Sask. to extend life of all coal-fired power plants despite federal clean electricity regulations
Social Sharing
The Saskatchewan government has informed Crown employees it will extend the life of all its coal-fired power plants, setting up a potential legal battle with the federal government over environmental regulations.
Crown Investments Corporation Minister Jeremy Harrison announced the decision in a letter distributed to all SaskEnergy employees on Wednesday. It was not announced publicly.
Harrison said the province will continue the use of the coal plants as it moves toward adopting nuclear power generation for its base load requirements, and remains committed to the goal of a net-zero grid by 2050.
The letter also tees up a potential dispute between the province and Ottawa, with Harrison writing that the province does not believe the federal government has any standing to shut down provincial coal plants.
"We have also been clear that we do not recognize the legitimacy of the federal Clean Electricity Regulations," Harrison wrote.
Brett Dolter, a professor of economics at the University of Regina, described the decision as an "incredibly disappointing development."
Dolter, who has researched electricity options and pathways in Saskatchewan for more than a decade, said the decision to extend the life of the province's coal-fire plants violates federal regulations meant to reduce carbon dioxide emission.
"This opens up the door for protracted legal battles with the federal government and great uncertainty at a time when rapid investment in our electricity system is needed, " Dolter said in an email.
The province announced earlier this year that it was mulling this decision over.
At the time, it appeared to fly in the face of years of work on the coal-fired power plants. In 2012, then-prime minister Stephen Harper's federal government passed new regulations that would see the end of most coal-fired power by mid-21st century.
In 2016, Justin Trudeau's government passed further regulations requiring all coal-fired power stations to be closed down after 50 years of operation, or by 2030, whichever comes first. The province has previously said it would comply with those rules.
The decision announced today makes it clear that will no longer happen.
Saskatchewan even provided financial support for communities as it initially pushed toward ending its use of coal-fired plants. In 2020, it announced Estevan would receive $8 million and Coronach would receive $2 million. A further $550,000 was announced for Coronach in 2023.
A 'Blockbuster Video' decision: expert
Work to "restore" Boundary Dam 4 to service and get it recertified is set to begin this year, Harrison wrote.
He also promised to extend the lives of all coal units at Poplar River Power Station near Coronach, as well as Shand Power Station and Boundary Dam Power Station near Estevan, in the "years to come."
It's not clear how much that work will cost. The province "isn't releasing cost estimates at this time."
WATCH| Saskatchewan is looking to build a small modular reactor. Here's why.
Saskatchewan is looking to build a small modular reactor. Here's why.
11 months ago
Duration 1:56
A final decision on whether an SMR will be built in the province is not expected until 2029. If approved, construction could begin as early as 2030, with the first SMR in Saskatchewan becoming operational as soon as 2034. CBC Saskatchewan reporter Alexander Quon explains why the province is looking to set one up in the first place.
Dolter said he believes the cost will be significant and that a better investment would be constructing new power plants that can operate beyond 2050 and are resilient to any future policy changes at the provincial and federal levels.
"Investing in coal power plants now is like Blockbuster Video doubling down on building new VHS-rental stores in an era of Netflix and other streaming services. It is a waste of Saskatchewan ratepayers' and taxpayers' money," Dolter wrote.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
26 minutes ago
- CTV News
U of R professor found liable of defamation for calling a book ‘racist garbage'
Image is file of McLean reading her book. A University of Regina professor has been found liable for defamation after calling a book critical of the Neil Stonechild inquiry 'racist garbage.' The book's author, Candis McLean, filed the lawsuit eight years ago. Justice Neil Robertson issued his written decision on June 13 at the Regina Court of King's Bench. 'I'm absolutely thrilled to get this decision,' McLean said in an interview with CTV News. McLean's 2016 book, When Police Become Prey: The Cold, Hard Facts of Neil Stonechild's Freezing Death, challenged the findings of the inquiry into Stonechild's death. The inquiry concluded the 17-year-old from Saulteaux First Nation was taken into custody by two Saskatoon police officers on the night he froze to death in November 1990. The book claims to clear the names of the two officers who were fired from the Saskatoon Police Service as part of the broader 'Starlight Tours' scandal, where police were accused of dropping Indigenous people on the outskirts of the city in freezing temperatures. When McLean planned book signings in Saskatchewan, they were met with backlash from the Saskatchewan Coalition Against Racism. University of Regina professor Michelle Stewart was among those opposed, urging venues to cancel the signings. She also called the book 'racist garbage' on Facebook. In his ruling, Justice Robertson found Stewart made the post without reading the book. 'Having read the book, I do not find that it is racist,' he wrote. He added that while the comment targeted the book, the term 'racist' could reasonably be associated with its author. 'If a reasonable person believed that the book was racist, they might then believe that the author was as well,' Robertson said. He noted that 'racist' is a 'highly charged word' and should not be 'thrown around carelessly.' Stewart was also found liable for inducing a breach of contract by contacting venues and urging them to cancel McLean's events. McLean sought $165,642 in damages. The court awarded her $6,450, including $1,000 in general damages for defamation, $3,000 for inducing breach of contract, and $2,450 in actual damages related to the cancellations. She was not awarded any additional special, aggravated or punitive damages. McLean said while she's 'disappointed' with the amount, her lawyer reminded her they were fighting for 'the principle of free speech.' 'I'm hoping that the activists will now realize there are limits to their behavior,' she said. 'They deserve freedom of speech, but not to the point where it impinges on others.' CTV News reached out to Stewart and her lawyer but did not get a response by publication.
