logo
Is this the end of the road for Italy's citizenship reform?

Is this the end of the road for Italy's citizenship reform?

Local Italy10-06-2025

It was always a long shot. But many of The Local's readers had their fingers crossed that there might be a chance of a Yes vote in the closely-watched referendum this week on whether Italy should cut the wait for those applying for citizenship through residency.
Non-EU nationals must live in Italy for 10 years before they can start the application process, and usually have to wait several more years for it to be processed.
The waiting time to apply would have been reduced to five years under the referendum proposal, putting Italy in line with other major European countries including Germany and France.
But, as expected, voter turnout was too low, which meant that the referendum result was declared invalid. There's a minimum threshold, or quorum, of 50 percent for the vote to count. Turnout was 30.6 percent, slightly lower than polls predicted.
This is nothing unusual in an Italian referendum. Participation has been historically low and falling for decades.
As the results came in, there were renewed calls for sweeping changes to the country's referendum laws. There have long been calls for lowering the quorum from 50 to 40 percent, or eliminating it altogether.
But, without this threshold, how would the vote have gone?
Of the votes cast this time, 65 percent were in favour of changing the law on citizenship.
While high enough for a positive result, this was lower than the percentage who voted in favour of the other four referendum questions (on workers' rights), which was 87 to 89 percent, reflecting divided public opinion.
The leftwing opposition parties who backed the referendum said that it had sparked public debate on an issue that no one had been talking about.
They could, in theory, put similar proposals to parliament in future. However, they'd be unlikely to get far while the ruling coalition government enjoys a majority in both houses.
The government is strongly opposed to easing citizenship rules in any way. Senior ministers made it clear ahead of the vote that they didn't want the quorum to be reached, urging voters to 'stay home' or 'go to the beach'.
The failure of the referendum was widely reported as a victory for Meloni, who had appeared at a polling station on Sunday to announce to reporters that she would not be voting.
Her government's stance shouldn't surprise anyone.
In March it abruptly forced through changes to the law on eligibility for Italian citizenship by descent, applying a two-generational limit. Last year, it quashed proposals to extend citizenship to young people who complete their education in Italy.
As long as Meloni's government remains in power, any changes that would make the lives of foreign nationals in Italy easier seem a remote possibility.
The proposal to cut the waiting period from 10 years to five originally came from Italiani senza cittadinanza (Italians Without Citizenship), a grassroots movement highlighting obstacles faced by would-be applicants. They say they'll continue to campaign on the issue.
For those who plan to apply for citizenship via residency in the next few years, the wait continues.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Which European countries currently have Schengen border checks in place?
Which European countries currently have Schengen border checks in place?

Local Italy

time6 days ago

  • Local Italy

Which European countries currently have Schengen border checks in place?

