COVID Vaccine Removed for Kids, Pregnant Women
On Tuesday, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. delivered a historic course correction from the Biden-era vaccine policy.Standing alongside NIH Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya and FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary, Kennedy announced that COVID-19 vaccine recommendations for healthy children and pregnant women were officially removed from the CDC's immunization schedule.
'Hi, everybody. I'm Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., your HHS secretary. And I'm here today with NIH Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya and FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary. I couldn't be more pleased to announce that, as of today, the COVID vaccine for healthy children and healthy pregnant women has been removed from the CDC recommended immunization schedule.'
It was an unmistakable shift away from coercive one-size-fits-all medicine, and a clear signal that data, not politics, is now leading the conversation.
On Tuesday, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. delivered a historic course correction from the Biden-era vaccine policy. Standing alongside NIH Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya and FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary, Kennedy announced that COVID-19 vaccine recommendations for… pic.twitter.com/ZWueGdQRyV — The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) June 1, 2025
Today, Dr. Marty Makary took the fight straight into the lion's den—appearing on CBS to dismantle the network's go-to vaccine talking points.
When host Margaret Brennan tried to paint the updated guidance as confusing, Makary didn't flinch.
'Can you clearly state what the policy is? Because this is confusing,' she asked.
Makary responded without hesitation: 'Yeah, we believe the recommendation should be with a patient and their doctor.'
That's when the real shift came into focus.
'So we're going to get away from these blanket recommendations in healthy young Americans.'
'On the COVID vaccine schedule, we don't want to see kids kicked out of school because a 12-year-old girl is not getting her fifth COVID booster shot.'
'We don't see the data there to support a young, healthy child getting a repeat infinite annual COVID vaccine.'
He then laid out the sheer absurdity of where the old policy was heading.
'There's a theory that we should sort of blindly approve the new COVID boosters in young, healthy kids every year in perpetuity, and a young girl born today should get 80 COVID mRNA shots or other COVID shots in her average lifespan.'
'We're saying that's a theory, and we'd like to check in and get some randomized controlled data. It's been about four years since the original randomized trials. So we'd like an evidence based approach.'
And then came the knockout line—delivered with facts no one could deny.
'That is a decision between a parent and their doctor—I don't know if you know these statistics, but 88% of American kids, their parents have said no to the COVID shot last season. So America, the vast majority of Americans are saying no.'
Today, Dr. Marty Makary took the fight straight into the lion's den—appearing on CBS to dismantle the network's go-to vaccine talking points.When host Margaret Brennan tried to paint the updated guidance as confusing, Makary didn't flinch.'Can you clearly state what the… pic.twitter.com/R7Gv4lE655 — The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) June 1, 2025
Brennan tried to shift gears—falling back on CDC data to argue that even healthy kids remained at risk.
'So the CDC data said 41% of children aged 6 months to 17 years hospitalized with COVID between 2022 and 2024 did not have a known underlying condition. In other words, they looked healthy,' she said.
'And COVID was serious for them.'
But Makary was ready.
Calm and precise, he dismantled the claim with surgical clarity.
'So first of all, we know the CDC data is contaminated with a lot of false positives from incidental positive COVID tests with routine testing of every kid that walks in the hospital.'
'We know that data historically under the Biden administration did not distinguish being sick from COVID or an incidental positive COVID test.'
He shared what he's heard from the people who actually run the ICUs in America.
'When you go to an ICU in America and you ask how many people are in the ICU that are healthy, that are sick with COVID? The answer I get again, again is we haven't seen that in a year or years.'
That's why, he warned, making universal recommendations based on flawed data isn't just wrong—it's dangerous.
'And so the worst thing you can do in public health is to put out an absolute universal recommendation in young, healthy kids.'
'And the vast majority of Americans are saying, no, we want to see some data. And you say, forget about the data, just get it anyway.'
Brennan tried to shift gears—falling back on CDC data to argue that even healthy kids remained at risk.'So the CDC data said 41% of children aged 6 months to 17 years hospitalized with COVID between 2022 and 2024 did not have a known underlying condition. In other words, they… pic.twitter.com/DhIkeoHmZB — The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) June 1, 2025
But it was the final exchange that landed like a sledgehammer.
