Trump memo on civil rights, DEI executive order undermine 60 years of progress
An executive order issued by President Lyndon Johnson in 1965 required the federal government to follow the letter and spirit of the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
President Donald Trump's reversal of that order is a stunning blow to America's 60-year fight against discrimination.
A Trump Administration memo issued last month, immediately freezing all U.S. Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division litigation, and an executive order halting any federal initiatives involving diversity, equity and inclusion, are just as disturbing.
But legal assaults on established civil rights law have been increasing for a while now, fostered or ignored by both Republican and Democratic politicians.
More from Freep Opinion: I'm suing Trump because of a promise I made to Michigan voters
For the past few years, I've been concerned that civil rights cases are being derailed by the menacing ghost of Roger B. Taney, the former U.S. Supreme Court chief justice who wrote what many legal scholars, judges and lawyers regard as the worst decision the high court has ever made: Scott v. Sandford, better known as the Dred Scott decision.
This 1857 decision, written for the majority of the court by Taney (who pronounced his name as 'tawny') remains a stain on American jurisprudence because it so perfectly articulated what racism has meant in our nation, and it made Taney the perfect example of a rogue judge. 'The black man has no rights that the white man is bound to respect,' Taney wrote, as he pronounced the fate of Dred Scott — an enslaved Black man who fought for his legal freedom in court for more than a decade.
Taney's outrageous viewpoint, along with the weak reasoning of his legal opinion, provoked a fierce national debate at the time it was written — and brought the U.S. closer to civil war, which broke out only four years afterward. As a lawyer who defends the rights of people who face unfair treatment on the job and elsewhere, I see a 21st century version of the Taney doctrine taking shape in judges' decisions and jury verdicts across the nation.
If judges don't fight the trend, there is a danger that Taney's ghost will represent America's official stance toward people of color in this century.
More from Freep Opinion: Trump puts blame on DEI for plane crash. It's meant to exhaust us
In my own law practice, which is national but based in metro Detroit, I've seen judges and juries suppress the lawsuits of workers who've suffered racial or sexual discrimination on the job.
One of my clients, DeSheila C. Howlett, worked as the first and only Black police officer for the City of Warren before we sued the city for employment discrimination in 2017. A federal jury finally found in her favor in May 2023, awarding her more than a half-million dollars — largely for backpay. While the legal victory was significant, we appealed the monetary award to reflect the wrongs Howlett endured. We eventually settled with the City of Warren in 2023 for an amount that both sides agreed not to disclose. But Howlett's fight for financial justice was a draining experience.
In two legal cases involving education in Detroit suburbs, I documented examples of blatant disregard for the rights of Black students — where 'no rights, no respect' attitudes were clearly evident.
I represented a Farmington Hills High School student whose high school teacher called him the N-word in a classroom in 2019, with other students present. But in a December 2022 ruling, a federal judge determined that the teacher's action was not 'sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of [the student's] education and create an abusive educational environment.'
In other words, a white teacher calling a Black student a word that the world recognizes as patently racist wasn't abusive at all.
Similar disrespect was evident when I filed a class-action lawsuit in November 2021 against Bloomfield Hills High School for failing to address an environment where hate and death-threat messages and shocking acts of animosity against Black students abounded, including frequent use of the N-word.
Numerous studies have scientifically documented that institutional racism causes psychological and physical injury to the health of Black students. I asked Enrique Nesbett Jr., a professor at the University of Michigan School of Public Health, to evaluate the Bloomfield Hills situation in 2022.
'Evidence (from cases such as Bloomfield Hills) points to racial discrimination as a clear contributor to racial and ethnic health disparities among African American populations,' including higher death rates, Nesbitt concluded.
This is applicable to adults of color as well.
Legal disrespect for Black Americans extends even to how the law itself is cited by lawyers and judges. According to the Citing Slavery Project, founded and led by Justin Simard, an associate professor of law at Michigan State University, much of American property law is based on slavery cases from the 1800s. The American legal system has unashamedly used slaveholders' claims of property rights in Black people as a basis for the development of property law in this country, and continues to use slave-related cases as legal precedent, pointing to how insensitive our courts are to the suffering of African Americans and the impact of institutional racism. Again: no rights, no respect.
