US climate pullback threatens planned debt-for-nature deals
BILLIONS of dollars of debt deals aimed at protecting vital ecosystems from Africa to Latin America are at risk of unravelling or may need reworking amid concerns that crucial US backing is about to dry up under President Donald Trump.
The 'debt-for-nature' swaps, which reduce a country's debt in return for conservation commitments, have gained traction in recent years with deals involving the Galapagos Islands, coral reefs and the Amazon rainforest among the most prominent.
The US International Development Finance Corporation (DFC) has been a key player, providing political risk insurance for over half of the deals done over the last five years, accounting for nearly 90 per cent of US$6 billion of swapped debt.
A source with direct knowledge of the plans said the DFC had about five swaps in the pipeline which are now in question, with CEO-in-waiting Ben Black and US government efficiency chief Elon Musk both criticising its climate work.
The source did not specify how much debt was covered by the swaps but pointed out that the last few DFC-backed deals involved over US$1 billion each.
Spokespeople for the White House and the DFC did not respond to requests for comment on future DFC involvement in such deals.
A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU
Friday, 12.30 pm ESG Insights
An exclusive weekly report on the latest environmental, social and governance issues.
Sign Up
Sign Up
A DFC official who spoke on condition of anonymity confirmed to Reuters it stepped down earlier this year as co-chair of a global task force set up in 2023 to expand the use of debt swaps.
US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has also hit out at multilateral lenders for climate change work amid a broader US retreat that has seen it withdraw from the Paris Agreement to curb global warming.
Angola and Zambia, and at least one Latin American country, are among those whose 'debt-for-nature' swap plans risk needing to be reworked or even abandoned due to DFC uncertainty, four sources that have been directly involved in the projects said.
Angolan Finance Minister Vera Daves de Sousa said her country, which is one of the most indebted in Africa and whose rivers feed the Okavango basin vital for endangered elephants and lions, has been talking to the DFC about two potential swaps.
One is a debt-for-nature deal, the other a broader 'debt-for-development' swap tied to education and young people.
'We feel openness from them (DFC), but especially on the debt-for-development swap,' de Sousa recently told Reuters.
'We respect their vision,' she added. 'For us, there is no difference – we have opportunities on the development side, and we have opportunities on the nature side.'
New reality
Generating money for conservation by exchanging costly government bonds for cheaper ones is seen as an obvious choice for smaller nations grappling with heavy debt loads and climate change pressures.
UK-based non-profit, International Institute for Environment and Development, estimates that the world's 49 poorest countries seen most at risk of debt crises could swap a quarter of the over US$430 billion they now owe.
Given the signals coming from Washington, those that do should drop hopes of DFC support and look at alternatives, said White Advisory managing director Sebastian Espinosa, who has advised Barbados, Belize and Seychelles on such swaps.
Those could include credit guarantees from major multilateral development banks, potentially alongside private sector insurers and guarantors, as pioneered by the Bahamas last year.
Historically, though, DFC backing has been crucial in scaling up deals, offering up to US$1 billion in political risk insurance. That protects those who buy the new lower-cost bonds if the governments involved fail to make payments.
The Inter-American Development Bank, involved in five of the last nine debt-for-nature swaps – sometimes alongside the DFC – declined to comment on whether any of its plans were being affected.
Investment firm Nuveen's Stephen Liberatore, who has been a cornerstone investor in some debt swaps, said while substitutes for the DFC could be found, the knock-on effects were yet to be seen.
