Liberals reject Bloc proposal to split Bill C-5 to speed 'consensual' lifting of internal trade barriers

OTTAWA — Government House Leader Steven MacKinnon rejected the Bloc Québécois' proposal to split Bill C-5 in two parts, so that the sections on lifting internal trade barriers and the fast-tracking of major projects can be studied separately.
Bloc House Leader Christine Normandin said earlier this week it made little sense that the bill, in its current form, would be sent to the House of Commons committee on transport as it falls under the mandate of Minister of Transport and Internal Trade Chrystia Freeland.
Normandin instead suggested dividing the bill to study the portions on free trade and labour mobility in one committee and the fast-tracking of major projects in the national interest in another. She said the free trade portion is 'rather consensual' and could go 'a bit faster,' whereas the major projects portion would warrant more scrutiny.
On Wednesday, MacKinnon offered a resounding 'no' to the Bloc's proposition.
'This is a bill that responds to economic conditions caused by the tariff war, among other things, and mobilizes premiers, mobilizes Canadians from coast to coast to coast behind projects of national significance,' he said.
'These projects have a certain urgency, as do interprovincial trade barriers that must fall,' he added. 'This is a very comprehensive bill. We understand that it's going to be debated, but it's something that we solicited and secured a mandate for.'
Prime Minister Mark Carney said his intention is to see the bill passed before June 20, when the House of Commons rises and MPs return to their ridings for the summer.
'It is a top priority for this government, and we will do everything to get it passed before the summer,' he said after C-5 was tabled on Friday. 'And if Parliament needs to sit longer, it should sit longer in order to get it passed. That's what Canadians expect.'
MacKinnon said to date there is no consensus from other parties to sit into the summer.
The part of the bill on lifting internal trade barriers would allow a good or service that meets provincial or territorial rules to have met federal requirements but also make it easier for workers to get a federal licence by recognizing provincial or territorial work authorizations.
The second part, which is a bit more contentious, seeks to get projects deemed in the national interest — such as highways, pipelines, mines and nuclear facilities — built faster by having only one environmental assessment done and respecting federal conditions.
On Wednesday, the Assembly of First Nations (AFN) once more expressed concern the Liberals were 'ramming' through this bill without giving First Nations time to properly study the text.
'I keep hearing that they want to push through this legislation right to the end of this month, and I think that that's the wrong way to go,' said AFN National Chief Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak during a press conference on Parliament Hill.
Woodhouse Nepinak is expected to meet with Carney in July, presumably after the bill may have passed. She urged the government to slow down the process to allow meaningful consultation and study to occur with all the parties involved, including First Nations.
'Look, take the summer, take the time to listen to First Nations, take the time to listen to Canadians. And I think that'll make a more united country,' she said.
Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, on the other hand, is favourable to the fast-tracking of major projects like pipelines and dismissed the need for a consensus to move ahead.
'If you wait till everybody agrees on everything, nothing will happen. You're never going to get everybody to agree on every single project,' he told reporters on Monday.
'If the prime minister says he's going to wait until everyone agrees, then nothing will get done, which is what has been happening for the last decade,' he added.
Woodhouse Nepinak said national chiefs before her were ignored in discussions on major projects, which caused civil unrest and lawsuits that slowed down the projects.
'Isn't it better to talk through things rather than always being in litigation?' she asked. 'It seems like First Nations always need to litigate, and then we get… results later.'
'Does Canada want to change that or not?'
National Post calevesque@postmedia.com
Carney prepared to sit over the summer to pass new bill to fast-track major projects
Proposed fast-tracking of national projects 'serious threat' to treaty rights: AFN Chief
Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what's really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here.
Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Hamilton Spectator

