HMRC boss ‘regrets' frustrations over £49m phishing scam disclosure
HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) chief executive John-Paul Marks has told MPs that he regrets any frustration over how information about a breach affecting around 100,000 taxpayers was disclosed.
The revenue body has faced criticism and questions over why MPs were not informed earlier about the incident.
On June 4, it was disclosed that HMRC had lost £47 million after a phishing scam breached tens of thousands of tax accounts.
Following updated information published by HMRC on Tuesday, that figure was revised upwards, to £49 million.
Senior civil servants at HMRC told the Treasury Committee that 100,000 people had been contacted, or were in the process of being contacted, after their accounts were locked down in what they said was an 'organised crime' incident which started last year.
The Treasury Committee, which held a live session on June 4, wrote to Mr Marks earlier this week, telling him that: 'To discover this information during a session from press reports and without adequate time for the committee to review the information in detail is unacceptable.'
During a Public Accounts Committee hearing on Thursday, Mr Marks told MPs: 'We welcome your scrutiny.'
Mr Marks described the incident as a 'serious, and (an) unacceptable loss of £49 million to the Exchequer, affecting 100,000 of our customers, which is about 0.2% of the PAYE caseload'.
He added: 'Given we collect over £840 billion a year, the judgment on materiality is different for HMRC perhaps than other government departments.
'But nonetheless, I agree with the point with regards (to) disclosure, and I will do that in my annual report, which I will publish next month for the first time, so that is, again, properly done according to the rules under public money.
'The final thing really to say, I do regret if there's been any frustration in terms of our handling of this, that was not our intent at all.'
He said he would respond to correspondence he had received this week with more detail.
Mr Marks continued: 'I welcome your point, with regards (to) the opportunity to have in-private briefings, the level of security threats is significant and constant.
'The team detected and disrupted this one well. There was a criminal investigation. And in (a) private hearing, I'm happy to bring the head of the fraud investigation service, my chief security officer, to explain more about some of that detail but also the threat environment and the way in which we are ensuring HMRC is secure now and secure for the future as well.'
Earlier this week, an HMRC spokesperson said: 'We faced a series of evolving and complex criminal attempts to access online tax accounts and our priority has been to protect customers and their accounts.
'Our customers suffered no financial loss as a result.
'Thorough investigation has been necessary to understand the extent of this activity and pursue the criminals responsible.
'We've worked closely with the Information Commissioner's Office throughout to ensure we met our obligations.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
7 hours ago
- USA Today
Minnesota shooting victims John, Yvette Hoffman detail 'horrific night'
"We are uplifted by the prayers and support from so many across the state of Minnesota and the country: thank you," the Hoffmans' statement reads. Sen. John Hoffman, shot alongside his wife at their Minnesota home nearly a week ago, in what officials deemed as "targeted," released a statement detailing the married couple's version of what happened during the violent break-in that left them hospitalized. Under the cover of night, on the early morning of June 14, a gunman gained access to the couple's Champlin home, shot the Democratic lawmaker, and then shot his wife. Police said Yvette Hoffman survived. Her husband, shot nine times, remained in critical condition on June 19, a spokesperson for the hospital system treating him told KARE 11. She was released from the hospital on Thursday, June 19, according to the Minneapolis-based TV station. USA TODAY is not identifying the hospital for safety and privacy reasons. A reporter contacted the hospital for more information, but has not received a response. Another lawmaker in Minnesota, state Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark Hortman, were also shot that same day at their home, Brooklyn Park Police officials said. Law enforcement discovered their bodies on Saturday, June 14. Following an intense manhunt, law enforcement on June 15 arrested Vance Luther Boelter, 57, in connection with both shootings. He faces state and federal murder charges, including multiple counts of murder and stalking. Gov. Tim Walz has publicly called the killings a political assassination. Now, days after the shootings, John and Yvette Hoffman are detailing that "horrific night." 