From Gaza prisoner to ‘the Israeli agent': how rise of Abu Shabab could ignite new phase of war
On 7 October 2023, Yasser abu Shabab was languishing in a Hamas-run jail in Gaza on charges of drug trafficking. With the outbreak of the conflict, the Palestinian from Rafah managed to leave prison, though the circumstances of his release remain unclear to this day.
For a while, Abu Shabab vanished from sight. That changed last week when Israeli defence officials acknowledged they had begun arming a clan that calls itself the Anti-Terror Service. It consists of about 100 armed men who operate in eastern Rafah under the command of Abu Shabab, whose nickname is 'the Israeli agent' and who is described as a 'traitor' on social media in the territory.
The officials said the Israel Defense Forces' goal was 'reducing Israeli military casualties' while systematically undermining Hamas. But critics have warned that the Israeli-backed criminal gang could push Gaza to the brink of civil war.
Abu Shabab, 32, has emerged as a powerful figure, exerting control over aid routes near the strategically vital Kerem Shalom crossing, while members of his group are accused of looting trucks carrying food, and of having ties to jihadist groups.
Last month Jonathan Whittall, the head of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) in occupied Palestinian territories, said: 'Theft of aid since the beginning of the war has been carried out by criminal gangs, under the watch of Israeli forces, and they were allowed to operate in proximity to the Kerem Shalom crossing point into Gaza.'
When contacted by the Guardian, Whittall said he was 'referring to gangs such as Abu Shabab'.
In a written interview with the Guardian, Abu Shabab blamed Hamas for the war in Gaza, defended himself from the accusations of looting and insisted his clan was providing security to aid trucks passing from the Kerem Shalom crossing into Gaza.
'My activities are humanitarian and it's for my people only,' Abu Shabab said. 'We are providing security in areas controlled by our national forces and providing support to hundreds of families, with hundreds of people flocking to our areas every day.'
Several videos circulating on social media in Gaza from his Facebook profile, verified by the Guardian with his associates, show members of Abu Shabab's group operating alongside Israeli soldiers in IDF-controlled areas in southern Gaza.
Asked if his group was acting in coordination with Israeli forces, Abu Shabab said: 'We do not work directly with the Israeli army.'
The Times of Israel cited defence sources who said Israel had provided members of Abu Shabab's faction with Kalashnikov assault rifles, including some weapons seized from Hamas.
Since Israel eased its blockade on aid to Gaza, dozens of lorries carrying food have been entering the territory each day, crossing through Kerem Shalom and moving towards Rafah, where Abu Shabab has set up a series of checkpoints.
A diplomatic official told CNN that the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), the new US-backed organisation tasked by Israel with distributing supplies in the territory, had contact with Abu Shabab, 'whether directly or indirectly'.
Asked if he had a collaboration with the GHF, which is distributing food at three sites in Rafah, Abu Shabab declined to comment.
Reached by the Guardian, a spokesperson for GHF said: 'We provide our own security and do not have any local security. Our trucks have never been protected by Abu Shabab or anyone else.'
Without providing any evidence supporting his claims, Abu Shabab – whose responses appeared contradictory and were often undermined by his previous statements or by verifiable evidence – blamed Hamas for looting trucks carrying food into Gaza.
'We do not take anything from the aid trucks,' said Abu Shabab, who did not respond to calls or texts but corresponded through an email address provided to international news outlets and confirmed by his associates. 'Aid is stolen in areas controlled by Hamas.'
However, in an interview in November 2024 with the New York Times, Abu Shabab admitted that his men had raided half a dozen aid trucks since the start of the war. 'We are taking trucks so we can eat, not so we can sell,' he told the paper, saying he was feeding his family.
Coverage of the war in Gaza is constrained by Israeli attacks on Palestinian journalists and a bar on international reporters entering the Gaza Strip to report independently on the war.
Israel has not allowed foreign reporters to enter Gaza since 7 October 2023, unless they are under Israeli military escort. Reporters who join these trips have no control over where they go, and other restrictions include a bar on speaking to Palestinians in Gaza.
Palestinian journalists and media workers inside Gaza have paid a heavy price for their work reporting on the war, with over 180 killed since the conflict began.
The committee to protect journalists has determined that at least 19 of them 'were directly targeted by Israeli forces in killings which CPJ classifies as murders'.
