The Gabby Petito case made him a must-read. But NewsNation's Brian Entin was always a newshound

As high-profile journalists were getting glammed up for the White House Correspondents Dinner last weekend, and cable network personalities were analyzing Donald Trump's first 100 days, Brian Entin was packing for a cross-country road trip in a leased RV.
'Would rather be doing this,' he posted on X.
A senior national correspondent for the cable news network NewsNation, Entin, 40, has built a career, and a large social-media following, by going where news happens, even though that means he doesn't sleep in his Fort Lauderdale home as often as he'd like.
He is a self-described 'newshound' who idolized local TV broadcasters when he was a child and was equally obsessed with the TV show 'America's Most Wanted.' He now has a job that combines those interests, as he frequently reports on crime.
Entin was already an accomplished broadcaster when Gabby Petito went missing in 2021, but his coverage of the case made him a must-read reporter after he camped out for weeks on the lawn next to Brian Laundrie's house.
He later spent months in Idaho reporting on the murder of four University of Idaho students.
To many of Entin's 465,000 followers on X, his feed is the place to go for breaking news on high-profile crimes. But the four-time Emmy winner was also one of the first journalists to interview Jennica Pounds, the Utah woman who goes by 'DataRepublican' on social media, before her identity was revealed.
He has also traversed the country talking to ordinary Americans about Donald Trump, just as he has been doing this week for a road trip that will eventually end in Salt Lake City. Highlights of the trip will be featured on a 'Cuomo' town hall airing at 6 MT April 30.
The road trips were Entin's idea.
'I had gotten really bored with seeing the same talking heads on TV – you turn on all the cable channels and it's the same people in DC or New York City or the big cities on the coast, telling you what everyday Americans think and how they feel and what's going to happen," he said. 'I talked to my boss and said, 'Why don't we do something different and actually go talk to real people?'
'Luckily, she loved the idea, so we rented a Ford Expedition and we drove I-80, started in New Jersey and ended in San Francisco, and we did stories all along the way. People had perspectives that were unexpected,' he said.
On the latest trip, Entin said, he traded up for an RV, but made it a point to re-connect with many of the Trump voters that he talked to last fall to see how they're feeling now.
Entin spoke with the Deseret News a few days before he took off from Nashville in the RV. He talked about the Petito case, the future of news and how his father's career as a criminal attorney influenced his interests, as well as the surprising way that he connected with 'DataRepublican' Jennica Pounds.
The conversation has been edited for clarity and length.
Deseret News: Megyn Kelly spoke at Yale recently and said that the future of news is digital and relationship-based. People may not trust news organizations, but they want to get news from 'trusted sources.' You're a good example of a trusted voice in this new environment, but you're still connected to a news organization. How do you see the future of news unfolding?
Brian Entin: I do think people these days connect more with individual personalities than with overall brands. I think it has to do with trust, and people not necessarily trusting the media overall. If they can connect with a person, they feel like they have that relationship. I think that's one reason I have been successful.
I'm happy to talk to anyone from any walk of life and listen to their side. And I go in with that mindset — sometimes to my own detriment. I've had producers say, 'You're just too trusting. You trust the bad guys.' … I don't trust the bad guys, but I am willing to give them a voice. I think that's really important in this day and age, and I think people can sense that through my stories. I give a lot of credit to NewsNation for giving me that platform and being open to try things in a different way.
I have friends who work at the other big networks, and they've sort of got a formula for the way they do things, the way they think it's been successful in the past. And the thing about NewsNation is, because it's a startup, they're open to different ideas, that I'd probably get laughed at at other places. … even letting my stories go longer.
There was this woman I met in Michigan before the election. She works at Ford, she's worked there for three decades building Ford Broncos. Really nice lady, her name is Misty. Huge Trump supporter — she was a lifelong Democrat. I met her (before the election) and we met up at the inauguration, and I met her again now as part of this series 100 days in. She had some really interesting perspectives a hundred days in — she actually cried at one point.
I'm able to play out her interview, long segments of it, so people can really understand where she's coming from, because it's complicated. She loves President Trump. She's glad she voted for him. But she has some things she's upset about. And at another network, that would just be spliced into a quick soundbite in a very short news story. Whereas when you actually let people voice their full opinion -— beginning, middle and end — I think people appreciate that, and you get a sense of how people are really feeling.
DN: You don't seem to be a political person, at least I can't detect any partisan leaning on social media.
BE: Definitely not. I try not to be biased or let my own feelings come into any of this. I'm not into politics, truthfully — I'm not a political person. I really don't like Washington, D.C. I've joked in the past, I do not like interviewing people who are wearing a suit and tie. I usually find those kinds of people to be boring. I really like everyday, real people. I just have a genuine curiosity and like being out in the nitty gritty of things.
DN: Was there one point at which your social media blew up, or did it just grow organically over time?
BE: I think I had about 20,000 followers on X when I had just started on NewsNation and started (to cover) the Gabby Petito story, thinking it was going to be like any other story: I'd be there a couple of days and maybe they would find her; I was hoping that it was a hoax or something.
And I ended up getting really invested in the story and staying there about six weeks and really becoming somewhat obsessed with the story .. there were so many strange things that Brian Laundrie and his parents were doing. So I ended up camping out on the lawn of Brian Laundrie's parents' neighbors' house. I had never done anything like that for a story before. ... I had become friends with the neighbors, and they said, 'Oh, you can stay on our lawn, that way you can keep track of everything that's happening at the house in case she comes home or if there is an arrest or anything.'
DN: Were you the only reporter doing that?
BE: In the beginning I was, but later there was a reporter with the Daily Mail who also got a spot on the lawn. And it just so happened that the nation became obsessed with this story right around the time I was doing that, and I was doing live reports on X and on NewsNation from the lawn constantly, and that was when my social media blew up. I think I went from 20,000 followers to about 300,000 in a week or so.
