Former N.S. school principal acquitted in historical sexual assault case

A former Halifax-area elementary school principal has been acquitted in a historical sexual assault case.
Judge Alanna Murphy announced her decision in the matter of Steve Hutchins in a provincial courtroom in Dartmouth, N.S. on Tuesday.
Hutchins, 60, was found not guilty in relation to one count each of sexual assault and sexual interference for offences alleged to have occurred in the late 1980s and early 1990s.
"I cannot be satisfied to the degree that I need to be to make a finding of guilt and consequently it would be dangerous for me to make findings of guilt in relation to the two counts before the court," Murphy told the court.
A woman, now 43, alleged Hutchins assaulted her when she was attending grades 3 to 6 at elementary schools in the Eastern Passage area where Hutchins was a gym teacher.
A trial was held over three days in March.
The woman, whose identity is protected by a publication ban, testified Hutchins would hold her in tight embraces in supply rooms adjacent to the gyms in the schools, or sometimes in Hutchins's office.
Hutchins denied all of the complainant's allegations while under questioning by his lawyer, Don Murray.
During his testimony, Hutchins used photographs and hand-drawn floor plans to demonstrate the layout of the schools to suggest the sort of encounters the woman described would not have been possible.
"I cannot say that the complainant's evidence was so persuasive and compelling that it rendered Mr. Hutchins's evidence unbelievable," Murphy said while delivering her decision.
"I can say that at the very least his evidence has left me with reasonable doubt," she said.
Murray declined a request from CBC News for a comment from his client.
Acquitted in separate case
Hutchins was also acquitted in a different historical sexual assault case last fall.
In a separate incident, a woman accused him of giving her an open-mouthed kiss and touching her body at a social function at a home in Hammonds Plains when she was 14.
The woman said she did not go to police until stories surfaced about charges laid against Hutchins involving another woman.
The judge in that case said while she found the complainant's testimony to be credible, she was left with some doubt and so had to acquit Hutchins.
MORE TOP STORIES

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Boston Globe

8 hours ago

• Boston Globe

Jurors in trial of Irish firefighter charged with rape return for third full day of deliberations

'I had no physical or verbal contact with her at all,' Crosbie said. The woman, a 29-year-old lawyer, testified she had fallen asleep in the second hotel bed after having consensual sex with Crosbie's roommate. She told jurors she was awakened by a man sexually assaulting her. 'I woke up, and a guy was inside of me,' Advertisement Superior Court Judge Sarah Weyland Ellis released jurors at 4 p.m. Wednesday after they had deliberated for about 15 hours since receiving the case Monday. Court was closed on Thursday in observance of Juneteenth. On Wednesday, the jury of eight men and four women asked to listen to a portion of Crosbie's conversation with police that took place after the woman reported the alleged assault at Massachusetts General Hospital. Advertisement Jurors specifically wanted to listen to a portion of the recording when Crosbie asked the officer if his DNA could have gotten on the woman or her clothes if he had In response to the jury's request, the judge said she could not play that portion of the interview because it was never entered into evidence. Noting that the prosecutor referenced it while cross-examining Crosbie, she said jurors should rely on their notes and memories of what they heard. 'You may consider any testimony on this subject as evidence,' she told them. During her closing argument, Suffolk Assistant District Attorney Erin Murphy said the evidence supports a guilty verdict. 'There's no mystery man here, there's no phantom rapist who slipped off into the night,' Murphy told jurors. 'Terence Crosbie is guilty.' Murphy said that while the woman had consumed alcohol, she was able to provide a detailed description of the alleged attack to police and medical staff just hours later. 'If she was so drunk, or so mixed up, or if she was making up a story, then how did she have so much right?' Murphy asked jurors. Additionally, evidence and records from the night in question connect Crosbie to the hotel room where the woman alleges she was assaulted, Murphy said. Murphy also reminded the jury that two male DNA profiles were found in a genital swab from the woman. Advertisement In 'I'm going to ask you to end that nightmare and find him not guilty,' he said. Crosbie's wife has attended the trial and often sat behind her husband in court, along with other friends. Reilly argued there is not enough evidence to link Crosbie to the alleged rape, in part because the woman never identified Crosbie's multiple arm tattoos afterwards. 'The Commonwealth has not proven beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Crosbie committed the crime he is accused of,' Reilly told jurors. John R. Ellement of the Globe staff contributed to this report. Claire Thornton can be reached at

