A time for honest reflection on South Africa's dream deferred
Former president Nelson Mandela smiles on April 27, 1994, as he casts his first vote at the polling station at John Langalibalele Dube's Ohlange High School in Inanda, near Durban, in South Africa's first democratic general elections. Freedom Day reminds us of where we come from as a nation, but it should also be a celebration of unity, says the writer
As South Africans gather to mark our 31st Freedom Day since the end of apartheid, we do so with a mixture of pride, pain, and even trepidation.
We do so with pride because, despite its imperfections, April 27, 1994, remains an indelible milestone in our country's history — a day when millions cast aside the shackles of apartheid to claim their dignity and their right to choose their leaders. And we do so in pain because the promise of April 27 has been betrayed over the decades through missed opportunities, broken promises, corruption, and a general failure of leadership.
Looking back, I was 35 years old in 1994. Like so many at the time, I stood in one of the long queues that snaked for hours, my heart pounding in anticipation. I believed, as did millions of other South Africans, that our country was on the cusp of greatness.
I truly did, and it was. We had the world's goodwill, a constitution that was the envy of many, thanks to its inclusive, progressive foundation, and a people united by the desire to build a just, prosperous, and inclusive society. But as I reflected yesterday, I feel compelled to ask: How far have we strayed from realising that vision?
Economic Dream Deferred
We all know that attaining political freedom was just the beginning. Even the architects of our democracy understood that true liberation would be incomplete without economic justice. Yet, three decades later, South Africa remains one of the most unequal societies on Earth. Unemployment, especially youth unemployment, is at crisis levels.
Millions of South Africans live in poverty, their dreams deferred by an economy that works for a few, including the politically connected who managed to position themselves at the forefront of transformative efforts, while excluding the many.
Let me be clear: the state our country finds itself in is not merely the result of global forces beyond our control or historic injustices that some would like to blame for all our troubles. It is the direct consequence of policy failures, toxic cadre deployment, and a state that has too often served the interests of politicians and their cronies rather than the people.
Corruption's Tentacles Remain Embedded in the System
Corruption has become the defining feature of post-apartheid South Africa. It has given fuel to the negative predictions of Afro-sceptics who warned that a black-led South Africa would eventually implode, just like many failed states elsewhere on our continent, due to greed, unethical leadership, and a lack of vision among those entrusted to lead. Billions have been stolen from the public purse — money that should have been used to build schools, hospitals, public infrastructure, and to educate our nation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
How international pressure fast-tracked policy changes that prioritise foreign profits over local ownership
President Cyril Ramaphosa suggests Starlink as a solution, which raises questions about the underlying motives, says the writer. Image: Jonathan Raa/NurPhoto/AFP On May 21, we witnessed an embarrassing scene of the presidential delegation in the Oval Office. Patrick Gaspard, a former American ambassador in South Africa under the Barack Obama administration, explained that Trump had turned the meeting with Ramaphosa into a "shameful spectacle" and "savaged him with some phoney snuff film and brutal rhetoric" (Gaspard, 2025). This was purportedly done to remedy the very high already present tensions between the US and South Africa that have escalated since the Trump administration took office. Interestingly, just 48 hours later, Communications Minister Solly Malatsi gazetted a new direction of policy to ICASA, permitting Starlink and other foreign investors to "harmonise" current ICT sector requirements (Department of Communications & Digital Technologies, 2025). The regulations previously demanded that at least 30% of shares be held by historically disadvantaged individuals. Current ICT Sector Rules Due to the expansive and strategic nature of the telecoms sector – controlling how South Africans communicate, access information, and participate in the digital economy – the previous requirement for foreign telecommunications licensees to sell 30% of their local subsidiaries to historically disadvantaged groups ensured that black South Africans didn't just use these services, but owned and profited from the infrastructure serving their communities (Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act, 2003). ICASA's Role ICASA is the regulator of South Africa's telecommunications sector, essentially the gatekeeper that licenses all companies wanting to provide internet, phone, or TV services (Independent Communications Authority of South Africa Act, 2000). Because they enforce the ownership requirements, they're the ones who need to ease these regulations to make room for Starlink and other prospective foreign investors. As the Department of Communications & Digital Technologies noted, this wouldn't just benefit one company but would apply to all ICT companies, including those from China and the Middle East (Department of Communications & Digital Technologies, 2025). Equity Equivalent and Ownership 'Workaround' The 'sidestep' or 'harmonising' commonly referred to speaks to Equity Equivalent programmes – this is when companies are permitted to avoid giving up ownership but instead can contribute through community projects worth the same value as what that 30% ownership would have been. This usually takes the form of skills and training development, job creation, and supporting black-owned suppliers (Department of Trade, Industry and Competition, 2019). In 2019, the South African government piloted this approach through the automotive industry, where BMW, Ford, and Toyota did not have to give up ownership but instead committed to ploughing back through skills development and funding for black-owned suppliers (Automotive Industry Development Centre, 2019). Essentially, companies keep their investments, shareholding, and decision-making power, but offer communities the equivalent value of what they would have given up in ownership. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Aphelele Mtwecu, a proud member of the Activate Change Drivers Network and a2016 Activator. She is a content writer, activist Image: Supplied Contentions of Timelines and Due Processes So, how exactly does a presidential delegation meeting occur on Wednesday and have a new policy gazetted by Friday? The credibility of how this gazette played out is questionable. According to reports, the delegation included three other officials who were familiar with what Starlink would bring to the South African economy, granted this wasn't a spontaneous engagement. However, here is the problem: South Africa, with all its flaws, values and upholds consultative processes. A major economic policy shift such as this one would normally require public hearings or parliamentary reviews to protect the Republic from exactly these kinds of overnight decisions (Promotion of Administrative Justice Act, 2000). In this matter of harmonising BEE laws, regardless of existing contentions, this is an important historical policy that would impact our state of affairs deeply. It is further alarming how these kinds of events occur under the supposed sensitivity of the GNU government, where consensus-building across coalition parties should be central to major decisions. Unless it is the citizens who are blindfolded, and we simply do not know there was a prior agreement between parties to fast-track this change. Pseudo Altruism According to Statistics South Africa's latest general household survey, only 1.7% of rural households had an Internet connection at home in 2023 (Statistics South Africa, 2024). This devastating statistic has become the most compelling reason for the urgency of Starlink's operations in South Africa. As we understand it, Starlink has been piloted in some South African rural communities and has indeed yielded positive results for farmers as well as the education sector. The need is undeniable – rural communities lack the same coverage and access compared to urban areas. This digital divide is real and valid. Currently, technology optimisation is everything, especially in education, and for children to have access to connectivity is critical. But here's my question: out of all telecommunications services globally, can we prove that Starlink is the crème de la crème of satellite coverage? Have other avenues been exhausted before we convinced ourselves we had no choice? And if Starlink had indeed piloted programs in rural areas and seen the benefits, why wouldn't they yield further to South Africa's legislative and broader economic equity by accepting a BEE partner under ICT BEE laws? If rural connectivity was so important to them, why was this condition such a deal breaker? In these cases, material interests and profit margins trump everything else. And that makes me question their philanthropic intent "to save rural communities" entirely. Digital Inclusion* (*Economic Participation Sold Separately) The Department of Communications highlighted a significant issue, emphasising that the policy is not just about Starlink but is intended to address the growing digital divide. However, I do not agree with the methodology. We must ensure that our approach to digital inclusion does not compromise future sustainability. We have identified the need, but here's the broader question: how can you give a society tablets when they cannot even harvest food to sustain themselves and their families? How is this different from any other interventions that have squandered the hopes of our people, only to leave them hanging with false hope and shattered dreams? What's the point of digital inclusion without economic participation? We're essentially saying to rural youth: 'Here's access to the internet, but the profits from connecting you will flow to foreign shareholders.' This is the bread vs. bandwidth dilemma – we're trading long-term ownership for short-term access, creating dependency rather than empowerment. Communications Minister Solly Malatsi gazetted a new direction of policy to ICASA, permitting Starlink and other foreign investors to "harmonise" current ICT sector requirements (Department of Communications & Digital Technologies, 2025). Image: X / IOLGraphics Racial Capitalism in Real Time We are not oblivious to the sequence of events unfolding in the terrain we find ourselves in. The actions of certain global leaders have influenced policies that affect digital inclusion and economic participation. After our ambassador was dismissed, claims emerged about land confiscation in South Africa, which were used to support allegations of land grabs and genocide. He curtain-calls this performance to the globe, summons 'Cupcake' to the Oval Office, and at the brink of our president making pleas for him to stop, the Trump-Musk axis asks: 'What will you give us in return?' Our president suggests Starlink as a solution, which raises questions about the underlying motives. But these dynamics of power and racial manipulation speak deeply to what Cedric Robinson identified as racial capitalism, where racism isn't incidental to capitalism, but fundamental to its operation (Robinson, 2000). As Robin D.G. Kelley reflects on Robinson's work, this system not only exploits black labour but also uses black societies as laboratories for testing how far capital can push without resistance (Kelley, 2017). Du Bois saw this clearly: the colour line isn't just about prejudice, it's about who gets to own, who gets to profit, and who gets relegated to being grateful for scraps (Du Bois, 1903). We need to critically examine these issues, as seen in 2019 when BMW, Ford, and Toyota used 'equity equivalent' programs to avoid ownership responsibilities. But where's the evidence that this worked? Are there measurably more black-owned automotive companies today? Now they want us to accept the same promise in telecoms, dressed up as digital inclusion.
