Iran already carrying out ‘wholly unacceptable' actions in UK, Reynolds warns
The threat from Iran in the UK could increase as Tehran seeks to retaliate against the US, Israel and their allies, a Cabinet minister has suggested.
Jonathan Reynolds said Iranian activity in the UK is already substantial and it would be 'naive' to think it will not escalate.
The Business Secretary said 'not a week goes by' without Iran targeting cyber attacks on the UK's critical national infrastructure.
Both MI5 and the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) have warned about Iran's activities.
The head of MI5, Ken McCallum, said in October that authorities had stopped 20 state-backed plots hatched by Iran in the UK since 2022.
He warned of an 'unprecedented pace and scale' of plots posing 'potentially lethal threats' to British citizens and UK residents.
The NCSC has warned Iran 'is developing its cyber capabilities and is willing to target the UK to fulfil its disruptive and destructive objectives'.
Mr Reynolds told Sky News the risk from Iran in the UK is 'not hypothetical'.
He said: 'There is not a week goes by without some sort of Iranian cyber attack on a key part of the UK's critical national infrastructure. There is Iranian activity on the streets of the UK, which is wholly unacceptable.
'It's already at a significant level. I think it would be naive to say that that wouldn't potentially increase.
'But again, there's a choice here for Iran: Do they want to continue being an agent of instability in the region and the wider world? Where has that got them? Where has it got the Iranian people?
'There's a better course of action for Iran to take here, and I think they should consider that.'
Iran was the first foreign power to be listed on the enhanced tier of the foreign influence registration scheme, aimed at protecting the UK from malign foreign influence.
It means anyone who is directed by Iran to carry out activities in the UK must declare it or face five years in prison.
The scheme is due to come into force in July.
The Home Office will also introduce new laws that will allow the UK to proscribe state-based groups such as Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.
In the latest sign of Iran's actions against the UK, it emerged on Saturday that authorities in Cyprus have arrested a Briton alleged to have been carrying out surveillance of the RAF Akrotiri base on the island.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
21 minutes ago
- The Independent
Lammy says Middle East needs ‘diplomatic solution' after US talks
Foreign Secretary David Lammy has reiterated the need for 'regional stability' in the Middle East following talks with US officials, as Israel continued to strike Iranian targets on Monday. His remarks came after a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, held in the wake of US airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear sites. Mr Lammy also spoke with secretary of state Marco Rubio. 'Important discussion with @SecRubio this evening on the situation in the Middle East,' Mr Lammy wrote in a post on X. 'We will continue to work with our allies to protect our people, secure regional stability and drive forward a diplomatic solution.' In a Monday post on Truth Social, Mr Trump claimed the US strikes caused 'monumental' damage, although US officials have said they are still assessing the situation. 'The biggest damage took place far below ground level. Bullseye!!!' he wrote. Over the weekend, the US attacked Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz which are linked to Iran's nuclear programme. The Tehran regime has insisted its nuclear programme is peaceful, but its uranium enrichment process has gone far beyond what is required for power stations. Israeli military officials confirmed late on Sunday they had struck infrastructure sites in Tehran and in the west of Iran. Explosions could be heard in the city of Bushehr on Sunday, home to Iran's only nuclear power plant. Israel confirmed it had struck missile launchers in the city, as well as a command centre where missiles were being stored. Iranian media reported defence systems were firing in Tehran in the early hours of Monday morning, but Iran is yet to comment on the latest strikes. On Sunday night, Downing Street said Sir Keir and Mr Trump agreed Tehran must not be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon and called for Iran to return to negotiations. 'The leaders discussed the situation in the Middle East and reiterated the grave risk posed by Iran's nuclear programme to international security,' Downing Street said. 'They discussed the actions taken by the United States last night to reduce the threat and agreed that Iran must never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon. 'They discussed the need for Iran to return to the negotiating table as soon as possible and to make progress on a lasting settlement. 'They agreed to stay in close contact in the coming days.' Other countries endorsed the US strikes, with Australian foreign minister Penny Wong giving the White House her full backing on Monday. 'We support action to prevent Iran getting a nuclear weapon and that is what this is,' she said. In the hours after Mr Trump's phone call with Sir Keir, he again posted on Truth Social, saying: 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!' The social media post marked a reversal from previous statements on regime change, including an earlier press conference from defence secretary Pete Hegseth, about the bombing on the three nuclear sites. Iran is yet to confirm how much damage was done in the US-led attack.