When Brennan questioned why the HHS bypassed the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) for the new policy shift, Makary landed a haymaker.
'That panel has been a kangaroo court where they just rubberstamp EVERY single vaccine put in front of them.'
He said the committee hadn't been focused on science, but on messaging and marketing.
'You look at the minutes of the last couple of years, they say, we want a simple message for everybody just so they can understand it. It was not a data based conversation. It was a conversation based on marketing and ease.'
And without real evidence, he warned, these recommendations become little more than guesswork.
'If there's zero clinical data, you're opining. I mean—it's a theory.'
'And so we don't want to put out an absolute recommendation for kids, with no clinical data to support it.'
The implication was unmistakable: public health decisions should be based on evidence and transparency—not rubber stamps and slogans.
For the first time in years, someone on national television was calling out the system.
But it was the final exchange that landed like a sledgehammer.When Brennan questioned why the HHS bypassed the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) for the new policy shift, Makary landed a haymaker.'That panel has been a kangaroo court where they just… pic.twitter.com/jG04k9Tz2s — The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) June 1, 2025
Also read: Moderna Disables Comments On X Post Announcing New Covid Shot Amid Backlash
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Insider
7 hours ago
- Gulf Insider
US Intel: Iran Likely To Pursue Nukes If US Joins Israel's War
Reiterating a long-running US intelligence community consensus that Iran has not been building a nuclear bomb, US intelligence officials are warning that an American entry into Israel's war would likely incentivize Iran to pursue becoming a nuclear-weapon state after all. Meanwhile, insiders say President Trump is wary of turning Iran into 'another Libya' if Israel's regime-change ambitions are somehow realized. In other major developments: President Trump on Thursday issued a statement seemingly granting more time for a diplomatic solution: 'Considering there's a significant likelihood of negotiations that may or may not happen with Iran soon, I will determine whether or not to engage in the next two weeks.' The Pentagon's Defense Threat Reduction Agency has advised top officials that America's formidable 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs may be insufficient to destroy Iran's nuclear enrichment facility buried in a mountain at Fordo — and that doing so may require a nuclear bomb. Otherwise, even in the wake of bombings of various other facilities, Iran could conceivably be capable of producing a bomb if it decided to. buried in a mountain at Fordo — and that doing so may require a nuclear bomb. Otherwise, even in the wake of bombings of various other facilities, Iran could conceivably be capable of producing a bomb if it decided to. Steve Bannon joined Donald Trump for lunch at the White House on Thursday; Bannon is staunchly opposed to America entering Israel's war , telling an audience, 'We can't do this again. We'll tear the country apart. We can't have another Iraq.' , telling an audience, 'We can't do this again. We'll tear the country apart. We can't have another Iraq.' Iranians have largely been cut off from the internet for more than 36 hours, with some observers claiming it reflects the government working to stifle domestic dissent, but most attributing it to Iranian wariness of potential cyberattacks . . Israel and Iran traded more attacks over Thursday night, with the Israeli Air Force claiming it hit ballistic missile launchers, missile production facilities and a nuclear research center, and Iran hitting the city of Beersheba, with unconfirmed reports of damage to a Microsoft building. Speaking to the New York Times , senior intelligence officials say a US strike on the uranium enrichment facility buried under 300 feet of mountainous rock at Fordo, or a US-facilitated assassination of Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, would probably push Iran to build a nuclear bomb to deter further aggression against it. In 2003, Khamenei issued a religious order — or fatwa — prohibiting the development of any kind of weapon of mass destruction. That edict is 'right now holding,' a senior intel official told the Times . One of