Iran-Israel War: US urges China to stop Iran from shutting Strait of Hormuz - 'economic suicide for them'

Iran-Israel War: US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has called on China to encourage Iran not to shut down the Strait of Hormuz after Washington carried out strikes on Iranian nuclear sites.
Rubio's remarks came after Iran's Press TV reported that the Islamic Republic's parliament has approved the measure to close the Strait of Hormuz, a chokepoint between Iran and Oman through which around 20 per cent of global oil and gas flows.
"I encourage the Chinese government in Beijing to call them about that, because they heavily depend on the Straits of Hormuz for their oil," said Rubio, who also serves as national security adviser.
Rubio spoke on Fox News' "Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo" show
"If they do that, it will be another terrible mistake. It's economic suicide for them if they do it. And we retain options to deal with that, but other countries should be looking at that as well. It would hurt other countries' economies a lot worse than ours."
Iran has long threatened to choke the Strait of Hormuz. Soon after the military strikes on the country's three nuclear sites by its long-time foe, the United States, Hossein Shariatmadari, the Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei's representative, reportedly called for immediate retaliation, including closing the Strait of Hormuz to American, British, German, and French ships.
Rubio said a move to close the strait would be a massive escalation that would merit a response from the US and others.
The Strait of Hormuz is a strait between the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman. It provides the only sea passage from the Persian Gulf to the open ocean and is one of the world's most strategically important choke points. The Strait serves as the primary export route for Gulf producers such as Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Iraq, and Kuwait.
This Strait allows about 20 per cent of the world's daily oil consumption—around 20 million barrels—to pass through it.
The Strait has been at the heart of regional tensions for decades, and recently, attacks have occurred near it and targeted alternative routes for oil bypassing Hormuz, news agency Reuters said.
The US officials said on Sunday that it "obliterated" Iran's main nuclear sites using 14 bunker-buster bombs, more than two dozen Tomahawk missiles and over 125 military aircraft. The strikes mark an escalation in the ongoing Middle Eastern conflict, with Israel beginning to strike Iran on June 13.
Israeli strikes on Iran have so far killed at least 950 people, wounded 3,450 others, news agency AP quoted a human rights group as saying.
Tehran has vowed to defend itself. Rubio also warned against retaliation, saying such an action would be "the worst mistake they have ever made."
If they do that, it will be another terrible mistake. It's economic suicide for them if they do it.
The US Secretary of State said US was prepared to talk with Iran.
Key Takeaways The Strait of Hormuz is critical for global oil trade, with 20% of the world's oil passing through it.
US military actions have escalated tensions, prompting Iran to consider retaliatory measures.
International diplomacy, particularly involving China, is crucial in mitigating potential conflict in the region.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Wire

24 minutes ago

• The Wire

If You Are Cheering for Bombs on Muslim Lands, You Are Not a 'Nationalist'