The Independent
36 minutes ago
- The Independent
NATO leaders gather Tuesday for what could be a historic summit, or one marred by divisions
U.S. President Donald Trump and his NATO counterparts are due to gather Tuesday for a summit that could unite the world's biggest security organization around a new defense spending pledge or widen divisions among the 32 allies. Just a week ago, things had seemed rosy. NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte was optimistic the European members and Canada would commit to invest at least as much of their economic growth on defense as the United States does for the first time. Then Spain rejected the new NATO target for each country to spend 5% of its gross domestic product on defense needs, calling it 'unreasonable.' Trump also insists on that figure. The alliance operates on a consensus that requires the backing of all 32 members. The following day, Trump said the U.S. should not have to respect the goal. 'I don't think we should, but I think they should,' he said. Trump lashed out at Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez's government, saying: 'NATO is going to have to deal with Spain. Spain's been a very low payer." He also criticized Canada as 'a low payer.' Spain was the lowest spender in the alliance last year, directing less than 2% of its GDP on defense expenditure, while Canada was spending 1.45%, according to NATO figures. Then Trump ordered the bombing of nuclear installations in Iran. In 2003, the U.S.-led war on Iraq deeply divided NATO, as France and Germany led opposition to the attack, while Britain and Spain joined the coalition. European allies and Canada also want Ukraine to be at the top of the summit agenda, but they are wary that Trump might not want President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to steal the limelight. A short summit, decades of mutual security The two-day summit in The Hague involves an informal dinner Tuesday and one working session Wednesday morning. A very short summit statement has been drafted to ensure the meeting is not derailed by fights over details and wording. Indeed, much about this NATO summit is brief, even though ripples could be felt for years. Founded in 1949, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization was formed by 12 nations to counter the threat to security in Europe posed by the Soviet Union during the Cold War, notably via a strong U.S. presence on the continent. Dealing with Moscow is in its DNA. Keeping the peace outside the Euro-Atlantic area is not. NATO's ranks have grown to 32 countries since the Washington Treaty was signed 75 years ago. Sweden joined last year, worried by an increasingly aggressive Russia. NATO's collective security guarantee — Article 5 of the treaty — underpins its credibility. It's a political commitment by all countries to come to the aid of any member whose sovereignty or territory might be under attack. Trump has suggested he is committed to that pledge, but he has also sowed doubt about his intentions. He has said the U.S. intends to remain a member of the alliance. A civilian runs NATO, but the U.S. and its military hold power The United States is NATO's most powerful member. It spends much more on defense than any other ally and far outweighs its partners in terms of military muscle. Washington has traditionally driven the agenda but has stepped back under Trump. The U.S. nuclear arsenal provides strategic deterrence against would-be adversaries. NATO's day-to-day work is led by Rutte, a former Dutch prime minister. As its top civilian official, he chairs almost weekly meetings of ambassadors in the North Atlantic Council at its Brussels headquarters. He chairs other 'NACs' at ministerial and leader levels. Rutte runs NATO headquarters, trying to foster consensus and to speak on behalf of all members. NATO's military headquarters is based nearby in Mons, Belgium. It is always run by a top U.S. officer. Ukraine's role at the summit is unclear With Trump demanding greater defense spending, it's unclear what role Ukraine will play at the summit. Zelenskyy has been invited, but it's unclear whether he will have a seat at NATO's table, although he may take part in Tuesday's dinner. Russia's war in Ukraine usually dominates such meetings. More broadly, NATO itself is not arming Ukraine. As an organization, it possesses no weapons of any kind. Collectively, it provides only non-lethal support — fuel, combat rations, medical supplies, body armor, and equipment to counter drones or mines. But individually, members do send arms. European allies provided 60% of the military support that Ukraine received in 2024. NATO coordinates those weapons deliveries via a hub on the Polish border and helps organize training for Ukrainian troops. NATO's troop plans A key part of the commitment for allies to defend one another is to deter Russia, or any other adversary, from attacking in the first place. Finland and Sweden joined NATO recently because of this concern. Under NATO's new military plans, 300,000 military personnel would be deployed within 30 days to counter any attack, whether it be on land, at sea, by air or in cyberspace. But experts doubt whether the allies could muster the troop numbers. It's not just about troop and equipment numbers. An adversary would be less likely to challenge NATO if it thought the allies would use the forces it controls. Trump's threats against U.S. allies — including imposing tariffs on them — has weakened that deterrence. The U.S. is carrying the biggest military burden Due to high U.S. defense spending over many years, the American armed forces have more personnel and superior weapons but also significant transportation and logistics assets. Other allies are starting to spend more, though. After years of cuts, NATO members committed to ramp up their national defense budgets in 2014 when Russia illegally annexed Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula. After Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, the NATO allies agreed to make 2% of GDP the minimum spending level. Last year, 22 countries were expected to hit that target, up from only three a decade ago. In The Hague, the allies were expected to up the ante to 3.5%, plus a further 1.5% for things like improving roads, bridges, ports and airfields or preparing societies to deal with future conflicts. Whether they will now remains an open question.
