
Musk's father praises Putin as ‘impressive and resilient man'
Errol Musk, a South African businessman and the father of tech billionaire Elon Musk, has praised Russian President Vladimir Putin as 'a very impressive and resilient man' and said he would like to learn from his leadership.
The 79-year-old made the remarks on Monday in Moscow, on the sidelines of the Forum of the Future 2050, a two-day event that brought together international participants to discuss high technology, science, space, development, and education.
'I think he [Putin] is a very impressive and resilient man. He has proven that,' Musk told journalists. He did not respond to a question about whether he planned to meet with the Russian president.
The remark echoed comments Musk made in April during an interview with the BBC, when he said he believed his family was 'impressed' with the Russian leader. He added that he had listened to Putin's speeches and found that the Russian president said 'logical things.'
Addressing the forum, Musk said it was his first visit to Russia and that he accepted the invitation to attend without hesitation, despite being advised not to travel to the country.
'The first thing I saw was an absolutely beautiful civilization in every sense,' he said, noting that he generally takes a critical view of most things.
'I saw a city that could truly rival Ancient Rome... In many ways, this city is the best capital in the world,' he added, drawing applause from the audience.
The businessman also criticized the Western media's portrayal of Russia, which he described as 'complete nonsense.' He said the country is often depicted as 'a terrible place full of awful people who will kill you if you visit.'
'It's absurd,' he said, urging an end to the negative stereotypes being spread in the West about Russia and its people.
'I think this may be one of the best countries I've ever seen,' Musk said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Russia Today
3 hours ago
- Russia Today
Top Iranian diplomat expects ‘critical' talks with Putin
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi is expecting to hold a 'crucial' meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin during his pre-arranged visit to Moscow, which coincided with US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities over the weekend. Israel launched an attack on Iran last week, claiming Tehran was on the brink of developing a nuclear weapon. Iranian officials rejected the accusation and responded with retaliatory strikes. On Sunday, the United States followed with what it described as 'massive precision strikes' on nuclear facilities in Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. The attacks were widely condemned as violations of international law. International Atomic Energy Agency Director General Rafael Grossi said the strikes caused 'a sharp degradation in nuclear safety and security.' Speaking to reporters on Monday morning after arriving in Moscow, Araghchi said the situation demanded urgent coordination. 'Given the current exceptional circumstances in the region, it is essential that Iran and Russia engage in closer, more precise, and more serious consultations,' he stated. 'Naturally, our talks this time will be more serious and cover broader dimensions. We will have important and serious discussions with President Putin, and I am confident that the outcomes will benefit both countries.' The Kremlin has yet to confirm a meeting between Putin and Araghchi. Russian President Vladimir Putin has repeatedly stated that Iran has the right to use nuclear technology for peaceful purposes. In media appearances during the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF) last week, he emphasized that resolving the conflict should include mutual security guarantees – protecting both Iran's right to peaceful nuclear development and Israel's right to security. Araghchi described Russia as a strategic ally and said the two countries have maintained regular dialogue on regional issues. He also noted that during recent nuclear negotiations with the US, Tehran 'continuously consulted with our Russian friends, sharing every step of the progress with them.' Russia has strongly condemned the US strikes on Iran's nuclear sites, calling them a flagrant breach of international law. In a statement on Saturday, the Russian Foreign Ministry described the attacks as 'a reckless decision' and 'a blatant violation of the UN Charter and relevant Security Council resolutions.' It warned that the strikes – carried out by a permanent member of the Security Council – could have caused a nuclear disaster and had 'drastically increased the likelihood of a larger conflict in the Middle East.'


