In Los Angeles, Trump is escalating a crisis of his own making
Los Angeles, in America's largest blue state where over one-third of the population is born outside the country, is no stranger to protest. During the 2006 immigration reform demonstrations, more than 500,000 people marched in LA alone. In 1992, violent unrest erupted after a jury acquitted four LAPD officers charged with using excessive force against Rodney King, an African American man. The Watts Riots of 1965 were similarly rooted in longstanding racism and poverty faced by African Americans. The city's residents have once again taken to the streets — this time in response to a wave of brutal crackdowns on immigrant communities by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). In response to the protests, President Donald Trump initially deployed 2,000 California National Guard troops to the city. On Monday, he authorised an additional 2,000 troops, along with 700 Marines mobilised by Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth.
Trump invoked Title 10 of the US Code, which permits the President to federalise National Guard units if the country is invaded, if there is a 'rebellion or danger of rebellion', or if the President is 'unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the US'. There is, however, little evidence of such an emergency. By bypassing California's Governor Gavin Newsom, Trump's move constitutes an unprecedented federal overreach. The friction between Trump and Newsom is well known — earlier this year, when California sought federal assistance during the devastating wildfires, the President turned it into a political standoff. Now, California has sued the Trump administration over what it calls the unlawful deployment of the National Guard.
Trump's claims — LA 'has been invaded and occupied by illegal aliens and criminals', and is being overwhelmed by 'violent, insurrectionist mobs' — are not supported by facts. The US is currently seeing the lowest levels of undocumented border crossings in decades, and violent crime has declined nationwide, including in California and LA. To project himself as tough on immigration, Trump is escalating a crisis of his own making. ICE has reportedly been given a daily arrest quota of 3,000 — a figure with no clear justification. This is not the first time Trump has resorted to the National Guard: In 2020, he deployed troops against demonstrators during the George Floyd protests in Washington, DC. Now, Trump hasn't ruled out invoking the Insurrection Act, which would provide him unchecked emergency powers. The US President would do well to douse the fire instead of stoking it.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
29 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Donald Trump to attend NATO summit on Tuesday, will urge members to boost defense spending
The NATO alliance has crafted a summit in The Hague this week to shore itself up by satisfying US President Donald Trump with a big new defence spending goal – but it now risks being dominated by the repercussions of his military strikes on Iran. The two-day gathering is also intended to signal to Russian President Vladimir Putin that NATO is united, despite Trump's previous criticism of the alliance, and determined to expand and upgrade its defences to deter any attack from Moscow. The summit and its final statement are meant to be short and focused on heeding Trump's call to spend 5% of GDP on defence – a big jump from the current 2% goal. It is to be achieved by investing more in both militaries and other security-related spending. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez, however, upset NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte's preparations on Sunday as he declared Madrid did not need to meet the new spending target even as Spain approved the summit statement. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has had to settle for a seat at the pre-summit dinner on Tuesday evening – rather than a formal session with the leaders when they meet on Wednesday – due to his volatile relationship with Trump. The US bombing of Iranian nuclear sites at the weekend makes the summit much less predictable than Rutte – a former prime minister of the Netherlands hosting the gathering in his home city – and other NATO member countries would like. Much will depend on the precise situation in the Middle East when the summit takes place – such as whether Iran has retaliated against the US – and whether other NATO leaders address the strikes with Trump or in comments to reporters. If the meeting does not go to plan, NATO risks appearing weak and divided, just as European members confront what they see as their biggest threat since the end of the Cold War – Russia – while bracing for possible U.S. troop cuts on the continent. Under the new defence spending plan, countries would spend 3.5% of GDP on 'core defence' – essentially, weapons and troops – and a further 1.5% on security-related investments such as adapting roads, ports and bridges for use by military vehicles, protecting