likely to issue a stock split. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More » Finally, there's also evidence that stock-split stocks outperform the S&P 500 over the 12 months following the split, according to research from Bank of America. While that's not a reason to buy stock-split stocks, it is a reason to pay attention to them. On that note, let's take a look at 10 stocks that could split by the end of 2026. 1. AutoZone AutoZone's (NYSE: AZO) chief rival, O'Reilly Automotive, just issued a 15-for-1 stock split, and AutoZone looks like a great candidate for one next year as well. The seller of aftermarket auto parts now trades north of $3,600 per share, making it one of the highest share prices on the stock market. AutoZone has a long track record of growth and performing well in both bull and bear markets. After tripling over the last five years, the stock seems overdue for a stock split. 2. MercadoLibre MercadoLibre (NASDAQ: MELI) is another longtime successful now trading at a lofty share price of around $2,500. The stock is up more than 8,000% since its 2009 IPO but has never had a stock split in its history. The company continues to grow rapidly thanks to its strong positioning in e-commerce and digital payments in fintech, meaning a stock split makes sense at some point, if not by the end of next year. 3. Costco Costco Wholesale (NASDAQ: COST) is a unique retailer in a number of ways, and that includes its approach to its share price, which is now hovering around $1,000, well above any mass market retailer. Costco has not done a stock split since 2000, but considering the high share price of the stock and the overall health of the business, a stock split would likely be greeted warmly by investors, especially for retail investors who just have a little cash to spend. 4. ASML ASML (NASDAQ: ASML) is one of the leading semiconductor equipment companies in the world. In fact, it's the only maker of extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography equipment used to make the most advanced chips for AI and other applications. ASML's stock price is currently trading around $800, making it a good candidate for a stock split as it has not done so since 2012, when it did an unusual reverse 77-for-100 stock split. 5. Coinbase Crypto is having a big year with Bitcoin hitting an all-time high, legislation regulating stablecoins passing, and the post-IPO of Circle, the owner of the stablecoin USDC. Against that backdrop, it wouldn't be a surprise to see Coinbase (NASDAQ: COIN) split its stock. Its share price is currently around $300. That isn't especially high, but the stock would likely soar on a stock-split announcement, so doing one to take advantage of the tailwinds in crypto could make sense. 6. Booking Holdings With a share price above $5,000, Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) may be one of the most obvious candidates for a stock split. However, the online travel agency has thus far resisted it. The company has only ever done a 1-for-6 reverse stock split when it was at its nadir in 2003 following the dot-com bust. Management may be opposed to a stock split, but doing so would likely make the stock more available to more investors. 7. Netflix Netflix (NASDAQ: NFLX) has been one of the biggest surprises over the last three years as the company overcame a decline in subscribers in 2022 and has since surged with the help of its new advertising tier, a crackdown on password sharing, and a push into live TV. With its share price now above $1,000, a stock split wouldn't be a surprise, especially since the company has done them several times in its history. 8. ServiceNow ServiceNow (NYSE: NOW) is one of the most successful software-as-a-service stocks, and it's now one of the highest-priced at nearly $1,000 a share. The company continues to invest in new AI features and deliver steady growth. The company has never done a stock split since going public in 2012. 9. Meta Platforms Meta Platforms (NASDAQ: META) is the only member of the "Magnificent Seven" to have never done a stock split. After going public in 2012, the stock has risen nearly 2,000% to around $700 a share. It's unclear if Meta will do a stock split by 2026, but one seems likely if the stock keeps climbing. 10. Intuit Finally, Intuit (NASDAQ: INTU) looks like a good prospect for a stock split. Shares of the owner of TurboTax and QuickBooks are trading at around $750 a share, and the stock has been a strong performer for years, recently benefiting from advances in AI to make its products easier to use. The company's most recent stock split came in 2006 so it seems due for another one. Should you invest $1,000 in Costco Wholesale right now? Before you buy stock in Costco Wholesale, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Costco Wholesale wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $664,089!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $881,731!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to172%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Bank of America is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Randi Zuckerberg, a former director of market development and spokeswoman for Facebook and sister to Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Jeremy Bowman has positions in ASML, Bank of America, MercadoLibre, Meta Platforms, and Netflix. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends ASML, Bank of America, Bitcoin, Booking Holdings, Costco Wholesale, Intuit, MercadoLibre, Meta Platforms, and Netflix. The Motley Fool recommends Coinbase Global. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Winnipeg Free Press
15 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Carney travelling to Europe for security, defence talks with EU, NATO
OTTAWA – Prime Minister Mark Carney will depart for Europe on Sunday for back-to-back summits where he is expected to make major commitments for Canada on security and defence. Carney will be joined by Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand, Defence Minister David McGuinty and secretary of state for defence procurement Stephen Fuhr at the EU and NATO summits, where military procurement and diversifying supply chains will top the agendas. The international meetings come as Canada looks to reduce its defence procurement reliance on the United States due to strained relations over tariffs and President Donald Trump's repeated talk about Canada becoming a U.S. state. Carney will fly first to Brussels, Belgium, starting the trip with a visit to the Antwerp Schoonselhof Military Cemetery where 348 Canadian soldiers are buried. He will also meet with Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever, European Council President António Costa and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. At the EU-Canada summit, Anand and McGuinty are expected to sign a security and defence agreement with the EU in what one European official described Friday as one of the most ambitious deals Europe has ever signed with a third country. The agreement will open the door to Canada's participation in the ReArm Europe initiative, allowing Canada to access a 150-billion-euro loan program for defence procurement, called Security Action for Europe. An EU official briefing reporters on Friday said once the procurement deal is in place, Canada will have to negotiate a bilateral agreement with the European Commission to begin discussions with member states about procurement opportunities. A Canadian official briefing reporters on the summit Saturday said the initial agreement will allow for Canada's participation in some joint procurement projects. However, a second agreement will be needed to allow Canadian companies to bid. At the EU-Canada summit, leaders are also expected to issue a joint statement to underscore a willingness for continued pressure on Russia, including through further sanctions, and call for an immediate and permanent ceasefire in Gaza. After Brussels, Carney heads to The Hague in the Netherlands for the NATO leaders' summit on Tuesday and Wednesday. There, Carney will meet with the King of the Netherlands and later with leaders of Nordic nations to discuss Arctic and transatlantic security. At the NATO summit, Carney will take part in bilateral meetings with other leaders. The summit agenda includes a social dinner hosted by the king and queen of the Netherlands and a two-and-a-half hour meeting of the North Atlantic Council. NATO allies are expected to debate a plan to hike alliance members' defence spending target to five per cent of national GDP. NATO data shows that in 2024, none of its 32 members spent that much. The Canadian government official who briefed reporters on background says the spending target and its timeline are still up for discussion, though some allies have indicated they would prefer a seven-year timeline while others favour a decade. Canada hasn't hit a five- per- cent defence spending threshhold since the 1950s and hasn't reached the two per cent mark since the late 1980s. NATO says that, based on its estimate of which expenditures count toward the target, Canada spent $41 billion in 2024 on defence, or 1.37 per cent of GDP. That's more than twice what it spent in 2014, when the two per cent target was first set; that year, Canada spent $20.1 billion, or 1.01 per cent of GDP, on defence. In 2014, only three NATO members achieved the two per cent target — the U.S., the U.K., and Greece. In 2025, all members are expected to hit it. Any agreement to adopt a new spending benchmark must be ratified by all 32 NATO member states. Former Canadian ambassador to NATO Kerry Buck told The Canadian Press the condensed agenda is likely meant to 'avoid public rifts among allies,' describing Trump as an 'uncertainty engine.' Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. 'The national security environment has really, really shifted,' Buck said, adding allies next door to Russia face the greatest threats. 'There is a high risk that the U.S. would undercut NATO at a time where all allies are increasingly vulnerable.' Trump has suggested the U.S. might abandon its mutual defence commitment to the alliance if member countries don't ramp up defence spending. 'Whatever we can do to get through this NATO summit with few public rifts between the U.S. and other allies on anything, and satisfy a very long-standing U.S. demand to rebalance defence spending, that will be good for Canada because NATO's good for Canada,' Buck said. Carney has already made two trips to Europe this year — the first to London and Paris to meet with European allies and the second to Rome to attend the inaugural mass of Pope Leo XIV. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 22, 2025.
National Post
16 minutes ago
- National Post
Rick Seymour: If we want strong national defence, we must support military families
As global instability grows and international threats evolve, Canada can no longer afford to underinvest in its national defence. The government's renewed commitment to strengthening the Canadian Armed Forces is timely — and long overdue. But as we debate where to allocate dollars, we must remember one fundamental truth: national defence isn't just about equipment or infrastructure. It's about people. Article content Article content Canada's military strength depends not only on ships, jets, and munitions — but on the human beings behind them. Recruitment, retention and readiness are impossible to achieve if we neglect the well-being of those who serve — and their families. Article content Article content Article content In my role as CEO of the Together We Stand Foundation, one of Canada's few national charities dedicated to supporting serving military families, I've visited 15 operational bases across the country. The conversations I've had reveal a consistent, sobering reality: many military families face significant challenges — challenges that would be daunting for any Canadian household. These include inadequate housing, limited access to health care, unaffordable childcare, and even food insecurity. Article content These struggles aren't the result of poor leadership within the military. They stem from decades of national complacency — a belief that our geography and global alliances would insulate us from harm. That belief no longer holds. Article content Article content We often describe our military as an insurance policy — a safeguard we hope never to use. But an insurance policy is only as strong as the people who uphold it. Article content Article content Right now, Canada's armed forces are under-resourced and stretched dangerously thin. We're more than 20,000 personnel short — and that's based on a target that's already lower than what our global commitments demand. Even more concerning, we're losing experienced members in the critical middle ranks — those essential to mentoring and training the next generation. Today, Canada has fewer troops than the Arkansas National Guard. Ammunition reserves are running low, and equipment across the Navy, Army and Air Force is aging. While much of the public conversation focuses on procurement and infrastructure — rightly so — we're still not talking enough about our most essential asset: people. We need individuals motivated to enlist, willing to serve, and prepared to sacrifice. But they will only step forward — and stay — if their families are supported. Would you take a job knowing it meant frequent relocations, no access to a family doctor, limited child-care options and few job opportunities for your spouse? Would you agree to deploy for months on end, knowing your loved ones are left behind with rising bills and little support?