'What is the price for a private entity (to provide risk insurance) versus a public entity like the DFC?' Liberatore said. 'Does it change the amount of savings (which are then spent on conservation)? That's the ultimate question.' REUTERS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
22 minutes ago
- Business Times
Walmart to pay US$10 million to settle US FTC lawsuit over money transfer fraud
[NEW YORK] Walmart has agreed to pay US$10 million to settle a US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) civil lawsuit accusing the world's largest retailer of ignoring warning signs that fraudsters used its money transfer services to fleece consumers out of hundreds of millions of US dollars. The settlement was filed on Friday (Jun 20) in Chicago federal court, and requires approval by US District judge Manish Shah. Walmart also agreed not to process money transfers it suspects are fraudulent, or help sellers and telemarketers it believes are using its services to commit fraud. 'Electronic money transfers are one of the most common ways that scammers tell consumers to send them money, because once it's sent, it's gone for good,' said Christopher Mufarrige, director of the FTC's consumer protection bureau. 'Companies that provide these services must train their employees to comply with the law and work to protect consumers.' The Bentonville, Arkansas-based retailer did not admit or deny wrongdoing in agreeing to settle. Walmart said that it was pleased to settle and shared the FTC's goal of protecting consumers from fraudsters, including from fraud-induced money transfers. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up In its June 2022 complaint, the FTC accused Walmart of turning a blind eye to fraudsters who used its money transfer services to cash out at its stores. Walmart acts as an agent for money transfers by companies such as MoneyGram, Ria and Western Union. Money can be hard to trace once delivered. The FTC said fraudsters used many schemes that included impersonating Internal Revenue Service agents, impersonating family members who needed money from grandparents to avoid jail, and telling victims they won lotteries or sweepstakes but owed fees to collect their winnings. Shah dismissed part of the FTC case last July but let the regulator pursue the remainder. Walmart appealed from that decision. Friday's settlement would end the appeal. REUTERS
Straits Times
31 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Trump floats firing ‘numbskull' Fed chair Jerome Powell
Mr Jerome Powell's term as chairman of the US Federal Reserve does not conclude until next year. PHOTO: REUTERS WASHINGTON - US President Donald Trump escalated his criticism of Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell on June 20 – publicly mulling whether to fire the official and appoint himself to the central bank. The Republican leader, who regularly berates Mr Powell over the bank's decisions not to lower interest rates, took to Truth Social to smear the banker as a 'numbskull,' 'moron' and 'obvious Trump Hater'. 'I fully understand that my strong criticism of him makes it more difficult for him to do what he should be doing, lowering Rates, but I've tried it all different ways,' said Mr Trump, who appointed Mr Powell during his first term. 'I've been nice, I've been neutral, and I've been nasty, and nice and neutral didn't work!' Mr Powell's term does not conclude until next year. He has said his dismissal would be unlawful, and that he has no intention of stepping down voluntarily if Mr Trump asks. 'I don't know why the Board doesn't override this Total and Complete Moron!' Mr Trump posted. 'Maybe, just maybe, I'll have to change my mind about firing him? But regardless, his Term ends shortly!' Mr Trump lashed out after the Fed held interest rates steady for a fourth consecutive meeting on June 18, forecasting higher inflation and cooler growth as Trump's tariffs take hold. The projections were its first since Mr Trump unleashed sweeping 10 per cent tariffs on almost all trading partners in April. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Vance, in Los Angeles, says troops need to stay, blasts Newsom over immigration
U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance's motorcade leaves the Wilshire Federal Building in Los Angeles, California, U.S. June 20, 2025. REUTERS/Aude Guerrucci U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance's motorcade arrives at the Wilshire Federal Building in Los Angeles, California, U.S. June 20, 2025. REUTERS/Aude Guerrucci U.S. Vice President JD Vance greets U.S. Marines at the Wilshire Federal Building in Los Angeles, California, U.S., June 20, 2025. REUTERS/Daniel Cole U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance's motorcade arrives at the Wilshire Federal Building in Los Angeles, California, U.S. June 20, 2025. REUTERS/Aude Guerrucci Vance, in Los Angeles, says troops need to stay, blasts Newsom over immigration LOS ANGELES - Republican Vice President JD Vance on Friday met troops who have been deployed in Los Angeles to quell protests against immigration raids, as he accused Democratic state and city leaders of encouraging immigrants to cross the U.S. border illegally. Vance, who met some of the 700 U.S. Marines and 4,000 National Guard troops recently deployed to Los Angeles by President Donald Trump, also accused the Democratic leaders of failing to support local law enforcement. Trump deployed the California National Guard troops to Los Angeles earlier this month, against the wishes of Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom, to quell protests triggered by immigration raids on workplaces by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents. A U.S. appeals court on Thursday let Trump retain control of California's National Guard. Trump's decision to send troops into Los Angeles prompted a national debate about the use of the military on U.S. soil and inflamed political tension in the country's second most-populous city. Vance said the court's decision made clear that Trump's troop deployment "was a completely legitimate and proper use of federal law enforcement." Vance gave no indication of when the Marines and National Guard would leave Los Angeles, and hinted that they might stay in the city for some time. "The soldiers and Marines are still very much a necessary part of what's going on here, because they're worried that it's going to flare back up," Vance said. He accused Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass of failing to crack down on people in the city illegally, and of failing to support local and state law enforcement. "They have treated Border Patrol and border enforcement as somehow an illegitimate force, instead of what they are, which is the American people's law enforcement trying to enforce the American people's laws," he said. Newsom is tipped to mount a presidential bid in 2028, and could conceivably face off against Vance. Diana Crofts-Pelayo, a spokesperson for Newsom, called Vance's claim "categorically false." "The Governor has consistently condemned violence and has made his stance clear," she said. She cited posts Newsom made on X, including one on June 9 when he said, "Foolish agitators who take advantage of Trump's chaos will be held accountable." Newsom has said Trump's deployment of troops exacerbated the protests, increased tensions and is unconstitutional. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
