What next for Apple's AI, OpenAI's funding impetus, and an impressive Noise Tag 1
The annual Apple WWDC keynote is next week. You may have heard the rumours about significant redesign and naming scheme changes for iOS, iPadOS and so on. My hunch goes beyond the clickbait and 140 character attention spans. Apple, trying to overcome a deficit that's still increasing every week (the upgraded Siri remains delayed), will reconfigure its Apple Intelligence plans. As consumers, you and I may only see the changes on the interface layer, but my belief is, there's more to that story. I don't foresee any AI company acquisitions, but more on the lines of exclusivity driven core partnerships. There are three names that, I feel, might play a big role. Perplexity, which already has deals in place with Samsung and Motorola to integrate their AI in upcoming phones, could have something to offer Apple as well. It will certainly be more than just a search plug-in, if that partnership has to fructify. Could that means Perplexity's agentic browser plans, intersect with Safari, for instance? Very much a chance of that happening. Case in point, Eddy Cue, Apple's senior vice president of services saying during the Google antitrust trial that, 'We've been pretty impressed with what Perplexity has done, so we've started some discussions with them about what they're doing.'
Secondly, Google itself stands to lose a little if Samsung (being by far the largest Android phone OEM) reduces reliance on Gemini which itself has received significant updates recently, with the Perplexity partnership. The ideal recourse would be to find a way to give Gemini a home on the iPhone, beyond the app. Not to be forgotten, is Apple and Google's search partnership. And to that point, it has been noted in the recent antitrust trial that traditional searches are reducing, for the first time, via Safari. That's because of AI, and Gemini is better positioned than anyone else to realign its placement within Safari and Apple's broader OSes. The upgraded Siri, for that matter, alongside OpenAI's GPT search? And finally, Anthropic. With the latest Claude models being touted for their coding skills (as are many others, increasingly so), might find a place behind-the-scenes. Apple's code writing tool for developers, called Xcode, could do well with a Claude layering. Reminds me of Microsoft's Satya Nadella saying recently that, 'maybe 20 to 30 percent of the code that is inside of our repos today in some of our projects are probably all written by software.'
That may be a poignant quote, particularly for Apple that missed the AI train the last time, and wouldn't want to do so ahead of the next big chapter. And whichever AI company finds the best partnership alignment with Apple in 2025, stands to gain the most. With things the way they are in the AI space, that'll be a race to the top. We'll most certainly chat about this next week.
With every new artificial intelligence (AI) model, inevitably come the claims that they're the best ever at what they do. And that they're better than every rival. When Anthropic released Claude 4 a week ago, the artificial intelligence (AI) company said these models set 'new standards for coding, advanced reasoning, and AI agents'. They cite leading scores on SWE-bench Verified, a benchmark for performance on real software engineering tasks. OpenAI also claims the o3 and o4-mini models return best scores on certain benchmarks. As does Mistral, for its latest, open-source Devstral coding model. It is a common theme, not limited to this troika of AI companies. I talked about the need for 'AI benchmarks' to evolve quickly, else we risk running into the same sort of scenario that unfolded in the PC and smartphone space for years — where one metric (such as processor GHz speeds) fallaciously defined the worth of a product.
The Apple AirTag has, irrespective of whatever competition may claim, has remained the most accurate tracker for all things easy to forget and for tracking luggage during your travels. The universal applicability is such, you've to really hide this in your luggage, because thieves know what to search for, and throw it into the nearest bin (or canal). Many have made an Apple AirTag rival in recent years, but none have had the sort of accuracy or consistency. Noise, a company that I've often noted is on a premiumisation trajectory, recently sent something called the Tag 1 Smart Tracker. Priced at ₹1,499 at this time, it's available in Charcoal, Midnight and Ivory colours. It is compatible with Apple Find My network on the iPhone and the Android Find My Device service for Android devices. I was able to seamlessly set up both.
In the Find My app on an iPhone, for instance, the Noise Tag 1 shows up just as an AirTag would. The location accuracy and refresh window, seems to be very similar to the AirTag — I had both in the same travel bag, for an even-kneeled comparison. If I left that luggage behind at the hotel when heading out for briefings and the keynote, the Noise Tag 1 generated a notification on the phone that the linked piece of luggage had been left behind, with the location details. In this instance, there was nothing to worry, but clearly the Noise Tag 1 is on the job rather seamlessly. There is a way to chime a lost tracker with the ring mode (it is louder than an AirTag, at least to my ears), and can also be shared with family or friends, if you need help in tracking.
