House Bill 1144 could change court locations in Indiana
GREENE COUNTY, Ind. (WTWO/WAWV) — A new bill from the Indiana House has been proposed and it looks to change some court locations in Indiana.
House Bill 1144, authored by Representative Chris Jeter, proposes the addition of Superior and Magistrate Courts in more densely populated areas of Indiana.
However, after an amendment made by the Senate, the bill, if passed, would also reduce the number of courts in more rural areas of the state, including Superior Court in Greene County.
While Greene County would keep Circuit and Magistrate Court, it would lose its Superior Court judge and employees. That judge handles all misdemeanor cases, all level 6 felony cases, and half of the level 5 and above felony cases in the county.
Greene County Attorney Marvin Abshire said the loss of Superior Court would cause issues for both government employees and residents.
'Losing Superior Court would flood the Circuit Court and Magistrate with an additional 633 criminal cases', Abshire said. 'In addition to that, there's the old saying that justice delayed is justice denied. When you add that many cases to the existing court system, it is going to dramatically slow down access to civil and criminal justice in the county.'
Abshire said Superior Court in Greene County also runs a rehabilitation program.
'Superior Court runs a therapeutic justice program, paid for by the opioid settlement funds', Abshire said. 'It's not county money or state money. That program is beginning to show some real successes. Circuit Court with Magistrate alone will not be able to handle that program and handle the additional load.'
The amendment by the Senate was added last week, just before the bill was heard by the Senate Appropriations Committee. However, Greene County Prosecutor Jarrod Holtsclaw said they weren't informed of the change until a mere few minutes before the hearing.
'It seems very, almost orchestrated, the complexity in which amendment 16 was drafted and only released minutes before the hearing on it', Holtsclaw said. 'That seems to suggest there were some behind the scenes dealings with trying to eliminate. They're eliminating more judges than what are being created. We're trying to, one, figure out what was really behind this amendment and, two, talk to those who may have some say in it.'
One of those people that has a say is State Representative Bruce Borders. He said he's been doing everything he can to not allow this bill to pass.
'I've been on the phone, I've been emailing, I've been receiving emails and forwarding those on to the Speaker of the House and to our floor leader', Borders said. 'I'm going to share my concerns and the letters I have received from judges, prosecutors, deputy prosecutors, etc. with my caucus members and go to battle on behalf of the Greene County Superior Court.'
These changes will not take effect immediately if the law passes. House Bill 1144 would become effective in each county differently, based on the term of the sitting judge.
For Greene County, Judge Martin's term ends on December 31 of 2026.
The Indiana Judicial Branch made a statement saying they conduct a weighted caseload study, and the most recent study shows that Indiana has about the right number of judges, but not necessarily in the right location.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
41 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump touts ‘great unity' in GOP after Iran strikes, pushes to get ‘big, beautiful' bill done
President Trump touted the 'great unity' among Republicans following the U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, as he called on the party to focus on getting his agenda bill through to his desk. 'Great unity in the Republican Party, perhaps unity like we have never seen before,' Trump said in a post on Truth Social on Sunday. 'Now let's get the Great, Big, Beautiful Bill done. Our Country is doing GREAT. MAGA!' he added. The president's remarks come after he announced Saturday evening that U.S. forces bombed three Iranian nuclear sites and said to Iran in a social media post, 'NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE!' The bombs targeted three nuclear sites in Natanz, Esfahan and Fordow, located inside a mountain. Six 'bunker buster' bombs were reportedly dropped on Fordow, while more than two dozen Tomahawk missiles were launched at the other two sites. The bombings put the U.S. directly in Iran's crosshairs for retaliation and made it an active participant in the Mideastern war, which Israel launched with airstrikes against Iran on June 13. Ahead of the strikes, news outlets had focused on the so-called 'civil war' in the GOP, between the pro-Israel foreign policy hawks and supporters who identified more with the 'America-First' agenda. Members of both groups had been publicly lobbying the president in opposite directions as he considered taking military actions against Iran. While some anti-interventionist Republicans—including Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.)—still publicly criticized the strikes, most of the GOP expressed support following the announcement. The news also comes as the Senate enters a pivotal week for the president's massive agenda bill, which Republican leaders in Congress still say they hope to get done by July 4.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Senate Can Keep Ban on State AI Rules in Trump Tax Bill