Yahoo

11 hours ago

• Yahoo

Polygraphs, a blanket and a bootprint: New details of investigation into missing N.S. children revealed

"Did you kill Lilly and Jack?" That was the first question Daniel Martell says he was asked during a polygraph test in the case of two missing Nova Scotia children. "I was extremely nervous," said Martell, the stepfather of Lilly and Jack Sullivan, who vanished nearly seven weeks ago. "It's like your stress level is just astronomically through the roof and your body doesn't know what to do because it's not every day the way you're hooked up to machines in an interrogation room where someone asks you questions like that." WATCH | Daniel Martell says he passed police polygraph Martell had offered to take a polygraph test early in the investigation, realizing investigators were likely looking his way in the mysterious disappearance of Lilly, 6, and Jack, 4. On the morning of May 2, police received a 911 call reporting they had wandered away from their home in Lansdowne Station, a sparsely populated and heavily wooded area about 140 kilometres northeast of Halifax. The disappearance sparked extensive searches that have so far turned up little evidence, as nearly a dozen RCMP units try to piece together what happened to the young siblings. Meanwhile, those closest to the children are revealing new details about a case that has captivated people across the world. Martell said he's gone above and beyond to help police with the investigation, encouraging them to search his family's property, offering up his cellphone and banking information and asking for a polygraph test. "The stepfather is always a prime suspect right off the beginning," said Martell in a recent interview. About three weeks ago, he sat in a large chair and had sensory pads placed under his forearms, buttocks and feet as part of a polygraph test. He said all the questions were presumptive that the children are no longer alive, such as: "Are you an accessory to the murder of Lilly and Jack?" None of the questions assumed the children were taken, he said. In Canada, polygraph tests are used as an investigative tool and are not admissible in court. Martell was informed of his results immediately after. He said the investigator told him: "You did a good job. You passed." The stepfather is one of 54 people who have been formally interviewed as part of the investigation. Some have received polygraph tests, although RCMP will not confirm how many. The children's paternal grandmother, Belynda Gray, has confirmed she was interviewed by police, as well as her son Cody Sullivan. Gray told CBC News they were not asked to participate in polygraph tests. On the first day of the search, emergency responders speaking over a non-encrypted radio channel mention a canine unit being dispatched to a blanket. "Families brought us to a location there not far away that there's a piece of a blanket which the mother says she believes belongs to her daughter, just off the road here," an official said over the radio. Martell confirmed it was a piece of Lilly's blanket. "There is more evidence than what the public knows, but I can't elaborate on any of that," said Martell. He did say it was found on Lansdowne Road near the location of a child-sized bootprint that was discovered around the same time by searchers in the area of a pipeline trail, just over a kilometre from the children's home. RCMP refused to answer questions about the blanket, however the force did confirm the bootprint was believed to be child-sized. Asked if anything of significance has been uncovered in the course of the investigation, RCMP Cpl. Guillaume Tremblay said there is no evidence to suggest the children were abducted. He also repeated what the Mounties have said all along, that every missing persons investigation is considered suspicious until they have reason to believe otherwise. "Investigators have access to all the resources and all the tools that the RCMP can offer, and even outside the RCMP we have other organizations that are engaged with this investigation," said Tremblay, referring to the National Centre for Missing Persons and the Canadian Centre for Child Protection. WATCH | What we know so far: Tremblay said they have received more than 500 tips from the public. "Whether it's a tip that indicates that there could be something that happened elsewhere in the province, elsewhere in the country, we have to follow up on those investigative tips to rule them out. And to this date we haven't had any confirmed sightings," he said. The last time the children were seen was the day before they went missing, when they were caught on surveillance footage with Martell, Malehya Brooks-Murray, who is the children's mother, and their one-year-old daughter, Meadow. Martell said the footage was from a store near Highland Square Mall in New Glasgow, N.S. "The investigators don't see me as part of the disappearance," he said. "I know I have nothing to do with any of it." Amy Hansen was part of a team of search and rescue officials that spent a cumulative 12,000 hours in the thick woods of Lansdowne Station, climbing over and under trees downed during a post-tropical storm in 2022. Hansen said the time and effort that's been put into this case is "pretty much unheard of in this province," and is by far the biggest search she's been involved in during her 22 years in search and rescue. She said searchers weren't just looking for the children, but also clues. "Clue-sensitive is what we call it. They're clue finders," said Hansen, who was the search manager for 10 operational search periods. "We're looking for all the evidence of them going through the area." Conditions were extremely difficult. Hansen describes teams being close enough that they could touch fingertips, but they couldn't actually see each other through the thick brush. Despite the lack of evidence, Hansen still believes the children are in the woods. "They're small. They'd be hiding. They would have crawled underneath something probably when they got tired. They could have gone further than what we searched," she said. "There's all kinds of scenarios unfortunately." Martell said he'd like to see cadaver dogs — which are trained to pick up the scent of human remains — brought in to search the woods. RCMP confirmed in a statement that cadaver dogs have not been deployed as part of the investigation. "Any searches involving the dog will be based on information gathered through the ongoing investigation," the statement said. Hansen said the case has taken a toll on volunteers. "There were members that couldn't bring themselves to call the names," she said. "They just want to find the kids and bring them home, so they're more than willing to keep coming back and keep searching. Unfortunately, at this point, unless something comes up, we're probably not going to be back." MORE TOP STORIES

