Got read the Chief Justice's speech or not? — Hafiz Hassan
APRIL 24 — I read Philip TN Koh's 'The (mis)reading of the Right Honourable Chief Justice of Malaysia's speech at the 24th Commonwealth Conference'.
Then I read Chief Justice Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat's speech entitled 'Judicial Independence and Parliamentary Sovereignty — a Colossi of Roads?' — again.
I must agree with senior lawyer Philip TN Koh, who is also Adjunct Professor, Universiti Malaya, that the Chief Justice did not advocate 'a form of juristocracy, i.e. the judiciary being an unelected body embarking on a road to establishing judicial supremacy over elected officers that represents the sovereign will of the people.'
Neither did the Chief Justice make 'such an assertion nor was there discernible any desire to promote her own virtues or character.'
The speech has been available on the Malaysian Bar website since April 9. Kudos to the Bar for publishing the speech. Read it here.
Chief Justice of Malaysia Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat attends the Opening of the Legal Year 2024 at Putrajaya International Convention Centre January 15, 2024. — Picture by Shafwan Zaidon
Concluding her speech, the Chief Justice said as follows:
'In closing, it is essential to reaffirm that the Malaysian system is founded not on parliamentary sovereignty, but on constitutional supremacy. At all times, the Federal Constitution stands as the highest authority, establishing the framework within which all branches of government — the Legislature, the Executive and the Judiciary — must operate. No single branch is supreme in its own right; rather, each derives its legitimacy and powers from the Federal Constitution itself.
'Within this framework, the unequivocal role of the Judiciary is to uphold the supremacy of the Federal Constitution by ensuring that parliamentary and executive power remain within their constitutional limits. This duty demands that judges adjudicate cases with absolute independence, impartiality and integrity, without yielding to fear or favour. They must stand resolute in the face of adversity, undeterred by criticism or external pressures. Judicial independence is not an end in itself but a paramount means to ensure that the Rule of Law prevails within the constitutional framework.
'At the same time, a constructive and balanced relationship between the Judiciary and the other branches of government is essential to preserving judicial independence while respecting the democratic mandate of Parliament. This relationship is not a contest for supremacy but a partnership in governance — one founded not just on mutual respect but on a clear understanding of our respective constitutional roles. While our functions remain distinct, both institutions ultimately serve the same fundamental purpose of safeguarding constitutional democracy and protecting the fundamental rights of citizens.'
Clearly, the Chief Justice has called for 'a constructive and balanced relationship' between the Judiciary and the other branches of government, and not just the executive.
She acknowledges that the relationship is 'not a contest for supremacy but a partnership in governance — one founded not just on mutual respect but on a clear understanding of [their] respective constitutional roles.'
Did the critics misread, or did they not read, the speech?
To put it in Manglish, got read or not?
* This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Barnama
2 hours ago
- Barnama
AGC Rejects Claims Of 'Flawed Prosecution' After Najib's DNAA In Second SRC Case
KUALA LUMPUR, June 20 (Bernama) -- The Attorney General's Chambers (AGC) has dismissed as baseless allegations that it carried out a 'flawed prosecution' in the second SRC International Sdn Bhd case involving Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak. In a statement, the AGC reiterated its firm commitment to upholding the rule of law and stated that it would continue to fulfill its responsibilities under the Federal Constitution with integrity, fairness and respect for the judicial process. However, the AGC acknowledged the decision by High Court Judge K Muniandy to grant Najib a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA) on three charges of money laundering involving RM27 million in funds from the company. 'The case was registered in the High Court on Feb 7, 2019, and scheduled for trial on five occasions: June 2020, July to August 2021, March to April 2022, September 2024 and April to May 2025. 'However, all trial dates were postponed due to the Movement Control Order caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, requests by the defence, or applications by the prosecution itself,' the statement read. According to the statement, the prosecution's requests for postponement were due to the ongoing trial of the first SRC case, which proceeded at the High Court, Court of Appeal and Federal Court until its completion on March 31, 2023. At the same time, the trial proceedings for the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) case had also begun while the first SRC case was still ongoing. 'Both cases involved overlapping material documents required for the second SRC trial. 'As these documents were critical to the second SRC case, the prosecution had no choice but to wait until they were available, which was until the 1MDB trial proceedings were completed. 'It must be emphasised that the material documents are available but are currently being used as evidence in the ongoing 1MDB trial,' the AGC said.
