logo
Immigration crackdown leaves Albuquerque man in limbo

Immigration crackdown leaves Albuquerque man in limbo

Yahoo07-06-2025

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. (KRQE) – As President Donald Trump cracks down on immigration, a Mexican citizen living in Albuquerque is sharing his story about the uncertainty he's facing trying to remain in New Mexico, where he's lived for decades.
Story continues below
News: Surveillance video captures crash involving off-duty officer that severely injured man
Events: What's happening around New Mexico June 6-12? Albuquerque Pride Parade
New Mexico Strange: Holy dirt and healing water: A look at NM's miraculous locations
Advocating for an Albuquerque man facing questions about his immigration status, dozens showed up Friday for Antonio Rios. Born in Mexico, Rios has been living and working in the U.S. for more than 20 years. In that time, he had two kids with a U.S. citizen who fell into drug addiction.
He was also deported more than once. He said he's kept coming back to support his kids, who are American citizens. 'They were in the street, he saw pictures of them, you know, living in the street, and so he was desperate to get to his children and to protect them,' said Rebecca Kitson, Immigration Attorney for Rebecca Kitson Law.
Since 2016, Rios has worked with an immigration attorney trying to get a visa, while staying in contact with immigration and customs. But amid a shift in federal policy, Rios is now worried he'll be deported any day.
'I mean, I think it's a real example of the shift in enforcement policy with this administration. In the past, ICE has had the ability to exercise its discretion in cases where they know the person individually and think that the person is deserving of some additional support,' said Kitson.
Rios applied for a special visa indicating he's a trafficking victim, after he said he worked at an unsafe Albuquerque job site. However, that application hasn't been decided on, leaving his family wondering if Rios will be allowed to stay.
'Like surreal, like it doesn't feel real. I've just always been with my dad, it's always been him who takes care of us, so it doesn't feel real that he's most likely about to leave,' said Juliana Chairez, daughter of Antonio Rios.
After talking to ICE officials on Friday, Rios is still here, but now on an ankle monitor that ICE is tracking. 'One isn't a criminal, I'm waiting. I've been working 20 years working here. I wish I could get through this and not come out in chains,' said Antonio Chairez Rios, currently waiting to hear from ICE.
Rios is expecting that ICE could make a decision on his status in the next few days. His next check-in with immigration and customs is in September. It's unclear when he'll receive a decision on his visa application.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Senate Republicans cannot force US Postal Service to scrap EVs, parliamentarian says
Senate Republicans cannot force US Postal Service to scrap EVs, parliamentarian says

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Senate Republicans cannot force US Postal Service to scrap EVs, parliamentarian says

By David Shepardson WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Senate Republicans cannot force the U.S. Postal Service to scrap thousands of electric vehicles and charging equipment in a massive tax and budget bill, the Senate parliamentarian said late on Sunday. The U.S. Postal Service currently has 7,200 electric vehicles, made up of Ford e-Transit vehicles and specially built Next Generation Delivery Vehicles built by Oshkosh Defense. USPS warned on June 13 that scrapping the electric vehicles would cost it $1.5 billion, including $1 billion to replace its current fleet of EVs and $500 million in EV infrastructure rendered useless and "seriously cripple our ability to replace an aging and obsolete delivery fleet." Senate parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough, whose role is to ensure lawmakers follow proper legislative procedure, said a provision to force the sale could not be approved via a simple majority vote in the Republican-controlled chamber and will instead need a 60-vote supermajority, according to Democrats on the Senate Budget Committee. She ruled last week that Republicans cannot use the bill to overturn landmark rules to drastically reduce vehicle emissions and boost EV sales. Senate Republicans have also sought to reclaim more than $1 billion out of $3 billion Congress gave USPS in 2023 as part of a $430 billion climate bill to buy EVs and charging infrastructure - including $1.2 billion for electric vehicles. USPS told Congress "summarily removing all electric vehicles and charging infrastructure would hobble our ability to deliver to the American people, it would directly harm our ability to serve your constituents, and it would waste crucial funds for no reasonable purpose." Replacing the current 7,200 electric vehicles would directly cost the Postal Service at least $450 million and USPS has also spent $540 million on electrical infrastructure upgrades "which is literally buried under parking lots, and there is no market for used charging equipment," the company added. USPS would also face significant costs from Oshkosh for halting EV purchases under its contract. USPS said in December that purchases in 2025 would be around "50-50" EVs and gas-powered. USPS plans to buy some 66,000 electric vehicles by 2028. Senate Republicans argued scrapping EVs would "focus USPS on delivering mail and not achieving the environmental aims pushed by the Biden administration." In March, the White House forced out Postmaster General Louis DeJoy, who led efforts to restructure the money-losing U.S. Postal Service for nearly five years. USPS has lost more than $100 billion since 2007. David Steiner, a FedEx board member and former CEO of Waste Management, has been named as incoming postmaster general. President Donald Trump said in February he was considering merging the Postal Service with the Commerce Department, a move Democrats said would violate federal law. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

