Column: Orange County once was an anti-immigrant hotbed. What changed?
For decades, I could count on my native Orange County to act against immigrants, legal and not, as regularly as the swallows returned to Capistrano. It was like a civic version of the Broadway classic 'Anything You Can Do (I Can Do Better),' except not as clever and with more xenophobia.
Cue the lowlight reel!
In a 1986 article in Time magazine, Newport Beach resident Harold Ezell, then director of the Immigration and Naturalization Service's Western region, criticized immigrants who use fraudulent papers. 'If you catch 'em, you ought to clean 'em and fry 'em yourself," he said.
Republicans illegally posted uniformed security guards outside voting booths in Santa Ana in 1988 with signs stating noncitizens couldn't vote.
A group of residents — including Ezell — drafted Proposition 187, the 1994 California ballot measure that sought to make life miserable for "illegal aliens" and their children. After downing margaritas at El Torito, they named the initiative 'Save Our State."
In 1996, the Anaheim City Council allowed immigration authorities to screen the legal status of detainees in the city jail — the first program of its kind in California.
Three years later, Anaheim Union High School District trustees passed a resolution to sue Mexico for $50 million for the cost of educating people like me, who were the children of unauthorized immigrants.
Long before it became a GOP tradition, local Republican candidates and politicians took trips to the border to boast about how tough they were on the 'invasion.'
In 2005, Mission Viejo grandfather Jim Gilchrist created the Minuteman Project, which enlisted suburbanites to help the Border Patrol find migrants who illegally crossed into this country. That same year, Costa Mesa Mayor Allan Mansoor tried to get police officers to enforce federal immigration laws, which would have been a first in the nation.
Read more: O.C. can you say ... 'anti-Mexican'?
From theorizing about how to repeal birthright citizenship to suing California over its "sanctuary" state law and allowing Immigration and Customs Enforcement to hold detainees in city and county jails, Orange County has shown the rest of the country how to be as punitive as possible toward the undocumented. With Donald Trump in the White House again, this Know Nothing legacy has its most powerful acolyte ever.
If you're against mass deportations and want to see some sort of amnesty, it's easy to feel deflated and even easier to curse Orange County for its past. I've been doing the latter for nearly all of my adult life — first as a college activist, then as a columnist. It's a subject I wish I could leave but — to paraphrase Michael Corleone — it keeps pulling me back in.
Because I've covered Orange County for a quarter-century, though, I haven't lost all hope. I know the result of O.C.'s scorched-earth campaigns against illegal immigration: initially shoving the national conversation rightward, but eventually, repeatedly, becoming the political equivalent of an exploding cigar.
Though Proposition 187 passed, it famously made my generation of California Latinos vote Democratic for decades and permanently kneecapped the O.C. GOP. The local anger over the ballot initiative led to Loretta Sanchez's historic 1996 win over incumbent Rep. Bob Dornan, as she became the first O.C. Latino elected to Congress. Her victory was so stunning that a House subcommittee investigated Dornan's claims that immigrants illegally voted in the election and swung it for Sanchez (they didn't).
The Minuteman Project? It quickly fizzled out.
John Eastman, the former dean of Chapman's law school who sparked Trump's interest in banning birthright citizenship with a cockamamie 2020 article claiming Kamala Harris wasn't a 'natural born citizen'? He faces disbarment for pushing Trump's unfounded claims that Joe Biden stole the 2020 election.
Costa Mesa? It now has a progressive, Latino-majority City Council that has loudly distanced itself from Mansoor's actions.
As the years went on, trashing immigrants for political gain in Orange County just wasn't as popular or effective as before. Trump, despite his noxious rhetoric over three presidential campaigns, never won the county. A UC Irvine School of Social Ecology poll released this month showed that 28% of O.C. residents thought immigration was a 'top problem' locally — compare that with a 1993 Times poll putting that number at 80%. Meanwhile, the UC Irvine poll found that 58% of people in O.C. favored some type of legal status for immigrants who have none, while 35% preferred deportation.
This ain't John Wayne's Orange County anymore. Hell, it's not mine. What changed?