CBC
29 minutes ago
- CBC
Nopiming business owners hope province will help shoulder losses from summer season cut short by wildfires
Business owners in an eastern Manitoba provincial park are glad to be reopening following more than a month of wildfire-induced closures, though they're shouldering thousands of dollars in lost revenue and wary their outdoorsy clientele might not rush back this summer. Earlier this month, the province announced tax deferrals for commercial operators that were impacted by wildfires, but one of the owners of Nopiming Lodge says there's concern that won't be enough to help them rebound right now. "We've taken quite a hit already," said Jesse Guenther, who owns and operates the lodge with his mother and brother. "It's going to be a lot less busy." A giant out-of-control wildfire ripped through the park, forcing evacuations in May. As of Friday, that fire remained 218,700 hectares in size — over four times the area of Winnipeg. "May is normally our busiest time, between the hunters and fishermen and everything, and people coming out camping," said Guenther. "So it's going to be a little tough to come back from that." Though the fire is still considered out of control, the southern portion of Nopiming Provincial Park was able to be reopened Wednesday for residents, cottagers and businesses. That includes areas along Provincial Road 315, as well as Bird, Booster, Flanders and Davidson lakes. Closures and mandatory evacuation orders remain in place for the rest of Nopiming, according to the Manitoba government's Friday wildfire update. Tulabi Falls and Bird Lake campgrounds will stay closed until at least June 26. Tulabi has 41 campsites and six yurts, with on average 3,862 nights stayed each year from May through October, while Bird Lake has 27 campsites and on average over 900 nights reserved, according to a provincial spokesperson. Beresford and Black Lake campgrounds will stay closed for the rest of the season, as will Shoe Lake, water routes in Nopiming and all backcountry locations hit by wildfires. 'Prime time is short': lodge owner But as the southern part of the park reopened this week, the Guenthers hurried back to their lodge, to do whatever they could to get back up and running. "Our amount of prime time is short — it's May to August, or May to September, and we need to get as much business as we can in them," Brenda Guenther, Jesse's mother, told CBC News in Nopiming on Thursday. The business relies not only on bookings, but also a raft of associated revenue streams, like boat and canoe rentals, which the family fears will suffer a slump due to backcountry closures. They also anticipate a drop in sales of firewood, bagged ice and other ancillary sources of cash flow due to the overall drop in traffic through the area. All told, the Guenthers expect to lose at least $60,000 this season. "It's the living for my boys and me," said Brenda. "This is their home. This is everything they've been doing forever." The head of the Manitoba Lodges and Outfitters Association thinks the provincial tax deferrals will be helpful down the line, but says the government may need to do more in the short term to keep small businesses afloat. "Any help is much appreciated, but they're still going to have to pay taxes eventually," said executive director Don Lamont. "We've got to try and find some financial support in other places for them. Otherwise, there's going to be quite a few people that close their doors." Jesse Guenther, meanwhile, is hopeful that as the forest regrows, and provincial crews clear out burned brush and deadfall hazards from public-access areas, that the local cottage industry will bounce back. But he worries it could take a couple of years for visitor levels to return to normal. He welcomes more help from the province for businesses. "If they're able to in some way, shape or form, that would be something I would be open [to]" he said. "At the end of the day, we're just thankful to be back." Manitoba 211 by calling 211 from anywhere in Manitoba or email 211mb@
Globe and Mail
35 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Why Centrus Energy Stock Leaped 5% Higher Today
Centrus Energy (NYSEMKT: LEU) attracted the right kind of energy on the stock exchange Friday. The company's shares closed that session 5% higher, after it published news of an important contract renewal. That pop looked particularly impressive when matched against the S&P 500 's (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) trajectory, which dipped into the red with a 0.2% decline. An energetic extension Before market open that morning, Centrus divulged that the U.S. Department of Energy (DoE) exercised its option to extend the company's contract to produce for it high-assay, low-enriched uranium (HALEU). The extension now runs through June 30, 2026. HALEU is a type of nuclear fuel that has a level of enrichment considered most suitable for current nuclear reactor technology, including the small nuclear reactors (SMRs) that have recently come into vogue. In what's probably not a coincidence, Centrus' latest news comes barely a week after its business partner Oklo was tapped to build and operate a nuclear plant to supply heat and electricity to an Air Force base in Alaska. The two companies have a memorandum of understanding (MOU) in place for Centrus to supply HALEU for Oklo's projects. The trend is its friend In its press release on the contract extension, Centrus added that the DoE holds options for further extensions to the existing contract. It could opt to keep Centrus's HALEU supply going for as much as a further eight years. So it's not only good news that a major business for the company has a longer runway, but it's looking for more as time goes by. Assuming President Trump's embrace of nuclear energy remains in place (and possibly outlives his administration), Centrus will be in a very good position indeed. Should you invest $1,000 in Centrus Energy right now? Before you buy stock in Centrus Energy, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Centrus Energy wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $659,171!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $891,722!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is995% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to172%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025
