PSEG to file court order seeking temporary access to properties along MPRP to review land

The Public Service Enterprise Group, an energy company developing a transmission line that would cross three counties in Maryland, plans to file a court order on April 15 — the first of several filings — asking for temporary access to properties along the project route.
PSEG needs to access properties in order to conduct field studies along the route of the Maryland Piedmont Reliability Project (MPRP), a 500,000-volt line that will extend for almost 70 miles across Frederick, Baltimore and Carroll counties.
In Frederick County, the MPRP would run through the southeastern and southern parts of the county near New Market and Ijamsville, continue toward Buckeystown and Adamstown, and end at the Doubs substation.
Maryland is requiring that PSEG conduct these studies, which will help illustrate the full environmental effects of the MPRP, to move the project forward.
Thousands of residents and many elected officials from around Maryland have mobilized against the project and have expressed fear, anger and frustration about the MPRP cutting through properties or possibly hurting the environment.
PSEG has a contract with PJM Interconnection, the company that coordinates electricity movement in 13 states and Washington, D.C., to build the MPRP to address anticipated increases in power demand.
Part of this increased demand is due to new data centers to be sited in Maryland and Virginia, which are estimated to require up to 7,500 megawatts of electricity.
Additionally, PJM has said that 11,000 megawatts of power generation across the grid have recently been deactivated while power demand continues growing.
PSEG sent out about 800 letters in the fall to the owners of about 600 tracts of property who will be impacted by the MPRP route. Some of the land parcels have multiple owners.
For months, land agents on behalf of PSEG have been reaching out to affected property owners to discuss the company temporarily accessing properties to conduct environmental surveys and field studies.
Some owners have been offered compensation of $1,000 for a temporary right-of-entry. Most people have either not responded or denied PSEG's requests.
Jason Kalwa, the project's director, said field data is used for most permits to confirm environmental conditions. He emphasized that gaining temporary access to properties through this court order would not be the same as PSEG using eminent domain.
Eminent domain is a governmental power to seize private property for public use with just compensation.
PSEG will not have access to the properties anymore after completing the field surveys.
A judge would decide how much time to grant.
'The property owners are not giving up any other rights. This is temporary access. This is effectively to allow our experts, environmental and otherwise, to walk on the property, take an assessment of what they see there,' Kalwa said in an interview.
'... It's not eminent domain. It gives us no permanent rights to the property. It merely gives us access to the property to conduct surveys, which are necessary for many types of permits out there.'
PSEG is asking for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity from the Maryland Public Service Commission as part of developing the MPRP.
This certificate authorizes the construction or modification of a new generating station or high-voltage transmission lines and is necessary for the MPRP to move forward.
'The MPRP will prevent extensive, severe, and widespread thermal overloads and voltage collapse conditions (reliability violations) from occurring on the bulk transmission system that serves Maryland electric customers and the surrounding region,' PSEG said in its application.
On March 26, the Power Plant Research Program, which is part of the Maryland Department of Natural Resources, said PSEG's certificate application is incomplete — it doesn't have enough information on alternative project routes or specific environmental and socioeconomic impacts.
The Maryland Public Service Commission said on Jan. 10 that it would start making a procedural schedule to move the application forward once the Power Plant Research Program deemed the application as complete.
The program said PSEG didn't provide 'any discussion detailing why each of the alternative routes other than the proposed route ... were rejected and instead, focuses on why the proposed route was selected.'
The program also said the application doesn't adequately show the environmental and socioeconomic consequences of the MPRP's construction and operation.
Specifically, the application doesn't include field studies, which are necessary to verify that the MPRP's impacts are correctly documented and appropriate mitigation actions are taken.
The program said the application lacked these field-based surveys:
* Wetland delineations
* Forest stand delineations
* Geotechnical surveys
* Surveys on sensitive species project review areas
* Maryland Historical Trust-required field surveys
'Without field-based information, [the program] cannot fully evaluate the Project's impacts to Maryland's socioeconomic and natural resources,' the program said in a letter to the Public Service Commission dated March 26.
The Power Plant Research Program said it isn't opposed to scheduling a prehearing conference for PSEG's application to set a limited procedural schedule, but it still needs more information outlined in its letter to finish assessing PSEG's application.
Once it's determined that the application is complete, further procedural dates can be scheduled.
Need to seek judicial support
The same day the program gave its letter to the commission, PSEG filed a response asking for a prehearing conference to be held to create a procedural schedule so the MPRP can be built by June 1, 2027 — the date that PJM said the MPRP has to start operating.
To meet this deadline, PSEG has to start constructing the transmission line by January and therefore needs a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity by then.
PSEG also wants the conference to be held to rule on more than 170 petitions to intervene, most of which were filed by people with properties on or near the MPRP route.
A petition to intervene is a request to become a formal party in a case and be able to actively participate in the legal process and influence the outcome of a project.
PSEG also asked the Public Service Commission to determine its application is complete for the purpose of setting a procedural schedule.
The company said the information the Power Plant Research Program wants 'go to issues that [the program] would like to better understand and not as required information that is missing' under Maryland law.
Still, PSEG anticipated that the Power Plant Research Program would ask for field studies, which is why the company has been trying to access properties. Its response says that where 'necessary and appropriate, the Company may also need to seek judicial support to conduct the surveys.'
Bill Smith, a PSEG spokesperson, said the court filing PSEG plans to submit on April 15 will involve getting temporary access to about 90 properties.
There will be multiple filings requesting temporary access if PSEG can't negotiate with the remaining property owners for voluntary rights-of-entry.
The company is still willing to have discussions with landowners regarding compensation for rights-of-entry to avoid taking court action.
Kalwa said PSEG is aware that some property owners are extremely hostile to the company and won't welcome the idea of company representatives walking on their land.
'The safety and security of our team, the contractors that work for us, members of the public are of utmost importance. ... We just ask for folks' patience throughout all of this. We understand it's difficult,' he said.
'For the folks that don't want to talk to us, if they could, if they'd be willing to have a conversation with us, I think they'll find us to be reasonable, and hopefully, that'll calm some of their fears.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Forbes

