Guy Vanderhaeghe wins book of the year at 2025 Saskatchewan Book Awards
Social Sharing
Saskatchewan author Guy Vanderhaeghe won both the Non-Fiction and Book of the Year Award at the 2025 Saskatchewan Book Awards.
Since 1993, the awards are presented annually in recognition of the best books in the province across 14 categories.
The Esterhazy, Sask.-born Vanderhaeghe is recognized for his memoir Because Somebody Asked Me To.
Because Somebody Asked Me To is celebrated writer Guy Vanderhaeghe's response to all the editors and publishers who have asked him for his insights on books, history and literature spanning his prolific career. It examines the state of Canadian literature when he first appeared on the scene in 1982, what's happened since and where it can go from here.
Vanderhaeghe is a novelist, short story writer and playwright. Except for a brief stint in Ottawa, Vanderhaeghe has always lived in his home province and was part of a new generation of writers forging Saskatchewan's contemporary literary scene. His first published short story was in the second-ever issue of the long-running Grain literary magazine based in Saskatoon.
Vanderhaeghe's debut short story collection Man Descending, published in 1982, earned him the Governor General's Literary Award and later the Faber Prize in Britain. He would go on to win two more Governor General's Literary Awards: in 1996 for The Englishman's Boy and in 2015 for the short story collection Daddy Lenin and Other Stories.
His book The Last Crossing won Canada Reads 2004. He won the Timothy Findley Prize, the Harbourfront Literary Prize and the Cheryl and Henry Kloppenburg Prize for his complete body of work.
Other notable winners include Victoria Koops, Dave Margoshes, Jarol Boan and Sylvia Legris.
Koops won the Young Adult Literature award for Who We Are in Real Life, a book about two young star-crossed lovers who meet in a game of Dungeons & Dragons.
Koops is a Saskatchewan-based author and practicing counsellor. Who We Are in Real Life is her debut novel.
Margoshes won the Fiction Book Award for his novel A Simple Carpenter, which is a blend of thriller, magical realism and biblical fable.
Margoshes is a poet and fiction writer and former journalist known for blending genres and is a former finalist in the 2016 CBC Short Story Prize and the 2012 Poetry Prize.
Afternoon Edition:
Boan won the First Book Award for The Medicine Chest, a nonfiction book about Boan's experiences as a physician returning to her childhood home in Saskatchewan and coming to terms with the ways the healthcare system fails Indigenous communities across Canada.
Boan is a physician and Associate Professor at the University of Saskatchewan.
Sylvia Legris won the City of Saskatoon Book Award for The Principle of Rapid Peering.
Legris is a Saskatoon poet and author originally from Winnipeg. She has published several volumes of poetry, including The Hideous Hidden and Nerve Squall, which won the 2006 Griffin Poetry Prize and the Pat Lowther Award.
"It's another year to celebrate the amazing diversity of our Saskatchewan literary community," said SBA Chair, Jack Walton," said Saskatchewan Book Award chairperson, Jack Walton in a press statement. "Except for double winner, Guy Vanderhaeghe, the book prizes were evenly distributed amongst authors and publishers. This is especially encouraging for emerging Saskatchewan authors because they see an opportunity for their books to be promoted and celebrated."
The awards were presented at a gala event at Saskatoon's TCU Place and each award comes with a $2,000 prize, except for the Book of the Year Award which is $3,000.
The full list of winners includes:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
23 minutes ago
- CTV News
Northern school boards shine in energy efficiency rankings
Northern Ontario Watch For the second straight year, Conseil scolaire catholique Nouvelon placed third in Ontario's Top Energy Performing School Board Report, which ranks boards on sustainability. Director of Education Tom Michaud said reducing environmental impact is a priority. Four other northern boards also made the top 10.
National Post
32 minutes ago
- National Post
Nigel Biggar: Is Canada really built on 'stolen' land?
Article content While natural moral rules such as these do provide a framework for governing interactions in the absence of commonly recognized law, they're much more contingent and less stable than legal rights. This is because whether I respect your freedom or invade it depends on whether I estimate that you have more than you need and I have less. Even if I make my estimate conscientiously, your estimate might well differ from mine and there is no overarching authority to arbitrate between us. What's more, not everyone is conscientious and some — whatever their skin colour or ethnicity — will be propelled by greed or by the unfair, egoistic assumption that the life of someone else is worth less than their own. Article content To this already unstable mix must be added the incomprehension, uncertainty, mistrust and fear that naturally arise when two culturally alien peoples, speaking entirely different languages, collide with one another. Under such volatile conditions — and in the absence of any commonly restraining law — friction, conflict, defeat and conquest are, tragically, almost inevitable. Article content Almost, but not entirely. Sometimes, it suits alien peoples to co-operate because they have reciprocal interests. In a new study of early relations between the Hudson's Bay Company (HBC) and Indigenous peoples on the coast of British Columbia, 'The Vancouver Island Treaties and the Evolving Principles of Indigenous Title,' the historian Ted Binnema reveals that land itself was not a bone of contention. While the company wanted to trade and gain access to natural resources, the Natives wanted the goods and opportunities that the British brought — including blankets, weapons, wage-labour and medical services. Article content They also wanted security. The peoples of the Pacific Northwest subsisted on salmon, which perishes quickly unless processed. Processing was labour-intensive, requiring far more work than women alone could provide. So, all of them depended on slave-labour. Consequently, slave-raiding and war were endemic. The HBC, however, made it clear that it wouldn't tolerate warfare on its doorstep. As a result, the Native peoples coveted the security and status that proximity to the company's trading posts offered. And when the foreigners cleared and cultivated land, or mined coal, they had no complaint, for land and the black stuff weren't what mattered most to them. Moreover, when they wanted to establish reservations, the company complied. It wasn't until the HBC first offered compensation in the 1850s that the Natives began to demand it. After all, when one set of them seized from another what did matter — slaves — they weren't in the habit of paying. Article content Article content This reminds us that relations between colonizers and Indigenous peoples weren't always characterized by conflict. In many cases, and for long periods, they co-operated to their mutual benefit. But it also shows us that the value of land differs not only between cultures, but over time. Even if it were true that, in the early 1800s, the territorial expansion of European settlement in British Columbia did deprive Indigenous peoples of their livelihood by trespassing on their fishing or hunting grounds, to surrender huge tracts of territory to them in 2025 is not to unravel history and restore the past. That's because what mattered in the past was not land but subsistence. And British colonization replaced traditional means of subsistence with new alternatives — trading, farming and wage-earning. Now, through the Canadian state, it offers welfare payments, too. Article content In the early 21st century, control over land means something quite different from what it meant in 1800. Its value has changed. Then, it meant access to fishing or hunting grounds and thereby the means of survival. Now, it means the lucrative ownership of resources for exploitation or development, which the Vancouver islanders in the 19th century could not imagine and did not value. So, to grant 'Native title' to Indigenous peoples today is not to uphold a historic legal right, for such a thing didn't exist. Nor is it to restore things to where they were, replacing like with like. It's to create a novel, unequal privilege. Article content Article content Article content
CBC
41 minutes ago
- CBC
Grade 12 students read letters they sent to themselves in Grade 9
Four students graduating from Nelson McIntyre Collegiate in Winnipeg open the letters they had written to themselves in 2021, when they were in Grade 9.