Times
43 minutes ago
- Times
Iran vows revenge on US, threatening to block vital shipping lane
Monitors are concerned over the whereabouts of 400kg of 60 per cent enriched uranium, enough with modest further refining for nine nuclear warheads. The uranium, which Iran has declared to the United Nations, is believed to have been moved to a safe location. JD Vance, the US vice-president, appeared to confirm this, telling ABC News: 'We're going to work in the coming weeks to ensure that we do something with that fuel. They no longer have the capacity to turn that stockpile of highly enriched uranium to weapons-grade uranium.' Of more immediate concern is the 400kg of enriched uranium. 'I think those cylinders of 60 per cent highly enriched uranium are the most valuable asset in Iran right now,' said Ian Stewart, who monitors Iran's nuclear programme at the James Martin Centre for Non-proliferation Studies in Washington. He said that Iran could have kept some enrichment centrifuges at a separate location, to enable the uranium to be processed further for a warhead. As it is at present, it could be fashioned into a crude bomb. Around 950 Iranians, including security force personnel, have so far been killed by Israeli strikes, a Washington-based human rights group has said. Over 3,400 people have also been injured, according to the Human Rights Activists group, which cross-checks local reports with its sources in Iran. It said it had identified 380 of the dead as civilians and 253 as members of the Iranian security forces. It did not identify the remainder Iran's health ministry said on Saturday that 400 people had been killed across the country and another 3,000 injured. Air defence systems were firing early on Monday in Tehran, state media reported, while explosions were also heard in the nearby city of Karaj. A social media account associated with Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, gave little indication that Tehran was preparing to surrender. The punishment continues,' read a post that was illustrated with an image showing missile strikes on Israel. Abbas Araqchi, the Iranian foreign minister, is expected to hold talks in Moscow today with President Putin over the war with Israel. Iran, which has provided Russia with drones and missiles for its war in Ukraine, is a major Kremlin ally. Russia also maintains close links with Israel, however. Although Moscow and Tehran signed a strategic partnership deal in January, it does not include a mutual defence pact. The point was highlighted on Sunday by Russian state television, which stressed that: 'In the event either party is subject to aggression, the other party shall not provide any military or other assistance to the aggressor.' Although Dmitry Medvedev, the former Russian president who is now a senior national security council official, has said 'a number of countries' are prepared to provide Iran with nuclear warheads, Putin has been far less bellicose in his comments. 'Judging by Putin's statements in recent days, he is extremely cautious. Maximally so,' said Fyodor Lukyanov, the head of Russia's Council on Foreign and Defence Policy, which advises the Kremlin. Praise for President Trump came from his estranged former vice-president Mike Pence, who campaigned against him in last year's contest for the Republican nomination. 'I couldn't be more proud of President Trump's decisive leadership in this moment or the extraordinary professionalism and courage of our armed forces that brought about this historic mission,' Pence told Fox News, adding that he knew Trump was prepared to bomb the nuclear sites in the absence of real concessions from Iran. It was 'really a continuation of the policies of our administration where we isolated Iran as never before,' he said. Pushed in whether he regretted saying he would not support Trump's reelection, Pence added: 'I'm not in the rearview mirror today … I really do want to commend President Trump and his entire national security team for doing what really needed to be done. The very idea that the most dangerous regime in the world would have possession of the most dangerous weapons on Earth has been intolerable.' Iran launched missiles towards Israel, including at Tel Aviv, early on Monday as the conflict between the two countries entered its 11th day. There were no immediate reports of casualties or damage, and the Israeli military gave the all-clear after just a few minutes. It was unclear how many missiles Iran had launched. At least 24 people have been