Demographics, for one. In 1990, as anger against illegal immigration was beginning to rage in Southern California, whites were 65% of the county. Fourteen years later, U.S. census figures showed they had become a minority in O.C. The latest stats put whites at just 37%. Nearly a third of residents are foreign-born, with immigrants living all across the county and occupying all rungs of the social ladder. It's harder to trash them when they're your neighbors, your children's friends, your in-laws or your co-workers, you know?
Those changing demographics also led to the political purpling of the county. Few O.C. politicians outside of Huntington Beach's MAGA City Council have publicly praised Trump's promises to clamp down on immigration. Even O.C. Sheriff Don Barnes — who's about as liberal as a Winchester rifle and who has drastically increased the number of jail inmates his department turned over to immigration authorities — put out a news release this week asserting that his deputies "remain focused on the enforcement of state and local laws," rather than joining Trump's deportation posse.
Most of all, it's the activists who have had enough of the old Orange County. There's always been pushback against anti-immigrant lunacy here. When I was a sophomore at Anaheim High, thousands of high school students walked out of class to protest Proposition 187. In 2006, there was a huge rally in Santa Ana — along with other marches in the rest of the country — to protest a congressional bill that would have made Proposition 187 seem as friendly as President Reagan's amnesty. But most of those efforts were haphazard, devolved into infighting among Chicanosauruses and didn't develop into a full-fledged movement.
Read more: In Orange County, land of reinvention, even its conservative politics is changing
Over the last 15 years, activists who grew up here — and not just Latinos — have organized rallies, staged sit-ins and formed nonprofits or community-based groups that coalesced into a multifront network standing up for people without papers. They campaigned to kick ICE out of local jails, aided various lawsuits seeking to change local policies and even helped pro-immigrant candidates populate school boards and city councils.
If such a loud, successful resistance can happen in Orange County, it can happen anywhere. It's not easy, but it's possible — nay, necessary.
One of the people fighting the good fight is Santa Ana native Sandra De Anda. She's a network coordinator for Orange County Rapid Response Network, which connects immigrants to legal help and runs a hotline to report ICE sightings.
The 31-year-old grew up on Minnie Street in a historically Cambodian and Latino neighborhood where migra detained residents 'all the time." When she returned to her hometown from Portland, Ore., in 2017, De Anda began to volunteer for pro-immigrant groups 'and never looked back.'
She's proud of how far Orange County has come and is more committed than ever to her cause. Friends and family worry for her safety, but De Anda remains undeterred.
'There's such a nasty conservative tradition here, but our folks have still been here just as long,' she told me in a matter-of-fact tone after a long day of work. 'We deserve to stay here. We're going to have to fight together through any means necessary for the next four years."
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
31 minutes ago
- Politico
‘It was a bloodbath': Cruz, Carlson feud offers preview of 2028
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and conservative media personality Tucker Carlson doubled down on their feud over U.S. involvement in the escalating war between Israel and Iran, with each releasing their own podcasts on Friday following up on the fiery debate earlier this week. The ongoing war of words between the two high-profile conservative thought leaders — both of whom have left the door open to a possible 2028 presidential run — could offer a glimpse at what the first Republican presidential primary of the post-Donald Trump era might look like. 'It was a bloodbath,' Cruz said of his appearance on Carlson's podcast on an episode of 'Verdict with Ted Cruz,' the show he hosts. 