'I'm going to be honest': North Dakota man charged with threatening official in email citing Minnesota shootings Statement from John and Yvette Hoffman According to the statement from John and Yvette Hoffman, shared with USA TODAY, the couple had attended the Humphrey Mondale dinner on Friday, June 13, and returned home that night with their adult daughter, Hope. At around 2 a.m., the couple was awakened by the "sounds of pounding on the front door and shouts of someone seeking entry," the statement reads. The individual identified himself as a police officer, and when the couple opened the door, all three of them were in the entryway, the statement continues. John Hoffman "initially lunged at the gunman as the weapon was pointed directly at him," leading to him being "struck nine times," according to the statement. As he fell, his wife reached out to push the gunman and shut the door, succeeding before she was also "hit eight times by gunfire," the statement continues. Hope Hoffman then rushed to shut the door and secure the lock before calling 911 and sharing that her dad had been shot in his home, the statement reads. "Her brave actions and quick thinking triggered the notice to public safety officials that a politically-motivated act was potentially underway," the statement says about Hope. The couple, which continues to receive medical care, said in the statement that they're "deeply grateful for those providers, for the first responders and for all those in law enforcement who worked so quickly, professionally and selflessly to safeguard others and to apprehend the shooter." The statement also mentions the murders of Melissa and Mark Hortman, saying: "We are heartbroken to know that our friends Melissa and Mark Hortman were assassinated. Our daughter Hope and Sophie Hortman went to school together, and we know that they - along with Colin Hortman - will have each other's support as we all work through the devastating consequences of that horrific night." The couple also thanked those at the Fernbrook Elementary School in Maple Grove, Minnesota, for the GoFundMe page that will help them "pick up the broken pieces of (their) lives." "We are uplifted by the prayers and support from so many across the state of Minnesota and the country: thank you," the statement reads. The statement also speaks on the risk of being a public servant in today's society, saying: "Choosing to work in the public sector, even in as limited a way as John's career as a senator, has always meant sacrificing a level of privacy. But now we are grappling with the reality that we live in a world where public service carries such risks as being targeted because someone disagrees with you or doesn't like what you stand for." "As a society, as a nation, as a community, we must work together to return to a level of civility that allows us all to live peacefully. The future for our children depends on that," the statement continues. "We will be praying for that work and appreciate all those who will join with us." USA TODAY contacted Hoffman's office on June 20 but has not received a response. Shooter 'meant to kill, injure, harass and intimidate' state leaders, feds say Boelter visited the homes of two other state officials the morning he launched a targeted "political assassination," Joseph Thompson, the acting U.S. attorney for Minnesota, said. Boelter drove to the houses of the other state officials after he shot and wounded John Hoffman and his wife. Police arrested Boelter on June 15 in rural Sibley County, some 50 miles from Minneapolis, after they accused him of fatally shooting Hortman and her husband in their home. The suspect also targeted several other lawmakers in the Midwest, prosecutors said. According to a 20-page court affidavit released June 17, detailing the violent and deadly crime spree, FBI Agent Terry Getsceh wrote the suspect meant to 'kill, injure, harass and intimidate'' more than 45 Minnesota state and federal officials whose names and addresses he had researched. Investigators say Boelter "extensively researched" and planned the June 14 attack. He compiled a list of mostly Democratic state lawmakers and their addresses; he fitted his SUV with lights and a fake license plate to resemble a police squad car; and he purchased a silicone mask and a cache of weapons, court documents filed in federal court show. Contributing: Rebecca Morin, Christopher Cann, Susan Miller and Jorge L. Ortiz Natalie Neysa Alund is a senior reporter for USA TODAY. Reach her at nalund@ and follow her on X @nataliealund.
CNBC
8 hours ago
- CNBC
Here's what your student loan bill could be under new repayment plan in Republicans' 'big beautiful' bill
Republicans' One Big Beautiful Bill Act could result in higher monthly payments for many federal student loan borrowers, a new analysis finds. If the legislation is enacted as drafted, a student loan borrower earning roughly $80,000 a year (the median for a bachelors' degree holder in 2024) would have a monthly payment of $467 under the GOP-proposed "Repayment Assistance Plan," or RAP, according to recent findings by the Student Borrower Protection Center. That compares with a $187 monthly bill on the Biden administration's now-blocked SAVE, or Saving On A Valuable Education plan. No matter their income, borrowers face higher monthly payments under RAP compared to SAVE, the analysis found. For lower incomes, the difference may be just $10 per month; for higher earners, the new repayment plan can be as much as $605 per month pricier. Depending on their income, some federal student loan borrowers also face higher payments on RAP than they would have on the U.S. Department of Education's other income-driven repayment plans, including PAYE, or Pay As You Earn and IBR, or Income-Based Repayment. However, some borrowers on PAYE or IBR plans would have a smaller bill under RAP. For example, a borrower with a roughly $60,000 annual income would pay $250 a month on RAP, and $304 on PAYE, the SBPC found. The House advanced its version of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act in May. The Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions released its budget bill recommendations related to student loans on