Anorexia is the deadliest mental health condition. We are treating it completely wrong
A disturbing reality De Cicco Carr learned while seeking treatment in the public hospital system was that unless her body weight was considered dangerously low, she had great difficulty accessing physical or mental health care for anorexia.
Loading
'I refer to it as the 'sick Olympics': eating disorders are quite competitive [with one's own, mental ill-health ideals] by nature, and are fuelled by the healthcare system that is supposed to be there, but is only there to help the people who are the most physically unwell with eating disorders,' she says.
And even then, she found the emphasis to be on physical weight improvement, and not on quality mental healthcare for the underlying causes. Thankfully, after three months in private residential treatment, De Cicco Carr has achieved recovery stable enough to have conceived her first child and be well into a healthy pregnancy.
Anorexia nervosa is considered the mental health condition with the highest mortality rate, in part because only about half of patients respond to treatment methods developed decades ago.
Up to 10 per cent of those with the disease lose their lives to it within 10 years of getting it, and up to 20 per cent will pass away because of it within 20 years.
In Australia, 1.1 million people live with an eating disorder, and 1273 people died of them in 2023, a higher toll than those killed on the roads.
Data provided by Orygen the National Centre of Excellence for Youth Mental Health shows that since 2012, the incidence of eating disorders among those under 19 has increased by 86 per cent.
Meanwhile, progress towards more effective treatments has been hindered by stigma, including the mistaken belief that anorexia nervosa affects only 'young, affluent white females', according to a paper to be published on Thursday in the journal, JAMA Psychiatry.
Associate Professor Andrea Phillipou, a co-author and principal research fellow in eating disorders at Orygen and the Centre for Youth Mental Health at the University of Melbourne, describes anorexia as 'an unbelievably under-funded area of research – a lot of it is [down to] stigma associated with eating disorders: they are still seen as a trivial thing that only affects young, white affluent women'.
Loading
Despite some promising developments, current treatment outcomes are 'unacceptably poor', and a narrow focus on weight restoration is a key reason medical understanding and effective treatment lags.
'Anorexia can be and is life-threatening in a lot of circumstances, and weight restoration is usually the main outcome [of current treatments]; we want to stabilise people and get the weight restored, but this has taken away from the fact this is a psychological condition,' Phillipou says.
'We need to also focus on the psychological aspect driving the eating disorder.'
Because anorexia is one of the few mental illnesses to also require a physical diagnosis, its treatment and research into better approaches has been 'siloed' and held back decades.
Loading
Phillipou describes the paper, co-authored with global experts from King's College, London, and Harvard Medical School, as a call to action for research that treats anorexia holistically, as a physical and as a mental health condition. She says that approach will boost understanding of what causes the condition and in turn promote more modern and effective treatments.
'Recovery rates haven't budged in about 50 years, we're still getting the same poor responses to treatments ... and that's on the treatments, it's not the individual or the family's fault,' she says. 'It's been decades since we've had any innovation in treatments.'
Clinical psychologist Sarah Cox, manager of the Butterfly Foundation National Helpline, agrees with the paper, Anorexia Nervosa—Facts, Frustrations, and the Future, that treatments and research have been stymied by bias and misconceptions.
'A lot of people still believe [anorexia] is a lifestyle choice, but eating disorders are very serious mental illnesses; people can't just make a choice to turn that on or off, they need the right treatment support and compassion,' Cox says.
Loading
On World Eating Disorders Action Day, on Monday, the Butterfly Foundation released statistics stating that one in seven people believe those with eating disorders could 'snap out of it', and one in six people 'perceive eating disorders as a sign of weakness'.
Cox said these ideas must be challenged because they could contribute to patients missing out on early intervention, which could be vital to prevent the illnesses progressing to a life-threatening stage.
She said clinical experience backed up the claim in Phillipou's JAMA paper that anorexia patients were 'often falling in the gap between physical and mental healthcare'.
'Something we hear from people we support is people can slip through the cracks because they might be considered not being of a low enough weight for some treatment options, and being of too low a weight for others,' Cox said.
'Sometimes they are hitting that crisis point before they can join the public or private systems.'