When Israel conducted unilateral and unprovoked attacks on Iranian territory on June 13, 2025, Iran retaliated to defend its sovereignty by firing missiles, including hypersonics, into Israel. For Israel, barrages of missiles bypassing their famed air defence system, the Iron Dome, were beyond tolerable. In this context, Israel has been desperate for the US to join the war under the garb of destroying Iran's nonexistent nuclear weapons. US president Donald Trump earlier showed all the signs of using a level-headed approach by stating that he would not enter the war for at least two more weeks, but then his own unpredictability or the pressure of the lobby that funds most political campaigns in the US prevailed over him. And on June 21, the USA conducted airstrikes on Iran's three nuclear facilities – Fordow, Isfahan, Natanz – almost against the will of its own people and his own poll plank. The conflict in West Asia is unfolding in the wider context of the humanitarian crisis in Gaza of which Iran has been one of the harshest critics and hence a legitimate target for Israel and its chief sponsor, the USA. The war is likely to have far reaching ramifications across the world. But India's digital sphere is not responding with strategic analysis, diplomacy, humanitarian concern or even wisdom. It is flooded with tank emojis, fanboy hashtags, and recycled Modi–Netanyahu selfies. This, however, should not be mistaken as solidarity for Israel. It is a digital hate theatre where communal rage is dressed up as foreign policy. In the aftermath of Hamas' October 2023 attack on Israel and Israel's indiscriminate war on Gaza, a significant portion of anti-Palestinian disinformation on social media and pro-Israel propaganda, often using violent or communal language, was traced to India and in some cases has been amplified by verified Indian handles, including some linked to the ruling party. This online behaviour reflects not geopolitical strategy, but a deeper domestic pathology - one where communal aggression finds its outlet under the cover of international conflict. The right-wing hate-mongers in India don't debate. They bait. 'But what about Hamas?' 'What about Pakistan?' 'What about Muslims and Masjids and skullcaps?' 'What about 1947?' If these were rational questions, one could engage with arguments. Much to our dismay, instead, these are smokescreens, designed to blur moral clarity and reframe nationalism as a shouting match. The tactic employed in the process is whataboutery – probably now the cornerstone of political discourse in India, under the Bharatiya Janata Party. The ruling party, its political influencers and troll networks routinely deploy whataboutery to deflect criticism – on issues ranging from economy, communal violence, human rights, or foreign policy. Rather than engage with facts or ethical questions, their rhetorical moves are designed to shift the spotlight – ensuring no accountability, just perpetually performative outrage. BJP took the good old statecraft. And replaced it with stagecraft. When Israel bombed Iran's consulate in Damascus in April 2024 – a direct violation of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations – there was no outcry from India's hawkish media or foreign policy circles. No prime-time outrage. No tweets about sovereignty. No talk of international law. This silence was not accidental. It was ideological. Iran is a Muslim country and for a large section of India's right-wing digital ecosystem, that alone is reason enough to suspend all concern for legal norms or moral consistency. Strategic thinking? No. It is a segregatory reflex, mistaken for strategy. And like every other, this mistake has a cost. Iran is not an enemy. It's a strategic partner. India defied US sanctions to invest in and develop the Chabahar Port – a critical trade and connectivity route to Central Asia and Afghanistan, and a calculated counterbalance to China's investment in Gwadar Port, Pakistan. In fact, India signed a 10-year agreement to operate Chabahar in May 2024, underscoring its long-term strategic importance despite US pressure and threats of secondary sanctions. Undermining Iran doesn't weaken Pakistan – it weakens India. Every cheer for Iran's isolation is, in effect, a cheer against our own regional leverage and long-term interests. India's foreign policy and strategic partnerships are the culmination of decades of deliberate and principled diplomacy, not accidental alignments. Jawaharlal Nehru's unwavering support for Palestine and Indira Gandhi's leadership in the Non-Aligned Movement laid the foundational groundwork for India's foreign policy. Atal Bihari Vajpayee's proactive engagement with West Asia and Manmohan Singh's careful calibration of relations with Tehran further solidified India's position, ensuring a delicate balance between strategic autonomy, economic imperatives, and moral consistency. This legacy has been instrumental in securing critical oil partnerships, protecting the interests of millions of Indian workers in the Gulf, and