Chad announces suspension of visas to US citizens in response to Trump travel ban
Chad's President Mahamat Idriss Deby has announced that his country will suspend the issuing of visas to U.S. citizens in response to the Trump administration's decision to ban Chadians from visiting the United States.
President Donald Trump on Wednesday resurrected a hallmark policy of his first term when he announced the visa ban on 12 countries including Chad, accusing them of having 'deficient' screening and vetting, and historically refusing to take back their own citizens who overstay in the United States.
The new ban targets Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen.
There will also be heightened restrictions on visitors from seven others in the new travel policy, which takes effect Monday at 12:01 a.m.
Get daily National news
Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
In a Facebook post, Chad's president on Thursday said he is directing his government to suspend visas to U.S. citizens 'in accordance with the principles of reciprocity.'
Story continues below advertisement
'Chad has no planes to offer, no billions of dollars to give but Chad has his dignity and pride,' Deby said, referring to the $400 million luxury plane offered to his administration as a gift by the ruling family of Qatar.
Republic of Congo calls the ban a mistake
The new travel policy has triggered varied reactions from Africa, whose countries make up seven of the 12 countries affected by Trump's outright visa ban with some exemptions.
In the Republic of Congo, government spokesperson Thierry Moungalla said he believes the country was among those affected because of a 'misunderstanding' over an armed attack in the U.S. with the perpetrators 'mistaken' to be from the Republic of Congo.
'Obviously, Congo is not a terrorist country, is not home to any terrorist, is not known to have a terrorist vocation. So we think that this is a misunderstanding and I believe that in the coming hours, the competent diplomatic services of the government will contact the American authorities here,' he said in the capital of Brazzaville.
In Sierra Leone, among countries with heightened travel restrictions, Information Minister Chernor Bah said the country is committed to addressing the concerns that prompted the ban.
'We will work with U.S. authorities to ensure progress,' he added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
37 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Wildfires: climate change cause and effect
Opinion Do we believe what we see or see what we believe? This question is at the heart of humanity's willingness to act on climate change. In the wake of record wildfire damage in Canada in 2023, the hottest year on record for the Earth in 2024, and scientists warning we will breach any chance of keeping global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius by 2027, it is fair to wonder. Do our world leaders believe in more climate change action? The G7 summit just concluded in Kananaskis suggests not. The term 'climate change' did not appear once in any of their communiques, a sharp departure from past summits but perhaps a sign of the times. Times preoccupied with urgent global economic and military conflicts and a U.S. Trump administration that has banned the term. Wildland fires like this one near Pimicikamak Cree Nation earlier this year, aren't only increasing as a result of climate change. They add to it as well. But if 'seeing is believing', then the G7 did see something alarming about our changing climate: wildfires. They issued the Kananaskis Wildfire Charter, stating: 'These increasingly extreme wildfires are endangering lives, affecting human health, destroying homes and ecosystems, and costing governments and taxpayers billions of dollars each year.' Wildfires are Canada's most public of dirty climate secrets. When we think of our biggest greenhouse gas (GHG) polluters, we tend to focus on the oil and gas sector. Think again. Canada's record wildfires in 2023 burned more than 16 million hectares of land, an area as large as 30 Winnipegs put together. It generated an estimated 647 megatonnes of carbon according to the authoritative scientific journal Nature. That is almost as much as all of Canada emitted the year before (709 megatonnes), and three times as much as the oil and gas sector itself. Trees and forests are natural carbon sinks. They absorb carbon dioxide when they are alive and healthy. But they release CO2 when they burn. Hot and dry weather caused by a changing climate is causing earlier starts to the fire season. It is making our forests more combustible when fires start. Forest fires become larger in area and of longer duration with more carbon emissions released. But Canada, like most countries, does not count most carbon emissions from wildfires in its GHG inventory. This is for two reasons. First, because the United Nations' climate rules focus on what's called 'anthropogenic' or human-caused emissions and second, it is hard to distinguish between carbon released from planned or managed land use changes such as timber practices and urban sprawl, versus unplanned wildfires. The atmosphere begs to differ. It doesn't care about carbon rules or even sources. It cares about carbon accumulation. Climate impacts today are caused from yesterday's carbon emissions, not tomorrow's. And it's caused by everyone's emissions, not just ours. Canada is more exposed to this vicious circle than any other country, due to our northern latitude and higher rates of warming being experienced. There's a reason we are on track for our second-worst wildfire season ever with 3.9 million hectares already burning and over 120 fires officially 'out of control', according to the Canadian Interagency Forest Fire Centre. What's the solution? Sadly, nothing easy, fast, or cheap. The federal government is spending $3.2 billion to plant two billion new trees over the next ten years. So far, 160 million trees have been planted. When finished, though, it would absorb only about 12 megatonnes of carbon per year in 2050. Not nearly enough or soon enough. Could those or other 'climate dollars' be more usefully invested elsewhere? Just as the G7 signalled combatting wildfires is now a global concern, Canada's governments need to make it a truly national priority. If you want to reduce our carbon footprint then focus on the emissions doing the most damage. That means investing more, now, in expanding our firefighting capacity. Canada has an aging water bomber fleet with insufficient planes. Trained wildfire fighters are lacking, particularly Type 1 firefighters, the first responders. Wednesdays A weekly dispatch from the head of the Free Press newsroom. Improvements are in the works. PEI is doubling its complement of trained wildfire fighters which, when deployed elsewhere as they were last month, helps in Manitoba and Saskatchewan. More water bombers are on order for Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Ontario. But these will not be ready for several more fire seasons at least. If we are in the midst of a growing wildfire trend, as the past three years attest, then expect more damage and more carbon pollution in the meantime. Canada has been embroiled in a debate about the cost of reducing carbon emissions from industry, vehicles, and consumers. There's another cost. The cost of climate change impacts on people and communities (185,000 displaced last year) ravaged by more wildfires. Insurance costs from last year's fires were more than $1.2 billion, according to the Insurance Bureau of Canada. That's the choice. Pay now or pay later. Tackling wildfires is a 'two-fer'. It protects lives and livelihoods. And it helps keep carbon in the ground, not emit it into the atmosphere. It's a way for Canadas to reduce its global carbon footprint in a more meaningful way than one more taxpayer-funded boutique programs spooled out to garner positive headlines about 'acting on climate'. Raging wildfires across Canada are the clearest case yet of 'see it, believe it' that climate change is real and expensive. David McLaughlin is a former clerk of the executive council and cabinet secretary in the Manitoba government.
Japan Forward
2 hours ago
- Japan Forward
G7: Stop Wavering in This 50th Anniversary Year
Canada hosted the just-concluded 2025 Group of Seven summit in its western Rocky Mountain region on June 15-17. This year, the leaders faced headwinds in the global economy due to the United States' tariff policies. As well, the international situation was increasingly tense due to the conflict between Israel and Iran. In the uncertain atmosphere, the leaders of the G7 nations shelved a comprehensive summit declaration. They also failed to issue a joint statement on the situation in Ukraine. American opposition to language criticizing Russia was one factor in the failure to agree on common positions. Along with it, they could not bridge the gap between Washington and Europe over issues such as the need for stronger sanctions against Moscow. The consequential lack of results from the summit was very disappointing. US President Donald Trump attends a G7 discussion leaders' summit in Kananaskis, western Canada on June 16. (Pool photo by Kyodo) This year's gathering marked the 50th anniversary of the first summit of the then-Group of Six Industrialized Nations in 1975. At that time membership in the G6 consisted of the United States, four European nations, and Japan. The G7 is an important forum for maintaining the international order and building consensus among democracies. Failure to reach consensus this time has left the impression that unity within the group has been wavering. President Trump suddenly returned to the United States on the first day of the summit to deal with the situation in the Middle East. He then convened a National Security Council meeting at the White House. That was unavoidable, as the President is Commander-in-Chief of the US military. However, the problem is that Trump failed to understand the value of the G7. During a meeting with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, Trump said it was a "serious mistake" to exclude Russia from the G8 in 2014. At the time, the group had been an expanded version of the G7. Russia was then excluded from the group due to its annexation of the Crimean Peninsula in southern Ukraine in the same year. Trump has also said that adding China to the G7 might not be a bad idea. Such remarks could be seen as a sign that the US President does not envision the G7 confronting authoritarian countries. G7 leaders including PM Ishiba attend a discussion with Ukrainian President Zelenskyy, in Kananaskis, western Canada, on the June 17. (©Kyodo) The leaders of Japan, Europe and Canada must strive to ensure that Trump fully understands the significance of the G7. In Kananaskis, the talks went ahead without Trump in attendance but Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy was included. Nonetheless, the group fell short in its effort to adopt a firm collective stance that could maximize pressure on Russia and force it to end its war of aggression. Summit members, however, did declare their commitment to peace and stability in the Middle East. That included affirming their unwillingness to allow Iran to possess nuclear weapons. They also issued a separate statement on the supply chains for critical minerals such as rare earths. It is fair to say that the G7 has just managed to preserve its relevance. In his opening remarks Carney summed the situation up as follows: "We're meeting at one of those hinge moments, those turning points in history. The world's more divided and dangerous." It is precisely because we live in such an era of unprecedented turmoil and crisis that we should look to the G7 to play a leading role. Japan and Europe have a responsibility to work to keep close ties with the United States and maintain unity. (Read the editorial in Japanese .) Author: Editorial Board, The Sankei Shimbun