'The two of us, frankly, beat the living daylights out of each other for two hours straight.' Carlson and Cruz's contentious conversation — in which both men repeatedly shouted at each other and traded personal insults — revealed fissures on the right between pro-Israel Republicans urging the White House to launch an attack on Iran and conservative isolationists who hope the president will uphold his commitment to keep the U.S. out of foreign conflicts. On Friday, both insisted on their respective podcasts that the other was leading the U.S. down the wrong path. Carlson said Cruz's ominous warnings of Iran's nuclear capabilities were part of an effort to 'justify American involvement in regime change.' '[Carlson] has gotten to a place of hardcore isolationism that I think is really dangerous,' Cruz said on his podcast. Cruz and Carlson's disagreement over the U.S.' policy over the escalating conflict in the Middle East will play out in the coming days. Trump told reporters in New Jersey on Friday he's taking 'a period of time' to decide whether to strike Iran, and that the self-imposed two-week timeframe to launch a strike the White House announced on Thursday would be the 'maximum.' But the two men may also find themselves in competing lanes of the 2028 Republican presidential primary, where the intraparty debate between war hawks and isolationists could be a fault line for Republican primary voters. Carlson said he would consider running for president in 2028 in an episode of his podcast last year, while conceding in the same breath, 'I don't think I'd be very good at it.' 'I would do whatever I could to help,' he told fellow conservative podcast host Patrick Bet-David. 'I want to be helpful.' Cruz, who ran for president against Trump in a bitterly-contested 2016 primary that was punctuated with personal attacks, has not closed the door on a 2028 presidential run. When asked about the possibility of running in 2028 by POLITICO in April, Cruz said he's focused on delivering legislative victories for Republicans — even as he uses his new post heading the Senate Commerce Committee to put his stamp on the direction of the party. Perhaps further forecasting another dynamic of the 2028 primary, Trump refused to show a preference for Carlson or Cruz's position, instead offering praise to both men when asked about the interview. 'Tucker is a nice guy. He called and apologized the other day, because he thought he said things that were a little bit too strong, and I appreciated that,' Trump told reporters on Thursday. 'And Ted Cruz is a nice guy. He's been with me for a long time.'
Boston Globe
38 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
R.I. Senate votes to ban sale, purchase of assault-style weapons
The Rhode Island Senate vote tally on amended legislation to ban the sale, purchase, and manufacture of assault-style weapons. Edward Fitzpatrick Senators Louis P. DiPalma, the Middletown Democrat who sponsored the Senate version of the bill, noted that assault weapons bills have been introduced for a dozen years without becoming law. 'We need to get this done,' he said. 'We need to get this done today.' Advertisement DiPalma noted that a union Get Rhode Map A weekday briefing from veteran Rhode Island reporters, focused on the things that matter most in the Ocean State. Enter Email Sign Up He said the state of Washington has enacted a similar law banning the sale, purchase and manufacture of assault-style weapons. And he said that if the bill becomes law in Rhode Island, 'the proliferation of assault style weapons will go down precipitously.' Senator Pamela J. Lauria, a Barrington Democrat, attempted to amend the bill to reflect the House-passed version of the legislation. She said it is crucial to pass a bill that bans possession — and not just sale — of assault weapons, especially now that President Trump's administration is scaling back the federal government's ability to enforce gun laws. Advertisement Lauria noted that Rhode Island Attorney General Peter F. Neronha had backed the House version of the bill, saying he could defend it in court. And she urged senators to 'pass the best possible bill,' including a ban on sale and possession of those guns. But DiPalma objected to Lauria's amendment, saying it sought to circumvent the committee process that had resulted in the House bill being held for further study in the Senate Judiciary Committee. New Senate President Valarie J. Lawson, an East Providence Democrat and teachers union president, upheld DiPalma's objection. Lauria challenged Lawson's ruling, and the Senate then voted 25 to 12 to back Lawson's ruling, thereby killing Lauria's amendment. Senate Minority Leader Jessica de la Cruz, a North Smithfield Republican, and other Republicans proposed several amendments, including a proposal to delay implementation until July 1, 2027, rather than July 1, 2026. De la Cruz said the banned weapons make up to 70 percent of the stock of some gun shops, and they need time to adjust. She noted the legislature had delayed implementation of new laws on casino smoking and payday loans, and she said those law don't involve the 'fundamental rights of the Second Amendment.' Senator Andrew R. Dimitri, a Johnston Democrat, voted against the bill, saying, 'This bill still punishes good people, and does nothing to stop crime.' But Senator Meghan E. Kallman, a Pawtucket Democrat, voted for the bill, citing mass shootings ranging from Columbine High School in 1999 to the Tree of Life synagogue in 2018. 'I am appealing to this chamber's sense of urgency. I do not want to have it happen here,' Kallman said. But she said she was voting for the bill 'over deep disappointment because we had the opportunity to do something better, stronger, and with much more moral clarity.' Advertisement In the leadup to Friday's vote, Edward Fitzpatrick can be reached at