Foreign reporters based in Israel filed a legal petition seeking access to Gaza, but it was rejected by the supreme court on security grounds. Private lobbying by diplomats and public appeals by prominent journalists and media outlets have been ignored by the Israeli government.
To ensure accurate reporting from Gaza given these restrictions, the Guardian works with trusted journalists on the ground; our visual teams verify photo and videos from third parties; and we use clearly sourced data from organisations that have a track record of providing accurate information in Gaza during past conflicts, or during other conflicts or humanitarian crises.
Emma Graham-Harrison, chief Middle East correspondent
Since Abu Shabab's name began appearing in the media, Hamas has publicly declared it is intent on killing him. Abu Shabab has reasons to loathe Hamas. The militant group killed his brother last year and has already tried to kill Abu Shabab at least twice.
'The war will not end as long as Hamas insists on its position,' Abu Shabab said.
On Wednesday the Israeli news channel i24 reported that Israeli soldiers clashed with Hamas members in order to protect Abu Shabab from being killed, which resulted in deaths on both sides.
Although the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, did not name Abu Shabab, he has admitted to having 'activated' clans in Gaza that he says oppose Hamas.
Netanyahu's comments sparked a row in Israel, with opposition leaders accusing the government of transferring weapons to a group of thugs and criminals 'who identify with [Islamic State]'.
Abu Shabab's links with Israeli forces were confirmed by his family, which issued a statement last week formally disowning him. 'We will not accept Yasser's return to the family. We have no objection to those around him liquidating him immediately,' they said.
The rise of Abu Shabab as the first openly acknowledged Palestinian collaborator with Israeli forces since the start of the Gaza war could, according to many analysts, ignite a dangerous new phase of the conflict.
In addition to clashes with Hamas, his clan may soon face violent confrontations with rival gangs and members of Gaza's popular committees, Israeli media report.
They say it is the kind of environment where civil wars often take root – and where civilians, once again, are likely to bear the heaviest cost.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
UPI
26 minutes ago
- UPI
Israeli hostage remains recovered, Netanyahu confirms
People react as they gather to watch a live stream reporting on the release of Israeli-American soldier hostage Edan Alexander, in hostages square outside the Kirya military base in Tel Aviv, Israel, in May. File photo Abir Sultan/EPA-EFE June 22 (UPI) -- The bodies of three Israeli hostages have been recovered from the Gaza Strip, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said. Yonatan Samrano, Ofra Keidar and Staff Sgt. Shai Levinson's remains were retrieved Saturday as part of a military operation. Keidar, 71, was killed at a kibbutz and her remains were taken into Gaza. Levinson, who engaged in the Oct. 7th attack, was 19 at the time of this death, according to the IDF. Samerano's remains were discovered by the Israeli army. "I thank our commanders and fighters for a successful operation, for their determination and courage," Netanyahu said following the return of the remains. The Israel Defense Forces has recovered a total of eight bodies from Gaza this month as the latest battle between the two adversaries ignited on Oct. 7, 2023, when Hamas launched a cross-border attack on Israel, killing more than 1,200 people and taking 251 others hostage. The return of the hostage remains comes amid a U.S. attack on three Iranian nuclear facilities Sunday, which bolsters Israel's efforts to cripple Iran's nuclear ambitions. Israel has recently started its own attacks on Iran. "The campaign to return the abductees continues continuously and is taking place in parallel with the campaign against Iran," Netanyahu continued. "We will not rest until we return all our abductees home -- both the living and the dead." The IDF did not say where the remains were recovered.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Iran Stands Alone Against Trump and Israel, Stripped of Allies
(Bloomberg) -- Iran's leaders are discovering they're on their own against the US and Israel, without the network of proxies and allies that allowed them to project power in the Middle East and beyond. Bezos Wedding Draws Protests, Soul-Searching Over Tourism in Venice One Architect's Quest to Save Mumbai's Heritage From Disappearing JFK AirTrain Cuts Fares 50% This Summer to Lure Riders Off Roads NYC Congestion Toll Cuts Manhattan Gridlock by 25%, RPA Reports As the Islamic Republic confronts its most perilous moment in decades following the bombing of its nuclear facilities ordered by US President Donald Trump, Russia and China are sitting on the sidelines and offering only rhetorical support. Militia groups Iran has armed and funded for years are refusing or unable to enter the fight in support of their patron. After decades of being stuck in a game of fragile detente, the entire geopolitical order of the Middle East is being redone. The Oct. 7 Hamas attack on Israel was only the beginning. It led to multiple conflicts and tested decades-long alliances. It offered Trump, on his return to power this year, a chance to do what no president before him had dared by attacking Iran so aggressively and directly. Since Israel started strikes on Iran on June 13, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has spoken of goals beyond neutering Tehran's nuclear threat, even hinting at regime change. But the risk is that an isolated Iran could become more unpredictable with its once-steadfast allies keeping their distance. 