
Judge Sides With Universities, Blocks NSF's 15% Indirect Cost Cap
A federal judge has blocked the Trump administration from implementing a 15% cap on indirect ... More research costs funded by NSF.
A federal judge has granted summary judgment in favor of several universities and higher education organizations that had sued the National Science Foundation over its attempt to limit the reimbursement of indirect costs associated with research grants funded by the agency.
In her 52-page ruling on Friday, U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani vacated NSF's recently announced policy of capping its indirect cost payments at a standard rate of 15%, declaring it 'invalid, arbitrary and capricious, and contrary to law.' She also ordered NSF to provide written notice of her decision 'to all funding recipients affected by the 15% Indirect Cost Rate' within 72 hours.
The decision represents the latest legal setback for the Trump administration, which has tried — so far unsuccessfully — to impose the 15% cap on grants funded by other federal agencies.
U.S. judges have previously blocked similar funding caps at the National Institutes of Health and the Department of Energy, and last week a similar suit was brought against the Department of Defense over its move to impose a 15% cap. A judge issued a temporary restraining order against the DOD cap one day after that suit was filed.
The NSF lawsuit was filed on May 5th in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts by 13 research universities and three higher education organizations: the Association of American Universities, the American Council on Education, and the Association of Public and Land-grant Universities.
The 13 plaintiff schools were Arizona State University, Brown University, the University of California, California Institute of Technology, Carnegie Mellon University, the University of Chicago, Cornell University, the University of Illinois, MIT, the University of Michigan, the University of Minnesota, the University of Pennsylvania and Princeton University.
At issue was a May 2 'policy notice' in which NSF indicated it was capping its indirect cost reimbursement rate at 15% for all new grants and cooperative agreements awarded to university investigators rather than paying a negotiated rate for these support costs as had been its past practice. The negotiated rates typically have exceeded 50% for the plaintiff universities, according to the lawsuit.
Indirect costs — also known as facilities and administrative costs — refer to the costs of conducting research that are not attributable to any one investigation. They include items like large-scale computer systems, maintenance of equipment, facility upgrades, the operation of labs, depreciation, employment of support staff, accounting, research compliance, legal expenses, and the salaries of key administrators in charge of an institution's research enterprise.
The plaintiffs contended that NSF's policy was unlawful for several reasons, including violations of federal regulations and the Administrative Procedure Act. They argued that 'the Rate Cap Policy exceeds NSF's statutory authority by reimposing, in more severe form, a categorical cap on indirect costs that Congress specifically eliminated in 1965 and has declined to reenact ever since."
The government had argued that the policy was necessary to control costs, reduce administrative burdens on institutions and increase the amount of federal funds that could be used to support direct research costs. And it contended that it was legally permitted to set the flat 15% rate. In the end, the judge agreed with the plaintiffs' multiple claims about the illegality of the administration's actions.
The government had agreed to voluntarily stay implementation of the 15% cap until June 20, the same day on which Judge Talwani handed down her ruling.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
37 minutes ago
- Fox News
Bret Baier: 'All bets are off' if Iran retaliates against US
All times eastern THE CLAMAN COUNTDOWN: POWER PLAYERS Maria Bartiromo's Wall Street FOX News Radio Live Channel Coverage
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What Do Employees Really Want Instead Of Pizza Parties?
'Overworked and underpaid employees don't want pizza parties and team-building exercises,' he said. His eyes looked strained, and I couldn't tell if he had a headache or was exhausted… I guessed both. 'What's wrong with pizza?' I joked, trying to lighten the mood. 'Nothing. I like pizza. But when you're stressed about finances, have to fight for every penny you make, juggle more responsibilities than you have time, and doing everything you can to exceed expectations to the point of burnout… well, what you need is to feel valued, have opportunities for growth, a wage and a title that reflects everything that you're doing, some help, strong support and a good work culture… some freakin' hope… something that has more of a lasting impact than a slice of pizza.' I remained silent. I couldn't decide if I was allowing him more space to think or if I was thinking to myself how much I agreed with him. 'It's almost insulting,' he continued. '99.9% of the time, they act like they don't even recognize our existence, and now they want to throw us a party? No thanks. Having a party is great, but first, let's get your team healthy enough to enjoy it.' He paused. 'They're panhandling a superficial solution to a real problem.' 'And what's the real problem?' I asked. 'They aren't investing in people — they're investing in results. They don't realize that the results will exceed their expectations if you authentically invest in good, hardworking, talented people. Despite the lack of meaningful appreciation and resources, we have a great team. Think what it could be if they added the missing components.' He removed his glasses and wiped his eyes. He stared at me with a tiredness that went well beyond the moment. 'Wouldn't it be nice to have an environment where employees are invested in so much that they could find another job but don't because they love where they work?' he asked. 'That would be nice,' I said. 'What do you think is going to happen?' 