maintaining a credible stance with both Israel and Iran. Yet, under the current administration, this hard-earned diplomatic legacy is being squandered, as the BJP prioritises petty politics of hate over the grand strategic vision that once defined India's global standing. The BJP's actions, marked by disinformation campaigns and a disregard for international norms, have not only undermined India's credibility but also jeopardised the delicate balances that previous leaders worked tirelessly to maintain. This indictment of the BJP's approach reveals a troubling shift, where short-term domestic gains are pursued at the expense of India's long-term geopolitical influence. And of course, it never helps to have an external affairs minister who is always on an official visit to some country or think-tank on the taxpayer's money but has somehow miserably failed at converting all these opulent trips into diplomatic gains for the nation. Meanwhile, there is a world beyond hashtags. And it is watching. A January 2024 poll across 16 Arab countries showed 92% identifying Gaza as a personal cause. 97% reported psychological stress. Saudi opposition to normalisation with Israel jumped from 38% to 68%. Clearly, these are not fringe sentiments. They are tectonic shifts in public perception. India has reduced itself to a spectator, scoffing at the world's changing views from behind a screen. Now for the legal truth – not spin, not sentiment. The UN has unequivocally called Israel's siege of Gaza collective punishment – a textbook violation of the Geneva Conventions. The International Court of Justice has gone further, warning of a plausible genocide. And again, these aren't fringe claims. Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, and UN-appointed experts have documented systematic attacks on hospitals, schools and refugee camps, forced mass displacement, and the deliberate use of starvation as a weapon. They are well-documented war crimes – codified in international law, recorded by the world's leading human rights bodies and broadcasted across the world in real time. And still, we cheer. Not because it helps India. But because it fits a narrative – a deeply entrenched one, where violence against Muslims is always seen as understandable, even justified and celebrated, and any dissent from that worldview is cast as anti-national. In this framework, foreign policy is not guided by strategic interests or moral principles. It's an extension of domestic bigotry projected onto the global stage. The suffering of thousands of innocent civilians killed in Israeli strikes become irrelevant – because acknowledging it would mean confronting the moral contradictions of the majoritarian politics at home. Support for Israel, in this context, is not about geopolitics. It's about reinforcing a domestic message: that Muslim lives are expendable, Muslim grievances are illegitimate, and any empathy for them is a betrayal of the nation. This is not foreign policy. It is hate and bigotry masked as politics. And in the long run, however, it does not just dehumanise others. It corrodes India's own moral standing, erodes its credibility abroad, projects India as thoughtless at the global stage, and turns legitimate dissent into a punishable offence at home. India today could have occupied a rare and enviable position in global geopolitics - one of moral credibility and strategic relevance. As one of the few major powers with working diplomatic ties to both Israel and Iran, India was uniquely positioned to act as a bridge in an increasingly fragmented world. With the region teetering on the edge of a wider war – and with the ever-present threat of nuclear escalation – India could have used its channels to urge de-escalation, mediate dialogue, and prevent the deepening of a catastrophic conflict. This did not just have to be naïve hope. It could have been a genuine strategic opportunity. At a moment when the world is desperate for calm, India could have been a voice of restraint and a platform for negotiation - projecting not just power, but wisdom. Instead, unfortunately, under the BJP government, our foreign policy is now a sub-genre of digital hooliganism. Gaza, West Bank, Lebanon, Yemen, Syria, Iran – all Muslim-majority countries are legitimate targets that fit the BJP's script. What's been branded as nationalism is, in truth, egotistical hate politics – a cynical rebranding of Orwellian control, where the idea of Indian democracy is to be contained, not celebrated. In the process, it has culminated into the slow, deliberate sabotage of India's moral and strategic standing in the world. Congress rejects this collapse. We call for a humanitarian ceasefire, for the two-state solution, for a return to law, principle, and strategic maturity. And here is the catch. If you cheer bombs on Muslim lands – even when they damage India's interests – you are not a nationalist. You are a saboteur. This is not love for India. It is its calculated undoing. Pawan Khera is chairman of media and communications of the Congress party.