Hamilton Spectator

20 hours ago

• Hamilton Spectator

Federal immigration agents asked to leave Dodger Stadium parking lot, team says

LOS ANGELES (AP) — The Los Angeles Dodgers organization said Thursday that it asked federal immigration agents to leave the Dodger Stadium grounds after they arrived at a parking lot near one of the gates. Dozens of federal agents with their faces covered arrived in SUVs and cargo vans to a lot near the stadium's Gate E entrance. A group of protesters carrying signs against U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement started amassing shortly after, local media reported. 'This morning, ICE agents came to Dodger Stadium and requested permission to access the parking lots. They were denied entry to the grounds by the organization,' the team said in a statement posted on X. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement posted on X that its agents were never there. Tricia McLaughlin, a spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security, said the agents were with Customs and Border Protection and that they were not trying to enter the stadium. 'This had nothing to do with the Dodgers. (Customs and Border Protection) vehicles were in the stadium parking lot very briefly, unrelated to any operation or enforcement,' she said in an email. The team said the game against the San Diego Padres later Thursday will be played as planned. Television cameras showed about four agents remained at the lot Thursday afternoon while officers with the Los Angeles Police Department stood between them and dozens of protesters, some carrying signs that read 'I Like My Ice Crushed' and chanting 'ICE out of LA!' Councilmember Eunisses Hernandez arrived at the stadium and said she had been in communication with Dodger officials and the mayor's office. 'We've been in communication with the mayor's office, with the Dodgers, with Dodgers security, about seeing if they can get them moved off their private property,' she told KABC-TV. 'Public property is different. Private property — businesses and corporations have the power to say, 'Not on my property,' And so we're waiting to see that movement happen here.' Protests began June 6 after federal immigration raids arrested dozens of workers in Los Angeles. Protesters blocked a major freeway and set cars on fire the following days, and police responded with tear gas, rubber bullets and flash-bang grenades. The team has yet to make a statement regarding the arrests and raids. The Dodgers' heavily Latino fan base has been pushing for the team to make a public statement and ignited a debate online about its stance on the immigration crackdown happening in Los Angeles. The Dodgers had been expected to issue a statement of support toward Los Angeles-area communities affected by immigration enforcement, but no statement had been released by 5 p.m. Thursday. 'Because of the events earlier today, we continue to work with groups that were involved with our programs,' Dodgers President Stan Kasten told a small group of reporters. 'But we are going to have to delay today's announcement while we firm up some more details.' The Trump administration has activated more than 4,000 National Guard members and 700 Marines over the objections of city and state leaders. Dozens of troops now guard federal buildings and protect federal agents making arrests. The demonstrations have been mostly concentrated downtown in the city of around 4 million people. Thousands of people have peacefully rallied outside City Hall and hundreds more protested outside a federal complex that includes a detention center where some immigrants are being held following workplace raids. Despite the protests, immigration enforcement activity has continued throughout the county, with city leaders and community groups reporting ICE present at libraries, car washes and Home Depots. School graduations in Los Angeles have increased security over fears of ICE action and some have offered parents the option to watch on Zoom. ___ Rodriguez reported from San Francisco. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .