National DigiFoundry and Mizzle Launch Innovation Sandbox for Blockchain, AI, and Web3 Research
San Antonio, TX March 27, 2025 --( PR.com)-- The National DigiFoundry (NDF), a National Science Foundation-funded technology incubator driving blockchain innovation across critical sectors, today announced a strategic partnership with Mizzle, a decentralized cloud infrastructure and AI platform. Together, NDF and Mizzle will deploy a global decentralized innovation sandbox, enabling NDF members to test, build, and scale next-generation digital asset technologies in a secure, scalable, and sovereign environment.
This collaboration creates a first-of-its-kind testbed for academic researchers, government technologists, and industry innovators exploring the frontiers of blockchain, artificial intelligence (AI), decentralized computing, and Web3 applications. Hosted on Mizzle's robust, infrastructure, the sandbox offers unparalleled access to composable tools, cloud resources, and compute power designed for experimentation and commercialization.
'As a NSF-funded technology incubator, NDF is at the forefront of blockchain-driven advancements that impact critical industries, including healthcare, advanced manufacturing, supply chain management, energy, transportation, dynamic contracting, and Web 3.0-related services,' said Kevin Jackson, National DigiFoundry Operations Executive. 'Mizzle accelerates our mission to deploy transformative technologies into the federal government. The NDF is now well positioned to play a significant role in advancing the US Blockchain Roadmap.'
Scalable, Secure, and Sovereign Digital Applications, Built on Decentralization
The Mizzle-powered sandbox offers:
• Decentralized Cloud Compute & Storage: Distributed infrastructure for permissionless hosting, deployment, and scaling.
• Blockchain Development Toolkits: Support for Ethereum-compatible smart contracts, zero-knowledge proofs, and on-chain AI models.
• Federated Learning & Edge AI: Privacy-preserving machine learning pipelines running across geographies and nodes.
• Multicloud Interoperability: Integration with leading providers including AWS, Google Cloud, Azure, Oracle, and Mizzle-native clusters.
• Tokenization & Digital Asset Frameworks: Resources to develop and test token economies, NFT platforms, and dynamic digital identities.
• Cybersecurity & Compliance Modules: Built-in tools for data governance, access control, and auditability across jurisdictional boundaries.
'Mizzle's infrastructure ensures that experimentation and deployment are resilient, scalable, and compliant with the decentralized ethos of Web3 and the operational requirements of real-world applications,' says Arjun Mishra, Founder & Director at Mizzle.
Catalyzing the Next Wave of Digital Transformation
This partnership builds on recent milestones in NDF's mission. In a landmark development, the University of Texas at San Antonio (UTSA) was awarded an Early-Concept Grants for Exploratory Research (EAGER) grant by the NSF to explore blockchain's role in boosting government efficiency and reducing operational costs.
'This is about more than technology—it's about enabling meaningful digital transformation across public and private sectors,' added Jackson. 'With Mizzle, we're laying the groundwork for an inclusive, decentralized digital economy rooted in open science, trustworthy data, and dynamic autonomy.'
By integrating real-world challenges and future-facing technologies, NDF and Mizzle aim to redefine how digital infrastructure is built, governed, and used—from smart energy systems to AI-powered supply chains and beyond. Join the digital asset revolution by completing a membership form at https://www.DigiFoundry.org/register/.
About National DigiFoundry
The National DigiFoundry (NDF) is a National Science Foundation-funded technology incubator advancing the research, development, and deployment of secure, interoperable blockchain and digital asset technologies. NDF convenes a national network of academic, industry, and government partners to accelerate innovation across key sectors of the digital economy.
About Mizzle
Mizzle is a decentralized, AI-enabled infrastructure provider that powers trustless cloud computing and Web3-native development. By offering programmable, distributed resources and next-generation tooling, Mizzle empowers builders and researchers to create scalable, secure, and sovereign digital applications.
National DigiFoundry
Kevin Jackson
571-294-1020
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
15 hours ago
- Miami Herald
What Trump's Strikes on Iran Mean for Gas Prices As Oil Costs Surge
Amid the conflict between Israel and Iran, oil prices have been surging, and after President Donald Trump announced on Saturday the U.S. would be joining the attack on Iran's nuclear sites, concern has been raised over what this means for gas prices in America. The U.S. dropped bombs on Iran's three main nuclear sites on Saturday night—Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan—escalating fears of an expansion of the Middle Eastern conflict that could throw the oil market into turmoil. With much of the West already seeing spikes in costs, further increases could be looming as the conflict continues. After the U.S. attack, the Iran's reaction will reveal whether the conflict could develop into a major regional or even international conflict. Iran may retaliate against U.S. forces in the region, cut off a global oil supply route or try to accelerate its nuclear program. Although, Trump has warned of further military action if Tehran does not now decide to make peace. In the past week, Brent Crude oil stocks have already jumped 11 percent since Israel attacked Iran and is expected to continue rising on Monday, according to Emirati newspaper Gulf News, although prices have been fluctuating. The oil market had stabilized on Friday, according to Reuters, after the U.S. imposed new Iran-related sanctions, which fueled hopes that a negotiated agreement could be made between the two countries. That relief in the market was only temporary as after Iran threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz, the world's most important oil chokepoint, in response to the U.S. strikes. Fears that Iran could attack U.S. oil infrastructure in the region, and levy its power over the Straits of Hormuz could "combine to make prices and speculation rise about the security and dependability of supply," Greg Kennedy, director of the Economic Conflict and Competition Research Group at King's College London told Newsweek. "Lack of clarity of how long this condition will last will also lead to hoarding or preemptive purchasing by other nations, so there are competition supply fears that will drive up prices," he added. Reflecting on the knock-on effect this would have on U.S. gas prices, Kennedy said that in the long term, the conflict "will most certainly see energy prices go up at the pumps." "This is not an act that just stays in the Gulf region, it has wider global strategic ripples," he said. Kennedy said that higher oil prices could also mean that Russia is able to gain more money—oil from the Urals region has already increased by 26 percent in the past month. "This is making war in Ukraine last longer now as well as it gives [President Vladimir] Putin both political and economic ammunition to continue his war efforts and avoid the need for peace talks." Greg Kennedy, director of the Economic Conflict and Competition Research Group at King's College London told Newsweek: "The overall impact of actions that make the world look even less safe than it was previously was is always a cost to the civilian sector and society as a whole." As the conflict, and its repercussions, continue to unfold in the next few days, it will become more clear how significant the prices hikes will be. Related Articles Donald Trump Warns Iran Against 'Any Retaliation' After US Strikes: Live UpdatesExclusive: Hezbollah Says It Won't Join Fight After US Attacks IranTrump Warns Iran To Make Peace or Face Further StrikesAOC Says Trump's Iran Strikes 'Clearly Grounds for Impeachment' 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
CNBC
16 hours ago
- CNBC
Oil to open higher as U.S. strikes on Iran boost supply risk premium
Oil is likely to rise by $3 to $5 per barrel when trading resumes on Sunday evening after the U.S. attacked Iran at the weekend, market analysts said, with gains expected to accelerate only if Iran retaliates hard and causes a major oil supply disruption. U.S. President Donald Trump said he had "obliterated" Iran's main nuclear sites in strikes overnight, joining an Israeli assault in an escalation of conflict in the Middle East as Tehran vowed to defend itself. Iran is OPEC's third-largest crude producer. Global oil benchmark Brent crude could gain $3 to $5 per barrel when markets open, SEB analyst Ole Hvalbye said in a note. Brent settled at $77.01 a barrel on Friday and U.S. crude oil at $73.84 a barrel. "An oil price jump is expected," said Jorge Leon, head of geopolitical analysis at Rystad and a former OPEC official. "Even in the absence of immediate retaliation, markets are likely to price in a higher geopolitical risk premium." Crude had settled down on Friday after the U.S. imposed fresh Iran-related sanctions, including on two entities based in Hong Kong, and counter-terrorism-related sanctions, according to a notice posted to the U.S. Treasury Department website. Brent has risen 11% while WTI has gained around 10% since the conflict began on June 13 with Israel targeting Iran's nuclear sites and Iranian missiles hitting buildings in Tel Aviv. Currently stable supply conditions and the availability of spare production capacity among other OPEC members have limited oil's gains. Risk premiums have typically faded when no supply disruptions occurred, said Giovanni Staunovo, analyst at UBS. "The direction of oil prices from here will depend on whether there are supply disruptions — which would likely result in higher prices — or if there is a de-escalation in the conflict, resulting in a fading risk premium," he said. A senior Iranian lawmaker on June 19 said that the country could shut the Strait of Hormuz as a way of hitting back against its enemies, though a second member of parliament said this would only happen if Tehran's vital interests were endangered. About a fifth of the world's total oil consumption passes through the strait. SEB said that any closure of the strait or spillover into other regional producers would "significantly lift" oil prices, but said they saw this scenario as a tail risk rather than a base case given China's reliance on Gulf crude. Ajay Parmar, oil and energy transition analytics director at consultancy ICIS, said it was unlikely Iran would be able to enforce a blockage of the strait for too long. "Most of Iran's oil exports to China pass through this strait and Trump is unlikely to tolerate the inevitable subsequent oil price spike for too long — the diplomatic pressure from the world's two largest economies would also be significant," he said.