June 10. Senate lawmakers are preparing to debate the massive tax and spending package. Under the Republican proposals, there would be just two repayment plan choices for borrowers who take out loans after July 1, 2026, compared with roughly a dozen options now. After graduation, those student loan borrowers could either enroll in a standard repayment plan with fixed payments, or a single income-based repayment plan: RAP. Here's a look at other stories affecting the financial advisor business. Under RAP, monthly payments would typically range from 1% to 10% of a borrower's income; the more they earn, the bigger their required payment. There would be a minimum monthly payment of $10 for all borrowers. The new plan would fail to provide many borrowers with an affordable monthly bill — the goal of Congress when it established income-driven repayment plans in the 1990s, Michele Zampini, senior director of college affordability at The Institute for College Access & Success, recently told CNBC. "If Republicans' proposed 'Repayment Assistance Plan' is the only thing standing between borrowers and default, we can expect many to suffer the nightmarish experience of default," Zampini said. Meanwhile, current income-driven repayment plans now conclude in loan forgiveness after 20 years or 25 years. But RAP wouldn't lead to debt erasure until 30 years. "This kind of financial drag could further delay major life milestones like homeownership, starting a family, or saving for retirement," said Doug Boneparth, a certified financial planner and the founder and president of Bone Fide Wealth in New York. He is a member of CNBC's Financial Advisor Council. There's also "an emotional toll" to carrying student debt for so long, said Cathy Curtis, the founder of Curtis Financial Planning in Oakland, California. She is also a member of CNBC's Financial Advisor Council. "It reinforces the feeling of being stuck — especially for those who've already struggled to access opportunity," Curtis said. Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., chair of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, has said his party's plans would lift the burden on taxpayers of subsidizing college graduates' loan payments. ″[Former President Joe] Biden and Democrats unfairly attempted to shift student debt onto taxpayers that chose not to go to college," Cassidy said in a statement on June 10. He said his committee's bill would save an estimated $300 billion out of the federal budget.
Yahoo
21 hours ago
- Yahoo
Sussex companies and businesspeople named and shamed for not paying their taxes
Seven firms and individuals operating in Sussex have been named and shamed for deliberately not paying their taxes. HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) updated its list of deliberate tax defaulters on June 18, revealing businesses and individuals who have received penalties for deliberately defaulting on their tax obligations, where the tax lost exceeds £25,000. The list includes those who made deliberate errors in their tax returns or deliberately failed to comply with their tax obligations. READ MORE: Businesses in Sussex named and shamed for failing to pay minimum wage Among the defaulters is BKE N.E. Ltd, a management consultancy business with offices in Newcastle and at 7–9 The Avenue, Eastbourne. The company was in default between April 18, 2019, and April 30, 2023, and accumulated a tax liability of £144,027, resulting in a penalty of £70,573.21, according to HMRC. Golden City 54 Limited, trading as Golden City, a takeaway on Ewhurst Road, Crawley, defaulted between October 1, 2017, and October 31, 2021, owing £88,549.86 in tax and resulting in a penalty of £61,984.88. Jakub Krzysztof Ciok, formerly trading as J C Tyres on Longford Road, Bognor Regis, was in default from April 6, 2016, until March 31, 2022, accumulating a tax bill of £64,960.43 and a penalty of £26,002.21. Golden City takeaway in Crawley was included on the list (Image: Google)READ NEXT: 50% increase in dangerous dog incidents with 1,063 involving children aged under 10 Msteamstelephony Ltd, a telephony installation company on The Drive, Iford, had two default periods between June 15, 2021, and September 30, 2023, resulting in a total tax liability of £36,579 and penalties amounting to £19,203.96. Heman Aziz Ahmad, involved in tobacco importation at Hughenden Road, Hastings, was in default on May 2, 2023, incurring a tax obligation of £37,441 and a penalty of £15,725.22. Property income earner, Peter Ernest Michael Shade, was in default from April 6, 2010, through to April 5, 2020, owing £63,470.16 in tax and was fined £34,725.03. His principal address was Sunnymead Drive, Selsey. Pest controller Malcolm Paradine, based on Crossbush Lane, Arundel, was in default from April 6, 2017, to April 5, 2022, during which he accumulated a tax liability of £52,540.13 and a penalty of £22,690.16. The details of these tax defaulters will remain published for 12 months. However, this list only includes those penalised under civil procedures and does not include criminal convictions for tax fraud. READ NEXT: Heat alert upgraded and deaths 'likely' as temperatures continue to soar Kevin Hubbard, HMRC's director of individuals and small business compliance, said: "The overwhelming majority pay the tax they owe, but for those who refuse, we use a range of tools to take firm action. "This includes publishing the names of those penalised for deliberate defaults to influence taxpayer behaviour and encourage defaulters to engage with HMRC."
