Only 5% of students in medical schools from lowest socio-economic group
Only a fraction of medical students are from working class backgrounds despite efforts to widen access to the profession, a report has suggested.
A small number of schools and colleges produce a high number of applicants to medical school, according to research by the Sutton Trust.
Applicants from private schools were 1.5 times more likely to receive an offer to study medicine compared to those from non-selective state schools, the study suggested.
The report, which includes an analysis of nearly 94,000 applicants in England to UK medical schools between 2012 and 2022, found just 5% of entrants were from the lowest socio-economic group in 2021.
In contrast, 75% of entrants to medical schools were from higher socio-economic backgrounds in 2021, according to the research.
While still low, the proportion of those from lower socio-economic backgrounds has doubled since 2012, the report said.
The study used the National Statistics Socio-economic Classification (NS-SEC) groupings of parental occupation to determine the socio-economic status of applicants.
Applicants from lower and intermediate socio-economic backgrounds were 'less likely' to get an offer than their better-off peers, according to the report which included an analysis by University College London (UCL) academics.
The study found that a 'major factor' in this was prior educational attainment, as these students had, on average, lower GCSEs, predicted A-levels, and lower results on the University Clinical Aptitude Test (Ucat) for medical schools.
The Ucat test may be a 'barrier' for those from worse-off homes, according to the Sutton Trust report.
Standard entry A-level requirements range from AAA to A*A*A in all medical schools bar one – with one of the new medical schools asking for AAB.
But the report found that most medical schools now give some kind of contextual offer for applicants from under-represented backgrounds – and an increasing number have introduced alternative entry routes to medicine.
Seventeen medical schools have 'gateway' courses – which have lower grade requirements for eligible applicants and an additional foundation year before the standard medical school programme.
The lowest contextual offers at some medical schools is BBB for participants in their own access to medicine programmes, according to the research.
Of the 2,719 schools or colleges that put forward any medical applicants between 2012 and 2022, the study found that the majority (80%) had few students applying for medicine – at five or fewer per year.
But 58 schools or colleges – comprising just 2% of all institutions – had an average of 20 or more applicants per year.
One had more than 850 applicants over the 10-year period – an average of 85 applicants per year.
Even after adjusting statistically for their exam grades, socio-economic status and other demographic factors, private school applicants had higher odds of receiving an offer than those from non-selective state schools, the report said.
The charity is calling for the Government to prioritise medical schools with a successful, widening participation record in any expansion of spaces to improve the socio-economic mix of students.
Medical schools should be properly resourced to fully support students from lower socio-economic backgrounds and they should make more ambitious use of contextual offers and review their use of Ucat in admissions, it added.
Nick Harrison, chief executive of the Sutton Trust, said: 'It's outrageous that working-class kids make up just 5% of medical students, especially when the NHS is facing a chronic shortage of doctors and a heavy reliance on overseas recruitment.
'The medical profession is stretched to breaking point, and urgent action is needed to widen access and create a more diverse pipeline of talent from all parts of society.
'Patients benefit from doctors who reflect the diversity of the communities they serve, but it's clear that we're a long way from that today.
'If you have the ability, where you grow up or your parents' income shouldn't be a barrier to becoming a doctor.
'Working-class entry into medicine is in a critical condition. The profession urgently needs a shot of equality.'
Professor Katherine Woolf, professor of medical education research at UCL Medical School, said: 'Despite the many changes medical schools have made over the past decade to improve access to the profession, our research has shown low prior attainment remained a major barrier to many aspiring doctors from the poorest backgrounds.
'Providing enough doctors to meet the country's needs will require better support for future doctors, especially those from disadvantaged backgrounds.
'This support is needed at all stages of a doctor's career: from school, before and during application to medical school, and throughout the many years of medical education and training that are essential to practise as a doctor.'
Ohemaa Asare, British Medical Association (BMA) medical students committee deputy co-chair (widening participation), said: 'These results are hugely disappointing but unfortunately not surprising as there is still a very long way to go to ensuring medicine is more accessible to students from underrepresented or disadvantaged backgrounds.
'It is such a shame that there are many aspiring and talented doctors of the future who could make a valuable contribution to medicine and the NHS but are being hindered by many hidden barriers.'
Clare Owen, director of education at the Medical Schools Council (MSC), said medical schools have made 'significant progress' in widening participation over the past decade.
She said: 'Entrants from deprived areas have doubled to 14%, and state school representation has risen from 47% to 54%. Meanwhile, independent school acceptances have dropped from 29% to 24%.
'However as noted in the Sutton Trust study, students from lower-socio-economic backgrounds still face challenges.'
A recent report outlined the MSC's action plan to address such barriers, including: developing targeted widening participation programmes and exploring the potential of contextual admissions.
