All-party delegation slams Pak for promoting its army chief

New Delhi: Senior BJP leader Ravi Shankar Prasad, who is leading one of the seven all-party delegations as part of India's diplomatic outreach, on Tuesday took a swipe at Pakistan's decision to promote its chief of army staff Asim Munir as Field Marshal, while Congress MP Shashi Tharoor-led group in Guyana's National Assembly conveyed India's message against terrorism.
Former Union minister MJ Akbar, who is part of the Prasad-led delegation that is touring six European countries, asserted India's clear and thought-through 'no first use' doctrine on nuclear weapons.
'Pakistan is a military state, it is no longer a civilian state. And a military state has a vested interest in conflict because conflict justifies its presence… now it sometimes thinks it can provide a nuclear shelter to terrorists. The Prime Minister (Narendra Modi) has made it very clear that there can be no nuclear blackmail,' Akbar said in Paris.
The delegation met the members of Parliament in the French National Assembly led by Thierry Tesson, the president of the India France Friendship group.
Hitting out a Pakistan, Prasad said: 'The most hilarious aspect was that the general whose forces were defeated at the hands of India decisively was promoted to Field Marshal. This is state of denial.'
Munir became only the second army officer in Pakistan's history after Ayub Khan to be elevated to Field Marshal.
'We have not come to Paris and meeting you in happier times. But we have to come to convey some straight message. Terrorism is not India-centric, terrorism is now a global phenomenon. In the majority of the cases, terrorists, their patrons, and the terror groups based in Pakistan have direct or indirect involvement. Today, there are 52 designated terrorists by UN,' Prasad said while talking to French journalists.
'The distinction between the state of Pakistan and terrorism has withered away. Terrorism as an instrument of state policy is a part of the military state of Pakistan,' the BJP MP added.
In Guyana, Congress MP Tharoor said the delegation's primary objective was to raise awareness about India's stance on terrorism and recent events in the subcontinent.
'Asked for evidence of Pakistani complicity in the #PahalgamTerroristAttack, I pointed to the claims of The Resistance Front, a known frontal organ of the Lashkar-e-Taiba, and the attendance of uniformed Pakistani military and police personnel at a terrorist's funeral — with picture!'
The Tharoor-led delegation will be in Panama from May 27-29.
The delegation led by JD(U) lawmaker Sanjay Jha called on Sim Ann, senior minister of state for foreign affairs and home affairs in the government of Singapore. Senior minister of state Janil Puthucheary and local MPs Vikram Nair and Saktiandi Supaat were also present.
Meanwhile, former Jammu and Kashmir chief minister Ghulam Nabi Azad was admitted to a hospital in Kuwait. 'He is stable, under medical supervision, and will be undergoing some tests and procedures. His contributions to the meetings in Bahrain and Kuwait were highly impactful, and he is disappointed at being bedridden. We will deeply miss his presence in Saudi Arabia and Algeria,' delegation head and BJP MP Baijayant Panda said in a post on X.
Indian delegations are travelling to 33 global capitals to reach out to the international community on Pakistan's designs and India's response to terror after the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack that killed 26 civilians.
India carried out precision strikes on terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir on May 7 under Operation Sindoor, following which Pakistan attempted to attack the Indian military bases over the next three days. The Indian side responded strongly to the Pakistani actions.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Wire

