India Becomes Crucial Node in Apple's Tariff-Battling Export Strategy

Foxconn's latest customs data confirms that from 1 March to 31 May 2025, an overwhelming 97 per cent of all iPhones assembled in India were destined for the United States, totalling $3.2 billion in exports—nearly double the 50 per cent average seen throughout 2024. May alone accounted for almost $1 billion, the second‑highest monthly export value ever recorded—just behind March's $1.3 billion.
This sharp shift reflects Apple's concerted effort to navigate escalating U.S. tariffs targeting Chinese exports, under a policy framework that now imposes 55 per cent duties on Chinese-made goods. India, by contrast, is subject to only a 10 per cent base tariff—with ongoing negotiations aimed at averting a proposed additional 26 per cent reciprocal levy.
Apple's strategic manoeuvres go well beyond plant output figures. In March, it chartered aircraft to ship around $2 billion worth of iPhone models—including the 13, 14, 16 and 16e series—from Chennai to the U.S.. Concurrently, it has lobbied Indian customs officials to streamline clearance time at Chennai Airport from approximately 30 hours to just six.
ADVERTISEMENT
Tata Electronics—the smaller of Apple's Indian manufacturing partners—also ramped up its U.S.-bound export rate, shipping an average of 86 per cent of its March‑April output abroad, compared to just 52 per cent across 2024.
Analysts at Counterpoint Research estimate that Apple's production capacity in India will contribute 25–30 per cent of global iPhone shipments by the end of 2025, up from 18 per cent in 2024. Industry insiders note that Tamil Nadu has become India's iPhone manufacturing epicentre, hosting some 70–80 per cent of domestic output through facilities run by Foxconn, Pegatron and Tata, and leverages major infrastructure investments to support scale‑up.
The strategic pivot has not gone unnoticed in Washington. Donald Trump voiced disapproval in Doha, urging Apple to prioritise U.S.-based manufacturing over Indian operations. He cast the policy shift as unwelcome, stating he did 'not want you building in India' and emphasised domestic production, although analysts warn it would be economically unfeasible—potentially tripling iPhone prices—if Apple were to replicate its Chinese supply chain in the U.S..
Despite vocal criticism from Trump, India's government continues to cultivate its appeal as a high‑tech manufacturing hub under the 'China Plus One' model. Prime Minister Narendra Modi's administration has facilitated green corridors and industrial investments, particularly in Tamil Nadu, aiming to amplify smartphone exports. The state's industrial minister and private‑sector leaders have pointed to India's growing workforce and operational readiness as key strengths.
However, the pathway is not without hurdles. High duties on imported components continue to hinder cost efficiency, even as trade negotiations between New Delhi and Washington seek to secure tariff relief. India remains more expensive than other manufacturing hubs unless concessions are secured.
Still, the numbers speak convincingly. Foxconn's India exports hit $4.4 billion to U.S. shores in just the first five months of 2025—already exceeding the full‑year 2024 tally of $3.7 billion. Simultaneously, India's mobile‑electronics exports raced ahead, reaching approximately $12.8 billion in 2024, with iPhones now powering nearly 70 per cent of that figure.
India's climb in Apple's supply chain mirrors broader geopolitical shifts—illustrating how trade pressure, tariff regimes and national strategies are reshaping global manufacturing. As Apple continues to amplify operations in India, the region is fast developing into a pivotal node in the technology economy—offering a compelling alternative to the long-established China corridor amidst deepening trade tensions.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Arabian Post

