Green Bay Police Chief Chris Davis provides details on local immigration enforcement policies
GREEN BAY, Wis. (WFRV) – Amidst nationwide immigration enforcement protests and raids, Green Bay Police Chief Chris Davis answered some of the most commonly asked questions regarding local policies on the recent actions.
In an over 13-minute video uploaded to YouTube by the Green Bay Police Department, Chief Davis answered nearly a dozen questions people have posed about Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) policies and what local officials would do concerning immigration enforcement in the city.
'No Kings' anti-Trump military parade protests planned all across Wisconsin on Saturday
The questions from the video are listed below, with a summarization of answers from Chief Davis:
Is the Green Bay Police Department assisting ICE with arrests?
Chief Davis said in the video that the department isn't assisting and that they've had no communication with ICE since well before January 1.
Arrests are made under federal authority that local police don't have, and it wouldn't be appropriate for the Green Bay Police to do so.
Why are so many people appearing to be jailed in Brown County on an 'ICE Safekeeper' hold?
Chief Davis said the department believes they were immigration enforcement arrests potentially through an agreement with the jail; however, they are not involved with as they do not have the lawful authority to make arrests solely based on immigration charges.
How does someone locate a detainee currently in ICE custody?
The Immigration and Customs Enforcement website has a locator system at ICE.gov.
What is the Green Bay Police Department's current policy regarding cooperation with ICE?
Chief Davis said that federal law prohibits local government officials from stopping employees from cooperating with immigration enforcement; however, they are not required to cooperate with ICE.
The Green Bay Police Department's policy is to evaluate any request from federal government bodies on a case-by-case basis, considering if it's an appropriate use of city resources and its potential impact on public safety.
Chief Davis said that officers are asked to let officials know if they have had contact with ICE; however, no such case has been mentioned.Federal law prohibits anybody from impeding a federal enforcement group from doing their duties, as they have jurisdiction here.
Chief Davis added that they have expectations of all law enforcement groups, whether it's local, state or federal, that they do their work in a lawful manner with respect to the community.
The Green Bay Police Department, according to Chief Davis, does not receive notice, and they have not received any related to immigration; however, this does not mean they will not be notified in the future.
The Green Bay Police Department may be prohibited from publicly informing residents about an upcoming ICE raid, as sometimes they are confidential. Similar to a search warrant related to another case, it could create safety issues if public notice is issued in advance.
ICE could notify the public if it chooses to.
The First Amendment gives a constitutional right to free speech and to peaceably assemble, and it applies to all people in the United States.
The Green Bay Police Department takes this very seriously, especially with the rise in protests.
Chief Davis said that while protest isn't a crime, crime is not a protest, and that officials won't tolerate property damage, safety threats to anybody and people who choose to be violent will be held accountable.
Chief Davis also added that he understands most people who come out for protests have no intention to commit crimes, but that it is their responsibility to protect and ensure the right to peacefully protest.Law enforcement activities require planning, which is confidential, as it is part of a code of ethics, Chief Davis said in the video. It is not up to the Green Bay Police Department to talk about things that may be happening enforcement-wise unless it's part of the plan to publicize things like traffic regulation.
Chief Davis said that any law enforcement agencies wishing to come into the Green Bay community are encouraged to talk to the local police first because they know best what works in this area, and may be willing to help as long as it's legal without a negative impact on the people.
Chief Davis said that the Green Bay Police Department is here to keep anybody and everybody in the city safe, no matter what.
'It is not relevant to that work for us to ask someone what their immigration status is. If you have a problem, as in being the victim of a crime or there's a safety issue, we're not going to ask you about your immigration status; we don't need to know that.'
'Immigration enforcement is not our responsibility, and federal immigration policy is not something that I can influence. We all took an oath to keep our community safe and to serve the community that's here in Green Bay right now and that has not changed.'
fact from fiction on social media?
'One of the biggest problems we're seeing right now is this proliferation of rumors and misinformation on social media,' Chief Davis said. 'There's a lot of energy on this issue right now and people have very strong feelings on it, and that's what people who spread misinformation on social media count on, that the heightened emotions on these issues will make it easier for people to believe things that aren't true.'
Chief Davis said to take everything on social media with a grain of salt, whether it's using a fact-checking site or other resources to learn more accurate information.'The Green Bay Police Department is here to keep people safe,' Chief Davis said. 'At the same time, the federal government has its authority and it's not appropriate for us to impede that. We all have opinions, I've got mine, but in our organization, we don't let those opinions get in the way of our work.'
The Green Bay Police Department's focus is local public safety, and Chief Davis says it will not get into the business of immigration enforcement as they aren't trained for it.