She described the paper demanding a rethink in anorexia research and treatment as a powerful and important step in highlighting reasons that progress for patients had been so slow, 'and trying to point to possible solutions to correct it'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
6 hours ago
- The Age
Your step count is boring me to tears (and probably everyone else too)
Once upon a time, in the distant year of 2005, when it was inconceivable that statement belts would ever be unfashionable, Special K launched a wildly exciting promotion: buy an enormous box of cereal and a pedometer might just appear inside! My memory of the specifics is a little hazy (2005, to me, will always be the era of Going Out Tops and little else), but I'm pretty sure it was a one-in-every-three-box-wins-a-pedometer situation. Fuelled by the twin desires to get our hands on this technology and to do so in the cheapest possible way, my housemate and I went off to the supermarket. We weighed a bunch of Special K boxes and emerged victorious with our very own pedometers. I wore mine to university a few times, then quickly grew discouraged that my purely incidental exercise wasn't quite hitting the mythical 10,000 steps a day goal. So I stopped wearing it, then I lost it altogether, and never gave it another thought until, well, now. If this rather tedious tale were to unfold in a contemporary setting, things would be quite different. For one, almost everyone has some form of step-measuring device in their watch, Fitbit or smartphone now, so there would be no need for cereal boxes. But also, since the heady days of boho chic and Kim Beazley's last dance (not together), the world has changed. We in the West have evolved into body data narcissists. Thanks to our smartphones, smartwatches and Fitbits, we have become obsessed not just with compiling but aggressively sharing operational information about our bodies with the world at large. Step counting is the most profoundly stupid example of this. Did you know the idea of walking 10,000 steps a day isn't rooted in modern science at all? It originated from a Japanese clock company that created a pedometer for the 1964 Tokyo Olympics. They chose 10,000 steps because it was a nice, round, memorable number. The notion that this is an achievable, desirable and genuinely beneficial health goal is about as meaningful as feeling 'so special' after a bowl of cereal. While, of course, physical movement has proven benefits, the core objective of modern fitness is just part of a convenient marketing ploy. All right, so we've established that the whole premise of step counting is flawed. And that would be fine if it were just one of those we things knew but nobody talked about (like Maroon 5 having three Grammys). But these days, it's apparently a crucial part of the step-counting process to just blah blah blah about it. Loading If my Special K story happened today, I'd wear the step counter constantly. I'd talk endlessly about it, doing annoying things like announcing to the office, 'All right, I'm going for a walk to get my steps up!' or 'I'll get the photocopying, my steps are way down today.' I'd even proclaim, 'Hey everyone, did you know that I WALK?' And I'd never lose interest or stop wearing that pedometer. In fact, when I died, I'd request in my will that someone else put on my Apple Watch, so my steps could continue for time immemorial. This is because the incessant monitoring of step counts (along with sleep scores and exercise loads) has become intricately linked to our identity. Talking about your daily steps tells everyone that you have a health regimen and the emotional, mental, and financial capacity to indulge in this particular brand of self-analysis. It's showing off. A stupid flex, like carrying a huge water bottle or constantly eating fruit. Yes, I get it, you're healthy; now, please leave me alone with my idleness and my tablespoon of butter dipped in the communal sugar.
Sydney Morning Herald
6 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Your step count is boring me to tears (and probably everyone else too)
Once upon a time, in the distant year of 2005, when it was inconceivable that statement belts would ever be unfashionable, Special K launched a wildly exciting promotion: buy an enormous box of cereal and a pedometer might just appear inside! My memory of the specifics is a little hazy (2005, to me, will always be the era of Going Out Tops and little else), but I'm pretty sure it was a one-in-every-three-box-wins-a-pedometer situation. Fuelled by the twin desires to get our hands on this technology and to do so in the cheapest possible way, my housemate and I went off to the supermarket. We weighed a bunch of Special K boxes and emerged victorious with our very own pedometers. I wore mine to university a few times, then quickly grew discouraged that my purely incidental exercise wasn't quite hitting the mythical 10,000 steps a day goal. So I stopped wearing it, then I lost it altogether, and never gave it another thought until, well, now. If this rather tedious tale were to unfold in a contemporary setting, things would be quite different. For one, almost everyone has some form of step-measuring device in their watch, Fitbit or smartphone now, so there would be no need for cereal boxes. But also, since the heady days of boho chic and Kim Beazley's last dance (not together), the world has changed. We in the West have evolved into body data narcissists. Thanks to our smartphones, smartwatches and Fitbits, we have become obsessed not just with compiling but aggressively sharing operational information about our bodies with the world at large. Step counting is the most profoundly stupid example of this. Did you know the idea of walking 10,000 steps a day isn't rooted in modern science at all? It originated from a Japanese clock company that created a pedometer for the 1964 Tokyo Olympics. They chose 10,000 steps because it was a nice, round, memorable number. The notion that this is an achievable, desirable and genuinely beneficial health goal is about as meaningful as feeling 'so special' after a bowl of cereal. While, of course, physical movement has proven benefits, the core objective of modern fitness is just part of a convenient marketing ploy. All right, so we've established that the whole premise of step counting is flawed. And that would be fine if it were just one of those we things knew but nobody talked about (like Maroon 5 having three Grammys). But these days, it's apparently a crucial part of the step-counting process to just blah blah blah about it. Loading If my Special K story happened today, I'd wear the step counter constantly. I'd talk endlessly about it, doing annoying things like announcing to the office, 'All right, I'm going for a walk to get my steps up!' or 'I'll get the photocopying, my steps are way down today.' I'd even proclaim, 'Hey everyone, did you know that I WALK?' And I'd never lose interest or stop wearing that pedometer. In fact, when I died, I'd request in my will that someone else put on my Apple Watch, so my steps could continue for time immemorial. This is because the incessant monitoring of step counts (along with sleep scores and exercise loads) has become intricately linked to our identity. Talking about your daily steps tells everyone that you have a health regimen and the emotional, mental, and financial capacity to indulge in this particular brand of self-analysis. It's showing off. A stupid flex, like carrying a huge water bottle or constantly eating fruit. Yes, I get it, you're healthy; now, please leave me alone with my idleness and my tablespoon of butter dipped in the communal sugar.