The borderless Schengen area guarantees free movement to tens of millions of EU citizens, residents and visitors. It recently celebrated its 40th anniversary, and after originally starting with just five countries signing a convention pledging to 'gradually abolish' internal borders checks and allow people to travel around freely, today the Schengen area includes 25 of the 27 EU member states and the four countries of the European Free Trade Association (Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland). According to the EU Council website, the Schengen area covers over 4.5 million square kilometres with a total population of almost 450 million people. Every day around 3.5 million people cross the Schengen internal borders for work, study or visits, and almost 1.7 million people reside in one Schengen country while working in another. Under the Schengen Borders Code, which sets the rules governing the Schengen area, internal border checks can be temporarily restored where there is a 'serious threat to public policy or internal security', from the organisation of a major sport event to a terrorist attack. These checks should be a 'last resort' measure, should be limited to the period 'strictly necessary' to respond to the threat and not last more than 6 months. In exceptional circumstances, internal border controls can be reintroduced for a maximum of two years. Several members of the bloc have reintroduced temporary border controls in recent years. The full list of countries that currently have controls in place is available here. According to European Commission information, the following European countries have reintroduced temporary border checks for the following dates: Spain - 27/06/2025 – 05/07/2025 - IV United National International Conference on Financing for Development in Sevilla (30 June – 3 July 2025); land borders with France and Portugal, internal air borders of Alicante, Almería, Barcelona, Bilbao, Girona, Granada, Madrid, Málaga, Murcia, Sevilla and Valencia; internal maritime borders of Barcelona, Málaga and Palma de Mallorca. Italy - 19/06/2025 – 18/12/2025 - Continued threat of terrorist infiltrations into migratory flows along the Western Balkan route, ongoing crises in the Middle East and Ukraine, high level of irregular migration including a strong presence of criminal smuggling and trafficking networks, and heightened security risks associated with the Universal Jubilee of the Catholic Church; land borders with Slovenia. Italy - 19/12/2024 – 18/06/2025 - Continued threat of terrorist infiltrations into migratory flows along the Mediterranean route and the Balkan route, ongoing crises in Eastern Europe and the Middle East, increasing migratory pressures and the risk of terrorist infiltration, risk of violent actions against Israeli citizens and terrorist activity, and heightened security risks associated with the Universal Jubilee of the Catholic Church; land borders with Slovenia. Austria - 12/05/2025 – 11/11/2025 - Threats associated with the continued high levels of irregular migration and migrant smuggling across Austria's southern borders, as well as the strain on the asylum reception system and basic services, Russia's ongoing war of aggression against Ukraine and the security situation in the Middle East, intensifying the threat posed by Islamist extremism and terrorism; land borders with Hungary and Slovenia. Austria - 16/04/2025 – 15/10/2025 - Threats associated with irregular migration, such as via the Balkan routes (including expected migratory pressure), as well as the strain on the asylum reception system and basic services, Russia's ongoing war of aggression against Ukraine, and the security situation in the Middle East aggravated by terrorist groups; land borders with Slovakia and Czechia. Denmark - 12/05/2025 – 11/11/2025 - Serious threats to public policy and internal security posed by possible sabotage actions from Russia, as well as continuous terrorism-related events and organised crime, notably, tied to the Israeli-Hamas conflict and driven by radicalisation from groups such as Islamic State and Al-Qaida. These threats include potential attacks on Jewish and Israeli targets; land and sea borders with Germany but may extend to all internal borders. Norway - 12/05/2025 – 11/11/2025 - General threat aimed at the energy sector, threats of sabotage posed by the Russian intelligence service, as well as to increase infrastructure protection; ports with ferry connections to the Schengen area Sweden - 12/05/2025 – 11/11/2025 - Serious threats to public policy and internal security arise from organised cross-border crime and terrorism, highlighted by attacks involving military-grade explosives against foreign institutions and the public, including the involvement of foreign state actors leveraging criminal gangs, coupled with persistent threats from violent Islamist groups and individuals; all internal borders (land, air, and sea) and land borders with Denmark. France - 01/05/2025 – 31/10/2025 - Serious threats to public policy, public order, and internal security posed by persistent jihadist threats, a rise in antisemitic attacks, the growing criminal networks facilitating irregular migration and smuggling, and irregular migration flows towards the Franco-British border that risk infiltration by radicalised individuals, as well as the irregular crossings on the Channel and North Sea borders, along with rising violence among migrants, particularly in northern coastal areas such as Dunkirk and Calais, leading to tense and perilous situations for both migrants and law enforcement; all internal borders (land, air, and sea) with Belgium, Germany, Luxembourg, the Swiss Confederation, Spain, and Italy. Germany - 16/03/2025 – 15/09/2025 - Serious threats to public security and order posed by continued high levels of irregular migration and migrant smuggling, and the strain on the asylum reception system. The impact of the global security situation (including Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine and the situation in the Middle East) on security and migration; land borders with France, Luxembourg, Belgium, the Netherlands, Denmark, Austria, Switzerland, Czechia, and Poland. Slovenia - 22/06/2025 – 21/12/2025 - Serious threats to public policy and internal security posed by a high level of terrorist threats and organised crime, including human smuggling and arms trafficking, the risk of terrorist infiltrations into migratory flows via the Western Balkans, hybrid threats from the Russian Federation and Belarus, as well as instability in the EU's neighbourhood, including Russia's ongoing aggression against Ukraine and instability following the fall of Assad's regime in Syria; land borders with Croatia and Hungary. The Netherlands - 09/06/2025 - 08/12/2025 - Serious threat to public policy caused by high levels of asylum applications, irregular migration, migrant smuggling, and secondary movements, leading to an overburdening of the migration system in general and the asylum system in particular, as well as pressure on public services, including housing, health care and education; land and air borders with Belgium and Germany. Bulgaria - 01/01/2025 – 30/06/2025 - Security risks related to illegal migration, including smuggling activities, as well as migratory pressure caused by ongoing crises in the Middle East and Africa, particularly in Syria, Afghanistan, and Gaza/Lebanon; land borders with Romania.