Ms Owen added: 'By 2032, medical schools aim to have 33% of students from disadvantaged backgrounds, representing almost 6,000 students annually.
'Achieving this goal will require a sector-wide effort, and we look forward to working closely with the Sutton Trust and other key stakeholders to improve access to the medical profession.'
A Government spokesperson said: 'While we inherited an education system with a number of baked-in inequalities, our ambitious Plan for Change sets out our clear mission to break the link between background and success.
'We will act to address the persistent gaps for different student groups and to break down the barriers to opportunity.
'While we have announced a 3.1% increase in loans for living costs for 2025/26, it's vital that all HE providers play a strong role in expanding access and improving outcomes for disadvantaged students.
'This Government is committed to growing our own homegrown talent, and training thousands more doctors.
'We will work with partners including NHS England and the university sector to ensure that everyone has an opportunity to study medicine – regardless of their background.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
12 hours ago
- Metro
This is why it seems like everyone has ADHD right now — including you
It might seem like 'everyone has ADHD right now' – but that couldn't be further from the truth (Picture: Metro) Opening up to a friend after I was diagnosed with ADHD, I voiced my struggles with time blindness, lateness, general disorganisation, and emotional dysregulation. 'But isn't it normal to get a little bit distracted sometimes? I probably have ADHD too, if that's the case' she said to me. My heart sank, feeling both rejected and my life experiences diminished in one simple interaction. I doubt she meant to upset me, but her words stung. There's an increasing perception that having ADHD is becoming a 'trend' or a 'personality quirk.' Just like OCD has been carelessly thrown about as being neat and tidy, ADHD is starting to become synonymous with making seemingly normal, harmless mistakes like misplacing a purse, or being 10 minutes late to a coffee date. As soon as I first read about ADHD in women, I knew that I had it. I once lost my house keys and paid my landlord for another set, only to find them wedged down the back of the sofa when I moved out. I also impulsively switched subjects during my GCSEs, A Levels and university; I had my library card revoked at the age of 10 after I failed to return the books I'd borrowed, and I'd spent my whole life feeling that my brain was simply a little bit different. So, does everyone really have ADHD now? Or are we just being equipped with the tools to navigate our own brains, and connecting with a like-minded community in the process? Have ADHD diagnoses increased in the last few years? In 2023, a study from UCL found that the number of people being diagnosed with ADHD has increased over the last 20 years, but this doesn't mean that 'everyone' has it now. Between 2000 and 2018, there was a twenty-fold increase in ADHD diagnoses, rising to almost fifty-fold in ADHD prescriptions issued to men aged 18-29. Largely owing to medical misogyny that favours research into symptoms in men and boys, women are still largely going undetected: the ADHD Foundation estimates that between 50 and 70% of the 1,000,000 women in the UK living with ADHD are undiagnosed. There might've been an increase in people seeking help for ADHD in recent years, but that doesn't mean that the condition is becoming more common. It still only impacts between 2% and 6% of the world's population. ADHD impacts between 2% and 6% of the population (Picture: Getty Images) Likewise, a 2025 review from King's College London looked at 40 studies across 17 countries and concluded that the prevalence of ADHD (AKA, the number of people living with a condition within a specific timeframe) hasn't increased since 2020. The author, Dr Alex Martin, noted that while much of the media has been concerned about a 'surge' in ADHD diagnoses, both 'assessments and help-seeking' are snowballing – which goes some way towards explaining why it might feel like more people have it now. There are also multiple barriers to diagnosis, including excessive NHS waiting times (as long as eight years in some parts of the UK), and the hefty cost of a private diagnosis, which averages out at £1,200 for adults. For many, self-diagnosis is their only option – and that's valid. Meeting the threshold for diagnosis Getting an ADHD diagnosis isn't an easy task, and psychiatrists certainly aren't handing them out like they're lollipops. To qualify, adults need to align with at least five symptoms on the DSM-5, the framework that's used to detect it. As psychologist and clinical director Dr Angela Pickering tells Metro, various symptoms of ADHD might seem relatable to the general non-neurodivergent public. But what differentiates these symptoms between being a normal part of life and being suggestive of neurodiversity is the frequency with which they happen and how debilitating they are. 'The key difference is that for someone with ADHD, these symptoms are persistent, pervasive and significantly impact their ability to function in daily life, across multiple settings such as work, school and relationships,' Dr Angela explains. ADHD isn't just being 'scatterbrained' or 'disorganised': in Angela's words, it's a 'neurodevelopmental condition rooted in differences in brain structure and function.' And so, a diagnosis doesn't just require checking off a few traits, but a 'detailed evaluation to understand the full context of a person's life and challenges.' As part of an ADHD assessment, psychiatrists will look at the pattern, intensity, and consistency of symptoms over time, even going as far as to ask a parent or family member to testify that their loved one's symptoms have longevity and started before the age of 12. When I was diagnosed in November 2021, I asked my mum to fill out the forms for me. Thankfully, she was able