2 days ago

• Forbes

Siemens Energy's Demerged India Unit In Stock Exchange Debut, Falls 5%

The Siemens Energy logo on flags at a branch of the company in the Neuperlach district of Munich, ... More Germany (Photo: Matthias Balk) Siemens Energy's demerged Indian unit - Siemens Energy India Limited or 'SEIL' - made its stock exchange debut on Thursday, in a keenly watched emerging market move by the German vendor. The lucrative unit's demerger from its parent company saw it debut at a listing price of ₹2,840 ($32.85) per share on the National Stock Exchange of India, already up 14% on its stated discovery price of ₹2,478. Its demerger price was in the region of ₹2,350. At one point intraday, the stock rose as high as ₹2,982 given the company is expected to be India's largest listed pure-play power transmission and distribution equipment provider. However, at end of day's session the stock closed 5% lower at ₹2,735. SEIL has a firm foothold in India's lucrative and burgeoning, but extremely competitive, energy market. It supports the integration of renewable energy, modernization of the national grid, and decarbonization of key industries. As India pursues its officially stated goal of achieving net-zero emissions by 2070, SEIL said it would be part of the government's 'Make in India' initiative. The company is making what it describes as 'significant investments' in India in expanding its local manufacturing footprint, including an investment of ₹4.6 billion ($53.2 million) in its Kalwa Transformers facility. In addition, SEIL has launched a 'competency hub' to 'foster innovation in energy technologies and position India as a global innovation leader.' (Left to right) Tim Holt, member of the executive board and labour director, Siemens Energy, ... More Guilherme Mendonça, MD and CEO, Siemens Energy India Limited, and Harish Shekar, executive director & Chief Financial Officer, Siemens Energy India Limited ringing National Stock Exchange of India's ceremonial bell, joined by Ashish Chauhan, MD and CEO, National Stock Exchange of India, and Sunil Mathur, chairman of the board, Siemens Energy India Limited, during the listing of Siemens Energy India Limited on the National Stock Exchange on June 19, 2025/ Guilherme Mendonca, managing director and chief executive officer of SEIL, said: "With this listing we reaffirm our long-standing commitment to India's energy future. As India advances toward becoming a $7 trillion economy, a strong and resilient energy system will be essential. "Siemens Energy India Limited with its dedicated team is ready to support this important journey for India and its people.' Furthermore, the company which employs more than 4,000 professionals, has ten manufacturing sites and eleven regional offices, also serves neighboring countries in the South Asian subcontinent including Bhutan, Nepal, Sri Lanka and Maldives. SEIL's successful listing is also welcome news for Siemens itself and its Siemens Energy sub-unit from which the Indian unit demerged and listed on Thursday. Depending on the stock's performance, a substantial windfall may follow. As things stand, Siemens subsidiaries hold 69% in SEIL and the subsidiaries of Siemens Energy hold 6% in Siemens Energy India Limited, with the remainder in free float for retail and institutional investors alike. It is a marked contrast Siemens Energy's wind unit - Siemens Gamesa - which has been buffeted by operational headwinds and losses in the face of competition from Chinese rivals who often undercut it on prices, as acknowledged by CEO Christian Bruch last year. That unit posted another quarterly loss in April of €249 million ($285 million). Ironically, the figure included a loss from disposal of a majority stake of Siemens Gamesa's Indian (and Sri Lankan) wind business. That happened in March, when Siemens Gamesa divested 90% of the business to a TPG-led investor group, while retaining a 10% stake. The deal included transferring approximately 1,000 employees and two manufacturing plants in India to the new company. However, Siemens Energy, via Gamesa, will continue to support the new entity through a long-term technology licensing agreement.