First Post

24 minutes ago

• First Post

Will India be hit if Iran closes Strait of Hormuz? How will West Asia war impact trade?

With the US inserting itself in the Israel-Iran conflict, more uncertainty grips the world. The Islamic Republic has threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz, a key oil supply route. With global oil prices rising, will India feel the pinch? What else should the everyday Indian be worried about with no end to the war in sight? read more Oil tankers pass through the Strait of Hormuz. Iran has threatened to close this key oil supply route after US attacked its nuclear sites on Sunday (June 22). File photo/Reuters It's a jittery Monday. A day after the US struck nuclear sites in Iran, there are concerns about disruption in the energy markets, even more so after Iran's parliament approved a motion calling for the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, the oil artery of the world. While the final call on this crucial oil supply route will be taken by Iran's Supreme National Security Council, oil prices on Monday hit a five-month high before easing and Asian markets slid. India will be impacted as uncertainty continues over the US and Iran's next movie. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD New Delhi has stakes in both Israel and Iran, and a prolonged conflict could hit everything from oil supply, trade and the rupee. We analyse how prepared India is for the fallout from the West Asia crisis. Strait of Hormuz and India's oil trade India is watching closely if Iran will act on its threat and shut down the Strait of Hormuz , the world's most critical oil transit checkpoint. The Islamic Republic has never done this in the past, though similar warnings have been issued on multiple occasions. Iran is the world's ninth-biggest oil-producing country with an output of nearly 3.3 million barrels a day. India, the world's third-largest consumer of crude oil, depends heavily on imports to meet more than 85 per cent of its requirements. However, Indian refiners do not purchase crude from Iran, as its energy sector is sanctioned by the US, The Indian Express reports. India has also shifted its oil procurement strategy with a focus on Russia and the US. Imports from Russia increased after the Ukraine invasion because of good discounts following Western sanctions. American oil shipments to India increased to 439,000 barrels per day in June, higher than the 280,000 bpd in the earlier month. The dependence on West Asian countries is slowly reducing. But India still gets its crude oil from Iraq, Saudi Arabia and the UAE. It also purchases oil from Kuwait, Qatar, and Oman. The Strait of Hormuz, then, matters to India as close to 47 per cent of this imported crude is transported via this route, the report says. So if the oil supply channel is disrupted, the distribution in the supply chain will hit India. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The shutting down of the narrow passage would have significant global repercussions across energy markets, and it will impact India's energy security as well, Dr Laxman Kumar Behera, associate professor at Special Centre for National Security Studies at the Jawaharlal Nehru University, told news agency PTI. According to Behera, any disruption in the critical shipping lane, which is a geopolitical flashpoint, will majorly impact India's crude oil imports from Iraq and, to an extent, from Saudi Arabia. A map showing the Strait of Hormuz and Iran is seen behind a 3D-printed oil pipeline in this illustration. A big percentage of India's imported crude comes via this route. Reuters However, the Indian government says it is prepared. Petroleum and Natural Gas Minister Hardeep Singh Puri said for the past two weeks, India has been closely monitoring the evolving geopolitical situation in West Asia. 'Under PM Narendra Modi's leadership, India has diversified its supplies over the past few years, reducing reliance on the Strait of Hormuz,' he said. 'Our oil marketing companies have several weeks of supplies and continue to receive energy from various routes. We will take all necessary steps to ensure the stability of fuel supplies for our citizens.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Puri said if India imports only about 1.5 million barrels through this route, it will turn to other suppliers to fill the gap if the strait is closed. Behind-the-scenes negotiations are reportedly underway to ensure that Russia, Qatar, and African countries provide more oil without relying on the Strait of Hormuz, reports News18. Fuga Bluemarine crude oil tanker lies at anchor near the terminal Kozmino in Nakhodka Bay near the port city of Nakhodka, Russia. Russian oil imports to India measured 1.96 million barrels per day in May. Reuters Inflation While India might have enough oil supplies for now, it is likely to be affected by the disruptions if the oil route is shut. In such a scenario, oil prices could see a jump. 'Oil prices are expected to surge due to increased tensions in the region, with some analysts predicting prices to reach $80-$ 90 per barrel or even $00 per barrel if Iran responds with retaliatory measures,' said Captain D K Sharma (retd), a former Indian Navy spokesperson, who closely follows developments in the Gulf region. Some experts even hit that it could touch $120 per barrel. The surge in prices will have a domino effect in India. If oil prices rise, it will lead to higher energy and shipping costs, leading to domestic inflation. However, India need not worry just yet. Sachchidanand Shukla, group chief economist at Larsen & Toubro, told Mint, 'India can absorb oil prices up to $85 a barrel without triggering large macro imbalances. There is no need to panic, and one needs to keep an eye on how the situation evolves.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD If global oil prices rise, India's economy will also be affected. Reuters India's trade with West Asia Both Iran and Israel are important trading partners for India. Basmati rice is one of India's big exports to the Islamic Republic, which amounted to $753.2 million in FY25. Other exports are banana, tea, soya, and Bengal gram. The basmati exports to Iran have stopped since the latest conflict with Israel started 12 days ago. Operations at Iran's Bandar Abbas port have reportedly been suspended, and many consignments are stuck. 'We export around one million tonnes of basmati to Iran, which is approximately 15 to 16 per cent of total global export from India. Due to the present crisis, now around Rs 3,000 crore worth of export orders are hanging in the balance as no one knows how the situation will develop in the coming days as the banking infrastructure there has either collapsed or frozen, thus no transactions. We have just kept our fingers crossed,' Ranjit Singh Jossan, vice-president of the Basmati Rice Miller and Exporter Association, told The New Indian Express. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD India is a major exporter of basmati rice to Iran. This trade has taken a hit since the Israel-Iran conflict started. Reuters Other perishable items like bananas and tea will also be hit by delays. India exports 20,000 to 25,000 tonnes of tea to Iran, especially from Assam. However, exports are now on hold because of the conflict. B Rajesh Chander, a member of the Tea Board India, told The Hindu last week, 'There is fear that exports to countries such as Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan may also get affected in the future if the conflict continues.' 'A prolonged conflict could dampen Iranian demand and squeeze Indian exports,' Ajay Srivastava, founder of the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI), said. Israel is a larger trading partner – exports in FY 2024-25 amounted to $2.1 billion, and imports were at $1.6 billion. Trade with other countries in West Asia, like Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria and Yemen, could be hit. India's exports to the region stood at $8.6 billion, and imports were $33.1 billion. Financial markets India's benchmark indices, Sensex and Nifty, opened lower on Monday over tensions in West Asia. Almost all sectors were in the red. The Indian rupee fell 20 paise to 86.75 against the US dollar in early trade. The Indian rupee and government bonds face pressure this week following the US strike on Iran. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD It is impossible to be shielded from the impact of the conflict. However, a few cautionary steps will prevent New Delhi from feeling the full blow.

