What is genocide and is it happening in Gaza?
Israel says it is seeking to wipe out Gaza's Islamist rulers and free its hostages still held in the occupied Palestinian coastal strip since the Hamas militant attack in Israel on October 7, 2023.
But Israel's devastating war on Gaza -- largely populated by descendants of Palestinian refugees who were expelled from or fled what became Israeli land in 1948 -- has killed tens of thousands of civilians and sparked growing global outrage.
The accusation against Israel of genocide has been made with increasing force from quarters ranging from "Schindler's List" star Ralph Fiennes to Amnesty International and some Israeli historians.
What does the legal term really mean and who can decide whether it applies?
What is 'genocide'?
The word genocide -- derived from the Greek word "genos", for race or tribe, and "cide", from the Latin for "to kill" -- was coined in 1944 by Raphael Lemkin.
Lemkin, a Polish Jew who had fled to the United States, used it to describe the crimes committed by Nazi Germany during the Holocaust.
It was used for the first time within a legal framework by an international military tribunal at Nuremberg to try Nazi leaders for their crimes in 1945.
However, those accused were eventually convicted on charges of crimes against humanity.
It has been recognised within international law since 1948 and the advent of the UN Genocide Convention.
That text defines genocide as any of five "acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group".
These five acts include killing members of the group, causing them serious bodily or mental harm, imposing living conditions intended to destroy the group, preventing births and forcibly transferring children out of the group.
Regardless of the definition, the qualification of "genocide" has been hugely sensitive over the decades.
What is happening in Gaza?
Israel's military offensive on Gaza since October 2023 has killed 54,677 people, mostly civilians, according to the health ministry in the occupied Palestinian territory.
The United Nations has said the territory's entire population of more than two million people is at risk of famine, even if Israel said last month it was partially easing the complete blockade on aid it imposed on Gaza on March 2.
Despite international calls for an end to the war, a ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas remains elusive.
The latest war started after Hamas fighters attacked Israel on October 7, 2023.
The attack resulted in the deaths of 1,218 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official Israeli figures.
Of the 251 hostages seized, 55 remain in Gaza, including 32 the Israeli military says are dead.
Who speaks of 'genocide' in Gaza?
In December 2023, South Africa brought a case to the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the United Nations' highest judicial organ, alleging that Israel's Gaza offensive breached the 1948 UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.
Israel denies the accusation.
In rulings in January, March and May 2024, the ICJ told Israel to do everything possible to "prevent" acts of genocide during its military operations in Gaza, including by providing urgently needed humanitarian aid to prevent famine.
While no court has so far ruled the ongoing conflict is a genocide, human rights groups and international law experts -- including several who are Israeli -- have used the term to describe it.
Amnesty International has accused Israel of carrying out a "live-streamed genocide" in Gaza, while Human Rights Watch has alleged it is responsible for "acts of genocide".
A UN committee in November found Israel's warfare in Gaza was "consistent with the characteristics of genocide".
And a UN investigation concluded in March that Israel carried out "genocidal acts" in Gaza through the destruction of the strip's main IVF clinic and other reproductive healthcare facilities.
Omer Bartov, an Israeli scholar of the Holocaust, wrote in August last year that "Israel was engaged in systematic war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocidal actions".
Fellow Israeli historians Amos Goldberg and Daniel Blatman in January co-wrote an article in which they said: "Israel is indeed committing genocide in Gaza."
Western governments have largely refrained from using the word, with France's President Emmanuel Macron saying it was not up to a "political leader to use to term but up to historians to do so when the time comes".
But Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has used it, while Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva has accused Israel of "premeditated genocide".
What does Israel say?
Israel alleges it is exercising its right to security and "self defence", an argument echoed by its staunch ally the United States.
Israel has dismissed accusations of genocide as "blatant lies" and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has accused the UN Human Rights Council of being "an antisemitic, corrupt, terror-supporting and irrelevant body".