'We are woefully under-supported, yet the expectations keep rising. Essentially, we're being set up to fail… either by failing to reach their unattainable bar or by failing our health and family in thinking that we must continue without setting realistic boundaries. Heck, it could end where I cannot meet their increasing expectations, get let go, and cannot even use them as a reference. That would be ridiculous, as I'm a great employee. I feel destined to fail, and that's a horrible feeling.' 'Sounds like fear is playing a role, too,' I said. 'You bet it does! They have me: I am too strapped for time and finances to even look for another job. By the end of the workday, I'm beyond exhausted, have headaches, can't sleep, and am barely present for my family. Yet, I'm doing this for my family. That's messed up. Worst, I actually like my job. Heck, I'm great at it. But who cares? They'd rather put money into hiring other positions and socials than caring for the few doing the bulk of the work. Where does that leave me? Seriously, where? It leaves me angry because I CARE.' I didn't say anything. 'Right… you're lack of response has been my answer for a long time. I can't do a damn thing, and they know it. But you know what?' 'What?' 'Even more than what I know about them, I know me,' he said. 'I've been in much worse situations than this one. I'm accustomed to survival mode. The difference was that I was fighting for something worth the sacrifice. Here, I am fighting to take care of my family in an environment that isn't fighting for me. The sacrifice, as it stands, is not supporting my why… if I am too sick or strained to be available to my family, why am I giving my limited energy to a job that would soon forget me the moment I'm gone?' 'Very true,' I said. 'I have two months of savings in my account. If I quit today, I would have two months to look for a job. Imagine what I could do with two months of actual rest and serenity. Granted, it would be stressful, especially since I'm already familiar with the devil I know. But, as it stands now, eventually, my body will force me to take two months off to recuperate from whatever condition I'm bringing upon myself. So, if I have to be down and out, wouldn't it be better to be down and out to find a job — rested and fed — than sick?' 'Sounds like you lack work-life balance because you fear losing your job if you speak up, fear failing their continued rising expectations, and fear of an eventual health prognosis of keeping your job if nothing changes,' I said. 'I'm afraid either way, I'm going to lose everything,' he said. 'Let's play that out. What if you lost your job today for whatever reason? What horrible thing could happen?' I asked. 'I could have a hard time finding another job due to the economy, I could be forced to sell our home, I would default on some loans, I would….' He stopped. 'I would fail my family.' 'Of all you just said, you didn't mention losing your family,' I said. 'Oh, I would never lose them. They are my life, and I know my wife and kids are always beside me,' he said. 'Always.' 'So, you'll never lose what is most important because you won't lose them, right?' I asked. 'Right,' he said. For the first time, his eyes looked like they had just read a hopeful line in a sad book. 'You're not letting your family down by acknowledging your worth, recognizing where you're most needed, and adjusting accordingly,' I said. 'What are you suggesting?' he asked. 'I would never tell you what to do, as that is between you and your family. I would recommend you take it to prayer with your wife. I would caution you not to allow this to continue for much longer, as you will eventually begin to harbor resentment and anger toward your employer and yourself for putting up with it. And I would stop having so many passive boundaries.' 'Passive boundaries?' he asked. 'Yes. You know you are a valuable employee. You mentioned to me earlier that you've been a stellar employee in every job you've had. Guess what? You will be again if you choose to get another job. Stop allowing others to pacify you with empty promises and pizza parties. Speak to what you want, whether a promotion or help … whatever you know to be true. If they don't see your requests as valid, that doesn't make them false. It just means they don't know your worth… make sure you do.' 'I know my worth, but I also know my responsibilities,' he said. 'That's fair. Often, we do things as adults because we 'have to' more than 'want to.' Responsibility isn't meant to be taken lightly or shirked. Over time, however, we must pay attention to patterns, noticing when individuals consistently demonstrate that they are not going to change and when it is upon us to change.' 'I get that. I'm just terrified of letting my family down,' he said. The weight upon him was suffocating, and I could tell he was carrying a burden that would eventually break him. 'That's speaking from a position of self-loathing and shame. Such thinking keeps you stagnant in areas where God has gifted you and given you talents to grow. There is nothing shameful about taking care of your health, not diminishing your value, and moving forward in full faith that God is opening doors you haven't even seen.' 'Opening doors I haven't even seen,' he repeated. 'I like the sound of that.' 'All I'm saying is keep your options open… you've convinced yourself that you're trapped. You're not. Even if things change for the better in your current job or it all falls away, the most important things will remain. And God will eventually position you on higher ground. He knows your needs. He knows you. Believe this. Trust God. And move forward, being okay with whatever outcome God provides.' 'Whatever outcome God provides. Yes,' he said. For the first time, he offered a faint smile. God, be with us as we make difficult decisions. Help us to simply be obedient to You, trusting that You will either change our situation or change us. May we use the skills and talents You have blessed us with to serve You with joy, knowing that You will provide for us and sustain us well beyond any earthly position. You are stronger than our greatest fears, and in Your strength, and in Your name, we move. Our true position is in You alone, Christ Jesus. Lead us, guide us, and take us from fear to faith in Your presence and peace. This column was initially published by CherryRoad Media. ©Tiffany Kaye Chartier.


Fox News
42 minutes ago
- Fox News
'Wounded adversaries are much more dangerous,' former general warns
All times eastern THE CLAMAN COUNTDOWN: POWER PLAYERS Maria Bartiromo's Wall Street FOX News Radio Live Channel Coverage