Raising of Palestinian flag at Providence City Hall also raises tensions among city leaders

PROVIDENCE – A Palestinian flag waved outside Providence City Hall in hopes of invoking solidarity and honoring 'the important role' that Palestinian-Americans play in a city as diverse as Providence, speakers at a May 16 flag-raising ceremony said.
But the proposal to raise the flag has opened conflict within the ranks of local and state leaders.
According to members of the City Council, the flag was raised at the request of constituents.
'Every one of us is safer when we can celebrate every part of our community,' City Council President Rachel Miller said at the flag-raising ceremony.
The downtown Providence rally drew a large crowd to the steps of City Hall, where people of all ages brought their own Palestinian flags and banners, sticking around to play music and dance after an hour of speeches from community leaders.
Despite support from some community members, there had been staunch opposition to placing a Palestinian flag on government property from other members of the public, who referred to it as an endorsement of terror and criticized the local government for taking a stance on international issues.
A cohort of counterprotesters attended the Palestinian flag ceremony, too, carrying Israeli flags and, at times, attempting to drown out the official lineup of speakers, but the event carried on peacefully.
'City Hall displays many different flags throughout the year to mark different occasions and honor the many ethnic and cultural backgrounds and traditions that make our city strong. Just in the past couple of months, the city has flown the Dominican flag, the Irish flag, the Italian flag, the Armenian flag, and the Israeli flag,' the City Council's communication director, Marc Boyd, said in a statement.
For Reema Said-Awad – a Palestinian Rhode Islander who just completed a master's degree in justice studies at Rhode Island College while focusing on academic freedom for Palestine – getting to see a flag from her homeland hanging outside City Hall has remarkable symbolic value.
'It means a lot. It means we're finally being recognized as human beings,' she told The Providence Journal after delivering remarks to the audience. 'We don't hold hate. We want unity. We want people to understand that we are human beings who deserve existence.'
According to Said-Awad, hundreds of Palestinian-Americans across Rhode Island have joined campaigns to demand that state representatives use their power to end the U.S.-backed Israel-Hamas war.
The Palestinian death toll in the Gaza Strip has surpassed 53,000 people, according to Gaza's Ministry of Health, since Israel began its armed assault in October 2023, following the Oct. 7 Hamas-led attack into Israel that killed about 1,200 Israelis and led to the taking of about 250 hostages. Since March, Israeli forces have blocked deliveries of food, water, medication and other necessities from entering Gaza, and aid groups stress the mounting toll that the humanitarian crisis is taking on civilians, as reported by Al Jazeera.
Said-Awad said she and fellow community members have made thousands of phone calls, but they consistently receive generic responses.
'Obviously, we are very aware of what has been happening to the Palestinian people for quite some time now, so we want to uplift that message and show the Palestinian-Americans we have here that we see them and we're here to support them,' said City Councilor Miguel Sanchez.
Sanchez said that a few council members were looped in about the request for a flag, and they alerted the mayor's administration before taking the idea public.
Mayor Brett Smiley said that he would not have chosen to raise the flag himself out of fear that it would isolate Jewish residents.
'My office does not have the authority to prevent a separate, independent branch of government from expressing their differing political and cultural views,' Smiley said in a statement. 'It is my hope that both the City Council and the community who participates in the flag raising ceremony will use this as an opportunity to find unity instead of further division.'
