Denbigh hockey player 'in limbo' after head struck by ball
"I understand there is an element of risk in hockey, but surely a brain injury must trigger some help?"Claerwen Render, 42, loved sports but her life changed when she was hit on the forehead by a hockey ball five years ago.The mother-of-three has suffered daily migraines and fatigue since and has seen her income halve after giving up her role as a member of a secondary school's senior leadership team.But after being refused an insurance payout through her sport's governing body, she has been left questioning if affiliation payments are worth it.Hoci Cymru said it had developed their approach to head injuries but that more needed to happen to explain the limitations of insurance cover.
Mrs Render was playing for Clwb Hoci Rhuthun in Denbighshire in November 2019 when she was caught on the temple by a ball struck by an opposing player.Bleeding badly, she was taken by ambulance to the nearest A&E department.Over the next few months she tried to return to the classroom as a maths teacher, but struggled to cope."I'm not getting half my old life back. I'm just in limbo, in pain," said Mrs Render."I can't do anything. It really affects my sleep. I've taken time off work but no amount of rest gets rid of my symptoms. It's debilitating."I can't do normal things like before. I can't enjoy going to the kids' activities. If I stay I suffer, or I'll go to work in more pain and I have to go to bed."
Nine months after the incident, Mrs Render, from Denbigh, made an insurance claim through her Hoci Cymru membership but said her application did not trigger any benefits.She now works four mornings a week having been diagnosed with post-concussion syndrome."Why have I paid 15 years of affiliation and insurance? It was for something like this," said Mrs Render."I understand there is an element of risk, but surely a brain injury must trigger something? Are we just paying into a bottomless pit?"I'm just disappointed that I'm not compensated for loss of earnings, the future of my kids, everything."One sports lawyer said few players were fully aware of the level of cover they have for head injuries."No-one signs up to play these sports to get permanent and progressive brain damage and a very high number of sports men and women, we believe, have that," said Richard Boardman, from law firm Rylands Garth.
"It is critical that all grassroots players know about the risks involved in collision sports, and whether they are covered for brain injuries," Mr Boardman added.Colin Morris from brain injury charity Headway, stressed the health and social benefits of sports, including brain health, but also said players needed to be aware of how insurance cover works."It is something that governing bodies and insurers need to be transparent with and really convey to people what circumstances they wouldn't be covered."So people can take out further insurance if they need to, protection against loss of income for example," he said.
Hoci Cymru's concussion policy was first introduced in 2021. Its chief executive, Paul Whapham, said they could not comment on individual insurance cases but acknowledged the "very real impact" Mrs Render's injury had and took her concerns "seriously"."This situation highlights the importance of clear communication and transparency around insurance coverage," said Mr Whapham.He added Hoci Cymru's approach to head injuries had developed but there was "always more" to be done so players "understand the extent and limitations of cover provided through affiliation"."We are committed to working with our insurers, our clubs and partners to ensure that policies are clear, fair and supportive of our players' wellbeing," Mr Whapham said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
26 minutes ago
- The Sun
Sir Alex Ferguson quickly bounces back from Man Utd axe as alternative venture secures him more than a year's earnings
SIR ALEX FERGUSON is still earning a pretty penny, despite being ruthlessly axed from his lucrative role at Manchester United. The legendary manager was the biggest casualty of Sir Jim Ratcliffe 's ruthless cost-cutting spree last season. 3 3 3 Fergie was axed from his multi-million-pound ambassadorial role with the club, with the sacking coming into effect at the end of the season. That decision from INEOS bigwig Ratcliffe saw the Scot wave goodbye to a whopping £2.1million a year salary. But the 83-year-old won't be strapped for cash thanks to a business venture he embarked upon over FOUR DECADES ago. Fergie's personal company, ACF Sports Promotions Limited, recorded profits of £2.7m last year, taking its total assets to £26.9m. That figure is up from £24.2m the previous year, although it's not known if the £2.1m Ferguson received from United was paid into the account. ACF is the company that handles all of Fergie's commercial activities, including speaking appearances. Fergie stepped down from his role as company director in 2014, handing over the reins to his son Mark. The healthy bank balance of ACF, which was set up 42 YEARS AGO, means Fergie won't have to worry about losing his ambassador's role with United. Fergie axe comes at the right time - and he knows it By Phil Thomas IT is over a decade since he left the dugout but Sir