New Straits Times
3 hours ago
- New Straits Times
A-GC denies flawed prosecution in Najib's SRC case, cites evidence constraints
KUALA LUMPUR: The Attorney-General's Chambers (A-GC) has refuted claims that the prosecution in the money laundering case involving funds from SRC International Sdn Bhd (SRC) was flawed. In a statement, the A-GC said it has consistently upheld the highest standards and quality in discharging its prosecutorial duties, in line with public expectations. "The A-GC remains committed to upholding the rule of law and will continue to carry out its responsibilities under the Federal Constitution with integrity, fairness and respect for judicial processes," the statement read. The statement followed the High Court's decision to grant a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA) to former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak over three money laundering charges involving RM27 million linked to SRC. High Court Judge K. Muniandy issued the ruling today after the prosecution failed to furnish the defence with hundreds of documents related to the trial, despite the charges being filed as early as 2019. Addressing the delay in trial proceedings, the A-GC said the case, first registered at the High Court in February 2019, was postponed on five occasions due to various factors, including the Covid-19 pandemic, defence requests and applications by the prosecution itself. The A-GC said that proceedings for the 1Malaysia Development Bhd (1MDB) trial had commenced while the first SRC case was still ongoing at the High Court, Court of Appeal and Federal Court levels. This overlap led to delays in the second SRC trial, as both cases involved the use of key material documents required for the prosecution, it said. Following this, it said, there was no choice but to wait until the documents were made available. "Both cases involved the use of certain material documents that were also intended to be used in the second SRC trial. "As the documents in question are material to the second SRC trial, the prosecution had no choice but to wait until those documents became available, which is after the 1MDB trial proceedings have concluded. "It must be emphasised that the material documents are already available but are currently being used as evidence in the ongoing 1MDB trial," it said. The A-GC also said the prosecution had requested additional time to compile all the material documents to present them as evidence in the second SRC trial.
New Straits Times
4 hours ago
- New Straits Times
NSTP shines with 13 wins at MPI-Petronas Journalism Awards
KUALA LUMPUR: The New Straits Times Press (NSTP) group took home 13 accolades across various categories at the MPI-Petronas Malaysian Journalism Awards 2024 tonight. The wins were split among NSTP's titles, with four awards going to the New Straits Times (NST), six to Harian Metro (HM), and three to Berita Harian (BH). Harian Metro was the night's highlight, clinching the country's most coveted journalism honour, the Kajai Award. NST's Leslie Andres secured silver in the Best Column Writing category for pieces including 'UN veto power is main obstacle to world peace', 'Mindset shift must accompany any rule change', and 'Western singers skipping Malaysia due to those kicking up a fuss'. In the Best Investigative Journalism category, Aliza Shah from NST won the silver award for her impactful report titled 'Children forced into local pornographic content'. In video journalism, NST received bronze in both the Best Video Documentary and Best Video Talk Show categories. The documentary was produced by Aliza Shah, Iylia Marsya Iskandar, Khairus Ramli, and Amalina Kamal, while the talk show was helmed by Siti Nur Amalina Kamal, Hazween Syarina Md Hassan, Farrah Ain Jasmine Jasman, and Shahrul Redzuan Zulkifli. The ceremony saw over a thousand guests from across the media industry, including editors, reporters and corporate representatives, gather to celebrate excellence in Malaysian journalism. This year's awards attracted 549 entries from 58 media organisations, with honours handed out across 23 categories. The night also marked the launch of MPI's first-ever journalism e-journal by Higher Education Minister Datuk Seri Dr Zambry Abdul Kadir.