pipelines and deterring cyber-attacks. Such an increase – to be phased in over 10 years – would mean hundreds of billions of dollars more spending on defence. Last year, alliance members collectively spent about 2.6% of NATO GDP on core defence, amounting to about $1.3 trillion, according to NATO estimates. The lion's share came from the United States, which spent almost $818 billion. Washington has insisted it is time for Europeans to take on more of the financial and military burden of defending their continent. European leaders say they have got that message but want an orderly and gradual transition, fearful that any gaps in their defences could be exploited by Putin. They are particularly keen to stress their spending commitment as Trump has previously threatened not to protect allies that do not spend enough on defence. A prepared text summit statement agreed by NATO governments and seen by Reuters says: 'We reaffirm our ironclad commitment to collective defence as enshrined in Article 5 of the Washington Treaty – that an attack on one is an attack on all.' As part of their efforts to keep Trump onside, NATO officials have shunted difficult topics to the sidelines of the summit or kept them off the agenda altogether. While many European nations see Russia as an ever-growing threat, Trump has expressed a desire for better economic relations with Moscow – a prospect that Europeans think would help Russia to strengthen its military and threaten them more. Similarly, many Europeans are deeply wary of Trump's moves to lessen Russia's diplomatic isolation as part of his efforts to secure a deal to end the war in Ukraine. The brief summit statement will include just one reference to Russia as a threat to Euro-Atlantic security and another to allies' commitment to supporting Ukraine, diplomats say.
Indian Express
29 minutes ago
- Indian Express
What are sleeper cells and why is the US on high alert after Iran nuclear sites bombing?
The United States is on high alert after Iran threatened to activate sleeper cells inside the country in response to President Donald Trump's strikes on three major Iranian nuclear sites, which drew the US directly into Israel's war with Iran. The airstrikes, carried out on Saturday night, hit key facilities at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan sites central to Iran's uranium enrichment operations. The strikes came as part of a joint effort with Israel, whose offensive against Iran began earlier this month. Iran had earlier warned that if attacked, it could activate sleeper cells inside the US. The warning was reportedly delivered to Trump through an intermediary at the G7 summit in Canada last week, according to The Telegraph. Now, security agencies including the FBI and Department of Homeland Security have increased surveillance to counter potential threats linked to Iran or its allies, including Hezbollah. Sleeper cells are operatives who live quietly in a country, blending into society until they are told to act. These individuals may work normal jobs and avoid drawing attention. When activated, they could carry out attacks, sabotage or espionage. Former Homeland Security adviser Michael Balboni told Fox News, 'The Iranians have shown a good capability in terms of their intelligence apparatus and operatives being able to work clandestinely. They are determined. The question is how many are in the country and the answer is we don't know.' According to Fox News, White House border czar Tom Homan revealed that over 1,200 Iranian nationals reportedly entered the US during former President Joe Biden's time in office, sparking concerns about potential domestic sleeper cells driven by foreign terrorist organisations. Homan shared this information on 'Sunday Morning Futures' with Maria Bartiromo, highlighting the risks associated with foreign nationals flowing into the country. National security experts are worried that these individuals could pose a threat to US security, especially in light of recent tensions with Iran . However, US officials are especially concerned about cells linked to Hezbollah, a group supported by Iran. The FBI began stepping up monitoring of suspected Hezbollah-linked agents well before the latest strikes. The National Terrorism Advisory System issued a bulletin warning of a 'heightened threat environment' after the strikes on Iran's nuclear sites. While no specific plot has been identified, the advisory said the risk of violence could rise if Iran calls for retaliation inside the US. Former FBI assistant director Chris Swecker told Fox News that the situation is made more difficult because of gaps in border controls in recent years. 