NE TN House delegation splits 4-4 as vouchers pass
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (WJHL) — Four Northeast Tennessee House members voted against the school voucher bill Thursday and four voted for it as the bill passed fairly narrowly, 53-45. The bill is now being debated in the Senate.
LIVE: Tennessee Senate considers school vouchers after House passes bill
Tim Hicks (R-Gray), who has consistently expressed strong support of a statewide voucher bill, was joined in the 'aye' column by Timothy Hill (R-Blountville), John Crawford (R-Kingsport) and Bud Hulsey (R-Kingsport). Crawford and Hulsey had told News Channel 11 they were undecided on the bill at the end of last week, while Hill has not responded to requests for comment.
A total of 21 Republicans joined the House's 24 Democrats on the losing side, including local representatives Rebecca Alexander (Jonesborough), David Hawk (Greeneville), Gary Hicks (Rogersville) and Renea Jones (Erwin).
News Channel 11 has reached out to the members for comment and will update this story as we hear back from any of them.
'I voted in opposition to the proposed voucher plan, in accordance with the wishes of a majority of Greene County,' Hawk said in a text message minutes after the vote.
From Rebecca Alexander:
It was my greatest honor to stand up for what I felt what District 7 would want me to do. The letters and phone calls I received were around 10-1 against the voucher bill. I am in Nashville because you trusted me to represent you and I'm honored to do that and will continue to do so. We have the best public schools in our area and I am confident they will continue to be excellent and I promise to support them in Nashville.
From Bud Hulsey:
I voted 'yes' because 72% of my District appear to believe that it is good for parents to have a direct say in the type of education provided to their children, but with the full assurance that our local schools are fully protected and will lose nothing.
From Renea Jones:
The people of the Fourth House District elected me to be their voice in Nashville. Over the course of two months, I have met with parents, teachers, administrators, and citizens-at-large to ascertain how the Education Freedom Act ('vouchers') would impact Carter and Unicoi counties. After receiving over six hundred calls and emails through our office, and looking at the facts, I chose to vote against the Education Freedom Act. I feel that the legislation falls short of addressing the concerns our public education system faces. However, that was not the consensus of a majority of the legislature.
From Tim Hicks:
Education has a brighter future starting today. We will continue to support public education as the highest priority. There's nothing more important than giving our parents a choice for the education that best fits their child's needs.
(This is developing story)
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
31 minutes ago
- USA Today
Some Democrats are finally standing up to Trump – even if it gets them arrested
Not all Democrats are afraid to push back against Donald Trump's immigration policy. Some are willing to be detained. In safely blue areas of the country, constituents are asking themselves who has the audacity to stand up to President Donald Trump's extreme immigration agenda. Earlier this week, New York City constituents got their answer. On June 17, New York City comptroller and mayoral candidate Brad Lander was arrested by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents while escorting a man out of immigration court in Manhattan. Lander, who repeatedly asked to see a judicial warrant for the man ICE was attempting to detain, was held in custody for four hours. The federal government is still trying to decide whether it will charge him with a crime. 'We're not just showing up for just a few families, or for the strength of our democracy,' Lander told the supporters waiting for him outside the federal courthouse. 'We are showing up for the future of New York City.' While it's unclear that Lander's arrest will make any difference in his chances to be New York City's next mayor, one thing is now certain: He is the kind of person the city and Democrats need in the Trump era. Democrats should be fighting Trump's systematic hate Lander is now a member of an exclusive group of Democratic politicians who have gotten into legal trouble for combating the Trump administration's extreme deportation agenda. These politicians are not doing anything wrong – they are simply trying to stand up for the immigrants who make this country great. Opinion: Trump lied about the LA protests so you wouldn't see what he's really doing The first to face legal repercussions was Milwaukee County Judge Hannah Dugan, who was arrested in April and later indicted for allegedly assisting an undocumented immigrant in escaping arrest. Then in May, Newark Mayor Ras Baraka was arrested at an ICE detention center when three members of New Jersey's congressional delegation arrived for an unannounced inspection. Rep. LaMonica McIver, D-New Jersey, who was also arrested that day, was indicted on June 10 for allegedly interfering with immigration officers. Less than a week before Lander's arrest, Sen. Alex Padilla, D-California, was handcuffed and thrown out of a Department of Homeland Security news conference. This defiance is encouraging to see. People who have the privilege of a public platform are putting their careers on the line to stand up for those who are being terrorized by the federal government. These actions, so long as they are peaceful, are how Democrats should be reacting to the Trump administration. We need a mayoral candidate who suits New York Until this moment, Lander had flown under the radar for the duration of the city's mayoral race. Despite his position as the city's top financial officer and an endorsement from a panel of experts with The New York Times, Lander has been polling behind front-runner Andrew Cuomo, a former New York governor, and Zohran Mamdani, a member of the New York State Assembly. Who is Zohran Mamdani? A Democratic socialist is running for NYC mayor. I hope he can rally voters. | Opinion It's not that Lander is a bad candidate – he's experienced and policy-driven, and he has a progressive view of what the city can be. He and Mamdani have cross-endorsed each other in the hopes of besting Cuomo in the ranked-choice voting system. Lander just doesn't have Cuomo's name recognition or Mamdani's charisma. By getting arrested, Lander has shown New Yorkers that someone is willing to stand up for their values of protecting immigrants. We don't have to elect Cuomo, who had to resign in disgrace in 2021 after more than a dozen women accused him of sexual harassment. Nor do we have to elect incumbent Eric Adams, who has welcomed ICE into our city against the wishes of the voters. Lander is showing us that we could have someone who is willing to fight the Trump administration while leading the nation's most populous city. And he's one of several showing Democrats the way forward. Follow USA TODAY columnist Sara Pequeño on X, formerly Twitter: @sara__pequeno