Russia Today
7 hours ago
- Russia Today
Moscow blasts US redo of ‘Iraqi weapons of mass destruction' stunt
Russia has sharply condemned the United States for its airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, calling the attacks 'irresponsible, provocative and dangerous,' and warning they risk pushing the Middle East toward a large-scale war with potentially catastrophic nuclear consequences. Speaking at an emergency session of the UN Security Council on Sunday, Russian Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia accused Washington of violating the UN Charter, international law and the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). 'The United States has opened a Pandora's box, and no one knows what consequences may follow,' Nebenzia said, noting that by targeting IAEA-supervised nuclear sites, Washington has 'once again demonstrated total disregard for the position of the international community.' Nebenzia drew a pointed comparison to the lead-up to the 2003 Iraq War, when then-US Secretary of State Colin Powell presented false evidence to 'justify the invasion of another sovereign state, only to plunge its people into chaos for decades and not find any weapons of mass destruction.' 'Many today feel a strong sense of déjà vu,' he said. 'The current situation is essentially no different: we are once again being urged to believe in fairy tales in order to once again bring suffering to millions of people living in the Middle East.' Russia argued that Tehran has not been proven to be pursuing a nuclear weapon, echoing earlier assessments by US intelligence that were dismissed by President Donald Trump as 'wrong.' Nebenzia accused Washington of fabricating a narrative to justify the use of force and of undermining the decades-long diplomatic framework built around Iran's peaceful nuclear program. The Russian envoy also criticized what he described as the hypocrisy of Western nations that had for days called for 'restraint' in the same Security Council chamber, yet failed to condemn Washington for joining Israeli strikes – and even blamed Iran for the escalation. 'We are witnessing an astonishing example of double standards,' he said. 'Iran has been and remains one of the most thoroughly inspected states under the NPT, but instead of encouraging such an attitude, it receives bombardments of its territory and civilians by a state that refuses, in principle, to sign the NPT.' Nebenzia warned that the US strikes undermine the authority of the IAEA and the global non-proliferation regime, and that continued escalation could return the world to an era of uncontrolled nuclear risk. 'This is an outrageous and cynical situation, and it is very strange that the Director General of the IAEA did not say a word about it. Neither has he ever called on Israel to join the NPT,' Nebenzia added. Calling for urgent action, Russia – joined by China and Pakistan – submitted a draft Security Council resolution demanding an immediate and unconditional ceasefire and a return to diplomatic talks on Iran's nuclear program.


Russia Today
10 hours ago
- Russia Today
Zelensky makes new threats against Russia
Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky has suggested that Kiev's forces will conduct more long-range strikes targeting facilities deep inside Russian territory. Ukraine has significantly escalated drone attacks deep into Russia in recent weeks, despite ongoing diplomatic efforts to end the conflict. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has described the actions as an attempt to derail the peace process. In a post on his Telegram channel on Sunday, Zelensky wrote that he had held a meeting with the head of Ukraine's military intelligence, Kirill Budanov, claiming that Kiev was keeping tabs on Russia's 'main pain points.' He pledged to 'strike appropriate blows' with a view to 'significantly reducing' Moscow's military potential. Zelensky also stated that Kiev was sharing its intelligence on Russia with its Western backers, with which it is 'preparing joint defense solutions.' Speaking to reporters also on Sunday, Ukraine's commander-in-chief, Aleksandr Syrsky, similarly said that Kiev 'will increase the scale and depth' of its strikes on Russian military facilities deep inside the country. On June 1, Ukrainian intelligence conducted a coordinated attack on several Russian airbases across five regions, from Murmansk in the Arctic, to Irkutsk in Siberia. Ukrainian media later reported that the operation codenamed 'Spiderweb' involved dozens of first-person view (PFV) kamikaze drones. At least some of them were reportedly launched in close proximity to the targets, from commercial trucks that had been covertly brought into Russia. The strikes were said to have been prepared for more than a year and a half and focused on Russia's 'strategic aviation.' The Defense Ministry in Moscow said that a number of aircraft in Murmansk and Irkutsk regions had caught fire as a result of the attack. Kiev claimed that the strikes had damaged or destroyed approximately 40 Russian military aircraft, including Tu-95 and Tu-22 long-range bombers. Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov later dismissed these estimates as incorrect. 'The equipment in question… was not destroyed, but damaged. It will be restored,' the diplomat told TASS in early June. Around the same time, Keith Kellogg, US President Donald Trump's special envoy, cautioned that 'when you attack an opponent's part of their national survival system, which is their nuclear triad… that means your risk level goes up because you don't know what the other side's going to do.'