'We don't know where those thousand Iranians are and who knows how many others got across the border,' he said. He believes that authorities missed an opportunity to gather intelligence by not thoroughly vetting these individuals, saying 'we missed the opportunity to gather intel by interviewing them and thoroughly vetting them. We just simply let them go.' Swecker attributes this to 'gross negligence on the part of the Biden administration.' According to CBS News, potential targets of Iranian-backed plots include high-profile critics of the Iranian government, such as John Bolton, former national security adviser, and Masih Alinejad, an Iranian American journalist. Both individuals have been subject to alleged plots to be harmed, with prosecutors charging people with plotting to kill them in recent years. The increased surveillance started earlier this month, after Israel's Operation Rising Lion offensive began, according to the report. This heightened vigilance stems from longstanding concerns about Iranian operatives, particularly after the 2020 assassination of Iranian General Qasem Soleimani, which prompted the FBI and Department of Homeland Security to bolster counter-threat resources. Since then, several US-based individuals have been charged with plotting to kill Trump and his former national security adviser John Bolton. The airstrikes ordered by Trump targeted the Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan nuclear sites, which are central to Iran's ability to produce enriched uranium. Israel's campaign against Iran's military and nuclear infrastructure began on 13 June. Trump's decision to join the offensive marks a major escalation in US involvement. Iran has described the US strikes as 'unforgivable' and vowed to respond. Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned Iran that any attack on the US would be 'the worst mistake they've ever made,' speaking on Fox Business. Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Sunday that Israel was 'close' to destroying Iran's nuclear and missile capabilities. Sleeper cells have long been a concern for US security services. After the 9/11 attacks, agencies increased efforts to detect covert groups that could plan violence while appearing to live normal lives. While the 9/11 hijackers were not sleeper agents living in the US long-term, the attack highlighted the dangers of operatives planning in secret. Iran has previously been linked to attempts to use such cells for attacks or assassinations abroad. Balboni told Fox News that sleeper cells could target individuals or infrastructure and are difficult to track because they 'look just like everyone else.' Mashkoora Khan is a sub-editor on the global desk. With a background as a multimedia journalist, her work has been featured in publications such as Al Jazeera, Down to Earth, and The Wire among other national and International outlets. ... Read More
Indian Express
35 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘Gambler Trump, we will end it': Iran vows retaliation after US bombs nuclear sites
Iran's military on Monday issued a stern warning to US President Donald Trump, vowing powerful retaliatory operations in response to American airstrikes on key Iranian nuclear facilities. The United States launched strikes on three major nuclear sites in Iran, the underground uranium enrichment plant at Fordow, and facilities in Isfahan and Natanz. Trump later claimed the attack had 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear capabilities. In a rare direct address to the US President, Ebrahim Zolfaghari, spokesperson for Iran's Military Central Command, said in English: 'Gambler Trump, you can start this war, but we will be the ones who end it.' Zolfaghari further warned that the US strikes had widened the scope of Iranian military retaliation. 'The United States' direct involvement in the conflict expands the range of legitimate targets for the Iranian armed forces,' he said. The United States' direct involvement in the conflict expands the range of legitimate targets for the Iranian armed forces, Iran's military central command spokesperson said on Monday. Addressing US President Donald Trump directly, Ebrahim Zolfaghari said in English: 'Gambler… — Iran International English (@IranIntl_En) June 23, 2025 This comes amid Iran and Israel launched intense waves of attacks Monday and Trump raised the prospect of regime change in Tehran, escalating a crisis already inflamed the strikes over the weekend. In a post on the Truth Social platform on Sunday, Trump addressed the issue of regime change in Iran, applying his Maga rhetoric to the Middle East. 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!' he wrote. His comments, as is often the case, contradicted his senior government officials. The US defence secretary, Pete Hegseth, had previously said the mission 'was not and has not been about regime change' but instead 'a precision operation' targeting Iran's nuclear programme. The vice-president, JD Vance, said the US was 'not at war with Iran, we're at war with Iran's nuclear programme', while the secretary of state, Marco Rubio, said the US was 'not looking for war in Iran'. Israel struck missile launchers near Kermanshah, Iran, while Iran responded with waves of missile and drone attacks, triggering sirens and power outages in Israeli cities. Later, Israel hit targets in Tehran and Karaj, including a strike near the infamous Evin prison.