to recall with colour the school reports that were constantly telling me I was bright but needed to pay attention to detail and listen more; the eye tics that saw me blinking multiple times in a row, and my persistently hyperactive nature. I used to enjoy talking so much that I'd ask my parents if I could read my book aloud to them; my room was almost never tidy, and I had trouble paying attention in the classroom, often doodling into the line margins of my exercise books. So at the age of 23, I almost cried when I heard the words: 'you have combined ADHD' from my psychiatrist, as in one short moment, years of suffering were validated. Thankfully, I'd been able to skip the lengthy NHS waiting queue and had the cost of my private diagnosis funded through Right to Choose, so I was diagnosed within a matter of months, rather than years. Do you have ADHD, or is modern life just overwhelming? The reality is that, in the modern world, many of us will be feeling burnt out and overwhelmed by information. So, is it any surprise that we're increasingly distractible? As Dr Andrea explains: 'There's certainly growing evidence that people feel their environment – especially constant exposure to digital devices, social media and multitasking – can reduce attention spans and increase distractibility, even in people without ADHD.' With this in mind, the 'human brain simply didn't evolve to handle the level of information and stimulation we now face daily.' 'But while modern life can make anyone feel distracted, ADHD is a neurodevelopmental condition with symptoms that are consistent, long-standing and impairing across multiple areas of life,' she reminds us. So, whenever I hear people trivialising ADHD, I can't help but feel angry. It's not a quirky personality trait: it's an incredibly debilitating condition, and it's exhausting navigating a world designed by and for neurotypical people. ADHD isn't just losing your wallet or being a little bit 'scatty': it's so much more than that. Neurodiversity is finally in the limelight, and with awareness increasing, so many more people are sharing their stories. No doubt, it's saving lives. But the truth is that awareness without understanding is useless, and to suggest that 'everyone has it' diminishes the experiences of those who actually live with it. And no, it's not a 'superpower.' You don't have ADHD if you just forget your keys sometimes; you're probably just a regular human being living in an increasingly hectic world. Do you have a story to share? Get in touch by emailing MetroLifestyleTeam@ Arrow MORE: I'm desperate to lose my virginity but have a panic attack whenever I come close Arrow MORE: Video games are great for my mental and physical wellbeing – Reader's Feature Arrow MORE: Heston Blumenthal reveals touching wish after emotional moment with son
Telegraph
a day ago
- Telegraph
NHS survey overstates mental health crisis in children, say experts
A leading consultant has criticised official data that claims that more than one in five school children has mental health problems as 'nuts' and 'pernicious'. A new report by the Department for Education on the rise in pupils not attending school links it to increased levels of mental illness among young people. It cites NHS data showing that 21 per cent of children aged eight to 16 have a 'probable mental health problem'. The figure has been widely publicised and is part of the justification for the government's policy to put councillors in every secondary school. But experts warn that the calculation is based on 'subjective' questionnaire data and could be exaggerating the prevalence of mental health issues among young people. The Strengths and Difficulties survey used in the NHS data gives children multiple choice questions on their emotional state, concentration levels, conduct and relationships to assess their mental wellbeing. Pupils are asked questions such as: 'Have you recently felt capable of making decisions about things?'; 'Have you recently felt that you are playing a useful part in things?' and 'Do you sometimes feel anxious in certain situations?'. Response options are 'not true', 'somewhat true', or 'certainly true'. Children who score 17 or above out of 40 are recorded as having 'probable mental health problems'. However, Professor Dr Joanna Moncrieff, an academic at University College London and a practising psychiatrist for the NHS, has questioned the method and the labelling of children as mentally ill. 'Anyone scoring above the average in this survey is deemed to have a probable mental health problem – I mean that's nuts,' she told The Telegraph. 'It is a really good illustration of how misleading this whole mental health debate can be. Saying that the reason children are not going to school is because of mental health problems is oversimplifying to the extent that you are not saying anything. By saying it is a mental health problem, you think you've explained it, but you really haven't.' Dennis Hayes, a professor of education at Derby University and co-author of The Dangerous Rise of Therapeutic Education, described the data method as 'shoddy' and 'crude'. 'It is as bad as the little questionnaires in OKAY magazine,' he said. 'I went through some of those questions. One is 'do you sometimes feel anxious in certain situations?' Yes, all the time! So, I don't think this is the way to proceed.' Prof Hayes said children and adults are being taught to see normal anxieties as ' mental health problems '. 'Multiple choice surveys merely confirm a cultural belief that we are all unwell,' he said. 'It's a terrible and destructive thing. It creates introverted children and young people who can't cope.' Prof Moncrieff said labelling children can limit them: 'People think they've found an explanation, but they haven't; they have just acquired a label and labels can be really pernicious because they limit you,' she said. 