He has said UN experts should instead focus on "crimes against humanity and the war crimes committed by the Hamas terrorist organisation in the worst massacre against the Jewish people since the Holocaust", referring to October 7.
The International Criminal Court (ICC) in November issued arrest warrants for Netanyahu and former Israeli defence minister Yoav Gallant over alleged crimes against humanity and war crimes in Israel's war in Gaza -- including starvation as a method of warfare.
It also issued an arrest warrant for Hamas military chief Mohammed Deif over allegations of crimes against humanity and war crimes in the October 7 attack, but the case against him was dropped in February after confirmation Israel had killed him.
ICC prosecutor Karim Khan also initially sought warrants against Hamas leaders Yahya Sinwar and Ismail Haniyeh, but dropped those applications after their deaths in Israeli attacks.
Who decides and when?
Thijs Bouwknegt, a genocide expert, said the Israeli policy in Gaza seemed to be "designed to make a civilian population either perish or leave" but a court would have to decide if it was genocide.
"It bears the hallmarks of it but we still have to wait and see whether it actually was," said the historian, who has conducted research for the ICC and observed trials over genocide in Rwanda and former Yugoslavia.
In the case of Rwanda, in which the United Nations said extremist Hutus killed some 800,000 Tutsis and moderate Hutus in 1994, it took a decade for the International Criminal Tribunal to conclude genocide had happened.
It was not until 2007 that the ICJ recognised as genocide the murder by Bosnian Serb forces of almost 8,000 Muslim men and boys in Srebrenica in 1995 during the Bosnian war.
"The threshold for genocide is nearly impossible to meet," Bouwknegt explained.
"You have to prove that there was an intent and that there was the only possible explanation for what happened."
Has there been intent?
French-Israeli lawyer Omer Shatz said "there is no doubt that war crimes, crimes against humanity are being committed" in Gaza.
But the international law expert agreed intent was more difficult to prove.
That is why, after the ICC issued an arrest warrant against Netanyahu and Gallant, he filed a report with the court in December arguing they were among eight Israeli officials responsible for "incitement to genocide in Gaza".
"If incitement is established, that establishes intent," he told AFP.
His 170-page report lists such alleged incitements, including Gallant at the start of the war saying Israel was fighting "human animals" in Gaza and far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich urging "total extermination" in the Palestinian territory.
It cites President Isaac Herzog failing to differentiate between Palestinian militants and civilians when he spoke of "an entire nation out there that is responsible" for the October 7 attack.
Mathilde Philip-Gay, an international law expert, said it was ultimately up to a judge to decide on whether the genocide label applied.
But, she warned: "International law cannot stop a war."
"The judiciary will intervene after the war. The qualification (of genocide) is very important for victims but it will come later," she said.
What now?
The 1948 Genocide Convention says signatories can call on UN organs "to take such action... for the prevention and suppression of acts of genocide".
But while it implies they should act to stop any such crime from occurring, it does not detail how.
Activists have called for an arms embargo and sanctions against Israel.
The European Union last month ordered a review of its cooperation deal with Israel and Britain halted trade talks with the government.