Hindustan Times

27 minutes ago

• Hindustan Times

Bitcoin slides below $100,000 after US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites

Bitcoin slid below $100,000 for the first time since May and Ether sank sharply after President Donald Trump said US bombers attacked Iran's three main nuclear sites, triggering risk aversion in weekend trading in digital-asset markets. File photo - A bitcoin is seen in an illustration picture. (Source: Reuters)(REUTERS) Bitcoin sank as much as 3.8% to $98,904 as of 12:05 p.m in New York in the aftermath of the attacks. Ether, the second-largest, token fell as much as 10% to about $2,157, its lowest intra-day level since May 8. 'Markets are nervously eying ongoing geopolitical developments,' said Caroline Mauron, co-founder of Orbit Markets, a provider of liquidity for crypto derivatives. The focus of markets will be largely on oil when traditional markets reopen, she said. The latest losses come after Trump said the Iranian sites of Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan were struck in the operation, specifically describing a 'payload of BOMBS' dropped on Fordow, a key location of uranium enrichment that has raised international concern that Iran was preparing to create a nuclear weapon. 'The overhang of whether the US would strike Iran caused a selloff through the week and into the weekend,' said Cosmo Jiang, general partner at Pantera Capital Management. Total liquidation of crypto bets over the last 24 hours was more than $1 billion, with about $915 million and $109 million in long and short positions closed respectively, according to data compiled by Coinglass. Jiang said Bitcoin 'tends to lead the market out of a bounce' in times of geopolitical uncertainty.