Inside Italy: Why building a bridge to Sicily won't unite Italians
Inside Italy: Why building a bridge to Sicily won't unite Italians

Local Italy

time6 days ago

  • Local Italy

Inside Italy: Why building a bridge to Sicily won't unite Italians

Inside Italy For Members In this week's Inside Italy newsletter, we look at why the government is so enthusiastic about the Messina Strait bridge project, and why work may begin soon despite the challenges threatening to blow it off course. Inside Italy is our weekly look at some of the news and talking points from Italy that you might not have heard about. It's published each Saturday and members can receive it directly to their inbox, by going to their newsletter preferences or adding their email to the sign-up box in this article. Is construction work finally about to begin on the long-promised Messina Strait bridge? The Italian government is expected to give its final approval to the plans within the next two weeks. An enormous amount has been written about this contested bridge project and its viability over the years. Anyone who follows Italian current affairs will be aware of the long list of convincing arguments against the plan, which include a risk of major earthquakes at exactly the point it is set to be built, and the frequent high winds (of up to 140 kilometres per hour) that the Strait is notorious for. Then there's the cost to the Italian state, currently estimated at 13.5 billion euros, and the fact that a lot of that money is widely expected to be siphoned off by the mafia. Practical problems with building a bridge over the Strait have in the past thwarted everyone from the emperor Charlemagne, the Bourbon King of the Two Sicilies Ferdinand II, Italy's first King Victor Emmanuel, the fascist dictator Benito Mussolini, and more recently, Silvio Berlusconi. The idea is said to date back to the Roman Empire. Powerful men are well known for wanting to build physical monuments to their own greatness. And this particularly difficult construction challenge seems to attract them like a magnet. Enter Matteo Salvini, the latest champion of the bridge project, who seems to genuinely believe that he will succeed where so many others could not. In his position as Giorgia Meloni's deputy prime minister and infrastructure minister, he intends to make his late ally Berlusconi's plans a reality - and to name the bridge after him. And, after recent changes to the design, this is now set to be the longest suspension bridge in the world, at 3.3 kilometres. Salvini now insists that construction work will begin this summer, and that the bridge will be ready to use by 2032. Although he did say work would start last summer, as well. He has been accused of backing the attention-grabbing bridge project in order to remain in the spotlight, as his League party has been eclipsed by Meloni's Brothers of Italy. But it doesn't seem like a wildly popular policy to stake his career on. There's significant opposition to the project in Sicily itself, while it's not thought to be popular among Salvini's traditional support base in northern Italy, either. In fact, it seems that few people outside of the government are enthusiastic. Media reports often use the aphorism 'the bridge that divides Italy' when talking about the project, but I find most Italians I talk to are instead united in resignation over the fact that the state is, yet again, spending enormous sums of money on something no-one asked for. Do people think a bridge will actually be built? ' Boh, chissà?' To most of those I've asked, it hardly seems to matter. Residents of Messina and Reggio Calabria say they haven't been involved in consultations over the project planned to connect their cities. The mayor of Messina complained at the time that the government didn't even contact him before announcing the project's revival. Many people would like better transport links between Sicily and the mainland, as well as better infrastructure within Sicily itself. But the government in Rome doesn't seem overly concerned with, for example, replacing the old diesel trains still running on many stretches of track. Salvini meanwhile has described the bridge as 'a model for the Italy that believes in itself.' Looking at history, it seems more like a project for leaders who believe in their own exceptional power. The idea surfaced at the birth of a kingdom, and then of a dictatorship, at the peak of the post-war economic boom, and now again amid the rise and rise of the political right in Europe and beyond. Giorgia Meloni's hard-right government at the moment appears to feel untouchable, confident that it will reach its full term and then serve another, where so many Italian administrations have failed after just a year or two (an average of 18 months, to be precise). So why not build a bridge? To succeed, they'll have to defy both the gale-force winds on the Messina Strait, and the equally powerful and unpredictable winds of change in Italian politics, for the next seven years at least. Inside Italy is our weekly look at some of the news and talking points in Italy that you might not have heard about. It's published each Saturday and members can receive it directly to their inbox by going to their newsletter preferences or adding their email to the sign-up box in this article.