Globe and Mail
2 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Israel, Iran launch fresh attacks as war enters second week without diplomatic breakthrough
Hours of talks aimed at de-escalating fighting between Israel and Iran failed to produce a diplomatic breakthrough as the war entered its second week with a fresh round of strikes between the two adversaries. European ministers and Iran's top diplomat met for four hours Friday in Geneva, as President Donald Trump continued to weigh U.S. military involvement and worries rose over potential strikes on nuclear reactors. European officials expressed hope for future negotiations, and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said he was open to further dialogue while emphasizing that Tehran had no interest in negotiating with the U.S. while Israel continued attacking. 'Iran is ready to consider diplomacy if aggression ceases and the aggressor is held accountable for its committed crimes,' he told reporters. No date was set for the next round of talks. European leaders' meeting with Iran leaves room for more talks, but no breakthrough Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel's military operation in Iran would continue 'for as long as it takes' to eliminate what he called the existential threat of Iran's nuclear program and arsenal of ballistic missiles. Israel's top general echoed the warning, saying the Israeli military was ready 'for a prolonged campaign.' But Netanyahu's goal could be out of reach without U.S. help. Iran's underground Fordo uranium enrichment facility is considered to be out of reach to all but America's 'bunker-buster' bombs. Trump said he would put off deciding whether to join Israel's air campaign against Iran for up to two weeks. Analysis: Trump's two-week pause on Iran puts him at centre of world's biggest drama The war between Israel and Iran erupted June 13, with Israeli airstrikes targeting nuclear and military sites, top generals and nuclear scientists. At least 657 people, including 263 civilians, have been killed in Iran and more than 2,000 wounded, according to a Washington-based Iranian human rights group. Iran has retaliated by firing 450 missiles and 1,000 drones at Israel, according to Israeli army estimates. Most have been shot down by Israel's multitiered air defenses, but at least 24 people in Israel have been killed and hundreds wounded. Addressing an emergency meeting of the U.N. Security Council, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency warned against attacks on Iran's nuclear reactors, particularly its only commercial nuclear power plant in the southern city of Bushehr. 'I want to make it absolutely and completely clear: In case of an attack on the Bushehr nuclear power plant, a direct hit would result in a very high release of radioactivity to the environment,' said Rafael Grossi, chief of the U.N. nuclear watchdog. 'This is the nuclear site in Iran where the consequences could be most serious.' Israel has not targeted Iran's nuclear reactors, instead focusing its strikes on the main uranium enrichment facility at Natanz, centrifuge workshops near Tehran, laboratories in Isfahan and the country's Arak heavy water reactor southwest of the capital. Grossi has warned repeatedly that such sites should not be military targets. Explainer: What are the risks of a nuclear disaster from Israel's attacks on Iran? After initially reporting no visible damage from Israel's Thursday strikes on the Arak heavy water reactor, the IAEA on Friday said it had assessed 'key buildings at the facility were damaged,' including the distillation unit. The reactor was not operational and contained no nuclear material, so the damage posed no risk of contamination, the watchdog said. Iran previously agreed to limit its uranium enrichment and allow international inspectors access to its nuclear sites under a 2015 deal with the U.S., France, China, Russia, Britain and Germany in exchange for sanctions relief. But after Trump pulled the U.S. unilaterally out of the deal during his first term, Iran began enriching uranium up to 60 per cent – a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90 per cent – and restricting access to its nuclear facilities. Iran has long maintained its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes, but it is the only non-nuclear-weapon state to enrich uranium up to 60 per cent. Israel is widely believed to be the only Middle Eastern country with a nuclear weapons program but has never acknowledged it. Israel said its warplanes hit dozens of military targets across Iran on Friday, including missile-manufacturing facilities, while an Iranian missile hit Israel's northern city of Haifa, sending plumes of smoke billowing over the Mediterranean port and wounding at least 31 people. Iranian state media reported explosions from Israeli strikes in an industrial area of Rasht, along the coast of the Caspian Sea. Israel's military had warned Iranians to evacuate the area around Rasht's Industrial City, southwest of the city's downtown. But with Iran's internet shut off – now for more than 48 hours – it's unclear how many people could see the message. The Israeli military believes it has destroyed most of Iran's ballistic missile launchers, contributing to the steady decline in Iranian attacks. But several of the roughly three dozen missiles that Israel said Iran fired on Friday slipped through the country's aerial defense system, setting off air-raid sirens across the country and sending shrapnel flying into a residential area in the southern city of Beersheba, a frequent target of Iranian missiles where a hospital was hit Thursday.