'As Iran faces its most critical military test in decades, further tangible assistance from either Moscow or Beijing remains unlikely,' said Bloomberg Economics analysts including Adam Farrar and Dina Esfandiary. 'While both maintain bilateral strategic partnerships with Tehran, neither Russia nor China is a formal military ally, and neither is likely to provide significant military or economic aid due to their own limitations and broader strategic considerations.' Iran isn't getting any support, either, from the BRICS grouping of emerging markets that purports to want a new global order that's not dominated by Western nations. The organization — set up by Brazil, Russia, India and China and which Iran joined in early 2024 — has been silent over Israel and the US's attacks on the Islamic Republic. Iran signed a strategic cooperation treaty with Russia in January and it was a vital source of combat drones early in President Vladimir Putin's invasion of Ukraine. However, Russian officials have made clear the pact includes no mutual-defense obligations and that Moscow has no intention of supplying Iran with weapons, even as they say Tehran hasn't asked for any. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi told reporters in Turkey on Sunday he plans to travel to Moscow to discuss the situation with Putin on Monday. He can expect warm words and little practical support. That's a far cry from 2015, when Russia joined Iran in sending forces to Syria to save the regime of President Bashar Al-Assad, which was eventually toppled by rebels last year. Moscow risks losing another key ally in the Middle East if the government in Tehran led by Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei falls. Yet while the Kremlin has condemned the Israeli and US attacks, Putin is distracted and stretched — militarily and economically — by his war in Ukraine. China, too, 'strongly' condemned the US strikes as a breach of international law. But it hasn't offered assistance to Iran, which sells some 90% of its oil exports to Beijing. Iran's Gulf neighbors urged restraint and warned of potentially devastating implications for the region if Iran retaliates against US assets in the Middle East. Nations such as Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates spent months trying to use their geopolitical and economic heft to bolster nuclear talks between the Americans and Iran. In the end, the talks have been overtaken by military power. Iran's proxy militant groups are mostly absent too. Hezbollah in Lebanon, hitherto the most potent member of Tehran's 'axis of resistance' was pummeled by Israeli forces last year, much as Hamas was. Israeli strikes on Assad's military in Syria, meanwhile, played a part in his government's collapse. Hezbollah still poses a threat and on Sunday the US ordered family members and non-emergency government personnel to leave Lebanon. Still, the group's not threatened to back Iran by firing on Israel, as it did right after Hamas' attack in 2023. The Houthis in Yemen are an exception and hours about the US strikes on Iran, they issued fresh threats against US commercial and naval ships. Yet they risk another American bombardment like that one Trump ordered before a truce with the group in May. The Europeans, meanwhile, are increasingly irrelevant, in terms of swaying Trump and Israel, and Tehran. The UK, France and Germany have historically held an important role in the Middle East. They represented the dominant economies in Europe. The first two were colonial powers in the region and in the case of Germany, given its Nazi past, there was a strong pro-Israel voice. Both the UK and France have had to handle a vocal voter constituency that was pro Palestinian and complicated their messaging. That was not always an easy needle to thread. The current UK government is led by Labour, whose legacy was damaged by Tony Blair's decision to join US President George W. Bush in his invasion of Iraq in 2003. So for Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who has finally wrested control of the country from Conservatives, there is no upside to supporting any US military involvement. Trump didn't seem to need it, and the UK was happy to stay out of it even though it has enough of a presence that it could have been useful. Europeans find themselves sidelined with little power to influence the outcome. At the Group of Seven summit, Trump put France's President Emmanuel Macron in his place for suggesting the US was working toward a ceasefire between Israel and Iran. That did not stop Macron from working the phones, but the harsh reality that has filtered through is that Europe has its own existential crisis much closer to home. It needs Trump to at least make a cameo in The Hague for a NATO summit on Tuesday and Wednesday. The organization's leaders want assurances the US post-World War II commitment to stop Russian expansionism still stands. Europe has provided back channels for Iran in the past. In a climate where Europe and the US aren't working together on Iran, it's possible some valuable diplomatic signaling may be lost. That's one side effect of the US going it alone and of Europe being a bit player, as the crisis in the Middle East deepens. --With assistance from Eric Martin. Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags Is Mark Cuban the Loudmouth Billionaire that Democrats Need for 2028? Ken Griffin on Trump, Harvard and Why Novice Investors Won't Beat the Pros The US Has More Copper Than China But No Way to Refine All of It Can 'MAMUWT' Be to Musk What 'TACO' Is to Trump? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