‘Senseless project': Italy forges ahead with contested Messina bridge plan
‘Senseless project': Italy forges ahead with contested Messina bridge plan

Local Italy

time12-06-2025

  • Local Italy

‘Senseless project': Italy forges ahead with contested Messina bridge plan

The 13.5-billion-euro project would carry trains and six lanes of traffic, allowing cars to cross the Strait of Messina in 15 minutes. But widespread scepticism about the project continues, after decades of false starts. Challenges to its completion include winds of more than 100 kilometres an hour (62 mph) and the risk of earthquakes in a region that lies across two tectonic plates. The government says the bridge will be at the cutting edge of engineering, with the section suspended between its two pillars stretching 3.3 kilometres, the longest in the world. Infrastructure Minister and Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini, one of the main champions of the project, insists it will be a game-changer for the local economy. "The bridge will be a catalyst for development," he said on a recent visit to Reggio Calabria, where the bridge will begin. But critics point to a long history of public works announced, financed and never completed in Italy, whether due to corruption or political instability, at enormous cost to taxpayers. "The public does not trust this political class and these projects that become endless construction sites," said Luigi Sturniolo from protest group Rete No Ponte (No Bridge Network). Meloni's ministers are expected to give their final approval to the project later this month, and Salvini insists construction will begin this summer. But work had already been announced for the summer of 2024, before being postponed - a common theme in the history of the bridge. The first law for the project was passed in 1971. Since then, successive governments have either revived it or cancelled it. In 2012, the idea appeared to be definitely abandoned amid the eurozone debt crisis, only for Meloni's government, which took office in 2022, to return to it once again. There is also the question of mafia infiltration. The attorney general of Messina recently warned of the risk that organised crime would benefit from the project, noting that "the power of the mafia is hidden... behind public contracts". The government has proposed placing companies relating to the project under control of an anti-mafia structure reporting to the interior ministry. But Italian President Sergio Mattarella blocked this, saying it should only be used for one-off events such as earthquake relief or the Olympics. Salvini argued that the bridge can help tackle the mafia, saying: "You do not fight the mafia... with conferences and protests, but by creating jobs and giving hope to young people." The project has sparked local protests, with critics warning of the impact on a protected marine zone and an important bird migratory route. Sturniolo told AFP it was a "senseless project" which used up valuable funds when "our regions already suffer from many problems... healthcare, schools, and infrastructure." The Italian Court of Auditors has also criticised the extent of the debt-laden Italian state's investment in this one project in its assessment of the 2024 budget. "They want to make an entire territory believe that it's only hope is this bridge -- but then the bridge never arrives," Sturniolo added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store