39 minutes ago

• The Wire

A President and a Field Marshal

No one knows if the goat cheese gateau and burnt cipollini soubise the White House chef served at the famous Donald Trump-Asim Munir lunch were to the Pakistani field marshal's liking, but it is more than evident that this breaking of bread in Washington has set the cat among some very nervous strategic pigeons in New Delhi. The knee-jerk reaction is to pooh-pooh a very consequential event. The Pakistani newspaper Dawn reports that 'the meeting was not arranged through routine diplomatic channels, and was the outcome of 'unorthodox efforts' by a group of advisers, businessmen and other influential figures.' The same assessment is then passed on by 'sources' to the Indian Express, presumably as an expression of Indian foreign office disdain for an event that is an embarrassment for the ' vishwaguru ' coming so soon after Operation Sindoor. Sadly, no one in South Block remembers Deng Xiaoping's working axiom: it does not matter if the cat is black or white as long as it catches the mice. But, then, who can deny us our right to wallow in self-righteousness. Our current bewilderment at a democratically elected president hosting a self-promoted field marshal can easily be traced back to a misreading of American historical traditions. American society has always held the military man in high esteem; the very first president of the United States was the victorious general George Washington. After World War II, when the United States arrogated to itself the role of policeman of the new global order, the use of the military force and armed intervention became the most legitimate instrument at the disposal of the American presidents. In the famous spat between President Harry Truman and General Douglas MacArthur (called 'America's most talented general of this – the 20th – century' by Henry Kissinger), American public opinion was not entirely behind the White House. And, the election of a victorious general, Dwight Eisenhower, in the 1952 presidential election was a reaffirmation of a tradition of awe and reverence for the man in fatigues. Indeed, generals and admirals have always found their way to key decision-making slots as the US got busy quelling (or starting) fires around the world. It came naturally for American diplomacy not to regard the generals in Asia, Africa or Latin America as un-touchable. Influential intellectual voices like Samuel Huntington theorised about the stabilising role of the military in the Third World as newly liberated countries experimented with freedom and chaos. This notion of the military's institutional usefulness has been a constant consideration in the US approach towards Pakistan. We have always thought we were Washington's preferred partner because we are a 'democracy', and self-servingly felt disappointed that its affection was equally shared between 'a democratic India' and a 'dictatorial Pakistan'. In his memoir Nice Guys Finish Second, B.K. Nehru, then our man in Washington, talks of having been invited to an exclusive, 'coming out of mourning' party held by Jackie Kennedy. The date was September 22, 1965. India and Pakistan were at war; the Indian army was getting the better of (yes, the first) Field Marshal Ayub Khan's fauj. At Jackie's party, B.K. Nehru collared US secretary of defense, Bob McNamara, who obviously was keeping track of the fighting and knew that Pakistan was getting a bloody nose. Nehru writes: 'He [McNamara] went on to say that something had to be done to restore the morale of the Pakistani Army. I said, 'Surely, Bob, you aren't going to arm them again, are you?' He hummed and hawed and said, 'Well, I don't know. Perhaps we shall have to.' The date of this conversation is worth noting; it was three days before the cease-fire.' The American establishment had long concluded that the Pakistani army was the only organised and competent institution that could provide stability in that country. After all, unlike in India, the Pakistani political class had very little experience of democratic temper and, more importantly, Pakistan did not have a Jawaharlal Nehru – a leader with the mettle and disposition to marshal the energy and imagination of a new nation. The Americans were not choosy; they would work with anyone who could produce a semblance of order in Pakistan and would not be averse to joining military pacts like SEATO and CENTO. In recent decades, US policymakers – both Democratic and Republican – have greatly valued the Pakistani army as a highly useful tool for providing security and protection to ruling families in volatile Arab nations. We in India are free to mock Rawalpindi's GHQ as a mercenary corps; but the Americans are not prone to sentimentality in matters of realpolitik. It is rather late in the day for New Delhi to pretend to be flummoxed that Field Marshal Munir should have been given by Trump the respect becoming of a head of government. Trump has given sufficient notice to one and all around the world that he does not abide by conventions or traditions and that certainly he is not enamoured of the humbuggery that comes so easily to our leadership. We, of course, are entitled to hold this or that Pakistani general responsible for patronising terror groups; but, the American establishment cannot be faulted for concluding that for better or for worse, Field Marshal Munir's army remains the only organised force capable of ensuring stability and cohesion. We, indeed, have resented the Americans' inability – or unwillingness – to see the Pakistan army's mischievous record. Many years ago, when he was still on top of his game, President Ayub Khan could note in his diary (August 10, 1967) that 'Hindus, of course, are too crafty for the Americans.' He was, in fact, grudging New Delhi's professional foreign service's calm and calculated dealings with the bullying Americans. Five decades later, the first field marshal would be surprised to find his successors to have learnt the difficult art of being deceitful and yet being trusted by the Americans. We, on the other hand, have become more 'Hindu' and less crafty.