US strikes Iran's nuclear sites, risking wider Mideast war
The U.S. carried out airstrikes on three nuclear sites in Iran overnight, directly entering Israel's war with Tehran despite President Donald Trump's longtime promises to avoid new foreign conflicts. Trump said Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities had been "totally obliterated" and warned of "far greater" attacks unless the Islamic Republic agreed to make peace, raising the prospect of deeper U.S. involvement in a Middle East war sparked by Israeli strikes nine days ago. Iranian officials said the ongoing attacks by Israel - now joined by the U.S. - had left little room for diplomacy, arguing that negotiations are impossible while the country is under assault. Tehran fired missiles at Israel in response but has so far stopped short of targeting American forces or assets in the region. American B-2 bombers dropped 14 of the 30,000-pound (13,600-kilogram) bunker-buster bombs on targets including Fordow, a uranium-enrichment site buried deep under a mountain, according to U.S. Air Force General Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Natanz and Isfahan nuclear facilities were also struck with similar weapons and cruise missiles. "Our objective was the destruction of Iran's nuclear enrichment capacity and a stop to the nuclear threat posed by the world's No. 1 state sponsor of terror," Trump said. "Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace. If they do not, future attacks will be far greater - and a lot easier." Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, said the American strikes are "outrageous and will have everlasting consequences." The Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps said it would continue targeting Israel in response and cited American bases in the region as a vulnerability for the U.S., without openly threatening them. Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has yet to make an appearance or comment on the airstrikes. Despite Trump's declaration that all targeted nuclear facilities were obliterated, neither Israel nor Iran offered definitive assessment of the damages to those sites. Tehran's nuclear regulatory agency said there was no sign of radiation contamination and that it had taken precautions in anticipation of an attack. An official evaluation of the strikes' impact would follow later, said Caine, the chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff. America's entry into the conflict marks an extraordinary escalation by Trump - the most consequential foreign policy decision of his presidency to date. In ordering the strikes, Trump defied warnings from key U.S. allies in the Middle East and Europe, as well as from the International Atomic Energy Agency. The U.N. watchdog has repeatedly cautioned that nuclear facilities must not be targeted, citing risks of radioactive contamination. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said the strikes had a "limited" objective, focused on destroying Iran's nuclear program. "The mission was not, has not, been about regime change," he said. Iran has long maintained that it does not seek nuclear weapons, a view echoed in recent U.S. intelligence assessments that found Tehran had yet to commit to developing a bomb. Trump dismissed those conclusions and refused to rule out joining Israel's attacks on the Islamic Republic. Western and Arab concerns over Iran's nuclear program have intensified in recent years, as Tehran has enriched enriched uranium well beyond levels required for civilian use. It is now processing material close to weapons-grade purity, for which Western countries feel there is little justification with current civilian uses of the material. The U.S. strikes could lead to attacks on American assets in the Middle East. Earlier in the conflict, Khamenei warned Washington of "irreparable damage" if it bombed his country. "Trump wants this to be one and done," Eurasia Group analysts including Gregory Brew wrote in an emailed note. "Iran has to respond to the U.S. attack, but the response will be calibrated to avoid causing significant damage or casualties, as that would surely provoke Trump into mounting a more forceful campaign." The U.S. will likely have to put its troops on high alert. It has around 50,000 service members in the region, the bulk being in Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates, Iraq and Saudi Arabia. In Yemen, the Houthis, a militant group backed by Iran, issued fresh threats against U.S. commercial and naval ships. Until a