the officials cast doubts on Israeli claims that Iran could have a bomb in 15 days. Iran would first have to take uranium it's already enriched to 60% and enrich it to 90%. That's probably the easiest part. Next, they'd have to construct a nuclear explosive device, and miniaturize it so it can fit inside a missile warhead. As an alternative, US intel analysts speculate that Iran could build a crude, 10,000-pound Hiroshima-style bomb that would have to be dropped by plane — which wouldn't be a particularly credible deterrent. The analysts say that, contrary to Israeli claims, it would take between several months and a year to have a missile-ready warhead after a hypothetical decision to pursue one. Of course, it's always worth noting that Netanyahu has been warning of an imminent Iranian nuclear bomb since 1992 — when he said they would have one by 1997 at the latest. 🤯 WOW:2,780 year old israelite tablet finally translated to reveal its message:'Persia is only weeks away from developing a nuclear weapon' — Not Sure Gnosis 🦈 (@ViceLitty) June 18, 2025 The US assessment that Iran has not decided to pursue a nuclear weapon comes three months after the same conclusion was shared with Congress by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, which in turn came 18 years after the intelligence community first made that assessment. When confronted with Gabbard's testimony in the wake of Israel's bombing-and-mass-assassination attack on Iran, Trump told a reporter, 'I don't care what she said. They were very close to getting a nuke.' Vice President JD Vance offered his own flimsy deflection in a social media post, writing 'Tulsi's testimony was in March, and a lot has changed since then.' Thursday's remarks from senior intel officials severely undercut Trump's and Vance's characterizations. Unlike nuclear-weapon-state Israel, Iran is a signatory to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and has long insisted that its nuclear program is peaceful. In 2015, Iran signed the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), by which it agreed to physical modifications, additional monitoring and other provisions that would assure outsiders that the country would be incapable of enriching uranium to a weapons-grade level. Though Iran was in full compliance, President Trump withdrew the United States from the JCPOA in 2018 and reimposed harsh economic sanctions on the country — having promised to do so in a 2016 presidential campaign fueled by $45 million from Israel-focused billionaires Sheldon and Miriam Adelson. His JCPOA withdrawal came just a month after Trump appointed archetypal Iran hawk and neocon John Bolton as National Security Advisor. After several days of the feeling that US engagement in Israel's war could be imminent, Trump's setting of a two-week timeframe for making that enormously consequential decision partially reflects his wariness that Iran could turn into a failed state if the Ayatollah's regime is toppled, according to administration officials who talked to the New York Post . One of the insiders said '[He] doesn't want it to turn into Libya…There are two reasons Trump talks about Libya: the first is the chaos after what we did to Gaddafi. The second is the Libya intervention made it more difficult to negotiate deals with countries like North Korea and Iran.' Seeking to appease the West, Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi famously surrendered his nuclear development program in 2003, only to be the victim of a US-NATO regime-change campaign in 2011 that culminated in his being anally raped with a bayonet and then savagely beaten to death. That dark chapter looms as a stark cautionary tale for rulers all around the world facing American demands. Meanwhile, Libyans continue to suffer from the result of that Barack Obama-Hillary Clinton toppling of Gaddafi, which led to utter chaos, blacks being sold in open-air slave markets and illegal immigrants pouring into Europe as they flee the Western-cultivated Hell-scape. Insiders say Trump has also raised the specter of the disastrous outcomes of US interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq. Trump's confrontation with the ghosts of failed interventions — past, present and future — comes as Tucker Carlson, other major conservative figures and legions of MAGA social-media users are urging him not to get America involved in another foreign policy disaster. Is the growing right-wing uproar having an effect?