Rubio: ‘No planned military operations' against Iran unless they attack Americans
Rubio: ‘No planned military operations' against Iran unless they attack Americans

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Rubio: ‘No planned military operations' against Iran unless they attack Americans

Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on Sunday that the United States currently has no military operation planned against Iran but left the door open for future strikes if the country does not demonstrate a meaningful effort to make peace. 'We have other targets that we could hit, but we achieved our objective,' Rubio said in an interview on CBS News's 'Face the Nation.' 'The primary targets we were interested in are the ones that were struck [last night] in devastating fashion,' Rubio continued. 'And we've achieved that objective.' Rubio made clear that the U.S. would retaliate if Iran attacked Americans 'or American interests.' 'There are no planned military operations right now against Iran, unless — unless — they mess around and they attack Americans or American interests. Then they're going to have a problem,' he said. Rubio said he would not 'broadcast what those problems are' but stressed U.S. capabilities to carry out sophisticated attacks. 'Know this: The United States flew halfway around the world, right into the heart of Iran, over their most sensitive locations — these things got rocked — and then we left. And we were out of their airspace, we were over the ocean before they figured out what had happened,' Rubio said. 'And there are plenty of other targets — we don't want to do that. That's not our preference. We want peace deals with them, and that's up to them to decide,' he continued. President Trump announced Saturday evening that U.S. forces bombed three Iranian nuclear sites and said to Iran, in a social media post, 'NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE!' The bombs targeted three nuclear sites in Natanz, Isfahan and Fordow, the last of which is located inside a mountain. Six bunker buster bombs were reportedly dropped on Fordow, while more than two dozen Tomahawk missiles were launched at the other two sites. The bombings put the U.S. directly in Iran's crosshairs for retaliation and made it an active participant in the Middle Eastern war, which Israel launched with airstrikes against Iran on June 13. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Republican lawmaker on US bombs against Iran: ‘This is not constitutional'
Republican lawmaker on US bombs against Iran: ‘This is not constitutional'

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Republican lawmaker on US bombs against Iran: ‘This is not constitutional'

Rep. Thomas Massie (Ky.), one of the most vocal Republicans pushing against American intervention in Iran, posted on the social platform X that President Trump's bombing of Iranian nuclear sites is unconstitutional. Trump announced that American forces struck three Iranian nuclear sites — Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan — and that all planes are out of Iranian airspace. 'A full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordow. All planes are safely on their way home. Congratulations to our great American Warriors. There is not another military in the World that could have done this. NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE! Thank you for your attention to this matter,' he posted on Truth Social. Massie wanted to introduce a war powers resolution in the House on Tuesday that would prohibit American involvement in Iran. 'This is not our war. But if it were, Congress must decide such matters according to our constitution,' he posted on X on June 16. The Constitution's Article 1, Section 8 gives the power 'to declare war' to Congress. However, the president also has war powers dictated in Article 2 of the Constitution. Since the president is commander in chief of the armed forces, these two articles are a source of constitutional debate. Also, there has been no declaration of war. Republican Rep. Warren Davidson (Ohio) echoed a similar sentiment to Massie's in a post on X. 'While President Trump's decision may prove just, it's hard to conceive a rationale that's Constitutional,' Davidson wrote. 'I look forward to his remarks tonight.' Many members of the GOP support the president's actions against Iran. Sen. John Cornyn (Texas) was one Republican who supported the president on X, saying, 'President Trump made the courageous and correct decision to eliminate the Iranian nuclear threat. God Bless the USA. Thank you to our extraordinary military and our indomitable POTUS. This is what leadership on the world stage looks like.' Updated on June 22 at 10:47 a.m. EDT. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store