40 minutes ago

• Hamilton Spectator

Rejecting Trump's rhetoric, Maine's governor heads to Maritimes to build ties

HALIFAX - Maine's governor is heading to the Maritimes next week with hopes a charm offensive will slow the rapid drop in Canadian tourist visits to her state. In a release issued Friday, Janet Mills says she's aware the historically close relationship between New England and its northern neighbours has been challenged by U.S. president Donald Trump's tariffs and his rhetoric about Canada becoming the 51st state. According to U.S. federal border crossing data released Friday, 85,000 fewer Canadians entered Maine in May than in the same month a year ago, a drop of about 27 per cent. The governor says she will spend three days meeting with premiers, appearing in local media and visiting businesses in hope of sending a message that Maritimers remain 'welcome in Maine' despite Trump's trade policies. On Monday, the governor will stop in Saint John, N.B., where she intends to visit businesses with links to Maine and she then will travel to Fredericton to hold talks with New Brunswick Premier Susan Holt. On Wednesday, Mills will meet with Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston in Halifax and tour a marine technology centre. Last month, the governor unveiled new, bilingual signs welcoming Canadian visitors, which are being placed in windows around the state. On June 13, in her weekly radio address, Mills said she wants to ensure the 'historic friendship and deeply intertwined economies last for generations to come.' 'It's not just our economies – we are connected so deeply by mutual economic advantages and on centuries-old familial, cuisine, language, and cultural bonds that far supersede politics,' she told her listeners, reminding them that Canada is the United States' closest and most important trading partner. The Democratic Party member said Trump's 'roller coaster tariffs' are unsettling business in her state and 'making our Canadian neighbors feel unwelcome in the United States.' In 2024, nearly 800,000 Canadian visitors spent approximately US$498 million in Maine, according to the state's Office of Tourism. Overall, the data showed Maine welcomed 14.8 million visitors, who spent more than US$9.2 billion, supporting 115,900 jobs and generating US$5.4 billion in wages. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 21, 2025. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Business Insider

an hour ago

• Business Insider

Does Canada have UBI? Everything you need to know about the country's basic income programs.

As more basic income pilots and programs launch in the United States, Canada is following suit. Recently, politicians in Canada have considered how to implement no-strings-attached money initiatives, especially as many citizens lost jobs during the pandemic and the cost of living has increased. These discussions have drawn on studies and trials dating back nearly a century. As dozens of basic income programs in the United States spread, some leading policy experts have discussed whether these initiatives could be extended to a universal level. Other countries with basic income programs and experiments include Brazil, China, Germany, and India. Advocates for universal basic income — which offers recurring cash payments to all individuals in a population, regardless of their socioeconomic status — say Canada has the resources to create a program that covers every citizen. While universal income would be on a universal scale across a population, basic income programs typically target lower-income or vulnerable populations. Organizations in some provinces are testing what basic income could look like on a local level through guaranteed basic income pilots — recurring cash payments geared toward specific groups, like vulnerable populations. While many Canadian politicians across the political spectrum support basic income, some argue that these programs are costly to the local economy. Support from residents, meanwhile, varies. About 60% of Canadians support guaranteed basic income, while 37% support universal basic income, according to a poll published in 2022 by the market research firm Narrative Research. To be sure, cash payments can't replace full-time income or lift everyone out of poverty, but it can give many lower-income residents more opportunities to engage with the economy, said Sheila Regehr, a founding member and chairperson of the Basic Income Canada Network, an organization working to expand basic income access across the country. "From a fiscally conservative perspective, that little bit of investment could save a ton of money down the road and get better results for everything," Regehr told Business Insider, referring to the initial expense and potential benefits of basic income. "This idea we had several generations ago to get a good job, stay in a company for life, that doesn't happen anymore." Shortly after the pandemic began, talks about the efficacy of basic income in Canada accelerated. In 2020, 50 senators sent a letter to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland, and Finance Minister Bill Morneau commending them for their actions and calling for a minimum basic income. And in the last federal election in 2021, 189 candidates — representing 46% of Canada's electoral districts — pledged to support basic income. Canada's Parliamentary Budget Officer found that between 2022 and 2023, a universal basic income would cost $87.6 billion but would cut poverty by at least 40% in nearly every province; the cost of poverty totals about $80 billion each year, the PBO estimates. "We certainly have the capacity, there is no question that we do," Regehr said. In 2021, Ontario Sen. Kim Pate introduced Bill S-233 and Winnipeg MP Leah Gazan introduced Bill C-233, creating the country's first national framework for a guaranteed livable basic income for people over the age of 17. Both bills are now under consideration in the Senate. Canada, which has an Old Age Security pension, already has a version of basic income for older residents called the Guaranteed Income Supplement. The GIS is a monthly payment distributed to low-income pensioners aged 65 and older. The maximum monthly payment is $1,087 for someone who is single, divorced, or widowed. "Getting a government check has no stigma to it here; it's just something that happens," Regehr said. Canada's experiments with basic income Basic income experiments in Canada are not new. Talk of implementing a basic income dates back to the 1930s in Alberta, though the first major experiment took place in Manitoba starting in 1974. That project, called Mincome, was studied after completion, and researchers found that participants — who received $3,800, $4,800, or $5,800 a year through 1979 — on the whole continued to work and had higher secondary school graduation rates. Researchers also found that there was an 8.5% drop in hospitalizations for participants at the program's completion. Four decades later, Ontario launched one of the biggest pilots in Canadian history, the Ontario Basic Income Pilot Project. The pilot, whose participants were mostly employed and lower-income, gave up to $16,989 annually for single participants aged 18 to 64 and $24,027 for couples. Ontario Premier Doug Ford's government canceled the pilot just 10 months after payments were first distributed. Reasons for the cancellation included high costs and indications that the program didn't help people contribute enough to the economy. Still, interviews with participants after the pilot found that basic income helped them better afford necessities than traditional welfare payments and assisted in long-term financial planning. A 2020 Canadian Centre for Economic Analysis study determined that a basic income could create 600,000 jobs and contribute $80 billion to Canada's economy in five years, potentially generating $400 billion in additional GDP during that period. Current basic income programs in Canada Various basic income and cash transfer pilots are ongoing, including in Newfoundland and Labrador for people between the ages of 60 and 64. Quebec has a basic income of $1,309 monthly for people with limited income, according to Quebec's government website. Prince Edward Island, which recently hosted a conference on basic income, started its T-BIG pilot — the Targeted Basic Income Guarantee — in 2021 for over 600 people. The program gives cash to participants to bring them within 85% of the federal poverty level. Meanwhile, a few provinces, including Saskatchewan, have debated adopting a sovereign wealth fund that pays dividends similar to the Alaska Permanent Fund. In 2021, the British Columbia Basic Income Panel created 65 recommendations for implementing targeted basic income programs for people with disabilities, young Canadians aging out of government care, and women escaping violence. However, the panel recommended overhauling certain social programs and suggested against a general basic income. "We have concluded that moving to a system around a basic income for all as its main pillar is not the most just policy option," the report reads. "The needs of people in this society are too diverse to be effectively answered simply with a cheque from the government." The province's New Leaf Experiment has seen promising results. In New Leaf's first rendition, launched in 2018, which gave $7,500 total upfront to 50 people experiencing homelessness with a control group of 65 people, participants did not increase spending on goods like drugs or alcohol and spent 99 fewer days unhoused, according to a research note on the pilot's outcomes. The pilot also helped participants with financial literacy and getting them proper IDs and paperwork. Results are forthcoming for another iteration, which started in 2022. "The findings are that they work more hours, they get paid more per hour, and a lot of the individuals we're working with are accessing training," said Amber Dyce, CEO of Foundations For Social Change, a charitable organization that runs the New Leaf pilot. "By getting the cash transfer, they have more breathing room. They're trying to empower themselves to become more financially stable through employment."