In an interview with NBC 10, Smiley said that Providence doesn't have a foreign affairs department and that taking such measures isn't part of a city leader's job.
'I would push back on the mayor's comments,' said Sanchez. 'The mayor was literally in Israel for a week.'
The City Council's May 15 meeting was also a tense affair, where Councilwoman Helen Anthony and Councilman James Taylor opened the meeting with opposition to hanging a Palestinian flag. Taylor accused the City Council president and her staff of roping the council into her personal agenda, adding that at no point had he been consulted about the flag.
'You are welcome to speak, but you cannot make personal attacks on the floor,' replied Miller.
A week after the state House of Representatives passed a symbolic resolution recognizing Israeli independence and reaffirming the "bonds of friendship and cooperation" with the country, the state Senate on May 15 canceled a vote in a similar resolution.
The Senate resolution, S1065, introduced by Providence Democratic Sen. Sam Zurier, was "placed on the desk," a move that means it could resurface for a vote – or not – at any time.
"A couple of members raised concerns with the language of the resolution," Senate spokesman Greg Pare wrote in an email. "Because it was a new bill, they had not had the opportunity to speak with the sponsor."
The proposed Senate resolution is identical to the House version that passed without objection, with the exception of one paragraph in the House version that says Israel "has sought to achieve a secure peace with the Palestinians and Israel's other Arab neighbors," which is absent in the Senate version.
Both resolutions celebrate "a special relationship based on mutually shared democratic and moral values, common strategic interests, and bonds of friendship and mutual respect" between Rhode Island and Israel while lamenting "unjustified diplomatic and economic boycotts against the people of Israel."
One of the senators who objected to the resolution was Sen. Sam Bell of Providence, who posted on the social network Bluesky that he was "deeply disappointed that the RI House of Representatives passed an inflammatory resolution praising Israel in deeply inaccurate and offensive terms."
Smiley recently spent a week in Israel visiting Jerusalem and Tel Aviv, among other locations. The trip was organized and partially paid for by the Jewish Alliance of Greater Rhode Island, while the mayor personally funded the remaining costs. The visit's primary purpose was to 'strengthen the relationship between Israel and Rhode Island.'
Smiley told the Boston Globe that he converted to Judaism in 2024 after a year of study.
On his first morning back in town from Israel on May 15, about 20 demonstrators with the group Jewish Voice for Peace gathered outside the mayor's house and chanted, 'Wake up Smiley,' while banging drums and noisemakers at 7 a.m.
'We're hoping to make it clear to Smiley and other local leaders and politicians that going on these kinds of propaganda trips has consequences,' said Zack Kligler, an organizer for Jewish Voice for Peace. 'We're not going to let you comfortably pander to the Israel lobby for your higher political ambitions and leave behind the people of Providence who are struggling with rising rents and putting food on the table.'
The protest coincided with Nakba Day, Kliger said, which commemorates 77 years since the 1948 Arab-Israeli war, the creation of the state of Israel and the displacement of Palestinians.
In Arabic, Nakba means, 'catastrophe.'
'It is a deep, deep irony that Smiley's first day back at his home is on the anniversary of the expulsion of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians,' said Kliger. 'We're both here to honor Nakba Day and the legacy of those Palestinians and to show Smiley that he can't sleep comfortably in his home while Palestinians are bombed in theirs.'
'People are progressive until it has to do with Palestine,' Said-Awad said. 'Look at our college campuses and what's happening there. They've been trying to shut us down for speaking out about Palestine.'
This article originally appeared on The Providence Journal: Palestinian flag raising at Providence City Hall sparks tensions

