Suspected SK hynix HBM tech leaker arrested boarding flight to China
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission.
A man suspected of attempting to smuggle SK hynix tech secrets to China was apprehended at South Korea's Incheon International Airport earlier this month. DigiTimes reports that the former employee subcontractor aimed to leak the firm's proprietary high-bandwidth memory (HBM) packaging technology to entities based in China.
According to the source report, authorities had been aware of the activities of suspect 'Mr Kim' for several months. The Seoul Metropolitan Police Agency's Industrial Technology Security Investigation Unit made the dramatic airport arrest, moments before flight boarding, and charged Kim with violating South Korea's trade secret and unfair competition laws. Its investigators say that Kim stole critical data about HBM at around the same time he resigned as a subcontractor at SK hynix, at the beginning of the year.
Korean prosecutors allege that Kim kept printed and photographed records from his time at SK hynix. He went as far as removing SK hynix branding and 'confidential' markings from any material he captured, it is claimed. In total, reports say Kim was caught with a haul of 11,000 images from his time at SK hynix. Boldly, Kim is even said to have cited some of these stolen documents in job applications to Chinese firms, including Huawei's HiSilicon.
Above, we mentioned that the stolen proprietary data was mostly about HBM technology. More precisely, the almost-leaked SK hynix secrets were focused on the backend packaging stage of HBM, and hybrid bonding techniques, says reports.
HBM is widely used in AI accelerators, so it is understandable that Chinese rivals would covet SK hynix's work on fine-tuning the production of this kind of computer memory.
The case of Mr Kim is possibly only the tip of the iceberg, and there have been several other high-profile tech leaks to China involving rival companies like Samsung, for example.
South Korea already has reasonably strong deterrents to stem semiconductor IP theft. Individuals can face fines up to the equivalent of US$71,000 and up to 10 years behind bars. Harsher penalties and sentences can be imposed where strategic sectors fall victim to IP theft. Nevertheless, Korean authorities are making efforts to bolster legal deterrents, say reports.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Upturn
6 hours ago
- Business Upturn
LPRO DEADLINE ALERT: ROSEN, A GLOBALLY RESPECTED LAW FIRM, Encourages Open Lending Corporation Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important June 30 Deadline in Securities Class Action
NEW YORK, June 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — WHY: New York, N.Y., June 21, 2025. Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of Open Lending Corporation (NASDAQ: LPRO) between February 24, 2022 and March 31, 2025, both dates inclusive (the 'Class Period'), of the important June 30, 2025 lead plaintiff deadline. SO WHAT: If you purchased Open Lending securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Open Lending class action, go to or call Phillip Kim, Esq. at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for more information. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than June 30, 2025. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company at the time. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers. DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose materially adverse facts about Open Lending's business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, defendants: (1) misrepresented the capabilities of Open Lending's risk-based pricing models; (2) issued materially misleading statements regarding Open Lending's profit share revenue; (3) failed to disclose Open Lending's 2021 and 2022 vintage loans had become worth significantly less than their corresponding outstanding loan balances; (4) misrepresented the underperformance of Open Lending's 2023 and 2024 vintage loans; and (5) as a result of the foregoing, defendants' positive statements about Open Lending's business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages. To join the Open Lending class action, go to or call Phillip Kim, Esq. at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for more information. No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff. Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: on Twitter: or on Facebook: Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. ——————————- Contact Information: Laurence Rosen, Esq. Phillip Kim, Esq. The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. 275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor New York, NY 10016 Tel: (212) 686-1060 Toll Free: (866) 767-3653 Fax: (212) 202-3827 [email protected]
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Major warning over $50,000 act during popular Aussie travel period: 'Risky'