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Skiers Consider Boycotting Utah
As always, skiers on Reddit have all kinds of opinions, however wild they may or may not be. This week, r/skiing's keyboard warriors have decided to address the current reconciliation bill up for debate in the US Senate and the provision to it, which amongst other things, would mean the potential sale of a few million acres of US public lands. One particularly fired-up skier has taken to r/skiing to say that in light of the bill, Utah skiers should start boycotting the state. For context, the bill's provision that concerns the sale of public lands was published by the US Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, which is led by Republican Utah Senator Mike Lee."It's time to boycott Utah. Utah Sen. Mike Lee wants to sell millions of acres of public land. He needs to feel it where it hurts the most: his economy," the post by Reddit user Hobbitsliketoparty, is titled. Want to keep up with the best stories and photos in skiing? Subscribe to the new Powder To The People newsletter for weekly updates. The post details that, indeed, up to 3.3 million acres of US public lands would be sold across 11 western states, including Utah. In Utah specifically, this could include land near Big and Little Cottonwood Canyons, Millcreek, Parley's, and more BLM land close to some of Utah's National Parks like Zion and Arches. Under the provision, National Parks, National Monuments, National Recreation Areas, components of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, National Wildlife Refuge System, National Fish Hatchery Systems, Wilderness Preservation Areas, and 'nearly every other protected designations,' would be excluded from the sale. Land sold under the bill would be for the purpose of building housing in order to ease housing shortages in the US. u/Hobbitsliketoparty has done their research, because they also state that 'but there's no requirement that the land be used for affordable housing. Developers and private buyers could snap up access points, trailheads, and wild spaces. That access could be gone for good.'The bill's provision has some vague language about proposals to purchase the land would need to include a description of how intended development would address local housing needs, including supply and affordability. However, there's no stipulation on holding the proposer to that once the sale is carried out. Considering Utah Senator Mike Lee's creation and support of the bill, u/Hobbitsliketoparty is proposing a boycott of funding to Utah's outdoor economy in protest. "If we let this happen, it sets a dangerous precedent. Politicians should not be allowed to auction off public land with almost no public input. And Utah has a history of this. From shrinking Bears Ears to resisting wilderness protections, they've been chipping away for years. If Utah's leadership insists on selling out our public lands, we should stop funding their outdoor economy. That means skipping the ski trips. Skipping the canyoneering. Skipping the visits to the Mighty 5. In 2017, Outdoor Retailer pulled its convention out of Salt Lake City after similar attacks on public land. It worked. Maybe it's time we acted again," reads the post. Several commenters point out and thank u/Hobbitsliketoparty for doing their research and reiterate the fact that while many of Utah and other state's ski areas are on public lands, often managed by USFS, the permits they operate on also exempt them from the sale. But that doesn't mean that trailheads and access points for other, non-inbounds skiing recreation wouldn't be threatened by the sale. It's hard to say whether boycotting skiing in Utah and the rest of its outdoor tourism economy would send the right message to Sen. Lee. For one, the Senate vote is slated to take place sometime in the next few weeks, which means, by the time ski season rolls around, there will already be a decision. Also, food for thought—boycotting Utah's outdoor tourism economy as a revenue source for the state would potentially fuel supporter's of the bill's fire by giving them more ammunition to sell off public lands. But I get it, u/Hobbitsliketoparty is angry like a lot of Americans right now about this potential attack on our public lands, but rather than boycotting a local tourism industry, the best course of action would be to call your local senators and let them know you oppose the bill, or use a handy form from an organization like the Outdoor Alliance or Protect Our Winters to do Consider Boycotting Utah first appeared on Powder on Jun 20, 2025
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Former Clinton campaign manager laments 'leaderless' state of Dems as Biden remains 'off the radar'
Democratic strategist Patti Solis Doyle lamented on Thursday that the Democratic Party remains rudderless, with neither a leader nor a message to unite around. As Democrats continue to reel from their historic defeat in November and revelations about the alleged cover-up of former President Joe Biden's purported decline while in office, many are still struggling to chart a new course for their party. Solis Doyle, like other veteran Democratic Party strategists, vented her frustration to podcaster and commentator Mark Halperin on his "Next Up" podcast. "So, first, let me say that I have never been happier not to be actually in it, in the middle of politics, than I am right now, because it sounds really depressing, what's going on at the party," Solis Doyle said when asked for her take on the state of the party. Obama Isn't Coming To Rescue Democrats In Desperate Need Of Leadership: Ny Times Columnist In addition to how the Democratic Party is being criticized as any party would be after a devastating loss, she said another problem appears unique to the Democrats' predicament. Read On The Fox News App "The other problem that they have is that there's no real leader," Solis Doyle said. "You know, if your party holds the White House, the leader of the party is the president. If your party doesn't hold the White House, the leader of the party is the last, you know, president of that party. So, right now for us, that's Joe Biden, but he has completely — you know, he's off the radar completely." "And as you opened with, Mark, the DNC chair really isn't the leader of the party," she added. "I mean, they're supposed to keep operations going, they're supposed to raise money, they're supposed to make sure there's stuff going on in the states, but they're not really the leader of the party." This, Solis Doyle continued, is part of a larger issue showing the lack of guidance for the party to unite around. Click Here For More Coverage Of Media And Culture "So, right now, we're leaderless, we're message-less, we're agenda-less, we don't have any alternative ideas to the president and the Republicans right now. So, you know, I'm concerned, to say the least," the strategist said. Solis Doyle argued that if history is any guide, Democrats will take back the House in the midterms. However, the underlying problems of the party will remain, she article source: Former Clinton campaign manager laments 'leaderless' state of Dems as Biden remains 'off the radar'