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Chicago Tribune

4 minutes ago

• Chicago Tribune

Senate parliamentarian deals blow to GOP plan to gut consumer bureau in tax bill

WASHINGTON — Republicans suffered a sizable setback Friday on one key aspect of President Donald Trump's big bill after their plans to gut the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and other provisions from the Senate Banking Committee ran into procedural violations with the Senate parliamentarian. Republicans in the Senate proposed zeroing-out funding for the CFPB, the landmark agency set up in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, to save $6.4 billion. The bureau had been designed as a way to better protect Americans from financial fraud, but has been opposed by many GOP lawmakers since its inception. The Trump administration has targeted the CFPB as an example of government over-regulation and overreach. The findings by the Senate parliamentarian's office, which is working overtime scrubbing Trump's overall bill to ensure it aligns with the chamber's strict 'Byrd Rule' processes, signal a tough road ahead. The most daunting questions are still to come, as GOP leadership rushes to muscle Trump's signature package to floor for votes by his Fourth of July deadline. Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C., the chairman of the Banking Committee that drafted the provisions in question, said in a statement, 'My colleagues and I remain committed to cutting wasteful spending at the CFPB and will continue working with the Senate parliamentarian on the Committee's provisions.' For Democrats, who have been fighting Trump's 1,000-page package at every step, the parliamentarian's advisory amounted to a significant win. 'Democrats fought back, and we will keep fighting back against this ugly bill,' said Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, the top Democrat on the Banking Committee, who engineered the creation of the CFPB before she was elected to Congress. Warren said that GOP proposals 'are a reckless, dangerous attack on consumers and would lead to more Americans being tricked and trapped by giant financial institutions and put the stability of our entire financial system at risk–all to hand out tax breaks to billionaires.' The parliamentarian's rulings, while advisory, are rarely, if ever ignored. With the majority in Congress, Republicans have been drafting a sweeping package that extends some $4.5 trillion tax cuts Trump approved during his first term, in 2017, that otherwise expire at the end of the year. It adds $350 billion to national security, including billions for Trump's mass deportation agenda. And it slashes some $1 trillion from Medicaid, food stamps and other government programs. All told, the package is estimated to add at least $2.4 trillion to the nation's deficits over the decade, and leave 10.9 million more people without health care coverage, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office's review of the House-passed package, which is now undergoing revisions in the Senate. The parliamentarian's office is responsible for determining if the package adheres to the Byrd Rule, named after the late Sen. Robert Byrd of West Virginia, who was considered one of the masters of Senate procedure. The rule essentially bars policy matters from being addressed in the budget reconciliation process. Senate GOP leaders are using the budget reconciliation process, which is increasingly how big bills move through the Congress, because it allows passage on a simple majority vote, rather than face a filibuster with the higher 60-vote threshold. But if any of the bill's provisions violate the Byrd Rule, that means they can be challenged at the tougher 60-vote threshold, which is a tall order in the 53-47 Senate. Leaders are often forced to strip those proposals from the package, even though doing so risks losing support from lawmakers who championed those provisions. One of the biggest questions ahead for the parliamentarian will be over the Senate GOP's proposal to use 'current policy' as opposed to 'current law' to determine the baseline budget and whether the overall package adds significantly to deficits. Already the Senate parliamentarian's office has waded through several titles of Trump's big bill, including those from the Senate Armed Services Committee and Senate Energy & Public Works Committee. The Banking panel offered a modest bill, just eight pages, and much of it was deemed out of compliance. The parliamentarian found that in addition to gutting the CFPB, other provisions aimed at rolling back entities put in place after the 2008 financial crisis would violate the Byrd Rule. Those include a GOP provision to limit the Financial Research Fund, which was set up to conduct analysis, saving nearly $300 million; and another to shift the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, which conducts oversight of accounting firms, to the Securities and Exchange Commission and terminate positions, saving $773 million. The GOP plan to change the pay schedule for employees at the Federal Reserve, saving $1.4 billion, was also determined to be in violation of the Byrd Rule. The parliamentarian's office also raised Byrd Rule violations over GOP proposals to repeal certain aspects of the Inflation Reduction Act, including on emission standards for some model year 2027 light-duty and medium-duty vehicles.