Nevertheless, there are glimmers of hope.
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in April 2024 on a case similar to DeSheila Howlett's lawsuit against Warren. In that lawsuit, Sgt. Jatonya Muldrow, a Black woman, sued the St. Louis police department for discrimination against her on the basis of her gender, after an involuntary job transfer that involved changes in working hours, overtime opportunities and working attire.
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit ruled that Muldrow's job transfer was not a 'materially significant disadvantage' to her. Yet, the extremely conservative U.S. Supreme Court decided 9-0 in Sgt. Muldrow's favor.
The court ruled that the Black female officer was clearly targeted for mistreatment and the harm she suffered did not have to be 'significant,' as the lower courts had mistakenly ruled.
Justice Elena Kagan, writing for the majority, noted that in similar cases, such claims were 'rejected solely because courts rewrote Title VII, compelling workers to make a showing that the statutory text does not require.'
Established law, namely Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, not political posturing, should be the standard in the relentless fight against discrimination. Anything less constitutes rogue law, which Trump is now trying to establish through his executive orders addressing civil rights.
If Roger Taney had brought a solid interpretation of the Constitution, as written, to the Dred Scott decision, his reckless lurch toward 'no rights' and 'no respect' for Black citizens could have been avoided.
Our judges and elected leaders today should avoid following the rogue example of Taney and stick to the legislative intent of civil rights statutes enacted by our state and federal legislatures.
Leonard Mungo is owner of Mungo & Mungo at Law PLC, which specializes in employment and civil rights law. He is also general counsel for the National Black State Troopers Coalition.
This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: Trump memo freezing civil rights lawsuits is dangerous | Opinion
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
7 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
The Latest: The White House defends its massive bombing campaign against Iran
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told ABC News on Monday morning that Iran was an 'imminent threat' and that President Donald Trump is the 'first president with the guts to actually do something about it.' She was definitive about the outcome of U.S. strikes, saying they 'took away Iran's ability to create a nuclear bomb.' Over the weekend, American stealth bombers, fighter jets and a submarine struck Iran with bombs and missiles - joining Israel's attempt to wipe out Iran's nuclear program. 'The president was just simply raising a question that I think many people around the world are asking,' she told reporters on Monday morning. She added, 'if they refuse to engage in diplomacy moving forward, why shouldn't the Iranian people rise up against this brutal terrorist regime?' Trump's bombardment of three sites in Iran quickly sparked debate in Congress over his authority to launch the strikes, with Republicans praising Trump for decisive action even as many Democrats warned he should have sought congressional approval. 'We did make bipartisan calls,' Leavitt told Fox News. She said House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries 'couldn't be reached.' Traditionally, there are bipartisan briefings for congressional leaders, even for classified missions. Leavitt insisted the White House was 'not obligated to tell anybody' about the plans but 'we gave these calls as a courtesy.' Pakistan condemns Trump shortly after nominating him for Nobel Pakistan condemned U.S. President Donald Trump for bombing Iran, less than 24 hours after saying he deserved a Nobel Peace Prize for defusing a recent crisis with India. Relations between the two South Asian countries plummeted after a massacre of tourists in Indian-controlled Kashmir in April. The nuclear-armed rivals stepped closer to war in the weeks that followed, attacking each other until intense diplomatic efforts, led by the U.S., resulted in a truce for which Trump took credit.