ceasefire in early May, the Houthis were regularly firing drones and missiles at Western vessels and warships in the southern Red Sea. It's also possible that Tehran opts to leave the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, according to Ali Vaez, the director of the International Crisis Group's Iran Project and a long-time analyst of the country's atomic program. The NPT is the bedrock arms-control agreement that compels signatories to accept inspections from the IAEA. If Iran left, the world would get even less information about what remains of its atomic sites. Araghchi, the Iranian foreign minister, left the door open for such an eventuality, questioning the treaty's effectiveness since it failed to "protect" Iran from attacks. Israel was notified in advance of the strikes, according to a person familiar with the matter who asked not to be identified discussing private deliberations. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the U.S. and Israel had coordinated fully on the attacks. Israel's main stock exchange rose 1.5%, with Sunday's rise putting stocks on course for the biggest quarterly rally since 2003. The likelihood of an imminent strike seemed to have eased when Trump's team said on Thursday he would make a decision within two weeks. On Friday, the foreign ministers of France, Germany and the UK met their Iranian counterpart, Araghchi, in Geneva to try to get Tehran to restart nuclear talks with the U.S. The UK said on Sunday it didn't take part in the overnight strikes. Iran had been in negotiations with the U.S. for about two months, but called them off after Israel started bombing its territory. The two had made some progress toward a deal that would curb Tehran's atomic activities in return for sanctions relief, but stalled on enrichment. Iran insisted it must be allowed to continue that process, even if to the low level needed for civilian purposes. Trump and Israel said it shouldn't be able to carry out any enrichment at all. Energy prices The war between Israel and Iran has evoked fears of conflict with high civilian casualties and that spreads to other countries in the energy-rich region, disrupting flows of oil and liquefied natural gas. Those concerns among world powers and investors will probably increase in light of the American intervention. The most immediate impact on the global economy could be through higher crude and LNG prices. About a fifth of the world's daily oil supply goes through the Strait of Hormuz, which lies between Iran and its Gulf Arab neighbors such as Saudi Arabia. One option for Iran would be to hit or hassle crude and LNG tankers passing through the area. Brent crude closed on Friday at just over $77 a barrel, up 11% since the conflict began. Another rise when global markets reopen on Monday morning will further complicate the task of major central banks as they seek to slow inflation. For days, Trump had faced conflicting advice from his supporters, after he campaigned on promises to keep the U.S. out of foreign wars, pointing to American involvement in Afghanistan and Iraq this century. MAGA allies, including longtime Trump supporter Steve Bannon, have warned against any U.S. intervention, insisting this is Israel's fight to finish. Other Republicans urged Trump to join the conflict against Iran, arguing that Tehran was more vulnerable following Israel's attacks. They said it was an opportunity to deliver on the president's pledge that Iran's regime would never be allowed to have a nuclear weapon. Israel has said its attacks on Iran were aimed at setting back or destroying its nuclear program. On Sunday, Israel Defense Forces Spokesman Effie Defrin said the country will continue its mission, citing existential threat posed by Iran. While Israel has not said it is aiming to topple Khamenei and the Islamic Republic, its officials have said they hope their attacks undermine the regime, which has been an adversary to the U.S. and Israel for most of the period since the Iranian revolution in 1979. That event saw the fall of a Western-friendly monarchy and the birth of a theocratic government. Israel needed the U.S.'s help in attacking nuclear sites because it lacked the heavy bombs and B-2 stealth jets required to destroy facilities buried deep underground at Fordow and Natanz. Tehran has responded to Israeli bombings by firing waves of ballistic missiles and drones at the Jewish state every day. There was another salvo against Israel hours after the U.S. attacks. Iran's ability to react may be limited by its economic weakness, with inflation running at around 40%. It is also largely isolated internationally. While allies such as Russia and China condemned Israel's strikes and warned against U.S. intervention, they've offered little concrete support to Tehran. "Tehran is now in its nightmare scenario," said Ryan Bohl, a senior Middle East and North Africa analyst at risk consultancy Rane Network. "To act or to not act are equally dangerous. To essentially surrender is to invite internal challenges; to fight back is to invite an open U.S. air campaign that could aim to overthrow the Islamic Republic." _____ (With assistance from Steven T. Dennis, Dan Williams, Golnar Motevalli, Natalia Drozdiak, Eric Martin, Courtney McBride and Erik Wasson. _____ Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