Newsweek

10 minutes ago

• Newsweek

Iranians Put Faith in Diplomacy. Israel and Trump Shattered Their Hopes

Advocates for ideas and draws conclusions based on the interpretation of facts and data. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Every night for the last week, my family in Tehran wakes up to the Earth shaking as missiles strike and children scream. When the bombs go silent, they hear drones buzzing—a constant reminder they're being watched by the foreign army assaulting their city. Last week, Israel launched a surprise attack on Iran. Over 600 people have died, the majority civilians, including entire families killed while asleep. It has bombed Iran's state TV live on air, killing at least one journalist. Israeli bombs have hit hospitals and ambulances, killing paramedics. Medical facilities are overflowing with the injured. Smoke rises from the state media building targeted by Israel in the north of Tehran, Iran, on June 18, 2025, as the military confrontation between Iran and Israel escalates. Smoke rises from the state media building targeted by Israel in the north of Tehran, Iran, on June 18, 2025, as the military confrontation between Iran and Israel escalates. NIKAN/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images Israel says it targets military bases and nuclear sites. But its bombs have struck homes across the country. President Donald Trump said Tehran should evacuate—a threat to the entire civilian population. Tehran is a vast city of 10 million people. In June, the flowers are in bloom and the rivers overflow with glacier water. Mountain hiking paths fill with people. Tehran is also a diverse city. I lived near a church, close to a synagogue and Zoroastrian temple. There are Sunni and Shiite Muslims, atheists and Baha'is, Afghan and Iraqi refugees. Today everyone in Tehran is experiencing terror. Israel gives evacuation orders, like in Gaza and Lebanon. But it's impossible for everyone to leave. Many orders go out at night, when Iranians are asleep. Israel has hit fuel depots, causing gasoline shortages. On Monday, Israel told residents of District 3 to leave—300,000 people live there, including my family. They have nowhere to go. Many of my friends have also stayed to take care of elderly relatives. Those who can say goodbye to their homes, unsure if or when they'll return. They fear being bombed on the road, just like people killed in Gaza and Lebanon, or by Israeli bombs in Tehran. Just last week, my family was planning for summer holidays. My cousins wanted to rent a cabin near the beaches of the Caspian Sea. Instead, they are praying bombs don't kill them in their sleep. It didn't have to be this way. Last week, Iran and the United States were in the middle of negotiations. They'd spent months working out a deal. They already made a deal once before: the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). The 2015 Iran Nuclear Agreement led to joyful celebrations in Tehran. I'll never forget the optimism among friends and family. Both the U.S. and Iran held up their end of the bargain. Until Trump came to power and quit the deal in 2018. Former President Joe Biden campaigned on returning to the deal. But when he became president, he broke his promise. Instead, the U.S. continued crippling sanctions on Iran. They have been devastating for civilians. The currency has lost most of its value. Medicines have become hard to find, leading to preventable deaths. Ironically, sanctions strengthened the regime by encouraging smuggling, concentrating wealth among oligarchs. Sanctions did succeed in one thing: crushing ordinary Iranians. They weakened civil society, small businesses, and academic and cultural associations. For decades, Iranians have organized, protested, and rebelled for greater freedom. They have also advocated for better relations with the U.S. But America's betrayal of the deal—and its support for Israel's surprise attack—has undermined peace-loving Iranians. Every time Trump goes back on his word, it's a message Americans can't be trusted. Iranians have many reasons not to trust America, like the 1953 CIA coup that overthrew their democratically-elected government and put the tyrannical Shah back in power. Or U.S. support for Saddam Hussein when he used chemical weapons against Iranians. But Iranians kept fighting for diplomacy. They elected a president who promised to make it happen. When Trump said he wanted a deal, Iranians believed him. When he said he'd avoid a new Middle East war, they cheered. Instead, Trump secretly sent Israel missiles. Israel says it attacked because Iran is building a nuclear bomb. But U.S. intelligence has repeatedly shown this is false. Ironically, it is Israel that has an estimated 90 undeclared nuclear bombs, hidden from international inspectors. And it is Israel that commits what law experts argue is genocide in Palestine and war crimes in Lebanon. The U.S. not only failed to stop Israel—it keeps sending billions in military aid. Iranians feel betrayed by Americans—and terrified by the reckless warmongering of our allies. If Trump is concerned about Iran getting a nuclear bomb, then he should study history: diplomacy works. War is not the answer. The JCPOA is proof that Iran will uphold its end of a deal. Now Americans must prove that we, too, believe in peace, not war. The U.S. needs to end the flow of arms and sanction Israel, stop the war, and return to negotiations. If we don't want another generation around the world to grow up hating America, we must embrace peace. Let's show Iranians that Americans can be trusted. Alex Shams is an anthropologist with a PhD from the University of Chicago whose work focuses on Middle East politics. He previously worked as a journalist based in the West Bank. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.

Washington Post

17 minutes ago

• Washington Post

Israel is succeeding but will it overreach?