Australian travellers are being urged to rethink getting personal loans to pay for their winter travel plans. Nipping over to Europe or the US to escape the cold is a well-trodden path that thousands take every year. But some aren't spending months to save for the holiday and are instead taking out loans to ensure they can live life to the fullest. Tax expert Kiki told Yahoo Finance this can have huge ramifications down the line if you want to buy a home. "It's a bit risky taking out a loan, especially in this environment where the banks are quite strict with borrowing capacity, and taking out a personal loan of $50,000 will definitely impact your borrowing capacity," she said. Outrage as young Aussie spends $50,000 'house deposit' on Europe trip Centrelink age pension changes coming into effect from July 1 $1,000 ATO school fees tax deduction that Aussies don't realise they can claim "If they're going on a holiday just to have a break and take some pictures, and it's not for a family reunion or anything of that sort, then I think it's a bit silly." Fifty grand might sound like a ridiculous amount to spend on a jaunt to Europe, but this number was cited by some on social media. Brooklyn posted a TikTok asking how people managed to afford to go away every single it just sneaky savings hacks? Racking up credit card debt? Staying in the cheapest, nastiest hostel and eating bread every day? Everyone had their personal trick, but one person said, "I know a lot of girls take out $50,000 personal loans just to go." Another added: "I know of people who took out $50,000 to go on trips, absolutely astounding." The answer absolutely floored Brooklyn, especially considering she had budgeted just $16,000 for two people to spend 10 weeks in Europe. "Is this genuinely something people are doing? Like, I save diligently, I don't really drink, I don't really go out and do any of those things, and I can't afford to go on these massive holidays every year," she said. Data from Finder revealed Aussies have slowly been taking out more in personal loans for their holidays and travel plans. In January 2020, Aussies were approved for $35 million worth of personal loans for getaways alone. While that's a lot, it's nothing compared to the $1.1 billion taken out for car loans in the same month. Personal loans for travel obviously took a massive dip during the pandemic, but ever since July 2021, the total amount taken out has been steadily increasing. The latest data showed $59 million was approved just in July, 2024. Kiki said people are too often trying to 'keep up with the Joneses' and con themselves into these huge holidays just because others are jet-setting at the same time. Finder actually discovered more than 2.14 million people would go into debt to pay for their holidays. A further 5 per cent of Aussies, more than one million people, said they felt pressured to organise travel plans they couldn't afford. Personal finance expert Sarah Megginson told Yahoo Finance you need to be very careful going down this route as it can be a slippery slope. "A growing number of Aussies are drowning in debt to be able to travel," she said. 'While it's tempting to splurge on a holiday, taking out credit to do so can cause long-term financial consequences and keep you stuck paying off debt for months or even years." When Brooklyn uploaded her video, some Aussies weren't too fazed by the $50,000 admission. "I'm happy for them. As long as they pay it back who cares? Life is for living," wrote one person. "When it's that or waiting 5 years to save — take the loan! See the world! Life is too short," added another. But Kiki said this laissez-faire attitude towards loans isn't the best outlook. "People just don't realise the impact it has on them when they come back from the holiday, which is the concerning part," she told Yahoo Finance. "If you want to go on a holiday, then save for it, and then you won't have to stress about the aftermath of coming back and having to deal with this loan that is probably anywhere between two to five years of repayments." Having debt hanging over your head for that length of time can take a huge toll on your finances and mental health. Kiki said you can keep costs down by booking flights well in advance, checking the same accomodation on multiple sites for the lowest price, finding free walking tours, or going just before or after peak season. Also putting any savings into a high interest account can boost your money as much as possible. That was another point many raised on TikTok. They're both credit and yet it's personal loans that seem to be demonised, some said. However, Kiki explained that if you're putting all your travel expenses on a credit card, you're at least getting the frequent flyer points. You could rack up enough points that flights for your next holiday are a fraction of if you bought them outright. You can also get certain travel insurance when booking with a credit card, and some cards have interest-free periods if you pay off your debt in full each month, which is not usually available with personal loans. Credit cards and personal loans can carry incredibly high interest repayment rates, with some north of 20 per cent, however, there are some in the 5-10 per cent range, depending on a few factors. But Kiki said optics can play a role if you want to get a mortgage a few years after that big Europe holiday. "The bank might ask why was this loan taken out, and if the answer is, 'For a holiday', then they might perceive that behaviour as not someone that is financially stable," she said. The same can and will happen if you have loads of credit card debt. But the difference is you will have a credit card debt at the end of your holiday based on exactly what you've spent, compared to potentially overestimating how much you'll need for the in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data
Miami Herald
8 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Will skipping ‘Made in China' beat tariff price hikes?