CBS News

10-06-2025

• CBS News

Maryland PSC to set schedule for controversial energy project

Maryland's Public Service Commission will hold a virtual conference to set a procedural schedule for the controversial Piedmont Reliability Project. The proposed 70-mile transmission line would run through Baltimore, Carroll, and Frederick counties. Today's hearing comes as several Maryland property owners wait for a federal judge to decide whether the developer can survey property owners' land. What is the purpose of the Piedmont Reliability Project? The Piedmont Reliability Project would involve the construction of 70 miles of 500,000-volt overhead power lines connecting an existing transmission line through parts of Baltimore, Carroll, and Frederick counties. PSEG Renewable Transmission, the New Jersey-based developer, says the project is needed to keep up with Maryland's growing need for power that is generated within the state. According to the company, Maryland will face an increased energy deficit and power grid congestion if the state doesn't increase its capacity. Why the pushback? Residents in the path of the proposed project have expressed concerns about potential negative environmental impacts and how the transmission lines may impede personal property. Some residents say the power lines, if built, would cut through family-owned farms. A faith-based youth camp and outdoor education center in Carroll County said the project would jeopardize the camp experience that they provide to guests – since the transmission line would go through their property. Janet Stratton, a Hereford resident, told WJZ her farm that's been passed down for six generations is in the path of the potential transmission line. "I realized my childhood dream 30 years ago," Stratton said. "To have it taken away would be devastating." When it comes to environmental concerns, the Chesapeake Bay Foundation said the project poses risks to the bay's habitat and water quality. The CBF said the project has the potential to damage protected forests, nutrient-rich wetlands, and sources of clean water. Maryland Governor Wes Moore has also spoken out, saying he has concerns about the project. Developer asks court for access to residents' properties In April, PSEG submitted a court filing requesting that residents in multiple Maryland counties allow surveyors onto their land. The judge's ruling will determine if and how PSEG is able to move forward with the project, as the company must complete surveying before proceeding with construction. PSEG's filing for Temporary Right to Entry asks the court to allow the surveying of 91 properties for the project.