Alex Ferguson has lost none of his sense of timing. When to sell, when to buy, when to change and ultimately when to go, Fergie has always been in a class of his own. Over the years there were countless decisions which had everyone scratching their head — but Sir Alex always knew the time was right. Some were more obvious than others. Like the night Manchester United won the Treble on the back of his substitutions. Others less so, like the summer of 1995 when terrace legends Mark Hughes, Paul Ince and Andrei Kanchelskis were sold at the peak of their powers. The whole of football thought the manager had lost his marbles. But Fergie knew better, as he chose that year to unleash his 'you win nothing with kids' Double heroes. Just as he knew best when it came to right-hand men. Brian Kidd, Steve McClaren, Archie Knox and Co — an endless list of world-class coaches who all came and went. And, of course, the biggest decision of all. Calling time on 26 years in which he had gone from the brink of the bullet to English football's greatest-ever gaffer. The majority of people are convinced Ferguson stepped down because he knew United's era of dominance was over. Maybe not the nosedive to come but certainly that an almighty rebuild was just around the corner. Another mass overhaul, yet not one he was prepared to oversee. Now another end has arrived. Not as dramatic or as out-of-nowhere, admittedly, but an end nonetheless. Next summer Fergie will leave his 12-year role as global ambassador. Many see it as the most ruthless swing of Sir Jim Ratcliffe's cost-cutting axe — and they are wrong. For while he is trying to save every penny in making United great again — how's that going, Sir Jim? — Ferguson has not suddenly and callously been told he is surplus to requirements. This decision was a two-way call. An amicable parting. Football's own conscious uncoupling, in Chris Martin and Gwyneth Paltrow lingo. And not, incidentally, a departure which means we will no longer see Fergie at Old Trafford on a matchday. That simply will not happen. He will still be there rain, wind or shine . . . Only now as a high-profile non-executive director, rather than a man with the ear — and the sway — behind the owners' biggest decisions. Like he was when urging United to re-sign Cristiano Ronaldo in 2021. Admittedly not his finest hour, rather an indication of the influence he still retained. Back then, until just before Ratcliffe and his Ineos team arrived, in fact, Ferguson had the owners' ear. Almost a hotline to the Glazer family, you could say. And those days are done. Not that Sir Alex is bereft at the thought. For a start, some of the staff sackings have enraged the Scot — long-serving photographer John Peters and kitman Alec Wylie, for example. This is not a cosy-cosy relationship with Ratcliffe being severed. If anything, it is closer to the opposite. And as Fergie the Red, in every sense The Boss — those who played under him still call him that — knows, trousering £2million or so a year in such tight times is not a good look. Fair enough, not an amount anyone would turn down in normal circumstances. Yet when many in the steerage class are losing their livelihoods, it is not something that would have sat well with him. There is also the practical side of things as well. At the end of December, Sir Alex will be 83 years old, albeit still a freakishly fit 83 years old. Yet even though the grey matter remains oh-so-sharp and the mind clear as a bell, the bones grow creakier and even Superman had to put his feet up on occasion. That does not mean you will not see shots of Fergie alongside Ratcliffe at various points — Sir Jim loves too much the associated glamour of being pictured with the greatest. But any idea of Sir Alex having an emperor's thumbs-down power has gone for good — and quite frankly that is something which suits both sides. Fergie was given the role after bringing his legendary 26-and-a-half-year reign at Old Trafford to an end in 2013. He was paid just shy of £26m for his post-managerial gig, which Ratcliffe and Co. deemed to be an unnecessary expense. Sir Alex Ferguson spotted with unlikely TV star pal at Cheltenham again as legendary Man Utd boss bags £65k winner In an interview with the BBC in March, Ratcliffe said of the cost-cutting, which has resulted in hundreds losing their jobs: "We have got a club which was in a level of financial difficulty. "Manchester United would have run out of cash by the end of this year -- by the end of 2025 -- after having me put $300m (£232.72m) in and if we buy no new players in the summer. "If we hadn't have implemented the cost programmes and restructuring that we have done over the last 12 months. "So we have to deal with all those things, and there's only so many things you can deal with at once. "We have a new management team, we have to deal with the financial restructure, then we have to move on to the squad, data analysis, and moving forward. "But we are in the process of change and it's an uncomfortable period and disruptive and I do feel sympathy with the fans. "But I am not actually surprised where we are in the league because Ruben's only got a certain size of squad he can deal with, and quite a number of those players are injured or not available to him."