It is to be expected that the Noise Tag 1 would have a year's worth of battery life, similar to my experience over the years with an Apple AirTag — both use the same CR2032 type 3V lithium coin cell battery, easily replaceable too. The IPX4 splash resistance should help too, just in case your luggage finds itself immersed in the contents of a leaked bottle of water. The price of the Noise Tag 1 certainly adds value to this proposition, as does the compatibility with Android phones. There are choices aplenty for luggage and item trackers, but most don't do the task as consistently as the Noise Tag 1, or simply don't work with Android as well as an iPhone. For once, no limitations to work around.
Ahead of WWDC, Speechify has won the 2025 Apple Design Award for Inclusivity. The developers say this is the most popular app in the world to have anything read out loud to you, with hundreds of voices and more than 50 languages available. The proposition is simple — turn any written text into audio, be it from a document, a scan, a PDF file or a web page. 'The app offers an approachable UI with a variety of accessibility features - Dynamic Type and VoiceOver among them - that make it an instantly helpful tool for everyone: students, professionals, and leisure readers, as well as auditory learners and people with low vision. The design team clearly worked to reduce cognitive load all throughout the app too,' Speechify's Founder & CEO, Cliff Weitzman, tells us. You'll see them on the WWDC main stage.
OpenAI has shared details on the next phase of its AI for Impact Accelerator in India. The key statistics include expanded funding and technical support to 11 nonprofits that use AI across multiple domains including across healthcare, education and agriculture, and that brings the total value of technical grants to $150,000. The new solution developers include Educate Girls, Rocket Learning, Noora Health and Digital Green. 'These organisations are solving some of the country's most complex challenges with ingenuity and empathy. The AI for Impact Accelerator - now part of OpenAI Academy - is our way of learning from them, while ensuring frontier technology is being shaped by and in service of real communities,' Pragya Misra, Policy & Partnerships Lead for OpenAI India, tells us.
Rocket Learning, for instance, is using WhatsApp and generative AI to deliver personalised early learning experiences for parents and daycare workers, in the hope of improving school readiness across underserved communities. They claim to have reached 4 million children across 11 states. Digital Green is an attempt at scaling peer-to-peer agricultural learning, with curated insights and crop recommendations, to help boost agriculture. Educate Girls claims to have re-enrolled over 2 million girls, and improved learning processes for as many as 2.4 million children across 30,000 villages, while using AI to identify out-of-school girls and help with faster re-enrolment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Your Google account could be next: What a hacker can do with just one login
We don't want to freak you out—but if someone gets access to your Google account, they basically own your digital life. One single login. That's all it takes. And if you're one of the billions using the same password across accounts, or if your credentials were part of that recently reported 16 billion password leak, you need to act—like, yesterday. Let's walk through exactly what a hacker can do with just your Gmail address and password. It's worse than you think. This isn't just about reading your emails. Your email is the master key to the internet Your Gmail is the recovery email for dozens (if not hundreds) of other accounts—Facebook, Instagram, Netflix, Amazon, bank logins, food delivery apps. Hackers know this. Once they're in, they can click 'Forgot Password' on your other accounts, have the reset links sent to your Gmail, and quietly take over everything. You won't even know it's happening until it's too late. And unlike a phishing scam, which might fail if you spot a dodgy link, this happens legitimately through the real password reset processes. They can access google pay and google wallet If you've linked any cards or bank accounts to Google Pay, hackers can make transactions, drain prepaid balances, or misuse saved billing information. Some people even store gift cards or event passes inside their Google Wallet. That's all fair game if they're inside. According to Google's own data, over 150 million people actively use Google Pay globally. That's a massive attack surface. They can see where you've been—and where you're going If you've ever used Google Maps for directions, or even had location services turned on, your location history is saved. Hackers can access your Timeline, find out where you live, where you work, which gyms or hospitals you've visited, and even where you parked last Tuesday. Creepy? Yes. Dangerous? Absolutely. This isn't just about stealing money anymore—it's about stalking, blackmail, and real-world threats. Your Google drive isn't as private as you think Documents, spreadsheets, old ID scans, medical reports, passwords saved in a notepad file (yes, people actually do that)—hackers can access everything in your Google Drive. And if you've given 'offline access' to your files, that makes downloading even easier. If you store resumes, family photos, or signed PDFs with your signature? It's all up for grabs. They can access your YouTube channel, photos, and search history Think of everything Google knows about you. Your YouTube likes, your watch history, your Google Photos library (which could include