Associated Press
8 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Crypto Fervor Is Growing, But Some Remain Cautious - Place Your Bets Either Way With LMBO Or REKT
By Kyle Anthony, Benzinga DETROIT, MICHIGAN - June 23, 2025 ( NEWMEDIAWIRE ) - For many crypto enthusiasts, Donald Trump's re-election as president of the United States is a watershed moment for the cryptocurrency industry, given his stated proposals. For them, the Trump administration represents a promise of regulator clarity; an element that they may argue was absent in the previous administration. Beginning with financial oversight, Trump has appointed former Securities and Exchange Commissioner Paul S. Atkins to lead the agency once more. Atkins replaced the outgoing commissioner, Gary Gensler, a noted critic and perceived adversary of the cryptocurrency industry. From a policy standpoint, two critical bills, the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act (FIT21) and the Bitcoin Strategic Reserve Act, look poised to transform the cryptocurrency landscape. FIT21 seeks to establish a clear regulatory framework for digital assets by classifying tokens as digital assets or commodities. The main feature of this bill is that it bifurcates regulatory oversight between the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), where the former must regulate a digital asset as a commodity if the blockchain, or digital ledger, on which it runs is functional and decentralized. Conversely, the latter will regulate a digital asset as a security if its associated blockchain is functional but not decentralized. Furthermore, as President Trump mentioned during his campaigning, the Bitcoin Strategic Reserve Act could potentially establish a national reserve for Bitcoin, boosting its legitimacy and global recognition. If passed, it could encourage other nations to adopt similar policies. Submitted to Congress on July 31, 2024, and currently under Senate Banking Committee review, Trump seems well-positioned to advance this bill. Several U.S. states have also proposed Bitcoin reserve legislation, signaling that Bitcoin as a strategic reserve may become a reality in 2025. With the Republican party having a majority in Congress, albeit small, it is anticipated by many that there will be little resistance to passing the above-mentioned bills or enacting any policy President Trump deems necessary to his agenda. Finally, under the new Trump administration, relaxed application of the Howey Test – a framework set by the U.S. Supreme Court to determine whether a transaction qualifies as an investment contract and therefore be considered a security – by the SEC could increase approvals for spot crypto ETFs and public listings of crypto companies. Voices Of Caution At the same time, it's always important to maintain caution, and respected publications have in the past warned about shifts from rags to riches back to rags often occurring within a matter of weeks. Thus far, the hope of potential changes in cryptocurrency regulation has led to a rally in prices for various cryptocurrencies but has also opened the door for opportunism. Preceding his inauguration, President Trump and his wife launched meme coins – cryptocurrencies often inspired by internet memes or trends – a move some industry onlookers view as a cash grab, which undermines the legitimacy of digital assets in the public sphere. The increasing sentiment towards cryptocurrencies following the November 2024 election has resulted in Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies rising based on the expectation of regulatory change; however, if said change does not materialize, a broad market sell-off is also possible. Of President Trump's flurry of executive orders and proclamations on inauguration day, none pertained to cryptocurrency regulation. With momentum building around cryptocurrency policy, if it does not materialize meaningfully, there is a growing possibility of a correction. Geoff Kendrick, global head of Digital Assets Research at Standard Chartered Bank, noted the possibility of a 10-20% sell-off if no meaningful policy change is implemented. Gaining Comprehensive Exposure To The Crypto Industry With Direxion For investors looking to gain comprehensive exposure to the crypto industry, Direxion's Daily Crypto Industry Bull 2X and Bear 1X Shares – (ARCA: LMBO) and (ARCA: REKT), respectively – offer enhanced, pure-play exposure to U.S.-listed securities that have business operations in the field of distributed ledger or decentralized payment technology, which includes the following business fields: blockchain technology, non-fungible tokens, decentralized finance and digital asset mining hardware. These leveraged ETFs are designed to emulate the daily performance of the Solactive Distributed Ledger & Decentralized Payment Tech Index, enabling investors to gain exposure to the index's movements with returns of 300% on its rise or 100% of the inverse. It is important to note that these solutions are intended to take advantage of short-term trends and should not be held for more than a day. Whether bullish or bearish on the crypto industry, these ETFs can help traders easily engage with the industry's growth patterns. However, it's crucial to approach these leveraged products with a clear understanding of their risks. While the amplified exposure can translate to significant gains, it can also lead to substantial losses. These ETFs are best suited for those who can actively manage the inherent risks of leverage and are looking to capitalize on short-term trends occurring with the firm. Learn more about both ETFs on Direxion's website here. Featured photo by Traxer on Unsplash. This post contains sponsored content. This content is for informational purposes only and is not