The video can be watched in full at the following link.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
31 minutes ago
- Politico
Man arrested after Utah ‘No Kings' rally shooting is released as investigation continues
A man who brought a rifle to a 'No Kings' rally in Utah — prompting an armed safety volunteer to open fire and accidentally kill a protester — has been released from jail while the investigation continues. Salt Lake District Attorney Sim Gill's office said Friday that it was unable to make a decision on charges against Arturo Gamboa, 24, who had been jailed on suspicion of murder following the June 14 shooting. Salt Lake City police had said Gamboa brought an assault-style rifle to the rally and was allegedly moving toward the crowd with the weapon raised when a safety volunteer for the event fired three shots, wounding Gamboa and killing a nearby demonstrator, Arthur Folasa Ah Loo. Gamboa did not fire his rifle and it is unclear what he intended to do with it. His lawyer, Greg Skordas, said Gamboa was lawfully in possession of the rifle at the rally and was walking with it unloaded pointed at the ground before he was shot in the back by the volunteer. Skordas said he does not believe that Gamboa heard anyone tell him to drop the weapon. 'There was never any raising of the gun, any brandishing of the gun, any pointing it toward anyone at all,' Skordas said. Gamboa had been attending the rally as a supporter, Skordas said, adding that he was not entirely sure why Gamboa brought the rifle. Skordas said his client, who works at a grocery store and is a part-time musician, had brought a gun at least once in the past to a demonstration, during the Black Lives Matter protests several years ago. Skordas said the volunteer who shot Gamboa and the demonstrator should face criminal charges, not Gamboa. His father Albert Gamboa, told The Associated Press earlier this week that his son was 'an innocent guy' who was 'in the wrong place at the wrong time.' Utah is an open-carry state, meaning people who can legally own a firearm are generally allowed to carry it on a public street. The volunteer has not been publicly identified as investigators have worked to determine who was at fault. Judge James Blanch said in the release order that Gamboa must live with his father and is forbidden from possessing firearms. The conditions terminate after two months or if criminal charges against him are pursued, Blanch wrote. Police said the day after the shooting that witnesses reported seeing Gamboa lift the rifle when he was ordered to drop it and that instead he began running toward the crowd. He fled but was arrested nearby, accused of creating the dangerous situation that led to Ah Loo's death. Salt Lake City police said in a statement the next day that Gamboa 'knowingly engaged in conduct ... that ultimately caused the death of an innocent community member.' But three days after Gamboa was booked into jail, with no formal charges filed, police acknowledged that the circumstances surrounding the shooting remained uncertain. They issued a public appeal for any video footage related to the shooting or Gamboa, and said detectives were still trying 'to piece together exactly what happened.' The volunteer who confronted Gamboa was described by event organizers as a military veteran whose role as a safety volunteer was to maintain order. Experts say it's extremely rare for such individuals, often called safety marshals, to be armed. They typically rely on calm demeanor, communication and relationships with police and protesters to help keep order, said Edward Maguire, an Arizona State University criminology and criminal justice professor. Police said the permit for the protest did not specify that there would be armed security. Protest organizers have not said whether or how the safety volunteer who shot Ah Loo was trained or explained why he was armed. All attendees, including those in safety roles, were asked not to bring weapons, according to Sarah Parker, a national coordinator for the 50501 Movement. The demonstration involving some 18,000 people was otherwise peaceful. It was one of hundreds nationwide against President Donald Trump's military parade in Washington, which marked the Army's 250th anniversary and coincided with Trump's birthday.
Axios
32 minutes ago
- Axios
U.S. has "no interest" in putting troops on the ground in Iran, Vance says
Vice President Vance said Sunday that the United States doesn't plan to send ground troops into Iran and there is "no interest" in engaging in a "protracted conflict" with the nation. The big picture: Vance and other Trump administration officials appeared on Sunday shows to praise President Trump 's decision to carry out a series of airstrikes against three Iranian nuclear sites, while reassuring Americans that the mission — dubbed Operation Midnight Hammer — isn't the launching point for a wider conflict. Speaking on NBC's "Meet the Press," Vance called the mission a "precise, a very surgical strike tailored to an American national interest" — preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon — and that he had "no fear" of a drawn-out conflict. Secretary of State Marco Rubio echoed the sentiment on CBS' "Face the Nation," saying that there are no plans from the U.S. to engage in further attacks on Iran unless they "mess around" and attack Americans or U.S. military sites. What they're saying: Rubio said Sunday that the U.S. carried out the attack after efforts to negotiate with Iran stalled, but that Trump administration officials are "prepared to talk to them tomorrow." Both men also dismissed the notion that the U.S. is at war with Iran, with Vance stating that the war is with Iran's nuclear program. "We destroyed the Iranian nuclear program. I think we set that program back substantially," Vance told NBC News' Kristen Welker. Zoom out: Vance and Rubio were unable to confirm the extent of the damage done to the nuclear sites, but Iran Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei told CNN that the strike was a "betrayal of diplomacy." "No one knows what will happen next, but what is sure is that the responsibility of the consequences of this war must be borne by the United States and Israel," he said. Bagahei refused to say how Iran might respond to the U.S. strike, but said the nation is entitled to "exercise its right of self-defense."
CNN
33 minutes ago
- CNN
Dem. Senator Adam Schiff says 'we simply don't know' if US is safer after Iran strikes
Democratic Senator Adam Schiff speaks to Kasie Hunt about the congressional response to President Trump's order to strike Iran.