The Middle East is being reshaped by a fundamental shift in the balance of power: the rise of Israel. Consider the changed landscape. In the 1990s, Israel was closer to a run-of the-mill developing country. Today, its per capita gross domestic product rivals many in Europe and is the highest in the region, except for Qatar (which has a lot of oil and gas and few people). In 1990, Israel's GDP per capita was slightly higher than Iran's; today, it is nearly 15 times Iran's. The country now operates at the frontiers of technology, which is why the Gulf states have been so eager to develop ties with it. And in the last two years, Israel's military and intelligence forces have fought and bested Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, Syria and Iran. Its multi-tiered air defenses have stopped the vast majority of incoming missiles and drones. Put this all together, and you have a country that has become the region's superpower. Even so, Israeli officials were cautious about acting forcefully against some of the threats they faced. As Steven Cook of the Council on Foreign Relations points out, for the last two decades, the conventional wisdom in the United States and in Israel was that with adversaries such as Hezbollah and Iran — which had thousands of rockets and missiles that they could rain down on Israel — deterrence was the best that Israel could achieve. Every time it suffered a blow, Israel hit back, but it all seemed calculated to avoid escalation. The attacks on Oct. 7, 2023, changed the Israeli mindset, much as 9/11 did for the United States. The country's leaders were far more willing to take risks and confront adversaries preemptively, even preventively. Even so, it launched its exploding pager operation last September only because the plans were in danger of being exposed. Only then did the rest of Israel's attack follow, and it succeeded beyond all expectations, utterly devastating Hezbollah's leadership and its rocket infrastructure. This was the turning point. Hezbollah, the foe on Israel's borders it feared the most, turned out to be a paper tiger. In 2024, Israel attacked and destroyed many of Iran's air defenses. Neither of Israel's attacks that year produced anything near the kind of response that it had feared. Instead, the effect of these blows was to trigger the fall of Syria's Bashar al-Assad, who had been propped up by Iran, Hezbollah and Russia. And so, in 2025, Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu decided to act on the threat that he had been obsessed with for more than 30 years — and to act aggressively. He launched an air attack against Iran and, so far, it has destroyed much of Iran's military leadership and infrastructure. While it has not destroyed the Natanz and Fordow nuclear facilities, both of which are at least partially buried deep below ground, it has destroyed much of the rest of Iran's nuclear operations. President Donald Trump, who had been eager to negotiate a deal with Iran, counseled Netanyahu not to attack (by Trump's own admission), and, when Israel did anyway, Secretary of State Marco Rubio put out a statement distancing the United States from the operation. Since then, watching Israel's success, Trump has had FOMO — fear of missing out — and embraced the operation, even signaling that he might join in and use America's massive firepower to blast Fordow. But ultimately, putting an end to Iran's nuclear program cannot be done with just bombs, even bunker-busting ones. Iran is a country of 90 million, with a nuclear program that is now almost 70 years old, started under the shah. Thousands of scientists and technicians have worked on it. And nuclear technology is not cutting-edge technology; it was developed more than 80 years ago, in the era of shortwave radio and television tubes. The best way to put it under wraps is to make Iran agree to do so and verify that through intrusive inspections. One of the dangers of military success is that it often expands the victor's ambitions. After a stunning initial success in the Korean War, Gen. Douglas MacArthur decided he would try to unify the two Koreas and moved into the North, triggering a massive Chinese response that bogged down American forces for years. After Afghanistan fell in a matter of weeks in 2001, the Bush administration was emboldened to take the War on Terror to Iraq. In 1982, Israel's early successes in Lebanon led it to try to 'solve the problem' once and for all. What followed was an 18-year unsuccessful occupation of southern Lebanon. Israel's victories have been extraordinary so far, but they are making the country's leaders expand their ambitions — with some openly speaking about regime change and assassinating Iran's supreme leader. They are also emboldening Trump, who wants to get in on the glory. But it is at moments such as this that wise leaders avoid hubris and overreach and instead set clear, achievable goals that can transform military victories into lasting political success.