42 minutes ago

• Arabian Post

China's Iran Oil Bet Hits Strategic Snag

China is confronting significant disruption to its Iranian crude oil supply, risking both its energy security and geopolitical ambitions in the Middle East. With over 90 per cent of Iran's oil exports directed to China via Kpler, the contraction of that flow places Beijing's $400 billion 2021 cooperation deal in jeopardy. Major Chinese independent refiners, the so‑called 'teapots' in Shandong province, are enduring mounting losses as deepening discounts on Iranian oil clash with soaring global prices. Discounts have widened to between $3.30 and $3.50 a barrel against ICE Brent for July cargoes – up from approximately $2.50 in June – contributing to refinery utilisation dropping to around 51 per cent, down from 64 per cent a year ago. Despite Israel's airstrikes targeting Iranian energy infrastructure and concerns over potential U.S. sanctions, Iran has maintained its exports through a shadow tanker fleet and strategic logistics adjustments. Kpler reports that crude loadings have reached a five‑week high of about 2.2 million barrels per day, assisted by the use of a less exposed jetty on Kharg Island and pre‑positioning of floating stocks nearer to China – including approximately 8 million barrels stationed offshore China. ADVERTISEMENT In 2024, Iranian shipments to China peaked at 1.6 million barrels per day, but that volume had already declined to roughly 740,000 bpd by April 2025, as broader Middle East instability and tightening sanctions exerted pressure. Rival supplies from OPEC+ producers like Saudi Arabia and the UAE may partially compensate, yet analysts emphasise that prolonged disruption would still erode Beijing's strategic leverage and diplomatic role in the region. For China, this dependence on Iranian crude is part of a broader ambition to deepen its influence across the Middle East as a counterweight to the West. The initial rationale behind the 25‑year deal encompassed energy security, infrastructure projects, trade expansion, and regional diplomacy. But the conflict's escalation threatens those objectives, undermining China's established pipeline for cheap oil and complicating its efforts to mediate regional tensions. Economists note the urgency for Beijing to accelerate its shift toward renewable energy and domestic self-reliance. China had already reached a milestone with renewables comprising 56 per cent of its electricity capacity in 2024. The current moment has intensified calls to reduce external vulnerabilities and accelerate electrification. At present, the Chinese government has refrained from military engagement, calling for de-escalation and abstaining from direct intervention in support of Iran. Instead, it is pursuing regional diplomacy while guarding its considerable investments. A Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson emphasised the need to 'prevent the region from spiralling into greater turmoil', particularly to secure stable energy imports. However, should the conflict deepen, or if key Iranian oil infrastructure suffers irreparable damage, China's reliance on opaque supply routes and shadow trading may no longer suffice. Its medium‑term strategy of presenting itself as a credible peace broker in the Middle East faces growing strain amid diverging interests between Iran and Gulf states. China appears poised to rely more heavily on Gulf crude, yet that reliance comes with its own geopolitical calculations. Riyadh and Abu Dhabi together hold significant spare capacity – over 4 million barrels per day – which may cushion global shocks but do little to salvage China's ambition to sustain influence via energy partnerships. The unfolding developments in the Israel–Iran arena have exposed strategic fissures in a partnership that once appeared unshakeable. Even as Iran adapts tactically to maintain its export pipeline to China, Beijing must confront the reality that maintaining influence in the region demands resilience beyond discounted barrels and shadow fleets.