The Citizen
3 hours ago
- The Citizen
ConCourt's 'humanistic jurisprudence' source of pride, Ramaphosa
The Constitutional Court marked its 30th anniversary on Friday. As the country marked the 30th anniversary of the Constitutional Court, President Cyril Ramaphosa has called for continued recognition of the apex court's role in upholding democracy, saying its 'humanistic jurisprudence is a source of pride.' The Constitutional Court marked its 30th anniversary on Friday. Human rights Writing in his weekly newsletter, Ramaphosa discussed the threat to human rights across many parts of the world, with constitutionalism increasingly being tested. Ramaphosa stated that in March this year, the UN Human Rights Council said the 'world is facing a moment of profound instability' – characterised by conflict, democratic backsliding, declining respect for the rule of law, right-wing populism, attacks on civil society and judicial independence being undermined. ALSO READ: Ramaphosa defends transformation: 'We must dispel the false notion' Freedoms He said the council stressed the need for countries to strengthen democratic institutions charged with safeguarding fundamental rights and freedoms. 'As South Africans, we can be proud that we continue to strive to live up to this obligation. Even as we face numerous challenges, our democratic order is in good health, anchored in a progressive constitution and a Constitutional Court that continues to safeguard the rights of all'. 'Key facet' Ramaphosa said the imperative for the establishment of a specialised constitutional court was a 'key facet' of the multiparty negotiations that preceded the democratic transition. 'Whilst some believed that existing structures such as the Supreme Court could perform this task, the ANC advocated for a new court that was untainted by the past. 'Just as drafters of the constitution itself drew heavily on the experiences of other countries, when considering the model of the court, we looked to other jurisdictions for inspiration,' Ramaphosa said. 'Uniquely South Africa' Ramaphosa said while the ConCourt draws on the wisdom and support of international partners, it remains uniquely South African in its outlook, orientation, and values. The president said the court's first case in 1995, on the constitutionality of the death penalty, set the tone for a humanistic jurisprudence grounded in human dignity that endures to this day. 'In his judgment, one of South Africa's finest legal minds, South Africa's first black Chief Justice Ismail Mohamed, immortalised the vision of the new court,' Ramaphosa said. 'The South African Constitution is different,' Justice Mohamed writes. 'It retains from the past only what is defensible and represents a decisive break from, and a ringing rejection of that part of the past which is disgracefully racist, authoritarian, insular and repressive, and a vigorous identification of and commitment to a democratic, universalistic, caring and aspirationally egalitarian ethos.' Ramaphosa said throughout its 'proud history', the ConCourt has carried out its work without 'fear or favour, not hesitating to hold even the most powerful in society to account.' ALSO READ: Ramaphosa calls for dialogue to end Israel-Iran conflict
The South African
3 hours ago
- The South African
Sale of loose cigarettes to be BANNED under new law
Remember when you could just score loose cigarettes at the little shop on the corner? Well, updates to the Tobacco Bill aim to ban the sale of loose cigarettes by informal traders and spaza shops. And anyone caught doing so faces hefty fines and even imprisonment. However, the Portfolio Committee on Health has been hearing arguments against the law over the last week. Specifically, the Tobacco Products Control Bill in South Africa regulates all aspects of tobacco control, public smoking, advertising and packaging. Millions of illegal cigarettes smuggled into South Africa have been destroyed. Image: Pixabay According to the Cancer Association of South African (CANSA), tobacco-related diseases kill nearly 50 000 South Africans annually. More than 7-million South Africans smoke and there are over 1-billion smokers worldwide. Nevertheless, spaza shop owners and informal traders believe the banning of loose cigarettes could bankrupt their businesses, reports The Citizen . A spokesperson from the Enterprises and Hawkers Association told parliament that the ban on single cigarettes would cripple operations. He said customers only buy loose cigarettes because they cannot afford a full box. And they're a reliable means to bring customers to the shop/trader. The vast majority of e-cigarettes are sold online and therefore suffer from lax safety control, which the new laws hope to amend. Image: File Furthermore, the new Tobacco Bill aims improve public health by introducing stricter regulations. It will hold traders liable if customers are found smoking publicly near where they've purchased products. These laws include not just loose cigarettes but banning tobacco product displays at point of sale and regulating electronic nicotine devices (e-cigarettes). Currently, smoking in indoor public places is banned. Unless the smoking area makes up 25% of the premises. However, the new Tobacco Bill will completely ban smoking in all indoor public places and certain outdoor areas, too. Sale of tobacco products online will also be banned. This is in a bid to control underage smoking. As such, anyone who buys cigarettes and/or e-cigarettes will need to do so in person and produce a physical identification document at the point of sale. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