private family images), and even your Google search history going back years. Hackers can access and even delete your content—or impersonate you if you have a public YouTube presence. And yes, they'll also know what embarrassing questions you've Googled at 2 a.m. They can set up forwarding rules and watch silently One of the worst tricks? Hackers don't always change your password. Instead, they sneakily set up email forwarding rules that send copies of specific emails—like ones with banking info or OTPs—to their own accounts. You keep using Gmail like normal while they quietly spy. Some even add their backup email to your recovery options, so they can reset your account if you try to boot them out later. If you're logged in on Chrome, they can access everything If your Google login is synced with Chrome, hackers can see your bookmarks, browsing history, and even saved passwords—yes, the ones stored in Chrome's autofill. According to a research, over 30% of internet users use browser autofill to store passwords. If that sounds like you, your passwords aren't just at risk—they're already exposed. They can lock you out completely Hackers who gain access to your Google account often act fast. They change the password, recovery options, 2FA methods, and even delete your recovery codes. Some even set up Google Authenticator or new security keys—locking you out in under 10 minutes. If you've never gone through Google's painful account recovery process, trust us—you don't want to. How to protect yourself (starting now) Use Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) — Always. Preferably via an authenticator app, not SMS. Check 'Security Activity' in your Google Account regularly. Revoke access to unknown devices and apps. Use a password manager and never reuse passwords across accounts. Enable passkeys or security keys if you're serious about locking it down. Your Google account isn't just your email. It's your entire digital identity. From your bank logins and photos to your location and search history—it's all tied to that one login. So if there's ever a time to double-check your security settings, update your password, and stop brushing off 2FA, it's now. Because hackers aren't just after your money—they're after you. And with 16 billion passwords floating around out there, yours might already be in the wild.
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
Can AI quicken the pace of math discovery?
Artificial intelligence can write a poem in the style of Walt Whitman, provide dating advice and suggest the best way to cook an artichoke. But when it comes to mathematics , large language models like OpenAI's immensely popular ChatGPT have sometimes stumbled over basic problems. Some see this as an inherent limitation of the technology, especially when it comes to complex reasoning. A new initiative from the Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency seeks to account for that shortfall by enlisting researchers in finding ways to conduct high-level mathematics research with an AI "co-author." The goal of the new grant-making program, Exponentiating Mathematics, is to speed up the pace of progress in pure (as opposed to applied) math -- and, in doing so, to turn AI into a superlative mathematician. "Mathematics is this great test bed for what is right now the key pain point for AI systems," said Patrick Shafto, a Rutgers University mathematician and computer scientist who now serves as a program manager in DARPA 's information innovation office, known as I20. "So if we overcome that, potentially, it would unleash much more powerful AI." He added, "There's huge potential benefit to the community of mathematicians and to society at large." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Ta Pa: Unsold Furniture Liquidation 2024 (Prices May Surprise You) Unsold Furniture | Search Ads Learn More Undo Shafto spoke from his office at DARPA's headquarters, an anonymous building in northern Virginia whose facade of bluish glass gives little indication that it houses one of the most unusual agencies in the federal government. Inside the building's airy lobby, visitors surrender their cellphones. Near a bank of chairs, a glass display shows a prosthetic arm that can be controlled by the wearer's brain signals. "By improving mathematics, we're also understanding how AI works better," said Alondra Nelson, who served as a top science adviser in President Joe Biden's administration and is a faculty member at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey. "So I think it's kind of a virtuous cycle of understanding." She suggested that, down the road, math-adept AI could enhance cryptography and aid in space exploration. Live Events Started after World War II to compete with the Soviet Union in the space race, DARPA is most famous for fostering the research that led to the creation of ARPANET, the precursor to the internet we use today. At the agency's small gift store, which is not accessible to the public, one can buy replicas of a cocktail napkin on which someone sketched out the rudimentary state of computer networks in 1969. DARPA later funded the research that gave rise to drones and Apple's digital assistant, Siri. But it is also responsible for the development of Agent Orange, the potent defoliant used to devastating effect during the Vietnam War. Discover the stories of your interest Blockchain 5 Stories Cyber-safety 7 Stories Fintech 9 Stories E-comm 9 Stories ML 8 Stories Edtech 6 Stories "I'm sure this isn't 100% innocent," Andrew Granville, a mathematician at the University of Montreal, said of DARPA's math initiative, although he emphasized that he was only