Arabian Post

42 minutes ago

• Arabian Post

Toyota to Lift US Prices by Over $200 in July

Toyota Motor Corp has confirmed that it will increase the prices of selected Toyota and Lexus models sold in the United States by an average of US $270 and US $208 respectively, with the changes taking effect in July 2025. The pricing adjustment comes as part of Toyota's standard price‐review cycle, the company emphasised, rather than a direct response to the higher US import tariffs on vehicles and auto parts imposed by President Trump. Toyota spokesperson Nobu Sunaga stated, 'The latest price hike is part of our regular review of the prices,' reinforcing that tariffs were not the sole driver of the decision. Nonetheless, the tariff environment has posed significant pressures on automakers globally, and Toyota acknowledged that its US pricing strategy reflects a response to ongoing cost variations driven by market conditions. The average increases translate to roughly a 5–7 per cent jump in vehicle pricing, based on benchmark models such as the Camry and Corolla, according to industry analysts cited by Bloomberg. The Camry SEL, priced at around US $30,000, could see a rise of about US $1,500, while a higher-end Lexus RX could face an adjustment of around US $2,000. ADVERTISEMENT Tariffs are exerting a ripple effect across the automotive supply chain. The US government's 25 per cent tariff on imported vehicles and parts has intensified cost pressures, prompting not only Toyota but also other manufacturers—such as Mitsubishi and Honda—to consider similar price adjustments or cost‑containment measures. Ford has also announced price increases for North American‑produced models, citing uncertainty over tariff policies. Toyota's decision highlights the paradox at the heart of the tariffs debate: protectionist measures designed to encourage domestic production may instead shift the cost burden onto end consumers in the US market. Toyota has emphasised its commitment to American manufacturing, citing the economic contribution and employment generated by its US plants. The company operates several factories in states including Kentucky, Texas, and Alabama, producing high-volume models such as the RAV4 and Tundra. Analysts note the move is consistent with broader inflationary trends in the auto industry, where rising labour costs, supply‑chain disruptions and commodity price increases have required frequent price recalibrations. 'This is not price gouging,' one sector observer told Bloomberg, 'but a necessary step to safeguard margins amid escalating overheads.' Consumer responses are expected to vary by model and region. Entry‑level compact and mid‑size Toyota models—very popular among US families—are the most sensitive to small price increments, while luxury Lexus buyers may feel less immediate impact. However, consumer advocacy groups have warned that maintaining total vehicle affordability is critical, particularly as financing costs remain historically high. The US automotive landscape has already seen a rise in manufacturer price guidance and adjustments. Industry data suggest that in the first quarter of 2025, US consumers paid an average of US $2,500 more for new vehicles than a year earlier, reflecting a broader inflationary shift. Toyota's announcement coincides with this trend, signalling that pricing pressures are likely to persist amid ongoing tariff policies and global economic uncertainties. For dealers, this price increase will necessitate adjustments in inventory valuations and marketing strategies. Many dealerships rely on tight margin plays and promotional leasing rates, and the added costs may reduce flexibility in incentives or alter end‑of‑month sales targets. While Toyota maintains that the tariffs were not a definitive trigger, observers point out that cost pressures from global trade policies are converging with normal fiscal adjustments, amplifying the need for price revisions. As auto markets enter the second half of 2025, the industry will likely continue to test the elasticity of consumer demand amid elevated prices and shifting policy landscapes.

Gulf Today

an hour ago

• Gulf Today

Gold heads for weekly fall as Fed rate cut prospects weigh

Gold prices fell on Friday and were on track for a weekly decline, as an overall stronger dollar and the prospect of fewer US interest rate cuts offset support from rising geopolitical risks in the Middle East. Spot gold slipped 0.8% to $3,333.99 an ounce, as of 0604 GMT, and was down 2.5% for the week so far. US gold futures shed 1.4% to $3,361.80. Describing the situation in the Middle East as 'fluid', Kelvin Wong, senior market analyst, Asia Pacific, at OANDA, said it is causing traders to avoid taking aggressive positions both on the long and the short side of the trade spectrum. US President Donald Trump will decide in the next two weeks whether the US will get involved in the Israel-Iran air war, the White House said on Thursday, raising pressure on Tehran to come to the negotiating table. Meanwhile, Trump reiterated his calls for the US Federal Reserve to cut interest rates, saying it should be 2.5 percentage points lower. The Fed held rates steady on Wednesday, and policymakers retained projections for two quarter-point rate cuts this year. 'Macroeconomic developments, particularly steady yields and renewed USD strength, have not supported the (gold) price,' analysts at ANZ said in a note. 'Rising inflation expectations and the Fed's cautious stance have weighed on market expectations around the number of rate cuts this year.' The dollar was set to log its biggest weekly rise in over a month on Friday. A stronger greenback makes gold more expensive for other currency holders. Reuters