For most shoppers, "Made in China" has been a way of life for consumers. The mark is on seemingly everything. That has consumers concerned about how tariffs and trade battles between the United States and China might hit home, literally. If tariffs ultimately act as a tax on consumers – most economists say they do – how can Americans avoid paying higher prices? Stop buying things that were made in China. That's easier said than Trump recently took to Truth Social to say that the United States and China have a deal that's done, pending final approval of leaders from both countries. He said that U.S. tariffs would be set at 55% on Chinese goods, while China's tariffs remain at 10%. Officially, tariff plans with China and other countries are on hold until July 9, but U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has said several times that the 55% tariff "definitely" will not change. Related: Major housing expert predicts huge change to mortgage rates in 2026 While many of the harshest tariff hikes face legal challenges, current U.S. tariff rates are at their highest levels in nearly a century; estimates from the Yale Budget Lab say that's costing the average U.S. consumer an extra $2,500 a year. A recent study by covering consumer sentiment about tariffs shows that nearly two-thirds of Americans believe tariffs will have a negative impact on their personal finances. Just over 40% of respondents said tariffs would "greatly worsen" their personal finances. But even if consumers decide to tackle the China tariff problem by eliminating spending on goods from the country, it doesn't mean they will save money. They also will find the task daunting, if not impossible. That's according to journalist Sara Bongiorni, who tried to live without goods from China for a year back in the early 2000s; the trials and tribulations of her effort became the basis for her book, "A Year Without Made in China." Bongiorni, now an adjunct professor at Louisiana State University, woke up on Christmas morning in 2005 to a house full of stuff, and as she rummaged through it, she realized almost everything was made in China. "I said to my husband, 'Do you think it would be possible to live for a while without things made in China? You want to try that?' He was not very enthusiastic about that idea, but we gave it a whirl." Related: Forget tariffs, Fed interest rate cuts may hinge on another problem Bongiorni didn't set out to make a political statement or to write a book. She was simply hoping "to understand at a personal level, as best we could, how much we relied on things from China in our everyday, ordinary consumer life." In a recent interview on "Money Life with Chuck Jaffe," Bongiorni recounted how her rule was to avoid the words "Made in China," which are only seen on the end consumer product sold to shoppers. That's a low bar, given that countless products are assembled in the United States or in other countries using parts from China. Those goods-like the ones with the Made in China label-will incur increased costs due to tariffs. Bongiorni noted that in certain product categories – notably toys, household gadgets, many types of electronics, coffeemakers, sneakers and footwear, and children's clothing – it was nearly impossible to find items that weren't made in China. Even when she did find rare exceptions, Bongiorni noted that the options often pushed her to higher-end goods, which meant paying more for the purchase, in some cases, more than she would expect to pay now on goods from China with tariffs attached. "I think there were so many things we didn't buy that year because you couldn't find a viable option that wasn't made in China," Bongiorni said. She also noted that, ironically, it's nearly impossible to celebrate a wholly American holiday like July 4th without goods from China, as the small flags, fireworks, parade toys, festive paper goods, and more were made there. Truly trying to avoid all goods from China – including component parts – would be nearly impossible, Bongiorni said, noting that consumers would find themselves with no easy alternatives. "The share of things, ordinary consumer items from China, account for at least 65% of things you find in a typical household," Bongiorni said. "If you push up [prices with tariffs up to 55%], that is a huge impact, especially when we've got inflation and other things going on in the economy. It's a huge thing for most families to have to shoulder that burden." More Tariffs: Aldi plans huge price cut despite tariffs driving costs higherCar buyers should shop these brands for the best tariff dealGeneral Motors makes $4 billion tariff move Bongiorni does think the United States can bring some manufacturing back onshore, but that will have a limited impact because of the breadth and volume of goods coming from China, and the convenience of having those items and getting them cheaply. "I have a hard time thinking that we can lure ourselves off of our connection to China as consumers as a long-term affair," she said, "but also I can see a huge public outcry because this is going to affect people's bottom line every month." While Bongiorni recalls her efforts fondly nearly two decades later, she says she would not want to permanently do without Made in China, even if tariffs raise costs. Avoiding goods from China and finding alternatives was "incredibly time-consuming." And when there were no viable product options, she was willing to go without certain items for a year, but would not want to sacrifice them for a lifetime. "I do think it's interesting to have an awareness of where things come from, and to get a sense to the extent you can to which you are connected to the international economy on that consumer level," said Bongiorni. "I found that enjoyable and interesting, but the idea of weaning ourselves from Chinese goods, after doing this, just seems very unrealistic.…I can't imagine living like that long-term." Related: Fed official sends shocking message on interest rate cuts The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