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fact-checking attack ads in Buffalo Mayor's race
BUFFALO, N.Y. (WIVB) – News 4 is Your Local Election Headquarters, and we're fact-checking nasty television attack ads from the top two Democratic candidates in the race for Buffalo mayor to help you separate fact from fiction. The Buffalo primary is just days away and will be held on Tuesday, June 24. In these relentless attack ads, State Senator Sean Ryan is depicted as being too dangerous to be mayor. The ads against Buffalo Acting Mayor Chris Scanlon claim that Scanlon is tied to President Donald Trump, Carl Paladino and MAGA Republicans. But not everything you hear and see in the ads is true. 'Sean Ryan is just too extreme,' one ad says. 'Carl Paladino and MAGA are with Scanlon,' another ad says. You've probably seen these dueling political attack ads all over the airwaves. The two top Democratic candidates in the race for Buffalo mayor hurling accusations at the other. Where to vote early for the primary election for Buffalo mayor In one ad against Ryan, Scanlon's campaign uses real Buffalo police officers, not in uniform, making the claim that Senator Ryan is too dangerous. And, that he voted for bail reform — that's true, but he's also supported revisions to the bail reform law ever since it was approved as part of the State Budget in 2019. It also repeats the false notion that India Walton wanted to cut $7.5 million from Buffalo Police and fire 100 police officers. This claim came up four years ago, during Walton's campaign against former Buffalo Mayor Byron Brown. As an activist, Walton was aligned with the Defund the Police Movement. But, as a candidate for mayor, Walton's campaign at the time said her plan was to reallocate money to mental health programs within the department and that this would not result in layoffs — so that claim in Scanlon's ad is false. '[…] and the hotel tax on out-of-towners to fund our police, he fought against that too,' the ad against Ryan continues. Yes, Senator Ryan has been against Buffalo's hotel tax. But, the ad gives the impression that the extra fee could strictly fund BPD, which isn't the case. Instead, the hotel tax would be a way to balance the city's budget — so this claim is partially true. The use of Buffalo police officers in political ads is a tactic that Byron Brown used to defeat India Walton four years ago and was a strategy that raised ethical concerns. In New York state, police officers are prohibited by punishment of a misdemeanor from using or attempting to use their official power or authority, in any manner to control, affect or influence the opinion of any citizen. 'If you read the statute very literally, you can see how someone could interpret that to say that what they're doing by getting on the ad, talking about police-related issues and then, having a banner that says these are real Buffalo police officers, but they're not in uniform, you could see how it could be interpreted to be an A misdemeanor, a violation of election law,' said legal analyst Barry Covert. Covert says officers in campaign ads could still be protected under the First Amendment for free speech. 'First Amendment political speech is the most protected in the broad array of what the First Amendment protects by way of speech,' Covert said. Scanlon's chief of staff and deputy mayor Brian Gould told News 4 in an email: '[…] any Buffalo police officer, male or female, that appears in a television ad for the mayor's candidacy is doing so as a volunteer, is not in a BPD uniform, is not representing themselves as a BPD officer or representing the department itself.' Buffalo PBA president John Davidson says: 'The Buffalo PBA is fully endorsing Christopher Scanlon for mayor of Buffalo and we encourage our members to support him in any way that they feel comfortable, including political ads, while off duty.' Big takeaways from News 4's Democratic mayoral debate Claims to defund Buffalo Police — although deceptive in these ads — can be effective, said Republican political strategist Carl Calabrese. 'Even staunch Democrats will tell you that when the Democrat party back in 2020 got onto the defund police message it was a loser and it's been a loser since and you've seen a lot of Democrats backtracking from those previous positions. So yeah, people want law enforcement, they want safe neighborhoods,' Calabrese said. We questioned Acting Mayor Scanlon on the use of Buffalo police officers in his ad. Asked if he was using real Buffalo police officers in his ads, potentially in violation of Election law, Scanlon said: 'I don't think that's the case at all, but I would say because the senator has a history, a track record of supporting legislation that impacts public safety in the City of Buffalo.' Now to Senator Sean Ryan's attack ad against Chris Scanlon. 