Sydney Morning Herald
6 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Brisbane's abandoned 2032 Olympic Games
Queensland Sport and Athletics Centre Crisafulli was not the only premier to ignore the advice of a review he commissioned. Then-premier Steven Miles was widely criticised last year when he rejected the Quirk review's recommendation to build an Olympic stadium at Victoria Park and chose instead to host the Games' marquee events at the Queensland Sport and Athletics Centre, formerly QEII Stadium. QSAC, which hosted the 1982 Commonwealth Games, would have been demolished to make way for a permanent, 14,000-seat athletics facility. Loading During the Olympics, temporary seating would have increased the capacity to 40,000 – the smallest Olympic stadium since Amsterdam 1928. All up, the project would have cost $1.6 billion – and that was before public transport improvements, which Lord Mayor Adrian Schrinner said would cost about $400 million, were factored in. The QSAC gambit received even more criticism last July, when this masthead revealed preliminary designs via a photocopied black-and-white image obtained via an earlier RTI application. Now, the high-resolution version can be revealed, along with a less fully formed concept that included a roof over all stands. The concepts are now moot, with Crisafulli accepting GIICA's recommendation that a stadium be built at Victoria Park, despite a pre-election promise that no new stadiums would be built for the Games. Crisafulli told the Property Council lunch on Tuesday that retaining QSAC would have been the 'politically convenient' choice for his new government. 'There is no way in God's name that to go and spend a bucketload of money on temporary stands at that venue would either be a legacy play, nor would it make us look like a grown-up, mature city when the eyes of the world are on us,' he said. 'So I took the decision that I would wear the political heat for it. I owned it and I have been genuinely heartened by people who have absorbed why the decision was taken.' The Miles government had planned to upgrade Suncorp Stadium ahead of Brisbane 2032 as the host venue for the opening and closing ceremonies. According to renders captured in this masthead's RTI request, those upgrades would not dramatically change the 52,500-seat venue, which was largely rebuilt more than 20 years ago. The upper corners would have been filled in with new screens, while a giant screen would have been installed overlooking the Caxton Street plaza outside the stadium. But while Suncorp Stadium upgrades no longer feature in the government's 2032 delivery plan, the upgrades could still be on the table. 'Suncorp Stadium is a world-class stadium, and we're not going to let it wither on the vine ahead of 2032,' Crisafulli said when he unveiled the Games delivery plan in March. 'It will continue to be a world-class stadium and we will invest in it.' Indoor Sports Centres Chandler's old outdoor velodrome was set to make way for an indoor sports centre as part of a $257 million overhaul of the erstwhile Commonwealth Games precinct before the 2032 Olympics. But the GIICA review found space constraints on the site would have added 'significant cost' to the project. 'While there is a strong legacy argument for developing an indoor sports centre at Chandler Sport Precinct, this is not an operationally viable option for Games time,' the GIICA report found. The planned Sunshine Coast Indoor Sports Centre, near the outdoor stadium at Kawana, has been scrapped in favour of the planned Horizon Centre at Maroochydore. It was a reversal of a 2023 Palaszczuk government decision to go with the Kawana sports precinct, which would have been under construction this year. The proposal had the support of then-Sunshine Coast mayor Mark Jamieson and local sporting groups.