speculating about eventual outcomes. DARPA is, after all, part of the Pentagon , even if it has traditionally operated with enviable independence. The U.S. military is rapidly incorporating AI into its operations, with the aim of not losing out to China and its People's Liberation Army or to Russia, which has been testing out new technologies on the battlefield in Ukraine. At the same time, Granville praised the endeavour, which comes as the Trump administration is cutting funding for scientific research. "We are in disastrous times for U.S. science," Granville said. "I'm very pleased that DARPA is able to funnel money to academia." A surfer and skateboarder in his free time, Shafto, 49, sat in a sparse conference room one recent afternoon, imagining a future when AI would be as good at solving multistep problems as it is at trying to glean meaning from huge troves of texts, which it does through the use of probability theory. Despite the unseasonably raw weather, Shafto seemed dressed for the beach in a blue-and-white Hawaiian-style shirt, white flannel trousers and sandals, with a trilby hat on the table before him. His vibe was, on the whole, decidedly closer to that of Santa Cruz than of Capitol Hill, largely in keeping with DARPA's traditional disregard for the capital's slow, bureaucratic pace. (The agency sets priorities and funds outside scientists but does not do research on its own; academics like Shafto spend an average of four years as program managers.) "There are great mathematicians who work on age-old problems," Shafto said. "That's not the kind of thing that I'm particularly interested in." Instead, he wanted the discipline to move more quickly by using AI to save time. "Problems in mathematics take decades or centuries, sometimes, to solve," he said in a recent presentation at DARPA's headquarters on the Exponentiating Mathematics project, which is accepting applications through mid-July. He then shared a slide showing that, in terms of the number of papers published, math had stagnated during the last century while life and technical sciences had exploded. In case the point wasn't clear, the slide's heading drove it home: "Math is sloooowwww." The kind of pure math Shafto wants to accelerate tends to be "sloooowwww" because it is not seeking numerical solutions to concrete problems, the way applied mathematics does. Instead, pure math is the heady domain of visionary theoreticians who make audacious observations about how the world works, which are promptly scrutinized (and sometimes torn apart) by their peers. "Proof is king," Granville said. Math proofs consist of multiple building blocks called lemmas, minor theorems employed to prove bigger ones. Whether each Jenga tower of lemmas can maintain integrity in the face of intense scrutiny is precisely what makes pure math such a "long and laborious process," acknowledged Bryna R. Kra, a mathematician at Northwestern University. "All of math builds on previous math, so you can't really prove new things if you don't understand how to prove the old things," she said. "To be a research mathematician, the current practice is that you go through every step, you prove every single detail." Lean, a software-based proof assistant, can speed up the process, but Granville said it was "annoying, because it has its own protocols and language," requiring programming expertise. "We need to have a much better way of communication," he added. Could artificial intelligence save the day? That's the hope, according to Shafto. An AI model that could reliably check proofs would save enormous amounts of time, freeing mathematicians to be more creative. "The constancy of math coincides with the fact that we practice math more or less the same: still people standing at a chalkboard," Shafto said. "It's hard not to draw the correlation and say, 'Well, you know, maybe if we had better tools, that would change progress.'" AI would benefit, too, Shafto and others believe. Large language models like ChatGPT can scour the digitized storehouses of human knowledge to produce a half-convincing college essay on the Russian Revolution. But thinking through the many intricate steps of a mathematical problem remains elusive. "I think we'll learn a lot about what the capabilities of various AI protocols are from how well we can get them to generate material that's of interest," said Jordan S. Ellenberg, a mathematician at the University of Wisconsin-Madison who is part of a team applying for an Exponentiating Mathematics grant. "We have no intuition yet about which problems are going to be hard and which problems are easy. We need to learn that." One of the more disconcerting truths about artificial intelligence is that we do not entirely understand how it works. "This lack of understanding is essentially unprecedented in the history of technology," Dario Amodei, CEO of the artificial intelligence company Anthropic, wrote in a recent essay. Ellenberg somewhat downplayed that assertion, pointing out that electricity was widely used before its properties were fully understood. Then again, with some AI experts worrying that artificial intelligence could destroy the world, any clarity into its operations tends to be welcome. Nelson, the former White House adviser, acknowledged "legitimate" concerns about the rapid pace at which artificial intelligence is being integrated into seemingly every sector of society. All the more reason, she argued, to have DARPA on the case. "There's a much higher benchmark that needs to be reached than whether or not your chatbot is hallucinating if you ask it a question about Shakespeare," she said. "The stakes are much higher."
