An ally took control of live bombs dropped by US Air Force planes. That's never been done before.

The US Air Force recently allowed another country to take control of American bombs in flight for the first time, with F-15 Strike Eagle pilots passing control of their glide bombs over to Norwegian forces.
The Norwegian Armed Forces announced the successful weapons test last week, describing it as a test of networked weapons, "weapons you can communicate with after they're fired," that delivered a "groundbreaking" result.
"For the first time, the Americans have allowed another country to take control of an American bomb on its way to the target," the armed forces said.
The Norwegians said that two US Air Force F-15E fighter jets flew toward Norway's coast with two American GBU-53/B glide bombs in the exercise, called Jotun Strike.
Using data provided by various sensors, including those on a deployed P-8 maritime patrol aircraft, Norwegian soldiers took control of the bombs when they dropped and used a network to direct them toward targets they had selected. With the data support, the soldiers adjusted the bomb's course.
Chief of the Norwegian Armed Forces' Operational Headquarters, Vice Adm. Rune Andersen, called the result of the test key to Norway maintaining a "technological lead." He added that the test highlighted the "good relationship" between the US and Norway, saying that the test was "based on a high degree of trust and integration between close allies."
Capt. Brett Stell, from the 494th Fighter Squadron, US Air Force, explained that the recent exercise was "a demonstration of what warfighting looks like in the future."
It proved that "a weapon launched from a US platform can be guided by a Norwegian sensor across domains and distances," he said, adding that "this level of integration shows our shared ability to conduct complex, network-enabled engagements-even in contested environments."
The unprecedented exercise was not just about Europe, "it's about homeland defense forward," Stell said.
"Threats to the US can originate beyond the Western Hemisphere, and our forward capabilities in the European theater are essential for early warning, rapid response, and deterrence," he said, explaining that "exercises like Jotun Strike make our collective force more lethal, more integrated, and ready to fight and win together."
A new kind of weapons test
Network-enabled weapons are ones that can be guided and redirected as they fly using communications networks.
The armed forces said that "via a built-in radio transmitter, military personnel can communicate with the weapon after it has been fired, change its course, change the target it is going to attack, and await or abort an attack. All based on updates they receive in real time."
The concept tested last month was developed in Norway with Norwegian industry, the armed forces said. Specifically, the Norwegian Battle Lab & Experimentation had been working on its concept for network weapons since 2019, with a 2025 deadline.
NOBLE is a group in the Norwegian Armed Forces that is affiliated with the operational headquarters and tasked with concept development and experimentation for the military.
Its network weapons concept had only previously been tested in simulations, and Col. Roger Samuelsen, the head of NOBLE, said "this was the big test."
He said that "it was fantastic that this worked."
"It is the first time this weapon has been released in a live version. And it was also the first time someone from the Norwegian Armed Forces tested a live network weapon."
The test took place on May 14 at Andøya, a large island in Norway's northwest.
The system had already been tested in the US against other simulators, Samuelsen said. He said Norway was repeatedly told it was ahead of others on this technology and that he believed that was why the US wanted to provide weapons and planes for this test.
He added that he was "very excited to see if the software we have developed would work as intended, even though we have done all the preparations and tests that were possible in advance."
He said the outcome means Norway "now can both plan, lead, coordinate and carry out an engagement with network weapons."
Network weapons can get real-time data from external sensors, making them more likely to hit their targets. And they can be made to change course after they are fired.
The Norwegian Armed Forces said the network weapons have "increased range and safety" since they don't need to see the target. Instead, they can be launched from further away and controlled, so they "can be fired at a safe distance without the platform supplying the weapon having to expose itself."
It also means the target can be changed depending on what's happening and what the military wants to hit.
The technology is key for Norway, a smaller country that needs to use its resources efficiently and make the most of recent acquisitions like the P-8 and F-35 fighter jets, but there's also interest from allies.
Samuelsen said that people who work in "concept development in NATO have already shown interest in the Norwegian concept." And he said allies are interested in the control software that it has developed with Norwegian software company Teleplan.
"There are not many nations that have this weapon or the technology within reach," the armed forces said.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

New York Post

3 hours ago

• New York Post

B-2 bomber pilots had toilet, microwave and a cooler for snacks on their 37-hour Fordow bombing raid