But the United States and Germany, two major weapons suppliers, are not likely to want to review their relationship with Israel.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
Oil rises and stocks slump after US strikes on Iran's nuclear sites
Investors reacted to US strikes on Iran over the weekend as Iran and Israel continued to trade missile fire on Monday morning. The price of Brent crude oil rose around 1.53% to $78.19 a barrel as of around 7.15 CEST, while WTI rose 1.48% to $74.93 a barrel. On Sunday, US forces attacked three Iranian nuclear and military sites, stating that Tehran must not be allowed to possess a nuclear weapon. President of Iran Masoud Pezeshkian said that the country "will never surrender to bullying and oppression", while Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi has arrived in Moscow for talks with Russian president Vladimir Putin. Futures for the S&P 500 slipped 0.13% to 6,010.25 and Dow Jones Industrial Average futures dropped 0.2% to 42,431.00. Nasdaq futures fell 0.18% to 21,804.50 on Monday morning. In Asian trading, Tokyo's Nikkei 225 index fell 0.19% to 38,331.12, the Kospi in Seoul dropped 0.3% to 3.012,88, and Australia's S&P/ASX 200 declined 0.37% to 8,474.40. Hong Kong's Hang Seng and the Shanghai Composite Index were in positive territory, with respective gains of 0.35% to 23,611.68 and 0.13% to 3,364.29. The conflict, which flared up after an Israeli attack against Iran on 13 June, has sent oil prices higher linked to Iran's status as a major oil producer. The nation is also located on the narrow Strait of Hormuz, through which much of the world's crude oil passes. Investors are concerned that Tehran might decide to bomb oil infrastructure in neighbouring countries or block tankers from travelling through the Strait of Hormuz. Shipping company Maersk said on Sunday that it was continuing to operate through the strait, adding: "We will continuously monitor the security risk to our specific vessels in the region and are ready to take operational actions as needed." According to vessel tracking data compiled by Bloomberg, two supertankers Coswisdom Lake and South Loyalty U-turned in the Strait of Hormuz on Sunday. The situation now hinges on whether Tehran decides to opt for aggression or a more diplomatic response to US and Israeli strikes. Iran could attempt to close the waterway by setting mines across the Strait or striking and seizing vessels. Even so, this would likely be met by a forceful response from the US navy, meaning the oil price spike may not be sustained. Some analysts also think Iran is unlikely to close down the waterway because the country uses it to transport its own crude, mostly to China, and oil is a major revenue source for the regime. If Tehran did successfully close the Strait, this would cause a wider price spike for transported goods and complicate the deflationary process in the US, potentially keeping interest rates higher for longer. On Monday morning, Trump also floated the possibility of regime change in Iran. "If the current Iranian regime is unable to make Iran great again, why wouldn't there be regime change?" said the US president on Truth Social. Vice-president J.D. Vance had commented earlier that the administration did not seek regime change in Iran.
France 24
2 hours ago
- France 24
Turning 80, UN faces fresh storm of doubts
The UN's 193 member states will mark Thursday the signing of the organization's foundational treaty, the UN Charter, on June 26, 1945 in San Francisco. After ratification, the United Nations came into being on October 24. The anniversary comes as the world body faces a multi-faceted crisis that has raised questions about its future. "Since the end of the Cold War, we have seen the organization struggle in cases from the Rwandan genocide to the Iraq war," Richard Gowan, an analyst at the International Crisis Group, told AFP. "When each big crisis comes, commentators announce that the UN is finished. And yet it still survives," he added. "That said, this is an especially bad moment," Gowan acknowledged, pointing to numerous countries that are "deeply frustrated" by the UN Security Council's failure to act on major conflicts like those in Ukraine and Gaza. That inaction is largely due to the veto power of the council's five permanent members -- Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States -- which have competing interests. "The UN system as a whole has a credibility crisis, and it is not clear that the organization's members have the resources or political energy to rescue it," Gowan told AFP. For Romuald Sciora, a research fellow at the French Institute for International and Strategic Affairs, the credibility issue can only result in the virtual disappearance of an organization that is already a political "dwarf" on the world stage. "I'm not sure the UN will cease to exist, even by its 100th anniversary," Sciora told AFP. "I see a slow vanishing, and the UN becoming a bit of a ghost," like "these old organizations whose names we have forgotten." But experts say while the UN desperately needs to enact tough reforms, not all of its problems come from within, and it has become an easy scapegoat for its divided membership. 