BBC News
33 minutes ago
- BBC News
Bronglais Hospital: Concerns over stroke unit closure plans
Residents have raised concerns about plans to close stroke units in two west Wales hospitals, saying plans to transfer patients between hospitals could be difficult in such a large, rural Dda health board is considering closing the stroke units at Bronglais Hospital in Aberystwyth, Ceredigion, and Glangwili Hospital in Carmarthen, and introducing a "treat and transfer" service, with specialist care being provided in Llanelli and Protect Bronglais Service, which organised a meeting on Friday, described the proposed changes as a health board said changes to stroke services are needed to "meet standards and respond to service fragility". More than 400 people attended Friday's meeting in Aberystwyth, including politicians from various parties representing mid, north and west in attendance were residents from Ceredigion, Gwynedd and Powys - demonstrating the large geographic area served by Bronglais politicians have urged the health board to keep the Bronglais stroke unit open, calling instead for investment in what was described as the best performing stroke unit in Hywel Philip Kloer, chief executive of Hywel Dda, who attended the meeting, said he recognised the strength of feeling on the issue, but added that the health board cannot provide across all of its hospitals "the kind of care that the evidence tells us would give the best outcomes after stroke". Lisa Francis, chair of Protect Bronglais Services, said issues remain with the proposed changes, including around the logistics of moving patients to specialist care elsewhere."We have little or no information surrounding the transport of those patients," she said, adding that the ambulance service is already "overstretched"."We want the health board to keep Bronglais as it is with rehabilitation services there, but ramp those services up. Improve it and develop it," she said, adding that it provides a "first-class service".Hywel Dda provides services for a large geographic area, and says some of its clinical teams are spread across multiple sites and there is an over-reliance on a small number of consultation on the proposed changes runs until 31 August.
Telegraph
41 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Live England vs India: Score and latest updates from first Test, day two at Headingley
10:00AM Can England fight back on day two? It is advantage India after day one of the series as they ended the first day at Headingley on 359/3. Centuries from Yashasvi Jaiswal and new captain Shubman Gil led India to a dominant day despite being put into bat by Ben Stokes. It was a chastening day for England in the field having won the toss and opted to bowl first. Stokes' decision at the toss was a talking point after the first day's play, with former England captain Michael Vaughan particularly critical of that call. 'Within the first hour it was a good pitch, so it is not easy to restrict runs,' Vaughan said on Test Match Special. 'Ben Stokes is still positive and he will come back tomorrow [today] saying let's get seven wickets. 'I am an old-school traditionalist here at Leeds that when the sun is shining, with dry weather, you bat. I was staggered when he said he was going to bowl. Traditions are out the window. You always have to pick your decisions on that moment, and not things that you did here years ago. It cannot affect what the decision is today [yesterday]. 'You look at the England side and their strength is in the batting. And there is inexperience in the bowling. Ben clearly had a gut feeling, and sometimes it has worked. We always say that on this surface, it is flat. But we will not know that for sure until we see Jasprit Bumrah bowl.' In the last nine home Tests England have won the toss, they have batted first once and won six of those matches. The last six Test matches on this ground have been won by the team bowling first. Jaiswal's incredible record against England continued yesterday; it was his fifth Test century and third against England. In the last series played between these sides in India in 2024, Jaiswal scored a mammoth 712 runs. Speaking after the first day's play, Jaiswal expressed his delight at his performance and spoke of the importance of their preparation for this series. 'It was very, very good and we all did well today. It was amazing to go out and bat, enjoy the English summer as well so we are very happy. I just try to be myself and go out there and enjoy the game. That is what I do all the time. We had very good practice sessions and matches for a few weeks. We were trying to make it as simple as possible. If there is a loose ball I try to go for it. I was just thinking to focus on my process because I have worked very hard in my preparation. I was just trying in myself and have that desire to do well. I really enjoyed it.' Gill has taken over the Test captaincy from Rohit Sharma and yesterday marked his first Test ton outside of Asia. Day two gets under way at 11am BST.