'You think 'I have this thing, therefore I can't possibly do this and I can't possibly do that'. It is really worrying.' Another academic, Frank Furedi, emeritus professor of sociology at the University of Kent, argued that children who registered concern about their lives, or the state of the world, were not necessarily exhibiting signs of mental illness. 'What used to be called problems of life, problems of existence, are now framed in the language of psychology, and we tend to medicalise our personal problems,' he said. 'So, we no longer have shy people; we have people with social phobia. We no longer have kids who are just very energetic; we have ADHD. We are inciting young people to feel unwell. To me, the mental health industry is actually complicit in creating a mental health problem.' Long waiting lists Concerns have also been raised that the data method, and others like it, could be leading to a crisis in the already overstretched Children and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS), leaving referrals with the most serious mental health conditions stuck on long waiting lists. Almost one million children and young people had active referrals for CAMHS in England, figures from 2022-23 show. A third were on waiting lists, while 40 per cent had their referral closed before accessing support. Nearly 40,000 children experienced waits of at least two years. The most common reason for a referral for mental health treatment was cited as anxiety. 'I don't work with children, but we have quite a lot of young people coming through from CAMHS and we are absolutely overwhelmed with referrals,' said Prof Moncrieff. 'I would say anecdotally that there are people coming through who are less unwell (than in the past). Then we have the whole question of how we help; is it really helpful or might it be harmful? I don't think it is a good thing for lots of people to be on antidepressants or other forms of drug treatment.' Bridget Phillipson, the Education Secretary, has pledged to provide school counsellors in all secondary schools in England. Campaigners say this does not go far enough and want mental health professionals at primary level too. But Prof Moncrieff said the move could have unintended negative consequences. 'The worry is that they could end up identifying and labelling more kids and sending them off to CAMHS,' she said. 'The best case scenario is counsellors reduce the need because pupils have someone to talk to and that helps. But I do worry that we have such a mental health-obsessed culture now that most people think they are doing the right thing by labelling children and referring them.'
Daily Mail
4 days ago
- Daily Mail
Experts pinpoint simple mindset change that could slash the risk of early dementia
Staying positive can cut the risk of memory loss in middle age, a major study suggests. Researchers tracked more than 10,000 people aged over 50 and found those with higher levels of wellbeing were more likely to have better scores on memory tests. They also reported a greater sense of control, independence and freedom to make choices than other people. While the link was small, researchers suggested it was significant. Co-author Joshua Stott, professor of ageing and clinical psychology at University College London, said: 'This study represents an important step toward understanding the interplay between wellbeing and memory over time. 'It offers new insights into how self-rated wellbeing is associated with memory and vice versa. 'While our findings are preliminary, they highlight the importance of considering psychosocial influences on brain health such as memory.' The study, published in the journal Aging & Mental Health, tracked 10,760 men and women aged over 50. They were assessed on wellbeing and memory every two years – a total of nine times during the 16-year study period, starting in 2002. Researchers checked people's ability to learn and recall ten words immediately and after a delay. Wellbeing was also assessed using a quality-of-life questionnaire, looking at areas such as pleasure, control and autonomy. Questions people were asked included the phrases: 'I can do the things that I want to do', and 'I feel that life is full of opportunities'. The study found a small but significant association between higher wellbeing and better memory, which still existed even after any depression was taken into account. The researchers suggested reasons why wellbeing may have a positive impact on memory, such as people may be more likely to exercise, which improves health. Age, gender, other lifestyle factors and socioeconomic status may also have a negative or positive impact on wellbeing and memory, they added. The authors found no evidence that it was poor memory causing low wellbeing in some people, but they stressed this could not be ruled out. The research was funded by Alzheimer's Research UK and others, including the Medical Research Council. Emma Taylor, information services manager at Alzheimer's Research UK, said: 'Loving your heart, staying sharp and keeping connected are key to protecting our brain health as we age. 'There are 14 established health and lifestyle risk factors for dementia, including lack of physical exercise, social isolation, and depression, which are linked to wellbeing. 'This study found that people over 50 who reported they felt happier and more fulfilled in life had a better memory over time. 'However, this research is observational – and more work is needed to understand how a positive wellbeing and memory are connected and whether this has a knock-on effect on dementia risk. 'Looking after our mental wellbeing plays an important part in our overall health. 'And it's never too late to start taking steps to keep our brains healthy throughout our lives and lessen the devastating impact of dementia.' Study co-author Dr Emily Willroth, assistant professor of psychological and brain sciences at Washington University in St Louis, Missouri, said: 'Going forwards it would be fantastic if this research can build on the foundations of ongoing memory research to potentially inform strategies supporting cognitive health in ageing populations – that is the aim.'