Gulf Insider
8 hours ago
- Gulf Insider
US Starts Evacuating Diplomats From Embassy In Israel, As Prospect Of US Entry Into War Lingers
As tensions escalate between Israel and Iran, and the prospect of direct Pentagon involvement against Iran lingers, the US State Department has begun evacuating diplomats and their families from the American embassy in Israel. So far these are diplomats deemed 'nonessential' personnel. According to American officials cited in The Associated Press, a government aircraft transported several diplomats and family members who requested to leave on Wednesday. The exact number of individuals on the flight or those who may have exited via land routes to Jordan or Egypt – or sea routes – remains unclear. The AP notes that the evacuation flight occurred shortly before US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee posted on X that the embassy was preparing evacuation plans by air and sea for private US citizens – including by arranging cruise liners to assist with logistics. However, just hours later, the State Department's Bureau of Consular Affairs said on X that there are as yet no official plans (as of Wednesday) to assist private Americans in leaving Israel or the Palestinian territories. Some 600,000 Americans had lived in Israeli prior to the start of the Gaza war, however, most are residents and have dual citizenship. Already, going back to the Hamas terror attack of Oct. 7, 2023 – and Israeli military assault on Gaza – there have been a steady stream of Americans and foreigners departing Israel. Tel Aviv overnight came under heavy Iranian ballistic missile attack, and there have been missile attacks on the north as well. Israel's air defenses have been overwhelmed, and Israel's military has admitted that many warheads have made it through, with a major hospital also having been hit. Iran has been getting hit hard by Israeli warplanes for nearly a week, but the country's elite IRGC has been touting recent new waves of 'complex rocket and drone attacks on military targets' in Haifa and Tel Aviv – in a Thursday statement. There's no solution on the horizon, and while European countries scramble to also get their citizens out, there are so far unsuccessful efforts to get the Iranians back to the nuclear negotiating table. In terms of escalation, much may depend on what the White House decides in terms of the level of its direct involvement in the aerial war.
Gulf Insider
8 hours ago
- Gulf Insider
Netanyahu Threatens Assassination Of 'Modern Hitler' - Iran's Ayatollah
After on Thursday more ballistic missiles and drones struck Tel Aviv and various parts of Israel – including Soroka Medical Center in Beersheba – the Israeli Health Ministry reports that 271 people arrived at hospitals, four in serious condition, 16 in moderate condition, and many more with minor injuries – with most of this latter category being people suffering from anxiety attacks. In total, now nearly a week into the air war between Iran and Israel, 106 people are being treated in hospitals, and another 149 are being treated in emergency rooms, Israeli media reports based on the health ministry. The popular X account War Monitor gives voice to what many are likely thinking… Israeli leaders are ramping up their war rhetoric as President Trump is still said be mulling whether he'll order US military entrance into the war in order to penetrate Iran's most deep underground nuclear facilities with 30,000 pound bunker buster bombs. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is now openly threatening to assassinate the Islamic Republic's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei: Touring Beersheba's Soroka Medical Center in Beersheba after it was hit by an Iranian missile earlier today, Prime Minister Netanyahu said he would not rule out a strike on Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. 'No one is immune,' says Netanyahu. 'All the options are open.' He adds, 'It's best not to speak about this in the press.' Defense Minister Israel Katz, by contrast, has been publicly threatening Khamenei. Netanyahu says that US involvement in the war 'is a decision for President Trump.' He also called the top Shia cleric and ruler of Iran a 'modern Hitler' while touting 'We're going to see a different Middle East, a reality we haven't seen until now.' The country's defense minister, Israel Katz, has also said that 'eliminating' Khamenei is a goal of the war effort. And addressing whether he thinks Trump will come to Israeli's aid, Netanyahu said, 'He will do what is good for America, and I will do what's good for Israel.' But, the Israeli leader added, 'At the end of this operation, there will be no nuclear threat on Israel, and there won't be a ballistic threat.' Thus he's vowing to wipe out Iran's nuclear program as well as offensive missile capability – the latter being a very tall order given the longtime size of Iran's stockpile of missiles. Netanyahu then said, in comments which have already received severe criticism domestically, 'all of us are paying a personal price' in the war, 'and that hasn't missed my family as well — my son canceled a wedding.' The latest from President Trump on Thursday: Meanwhile, Iran's supreme leader reiterated in a message posted on X that Israel calling on the United States for help is a sign of 'weakness'. 'The very fact that the Zionist regime's American friends have entered the scene and are saying such things is a sign of that regime's weakness and inability,' he said. Iranian missiles accurately targeted the Israeli Defense system in Tel Aviv. You can see the multifold explosion during the fire eruption — Sumon Kais (@sumonkais) June 19, 2025 'I would like to tell our dear nation that if the enemy senses that you fear them, they won't let go of you. Continue the very behavior that you have had up to this day; continue this behavior with strength,' Khamenei added.