Yahoo

2 hours ago

• Yahoo

Wells Fargo Raises PT for Williams Companies (WMB), Keeps Overweight Rating

The Williams Companies, Inc. (NYSE:WMB) is one of the 10 Best Oil and Gas Stocks to Buy Now. On May 28, Wells Fargo raised its price target on The Williams Companies, Inc. (NYSE:WMB) from $64 to $67 but kept an 'Overweight' rating. The analysts highlighted the company's strong growth potential as the main reason for the increased price target. Wells Fargo suggests that The Williams Companies, Inc. (NYSE:WMB) is currently trading higher than its C-Corp peers, using a 2026 estimated EV/EBITDA multiple of 11.9x for WMB against 10.8x for its peers. WMB is trading at a premium and Wells Fargo analysts believe this premium is fair because of the company's superior growth prospects. A bird's-eye view of an oil & gas midstream platform in the Gulf of Mexico on a clear day. According to the analysts, The Williams Companies, Inc. (NYSE:WMB) can achieve an 11% compound annual growth rate (CAGR) in EBITDA over three years, which is much higher than the 6% median growth expected from its C-Corp peers. The analysis by Wells Fargo also indicates that if The Williams Companies, Inc. (NYSE:WMB) and its peer group traded at the same valuation multiple in three years, WMB should command a 1.5x premium over the current 1.1x. This change would mean about a 10% increase in WMB's stock price. Wells Fargo analysts further explained that The Williams Companies, Inc. (NYSE:WMB) is likely to keep growing at a strong rate even after three years. If this is true, the 1.5x premium could actually be a conservative estimate. The Williams Companies, Inc. (NYSE:WMB) is an American energy company that specializes in natural gas processing and transportation. The company also has some petroleum and electricity generation assets. While we acknowledge the potential of WMB as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 11 Stocks That Will Bounce Back According To Analysts and 11 Best Stocks Under $15 to Buy According to Hedge Funds. Disclosure: None. Sign in to access your portfolio