intended to be investing advice. This content was originally published on Benzinga. Read further disclosures here. An investor should carefully consider a Fund's investment objective, risks, charges, and expenses before investing. A Fund's prospectus and summary prospectus contain this and other information about the Direxion Shares. To obtain a Fund's prospectus and summary prospectus call 866-476-7523 or visit our website at A Fund's prospectus and summary prospectus should be read carefully before investing. Leveraged and Inverse ETFs pursue daily leveraged investment objectives which means they are riskier than alternatives which do not use leverage. They seek daily goals and should not be expected to track the underlying index over periods longer than one day. They are not suitable for all investors and should be utilized only by sophisticated investors who understand leverage risk and who actively manage their investments. The Solactive Distributed Ledger & Decentralized Payment Tech Index (SOLDLDPT) seeks to track the performance of US-listed securities that have business operations in the field of distributed ledger or decentralized payment technology, which includes the following business fields: blockchain technology, non-fungible tokens, decentralized finance, and digital asset mining hardware. One cannot invest directly in an index. Solactive AG is not a sponsor of, or in any way affiliated with, the Direxion Daily Crypto Industry Bull 2X Shares or Direxion Daily Crypto Industry Bear 1X Shares. Direxion Shares Risks – An investment in a Fund involves risk, including the possible loss of principal. A Fund is non-diversified and includes risks associated with the Fund's concentrating its investments in a particular industry, sector, or geography which can increase volatility. The use of derivatives such as futures contracts and swaps are subject to market risks that may cause prices to fluctuate over time. Leverage Risk – The Bull Fund obtains investment exposure in excess of its net assets by utilizing leverage and may lose more money in market conditions that are adverse to its investment objective than a fund that does not utilize leverage. A total loss may occur in a single day. Leverage will also have the effect of magnifying any differences in the Fund's correlation with the Index and may increase the volatility of the Fund. Daily Index Correlation Risk – A number of factors may affect the Bull Fund's ability to achieve a high degree of correlation with the Index and therefore achieve its daily leveraged investment objective. The Bull Fund's exposure to the Index is impacted by the Index's movement. Because of this, it is unlikely that the Bull Fund will be perfectly exposed to the Index at the end of each day. The possibility of the Bull Fund being materially over- or under-exposed to the Index increases on days when the Index is volatile near the close of the trading day. Daily Inverse Index Correlation Risk – A number of factors may affect the Bear Fund's ability to achieve a high degree of inverse correlation with the Index and therefore achieve its daily inverse leveraged investment objective. The Bear Fund's exposure to the Index is impacted by the Index's movement. Because of this, it is unlikely that the Bear Fund will be perfectly exposed to the Index at the end of each day. The possibility of the Bear Fund being materially over- or under-exposed to the Index increases on days when the Index is volatile near the close of the trading day. Crypto Industry Investing Risk — Companies in the crypto industry are subject to various risks, including the inability to develop digital asset applications or to capitalize on those applications, theft, loss, or destruction of cryptographic keys, the possibility that digital asset technologies may never be fully implemented, cybersecurity risk, conflicting intellectual property claims, and inconsistent and changing regulations. Information Technology Sector Risk — The value of stocks of information technology companies and companies that rely heavily on technology is particularly vulnerable to rapid changes in technology product cycles, rapid product obsolescence, government regulation, and competition, both domestically and internationally, including competition from competitors with lower production costs. Financials Sector Risk — Performance of companies in the financials sector may be materially impacted by many factors, including but not limited to, government regulations, economic conditions, credit rating downgrades, changes in interest rates, and decreased liquidity in credit markets. Additional risks of each Fund include Effects of Compounding and Market Volatility Risk, Market Risk, Counterparty Risk, Rebalancing Risk, Intra-Day Investment Risk, Other Investment Companies (including ETFs Risk), Cash Transaction Risk, Passive Investment and Index Performance Risk and for the Direxion Daily Crypto Industry Bear 1X Shares, Shorting or Inverse Risk. Please see the summary and full prospectuses for a more complete description of these and other risks of a Fund. ALPS Distributors, Inc. View the original release on
Washington Post
11 minutes ago
- Washington Post
The Latest: The White House defends its massive bombing campaign against Iran
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told ABC News on Monday morning that Iran was an 'imminent threat' and that President Donald Trump is the 'first president with the guts to actually do something about it.' She was definitive about the outcome of U.S. strikes, saying they 'took away Iran's ability to create a nuclear bomb.' Over the weekend, American stealth bombers, fighter jets and a submarine struck Iran with bombs and missiles - joining Israel's attempt to wipe out Iran's nuclear program.