'Worse' without UN Gissou Nia of the Washington-based Atlantic Council think tank says she fears that "the approach of might is right... is what is taking hold, and it brings us further and further away from the ideals" that led to the UN's founding as World War II ended. Nia, a human rights lawyer, says she hopes enough people will remain committed to the set of ideals and values "that will keep the UN alive," but still worries about the constant questioning of those values, notably from US ally Israel. "The constant berating from some very loud voices about the UN either being anti-Semitic, or the UN being a waste of funding, or the UN propping up dictators, actually has an impact," Nia told AFP. In a world devastated by the largest number of ongoing conflicts since 1945, and ravaged by major humanitarian crises, "the United Nations has never been more needed," Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said recently. "Our values have never been more relevant. And the needs have never been greater." Funding has nevertheless grown scarce as donors -- especially the United States under President Donald Trump -- pull back. Given the financial constraints, Guterres launched the UN80 initiative in a bid to streamline operations. Those changes could include thousands of positions being cut. For Gowan, "the UN is a very big organization, and of course it suffers from a variety of bureaucratic problems, just as almost all big organizations do. (...) So of course it deserves scrutiny and criticism." But, he added, "I think we have gotten a bit too accustomed to having this system at our service, and tend to spend too much time grumbling about its flaws and not enough time acknowledging its successes." The United Nations remains a place where arch-rivals and enemies still sit at the same table to air grievances, and where the smallest member state can have its voice heard. The UN also does important work on the ground, from the World Food Programme bringing needed supplies to more than 100 million people in 120 countries last year, to the thousands of peacekeepers protecting civilians in conflict zones. "The UN was a magnificent tool," Sciora said. "Obviously, it would be worse if it were to disappear from one day to the next." © 2025 AFP
AFP
2 hours ago
- AFP
Video shows fire at power plant in Yemen, not Israel refinery hit by Iran
on a Yemeni power plant has resurfaced in posts falsely linking it to the Iran-Israel war. The posts circulated after Israel confirmed an oil refinery in Haifa was struck by an Iranian missile, but the clip was geolocated to a power plant south of Yemen's capital Sanaa and was shared weeks before arch foes Iran and Israel traded waves of devastating strikes. "Bazan's power plant in Haifa was completely destroyed by an Iranian missile attack on June 16," reads a Thai-language X post shared on June 18, 2025. An attached clip shows an industrial facility engulfed in flames and blanketed by thick black smoke. It circulated after Israeli officials confirmed an oil refinery in the coastal city of Haifa was struck by an Iranian missile on June 15 (archived here and here). The arch foes have traded wave after wave of devastating strikes since Israel struck Iranian nuclear and military facilities with a barrage of missiles on June 13, killing several top officials and prompting a counter-attack by Tehran (archived here and here). In a flashpoint moment for the Middle EastPresident Donald Trump said US air strikes on June 22 had "totally obliterated" Iran's main nuclear sites and warned more targets would be hit if Iran did not make peace quickly (archived link). Hours later, Iran launched two waves of attacks against long-time foe Israel. Image Screenshot of the false X post captured on June 19, 2025, with a red X added by AFP The same footage also circulated in other Thai-language posts as well as English, Burmese, Japanese, Hindi and Bengali posts. But the video does not show an Iranian strike on Israel. Sanaa power plant A reverse image search using keyframes from the falsely shared video led to the same clip posted on Instagram on May 7 (archived link). According to an archive captured on June 19, its Arabic-language caption said it showed a power plant in Sanaa. The caption was later changed to say Tel Aviv. The Instagram user did not respond to an AFP request for comment. Image Screenshot comparison of the falsely shared clip (left) and the May 7 Instagram video (right) Elements in the video also correspond to south of Sanaa (archived link). Image Screenshot comparison of the falsely shared clip (left) and Google Maps imagery of the Haziz power plant (right), with similar elements highlighted by AFP Media reports from May 6 and a post on the Israel Defense Forces' official X account say Yemen's capital Sanaa was hit by a series of airstrikes that targeted infrastructure including power stations (archived here, here and here). Among the sites struck was the . AFP has previously debunked other misinformation related to the Iran-Israel conflict.