killed in Israel, but there have been no fatalities since June 16. When Iranian missiles have evaded Israel's air defences, they have caused massive damage to civilian infrastructure, including at a hospital in Beersheba, a city in southern Israel that was hit last week. In Tel Aviv, some people, especially those with small children, left the city when Israel first attacked Iran on June 13, sparking the biggest conflict in the Middle East for years. Others immediately rush for bomb shelters or safe rooms when air raid sirens wail. The Israeli military has also produced an app that gives warnings of incoming missiles. North Korea condemned the US strikes on Iran, calling them a violation of the United Nations charter and blaming the tension in the Middle East on the 'reckless valour of Israel'. 'The Democratic People's Republic of Korea strongly denounces the attack on Iran by the US, which severely violated the UN Charter with respect for sovereignty,' said a spokesperson of the North's foreign ministry, according to a statement carried by the state news agency. 'The just international community should raise the voice of unanimous censure and rejection against the US and Israel's confrontational acts,' the statement said. Some of President Trump's most loyal Maga cheerleaders are trying to make sense of his post last night suggesting regime change for Iran. Trump posted that 'if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!' The idea of US-sponsored regime change is anathema to a swath of Trump's support base who are perplexed by his post on Truth Social. It also contradicted flat denials that regime change is a consideration, made by JD Vance, the VP, and Marco Rubio, the Secretary of State. Charlie Kirk, founder of the pro-Trump youth movement Turning Point USA, chided Maga supporters criticising Trump, interpreting the post as talking about a 'bottom-up revolution' which 'rises from the will of the people.' But he nevertheless warned: 'America cannot get involved in a forceful decapitation effort in Persia.'Matt Gaetz, a former Florida congressman Trump nominated but withdrew for US attorney-general, cautioned on X: 'Just remember: every regime change war has been extremely popular at the start. But the historical trajectory isn't good.' President Trump responded to growing debate about the extent of damage done by the US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities in a post late last night. 'Monumental Damage was done to all Nuclear sites in Iran, as shown by satellite images. Obliteration is an accurate term!' Trump wrote on Truth Social, referring to his own description of the impact in the immediate aftermath. His senior general, Dan 'Razin' Caine, was more cautious on Sunday morning, saying that 'final battle damage will take some time but initial battle damage assessments indicate that all three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction.' In his post, Trump continued: 'The white structure shown is deeply imbedded into the rock, with even its roof well below ground level, and completely shielded from flame. The biggest damage took place far below ground level. Bullseye!!!' Iran has threatened to block the Strait of Hormuz, a vital shipping lane, as the world braces for retaliation for President Trump's bombing of the regime's three key nuclear installations. The parliament in Tehran voted to block the strait, through which 20 per cent of the world's oil supply passes, but Iran's leaders also said they may pause and plan more devastating responses. Although Saturday night's strikes are presumed to have caused huge damage to the three sites, Natanz, Isfahan and Fordow, Iran said that its nuclear programme would continue. Israel's prime minister said Israel will not end the war with Iran before it has eliminated its nuclear and missile threat. Speaking in a prerecorded press conference broadcast on Israeli news channels late Sunday, Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel is 'committed to achieving our goals. When those goals are met, the operation will end and the fighting will stop,' with the caveat that the war would not continue 'beyond what is necessary.' Netanyahu said Israel had taken out over half of Iran's missile launchers as the country's air force operated in new Iranian territory on Sunday. He also vowed a new dawn in the Middle East, with a 'massive expansion of peace agreements,' hinting at a much sought-after normalisation with Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States.