Forbes
19 hours ago
- Forbes
Judge Sides With Universities, Blocks NSF's 15% Indirect Cost Cap
A federal judge has blocked the Trump administration from implementing a 15% cap on indirect ... More research costs funded by NSF. A federal judge has granted summary judgment in favor of several universities and higher education organizations that had sued the National Science Foundation over its attempt to limit the reimbursement of indirect costs associated with research grants funded by the agency. In her 52-page ruling on Friday, U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani vacated NSF's recently announced policy of capping its indirect cost payments at a standard rate of 15%, declaring it 'invalid, arbitrary and capricious, and contrary to law.' She also ordered NSF to provide written notice of her decision 'to all funding recipients affected by the 15% Indirect Cost Rate' within 72 hours. The decision represents the latest legal setback for the Trump administration, which has tried — so far unsuccessfully — to impose the 15% cap on grants funded by other federal agencies. U.S. judges have previously blocked similar funding caps at the National Institutes of Health and the Department of Energy, and last week a similar suit was brought against the Department of Defense over its move to impose a 15% cap. A judge issued a temporary restraining order against the DOD cap one day after that suit was filed. The NSF lawsuit was filed on May 5th in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts by 13 research universities and three higher education organizations: the Association of American Universities, the American Council on Education, and the Association of Public and Land-grant Universities. The 13 plaintiff schools were Arizona State University, Brown University, the University of California, California Institute of Technology, Carnegie Mellon University, the University of Chicago, Cornell University, the University of Illinois, MIT, the University of Michigan, the University of Minnesota, the University of Pennsylvania and Princeton University. At issue was a May 2 'policy notice' in which NSF indicated it was capping its indirect cost reimbursement rate at 15% for all new grants and cooperative agreements awarded to university investigators rather than paying a negotiated rate for these support costs as had been its past practice. The negotiated rates typically have exceeded 50% for the plaintiff universities, according to the lawsuit. Indirect costs — also known as facilities and administrative costs — refer to the costs of conducting research that are not attributable to any one investigation. They include items like large-scale computer systems, maintenance of equipment, facility upgrades, the operation of labs, depreciation, employment of support staff, accounting, research compliance, legal expenses, and the salaries of key administrators in charge of an institution's research enterprise. The plaintiffs contended that NSF's policy was unlawful for several reasons, including violations of federal regulations and the Administrative Procedure Act. They argued that 'the Rate Cap Policy exceeds NSF's statutory authority by reimposing, in more severe form, a categorical cap on indirect costs that Congress specifically eliminated in 1965 and has declined to reenact ever since." The government had argued that the policy was necessary to control costs, reduce administrative burdens on institutions and increase the amount of federal funds that could be used to support direct research costs. And it contended that it was legally permitted to set the flat 15% rate. In the end, the judge agreed with the plaintiffs' multiple claims about the illegality of the administration's actions. The government had agreed to voluntarily stay implementation of the 15% cap until June 20, the same day on which Judge Talwani handed down her ruling.