'He's been Carl Paladino's pick,' one ad says. It's true when the acting mayor was a political newcomer over a decade ago, Carl Paladino supported him. Paladino, a local businessman, has been around politics for years — he once ran for governor and for Congress, and served on the Buffalo School Board. 'Paladino's made racist comments about Michelle Obama,' the ad says. Paladino has faced accusations of racism in the past, while serving on the Buffalo school board for comments he made in an Artvoice survey nearly a decade ago. 'The Paladino's are even bankrolling Scanlon's campaign,' the ad continues. Campaign contributions from the Paladino family to Scanlon came up during News 4's Mayoral Debate. 'Chris Scanlon has received tens of thousands of dollars from Carl Paladino and Carl Paladino has received tens of millions of dollars from the City of Buffalo. That ratio Chris, you're a cheap date on this one,' Ryan said. WIVB News 4 looked up New York State Campaign Finance records and found that since Chris Scanlon became acting mayor and then announced he was running for the office, nine campaign contributions can be linked to Carl's son William Paladino, or companies in the Paladino family ranging from $150 to $5,200. Donations from William Paladino, Paladino Development, Ellicott Construction, Joseph Hannon, the president of Ellicott Development, the 4628 Group, and an LLC called 727 Elmwood Avenue — totaling $19,100 in campaign contributions. 'William Paladino is the owner and CEO of Ellicott Development and a personal friend; William Paladino has donated to my campaign,' Scanlon said. 'As far as the assertion that Carl Paladino is funding my campaign and fueling my campaign, I have not received one dollar in this campaign from Carl Paladino.' We couldn't find any record of Carl Paladino directly giving campaign donations to Chris Scanlon. But Carl Paladino is still listed on Ellicott Development's website as the chairman of the board. 'It was me who was donating to the campaign, yes,' William Paladino said earlier this month. James Gardner endorsed by Republicans for Buffalo mayor We asked political strategist Carl Calabrese about Ryan's approach against Scanlon. 'Ryan on the other hand, it appears to me that his polling is telling him attack big money donors, attack Trump, attack MAGA Republicans and tie Chris Scanlon into those things. He's probably looking at how those messages play to the core Democrat voter, what's called the prime voter,' Calabrese said. What's not in Ryan's campaign ad is the $500 he received in 2014 from William Paladino when Ryan was in the state Assembly. We asked Senator Ryan about this. 'So, 10 years ago or so a donation slipped through my campaign, which I didn't find out about until a long time thereafter and we had a screen on the campaign for Ellicott Development and Carl Paladino, I never thought another Paladino would send a check in,' Ryan said. Ryan says that $500 check was then donated to a group in Albany. 'We took that donation of $500 and made a $1,000 contribution to the Alliance for Quality of Education, a group that supports high quality public education,' Ryan said. Senator Ryan says that policy not to take any money from Ellicott Development and Carl Paladino was then updated to include all Paladinos and their companies. We did reach out to Carl Paladino to get his reaction on being brought into the campaign as a talking point. Carl Paladino says he has no comment right now on the ad and asked that we contact him after the primary. Early voting in the Primary Election is already underway. The primary is just days away on June 24. Since Scanlon became acting mayor Date Name Amount To 1/10/2025 William Paladino $5,200 Friends Of Christopher P Scanlon 1/10/2025 Paladino Development Group Inc $5,000 Friends Of Christopher P Scanlon 12/6/2024 William Paladino $2,500 Friends Of Christopher P Scanlon 1/10/2025 Ellicott Construction Company II $2,500 Friends Of Christopher P Scanlon 1/10/2025 4628 Group, Inc $2,500 Friends Of Christopher P Scanlon 5/19/2025 727 Elmwood Ave LLC $500 Friends Of Christopher P Scanlon 4/8/2025 Joseph Hannon $500 Friends Of Christopher P Scanlon 1/7/2025 727 Elmwood Ave LLC $250 Friends Of Christopher P Scanlon 1/7/2025 Joseph Hannon $150 Friends Of Christopher P Scanlon Jeff Preval is an award-winning anchor and reporter who joined the News 4 team in December 2021. See more of his work here. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