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Apple talking to AI startup Perplexity, claims report and why it pulled down Google shares
Apple Inc. is exploring a potential acquisition of AI startup Perplexity AI to bolster its artificial intelligence capabilities, according to Bloomberg, citing sources familiar with the matter. The discussions, led by Adrian Perica, Apple's head of mergers and acquisitions, alongside services chief Eddy Cue and key AI decision-makers, are in early stages and may not result in a formal offer, the sources said, speaking anonymously due to the private nature of the talks. Apple buying Perplexity will be the company's largest-acquisition so far A deal for Perplexity, recently valued at $14 billion, would mark Apple's largest acquisition ever, surpassing its $3 billion purchase of Beats in 2014. The move could help Apple develop an AI-powered search engine, addressing concerns over its $20 billion annual deal with Google, which faces scrutiny from US antitrust regulators. No discussions have occurred with Perplexity's management, and the startup stated it has 'no knowledge of any current or future M&A discussions.' Apple declined to comment. Why Apple-Perplexity news pulled down Google stock Google shares reversed gains and fell nearly 1% in late trading after Bloomberg reported on Apple's Perplexity discussions. The news sparked investor concerns about Google's long-standing dominance in the search market, particularly its lucrative $20 billion annual deal to remain the default search engine on Apple's Safari browser. Apple's senior vice president, Eddy Cue, revealed during Google's antitrust trial that Safari search volumes declined for the first time in April, attributing this to growing user preference for AI-driven search alternatives like Perplexity and ChatGPT. If Apple acquires Perplexity, valued at $14 billion, it could reduce reliance on Google, threatening the latter's search advertising revenue, which accounted for $162 billion of Alphabet's $283 billion in 2022 revenue. The potential loss of this partnership, combined with the U.S. Department of Justice's push to curb Google's search monopoly, heightened market fears. Additionally, Perplexity's 20% month-over-month query growth signals a shift toward AI search, challenging Google's traditional model despite its own AI efforts like Gemini. Why Apple may be planning to buy Perplexity Perplexity's real-time, web-based question-answering service could enhance Apple's efforts to compete in generative AI, where it trails rivals. Apple's recent AI offerings, unveiled at its Worldwide Developers Conference, include live translation and a partnership with OpenAI for ChatGPT-based image generation, but a revamped Siri has been delayed until next spring. Acquiring Perplexity could provide Apple with AI talent, a recognized brand, and a consumer product to strengthen its position. Alternatively, Apple has considered partnering with Perplexity, potentially integrating its technology into Safari and Siri. The companies have met multiple times, with Apple's AI team evaluating Perplexity's technology, signaling interest in a closer relationship. Meta and Perplexity talks failed The news follows Meta Platforms Inc.'s failed attempt to acquire Perplexity earlier this year, after which Meta purchased a 49% stake in Scale AI for $14.3 billion. Apple and Meta are also competing for talent, with both companies vying to hire Daniel Gross, co-founder of Safe Superintelligence Inc. and a former Apple acquisition via his startup Cue in 2013. Google shares dipped nearly 1% in late trading after the report. AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