The B-2 stealth bombers used to attack the Fordow nuclear enrichment plant are equipped with toilets, microwaves and usually a cooler for snacks to make life more comfortable for the pilots who were stuck in the cockpit for the 37-hour trip from Missouri to Iran and back. The fleet of advanced American bombers — originally designed to drop nuclear bombs on the Soviet Union — took off from the Whiteman Air Force Base outside Kansas City on Friday for an 18 hour ride across the world, refueling several times in mid-air, officials said. For such long trips to be bearable, the high-tech bombers have their cockpits outfitted with mini refrigerators and a microwave oven to keep its crew fed an alert. 5 Pilots aboard the seven B2 stealth bombers used to attack Iran flew for 37, nonstop hours during the longest mission for the planes since 2001. Department of Defense 5 The bombers are equipped with small coolers, a microwave oven and bathrooms to accommodate the crew during long-duration flights. U.S. Air Force photo by Staff Sgt. Scott H. Spitzer And just like any plane equipped for long-haul flights, the B-2 Spirit has a toilet, too. There's also enough room for one pilot to lay down and rest while the other flies the batwing jet. The B-2 first entered service 1997 and each one costs more than $2 billion; the US Air Force has a fleet of 19 — after losing one in a crash in 2008. With a wingspan of 172 feet and a crew of just two pilots — the B-2 relies on automation to help complete long-haul flights. The seven B-2 bombers deployed for operation 'Midnight Hammer' flew in near complete radio silence, with their two-man crews taking turns to sleep during the tense night, The Telegraph reported. The 37-hours spent to attack Fordow marked the longest B-2 bomber mission since the initial American assault on Afghanistan following the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Pilots for these types of aircraft are trained to endure long, grueling flights, with past crews bringing cots aboard or even full camping pads, according to The Atlantic. 5 The pilots for operation 'Midnight Hammer' reportedly took turns sleeping as they flew to Iran. U.S. Air Force 5 The seven bombers met up with a crew of fighter jets and support aircraft to escort them to Iran's nuclear labs. Getty Images The stealth bombers did not spend the entire mission alone. A fleet of fighter jets and support aircraft deployed to meet up with the B-2s as they approached Iran. 'The B-2s linked up with escort and support aircraft in a complex, tightly timed maneuver requiring exact synchronization across multiple platforms in a narrow piece of airspace, all done with minimal communications,' Gen Daniel Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, touted in a statement. The 25-minute operation inside Iran began on Saturday at 6:40 p.m. ET, with a lead B-2 bomber dropping two GBU-57 'bunker buster' munitions on the 'first of several aim points at Fordow,' Caine said. 5 Aerial view of the Fordow underground complex in Iran after the American airstrikes. MAXAR Technologies 'The remaining bombers then hit their targets, as well, with a total of 14 MOPs (Massive Ordnance Penetrators) dropped against two nuclear target areas,' he added. It marked the first time that the US used the massive, 15-ton GBU-57 bunker buster bombs in a military attack. 'There is not another military in the world that could have done this,' President Trump wrote on Truth Social when revealing the attack on Iran.

Buzz Feed

5 hours ago

• Buzz Feed

What A.M. And P.M. Actually Stand For May Surprise You

Americans use many abbreviations in everyday speech and writing. Shorthands like 'yd' for yard and 'a/c' for air conditioning are pretty straightforward, but there are some misconceptions about others. For example, take 'a.m.' and 'p.m.' People in the US are constantly thinking and talking about time in terms of a.m. and p.m., but if you ask someone what those letters stand for, you may be surprised how little people actually know about the abbreviations. Some say it's 'after midnight' or 'past midday,' but that isn't exactly true... In fact, like many words and phrases in the English language, a.m. is short for a Latin phrase, 'ante meridiem' (or 'before midday'), while p.m. is short for 'post meridiem' (or 'after midday'). While there isn't a ton of information out there about when exactly a.m. and p.m. came into popular use in the English language, the 12-hour timekeeping system dates back to ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia. During the Renaissance period, mechanical clocks with 12-hour analog dials appeared in churches and palaces throughout Europe. Today, most of the world uses a 24-hour system, while many English-speaking countries follow the 12-hour clock. In the places that use the 12-hour standard, there is some debate around what to use for noon and midnight. By convention, people in the US say 12 p.m. in reference to noon and 12 a.m. for midnight. But some believe that going from 11 p.m. to 12 a.m. and from 11 a.m. to 12 p.m. is confusing. Others would argue that noon and midnight are neither a.m. nor p.m. since noon IS midday, it can't technically be ante meridiem or post meridiem midday. Likewise, midnight is both 12 hours before midday and 12 hours after midday, which makes it confusing to choose between a.m. or p.m. To avoid this confusion, many prefer '12 midnight' or '12 noon,' but that can seem a bit redundant, given that 'noon' or 'midnight' alone convey the same information. A lesser-known option is to denote noon with 'm' for 'meridiem,' as in 12 m ― though you run the risk of people interpreting that as '12 midnight.' Given all the confusion and debate, maybe we should go with the 24-hour military time and be done with it? After all, who doesn't love staying up late on Dec. 31 to shout 'Happy New Year!' at zero hundred hours? (Or is it twenty-four hundred hours?)