Hindustan Times

41 minutes ago

• Hindustan Times

Woman recounts chilling escape from flash flood with boyfriend and their dog on I-40 in Tennessee

The Netherlands has initiated operation Orange Shield to secure the upcoming NATO summit, deploying over 10,000 military and police personnel, along with combat helicopters and naval frigates. Key leaders, including U.S. President Trump and French President Macron, will attend the event in The Hague, while protests are anticipated outside. Cybersecurity threats are also under close surveillance.

News18

42 minutes ago

• News18

'Pashchimbanga Divas' Row: BJP Accuses Police Of Blocking Rally, TMC Calls Celebration Forced

Last Updated: TMC accused the BJP of undermining the secular spirit of the Constitution, calling the celebration "politically motivated" The ruling Trinamool Congress (TMC), led by Mamata Banerjee, and the opposition BJP engaged in a political slugfest on Friday over the celebration of 'Pashchimbanga Divas'. Union Minister and West Bengal BJP president Sukanta Majumdar accused Kolkata Police of obstructing the party's efforts to observe the day. Majumdar alleged that police tried to stop his two-wheeler rally from reaching Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose's residence on Elgin Road in south Kolkata. The BJP, following a central government notification, marks June 20 — the date in 1947 when the undivided Bengal Assembly voted for the partition of the state — as 'Pashchimbanga Divas'. Earlier this morning, BJP Yuva Morcha members gathered at the Bhowanipore residence of Dr Shyama Prasad Mukherjee, the Jan Sangh founder, before planning to cycle and walk to Netaji Bhavan, about a kilometre away. Majumdar alleged, 'we told the police that we will only carry the Tricolour and no party flags in this rally. Even then the police obstructed our movement and arrested our workers." A small group, including Majumdar and state BJP Yuva Morcha chief Indranil Khan, later managed to reach Netaji's house and garland his bust. 'We failed to understand the police's logic behind this obstruction. This wasn't a political rally and our destination was Netaji's house which lies in the same ward as that of the residence of Shyama Prasad Mukherjee. It is evident that we will either walk or reach there on motorcycles," Khan added. West Bengal Opposition leader Suvendu Adhikari led legislators on a colourful march from the assembly to Dr Mukherjee's statue on Red Road, where they garlanded it and chanted slogans calling for enduring recognition of June 20 as 'Pashchimbanga Divas'. 'This is a historic day which we must observe," Adhikari said. The row centres on which date should be officially recognised as West Bengal Statehood Day. The ruling TMC government has declared Poila Baisakh — the Bengali New Year — as the statehood day, passing a resolution in the assembly. In response to the allegations, TMC spokesperson Kunal Ghosh dismissed the BJP's actions as contrived. Ghosh said: 'The people of Bengal have already chosen their statehood day on the first day of the Bengali calendar. It's a day close to the hearts of all Bengalis. The state assembly has already endorsed it. It doesn't matter where a motley band of BJP workers gather and try to force a celebration which lacks spontaneity and with which the people have no direct association." West Bengal's Parliamentary Affairs Minister Sobhandeb Chatterjee accused the BJP of undermining the secular spirit of the Constitution, calling the celebration 'politically motivated". He said the Poila Baisakh resolution had already been endorsed by the state assembly and criticised the BJP's sudden interest in June 20. (With inputs from agencies) About the Author News Desk First Published: June 20, 2025, 22:09 IST Latest News MP HC commutes death penalty of man convicted of raping 4-year-old girl Agency feeds Agency feeds Jharkhand cabinet gives nod to key infra, edu projects, policy reforms Agency feeds Iran expects India to condemn Israeli military actions against it Cricket Shubman Gill Becomes 5th Indian To Score Century In 1st Test As Captain Politics 'Pashchimbanga Divas' Row: BJP Accuses Police Of Blocking Rally, TMC Calls Celebration Forced latest news