(Bloomberg) -- A Republican effort to block US states from enforcing new artificial intelligence regulations will remain in President Donald Trump's massive tax and spending package for now, marking a win for tech companies pushing to stall and override dozens of AI safety laws across the country. Bezos Wedding Draws Protests, Soul-Searching Over Tourism in Venice One Architect's Quest to Save Mumbai's Heritage From Disappearing JFK AirTrain Cuts Fares 50% This Summer to Lure Riders Off Roads NYC Congestion Toll Cuts Manhattan Gridlock by 25%, RPA Reports In a surprise decision, Democrats said the Senate parliamentarian ruled the provision aligns with the special budgetary process Republicans are using to consider the tax package. That process allows the GOP to avoid making concessions to Democrats, who otherwise could filibuster legislation. The Senate version of the AI moratorium would deny states federal funding for broadband internet projects if they enforce AI regulations. The provision will likely still be challenged on the Senate floor, where stripping the provision would need just a simple majority. Some Republicans in both the House and Senate have pushed back on the AI provision. 'We do not need a moratorium that would prohibit our states from stepping up and protecting citizens in their state,' Tennessee Republican Senator Marsha Blackburn said last week. Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough has advised lawmakers that many other provisions have failed to pass muster for the budget process, including language requiring state matching funds for food stamps and a requirement that people suing the federal government post enormous bonds to obtain temporary restraining orders, Democrats said. Republicans are racing to pass the fiscal package by July 4, with Senate leaders planning to vote on it this week. The bills' provisions are being litigated by staff in a closed-door process, with Senate Budget Committee Democrats releasing periodic updates to the media. The AI provision would benefit many of the US's largest tech and AI companies, some of which have lobbied against a state-by-state 'patchwork' of rules governing AI. California, New York, Utah and dozens of others have introduced or enacted AI laws in recent years, including bills to address concerns about data privacy, copyright and bias. Congress has yet to pass a federal framework on AI, which has effectively left the states to figure out how to set rules around the technology. The House passed its version of the bill, which would impose a 10-year moratorium on any state law regulating artificial intelligence or automated decision systems. House Speaker Mike Johnson said June 9 that the AI provision had the full backing of the White House, including AI and crypto czar David Sacks. More than 200 state lawmakers from both parties urged Congress to scrap the measure, which could have nullified a wide range of consumer protection laws on topics including children's online safety, generative AI harms, and government AI adoption and deployment, according to the AI safety think tank Center for Responsible Innovation. Senate Republicans also made progress on the broader bill as the Joint Committee on Taxation — the key congressional scorekeeper on tax matters — found the new tax provisions in the bill would add a net $441 billion to deficits through 2034. The Senate GOP's preferred 'current policy' baseline assumes that trillions of dollars in expiring Trump tax cuts are free. The score gives lawmakers room to negotiate final agreements on the broader package, including setting the level of the state and local tax deduction and how fast to end green energy tax credits. --With assistance from Erik Wasson. Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags Is Mark Cuban the Loudmouth Billionaire that Democrats Need for 2028? Ken Griffin on Trump, Harvard and Why Novice Investors Won't Beat the Pros The US Has More Copper Than China But No Way to Refine All of It Can 'MAMUWT' Be to Musk What 'TACO' Is to Trump? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
an hour ago
Sen. Cotton: ‘I think we have to be prepared for Iran to retaliate'
ABC News' Jonathan Karl interviews Senate Intelligence Chair Tom Cotton, R- Ark., on 'This Week.'