E&E News

05-06-2025

• E&E News

Storms, AI demand and policy failures are upending US grid

Ensuring the nation's power grids can reliably deliver electricity is clashing with the tech industry's voracious appetite for energy — pushing the risks of power outages to new highs, executives of regional power markets told federal regulators Wednesday. Grid rules developed during periods of relatively slow growth aren't equipped for the demands of Silicon Valley's investment in artificial intelligence, extreme weather shocks, and deep national and state political divisions over energy and climate policy, grid operators told members of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. 'AI is going to change our world,' said Manu Asthana, CEO of the PJM Interconnection, grid operator for 67 million customers in all or parts of 13 Eastern states and the District of Columbia. Advertisement 'In our forecast between 2024 and 2030, currently we have a 32-gigawatt increase in demand, of which 30 is from data centers,' Asthana said. 'We need to stabilize market rules and find that intersection between reliability and affordability that works both for consumers and suppliers, and that intersection is getting harder and harder to find.' Lanny Nickell, CEO of the Southwest Power Pool, PJM's counterpart in a band of Great Plains states, said extreme weather threats and the increasing role of weather-dependent wind and solar power put outages at 125 times more likely to happen than eight years ago. 'As if this wasn't challenging enough,' he said, 'we are now projecting our peak demand to be as much as 75 percent higher 10 years from now, and that's largely driven by electrification and data center growth.' Jim Robb, CEO of the North American Electric Reliability Corp., the architect of transmission grid standards, said grid operators need 'much deeper insight' into future electricity supply and demand and the probabilities of extreme storms and heat waves that could push power demand to new peaks. Limited real-time information about the effect that dangerous storms have on gas pipeline deliveries to electric turbines is also an area of concern that has been left unresolved by the broader energy industry. Current industry risk analysis cannot do the job, Robb said in comments filed for a two-day conference at FERC's Washington headquarters. 'This will require stronger modeling of fuel and capacity performance to assess reliability risk,' Robb said. The industry needs to establish an agreed-upon profile of the likely risks operators face, like the 'design basis' accident scenarios that nuclear power plant operators are required to defend against. Susan Bruce, counsel to a group of industrial power customers, said her coalition shares 'serious concerns' about regional grid reliability and the ability to add enough new electric generation to keep pace with demand, particularly from 'unprecedented but undefined' growth of data center and cryptocurrency mining operations. 'There is a lack of trust that even very high prices' in grid markets 'can move the needle' to get new nonrenewable generation in service, she said in remarks filed with the commission. 'New rules of the road are necessary,' she said. 'States leaning on other states' Sharp divisions at national and state levels over climate policies is apparent inside PJM, said FERC Chair Mark Christie. Christie told PJM's Asthana, 'You've got 13 states plus the District, you've got widely divergent policies from New Jersey to West Virginia, from Indiana to Maryland. 'It puts you in an impossible position,' Christie continued. 'How can you guys balance these incredibly divergent political goals and try to run a market … that fits the economic textbooks?' One answer, broached by Christie and several state regulators at the conference, was to push more responsibility on states to meet grid reliability challenges. Panelists at the FERC conference debated whether electricity reliability and affordability would be helped if states ordered utilities to purchase part of the generation they expect to need in the future, rather than relying on PJM's competitive energy markets to deliver supply. 'How do we make it work without the states having a much larger role?' Christie asked. 'We acknowledge that the states need a role because we are responsible for resource adequacy,' said Jacob Finkel, deputy secretary for policy for Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro (D), who has led a challenge to PJM policies by Democratic governors in its region. 'We have a responsibility to our ratepayers for affordability.' 'It's easy to throw darts at PJM,' said Kelsey Bagot, a member of the Virginia State Corp. Commission. 'To the extent we want a larger role in the process, we have to demonstrate that as a group of states with very different regulatory structures and very different goals and policies, that we can actually function as a collaborative body and make decisions. 'I think that challenge has been handed to us,' Bagot said. Dennis Deters, a member of the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, sided with Bagot, a fellow red-state regulator. 'We are reactive,' he said. 'Too many states are relying on [PJM] to provide resource adequacy. 'I do shudder to think of injecting more politics into an engineering effort,' he added. Michael Richard, a member of the Maryland Public Service Commission, said the divisions were over principle rather than politics. 'You know, Maryland policymakers, we believe the science on climate change.' Christie several times pressed panelists for opinions on whether states should be held accountable if their utilities aren't building enough generation to meet reliability needs, which, in his calculation, means generation that can operate around the clock, not renewables. 'If you don't build enough, maybe you need to pay a penalty. Clearly, there are states leaning on other states,' he said. 'The states have the ability to do a lot of direct contracting and direct support for their policies,' PJM's Asthana said. 'We have seen the state of New Jersey, for example, directly support offshore wind. We have supported them in that pursuit, and that can work.' Gordon van Welie, president of ISO New England, said that states can lose control. 'We know from experience that it's very hard building fossil resources in New England,' he said. A key part of the region's answer was investment in offshore wind. Now the Trump administration has thrown up barriers to that option, he added. 'So that puts us in a very difficult place as we enter 2030,' he said. 'Something's got to give in that equation. Otherwise we have trouble.'