Boston Globe

14 hours ago

• Boston Globe

That time I was headed nowhere, fast

Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up School was a break from work on the farm and on trucks, and I wanted to laugh and run wild. Still, I wonder what difference it might have made if any one of my teachers had given me a tape measure, pencils, and paper and sent me out to measure everything in the playground or draw the birds in the sky that I saw there. But that just wasn't how teachers taught boys like me. I suspect they had little doubt as to the type of man I would become — the kind I worked with on ranches and construction sites, ones with clichéd blue-collar traits, both good and bad. Advertisement My father was among them. A professional country music musician, a trucker, and operator of heavy equipment, he was also a drinker and a fighter. He espoused racist views that made no sense to me, since I'd only ever been around white people, and some of them were dangerous crooks who'd spent time in prison. My father was also the one man I spent much of my young life with — under trucks, tending farm animals, riding around in pickups. Advertisement I drank with or around him in my late teens. I spent endless hours with him as he worked and drank with other men. I often witnessed his raw violence — toward helpless animals on our farm, toward a sister's boyfriend who'd sneaked into the house. I learned that emotions can be dangerous. When I was 8, after weeks of being attacked by a rooster that left me bloodied, my father locked me in a barn with it. I had a large stick. The rooster, his spurs. I knocked him out of the air and would have killed him, but my father stopped me. He respected that rooster and called me 'Rooster' ever after. By the end of my junior year of high school in 1981, I had a grade-point average in the low D range, poor attendance, lunch time drinking, and pervasive discipline problems, including fights in and out of school. Like millions of American boys and young men, past and present, I was well on my way to becoming a member of a Advertisement So how am I writing this after a 30-year career in journalism instead of a few stints behind bars and the kind of hard-luck life I'd seen so much of? Rebellion, and a science fiction novel. As my senior year approached, my father wanted me to delay going back to school so I could work for him. Ambivalent as I was about school, I knew that if I did this, I would never go back, and I had the vague but motivating sense that I wanted something else for myself, something more. I rebelled by going back to school. Later that year, I moved out of my family home. I met the girl who has now been my partner for more than 40 years. I made guy friends who introduced me to punk rock and wild, nonviolent escapades with bikes, trampolines, junk cars, and conversation. And then I met Mark, who gave me the first novel I ever read. I had noticed that our social studies teacher genuinely engaged with Mark's challenging questions. Skinny and studious, Mark appeared more rebellious to me than those of us roughhousing, flirting, drunk or stoned or both, giggling at the back of the classroom. I was curious about Mark's ability to so constructively question authority. We spoke a few times about it, and one afternoon, he gave me ' Advertisement Briefly, 'Orphans' is about a young man, Hugh Hoyland, who discovers that his world exists inside a spaceship. This reality was hidden from him by myths and lies passed down to him that his own willful ignorance perpetuated. Only when he encounters the freaks of that world — banished mutants, the readers of forbidden books, and thinkers — does Hugh understand that there is an entire universe outside his world. There could not have been a more apt metaphor for my cramped, small, myth-laden life. The novel sparked something in me. I began to read and study. I participated in a week-long event for high schoolers on a college campus. I figured out how to get student loans and Pell Grants. I figured out how to get into the community college in Billings and then the University of Montana, where I studied philosophy and eventually earned an MFA in creative writing. For me, education was an act of defiance. It freed me from the confines and contours of a destiny as a hard and angry man, and it made me want to earn access to the world beyond it. But I had to discover my own path to the power of language and knowledge. There's a lot of talk about boys these days. How they're in trouble. How they're toxic. I hope that as we focus on them, we don't force-feed them our expectations or beat them down like dangerous animals. I hope we give them the time and space to be rebellious and build themselves up with education that welcomes them. It's a lot of trouble to let boys be boys, but I believe in us. Advertisement