DN: You still have a relationship with Gabby's parents?
BE: As time has gone on, I've stayed in touch with them, I've been to their house and hung out with them. Which kind of goes back to old-school journalism versus today. I have sort of struggled with some things, like, how close are you supposed to get to people while you are being professional? But at the end of the day, for me, you just can't help but be human. They obviously didn't do anything wrong, and I've become friends with them at this point. Last time, I went to their house, I showed up with a bottle of tequila and we just hung out. For me, the reporting is pretty much over for the most part. Sadly, we know what happened. But I like to help them with their foundation in any way that I can. They're doing a lot of really good work in trying to change domestic violence laws.
DN: You describe yourself on X as a newshound, and for a lot of people, that might be hyperbole, but a Vanity Fair piece about you said that as a child, you would want to go out on set with (broadcast) reporters.
BE: Oh, yeah, I grew up obsessed with the local news. I grew up in Fort Lauderdale, so it was the Miami market, and to me, as a kid, the people on the local news were famous. And I've just always been interested in people. My mom said that even going out to eat, as a kid, I would always ask the waitresses questions about their life. I just have this natural curiosity about people.
My dad was a criminal lawyer, so that may be one reason I grew up interested in crime, too. A lot of stuff that freaks other people out doesn't freak me out. My dad is still a criminal lawyer, although he's in the process of retiring now, and he had murderers he was representing, and a lot of drug dealers in the '90s in Florida, so there would always be drug dealers around, and that kind of thing.
I was just telling a friend the other day, now that I own my own house, I need stuff done around the house, and I will ask my dad, how did we get this done at our house? And it turned out he did a lot of trade with these people, when they couldn't pay their legal bills. They would build us a new kitchen, or put a sprinkler in. Or we'd have an extra car because the person couldn't pay their bill. Looking back, that seemed normal when I was a kid. … It sounds strange, I know.
DN: You've traveled all over the United States, seen some of the most beautiful places, but you bought a house in Florida. Why?
BE: Because my parents are here — being close to them.
I'm on the road, pretty much every week. There is something nice about, when you're on the road so much, coming back to a place that feels like home. Even when I land back in Florida, I always get a weird feeling when I look out the window, kind of like, this is home. And Florida fits my personality. It's kind of a weird place. There are a lot of characters here.
DN: You were one of the first people to get an interview with Jennica Pounds, the Utah woman who goes by DataRepublican on X and has been helping Elon Musk and DOGE. How did you connect with her when no one knew who she was?
BE: That goes back to what we were talking about, about being open minded, talking to people. I had become really invested in the North Carolina Hurricane Helene coverage … I always try to do stories that other people aren't doing, first of all because they're interesting, but also when there's a really important story that's not getting enough (news) coverage, and that's how I thought about the North Carolina hurricane. For a while there, people were just cut off from the world and weren't getting any help and the media weren't covering it. Lucky for me, NewsNation footed the bill and I probably went there 8 or 10 times, almost every month for a while.
Long story short, I met a guy there named Sean who was helping a lot of people. .. I think he was from Tennessee, but he came in and he knew how to build houses and clear debris, and so we became friendly. And, small world, a few months later, he said, 'I know DataRepublican and she really wants to do a real interview with a real journalist and really explain what she's trying to do.'
Who would have thought this guy that I met in North Carolina would know DataRepublican? So of course, I was super interested, and we set it up and I ended up flying and meeting her in California, because that's where her translator lives. And Sean set the whole thing up.
That's kind of how things work out for me. You know, people have the big Washington D.C. sources and secret FBI sources, but most of my tips come from people I have just met along the way that other people might think, 'Oh, why stay in touch with that person? How are they going to help you?'
DN: X has become a place where news breaks, which is a pretty dramatic change in the media landscape. Have you ever had to correct something because of the speed in which you were reporting in real-time?
BE: That's a really good question, because I am competitive, and you don't want to get beat. People want information right when it happens. You don't want to sit back and take your time. You want to be quick. But you have to be careful because if you make a mistake, people will remember that.
I'm sure I've made mistakes, 100%, but nothing bad comes to mind, nothing like I've put the wrong suspect out there. I've had little typos here and there, just in the rush to tweet something out. ... And if something is wrong, I will say that it's wrong, and not try to change it. And I think that is the future of news, too. People understand. Just explain it. Then they feel even more trust with you because you explained what happened.
I would love people to give NewsNation a shot. We're still sort of a start-up and we're trying to do things differently and be fair and old-school in that sense, but not stick to the formulas that the old-school networks stick to it. Give us a shot. And send me story ideas. I get story ideas from all over the country and some of the best stories I've had have been from people emailing me.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Newsweek

27 minutes ago

• Newsweek

War Powers Act Explained as Thomas Massie, Ro Khanna Push House Resolution

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A bipartisan group of House lawmakers, led by Republican Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Democratic Representative Ro Khanna of California introduced a War Powers Resolution Tuesday, just days before President Donald Trump authorized a military strike on three key nuclear facilities in Iran. The War Powers Resolution of 1973 was enacted to limit the president's ability to commit U.S. armed forces to hostilities abroad without Congressional consent. The current legislative push invokes the act's provisions and highlights persistent congressional frustration over what many see as executive overreach in the deployment of military force. Khanna called for Congress to return to Washington, D.C., to vote on the measure, which he said Sunday had up to 50 co-sponsors across both parties. Why It Matters The House resolution spotlights a critical debate over constitutional war powers at a moment when U.S. involvement in Middle Eastern conflicts risks escalation. Lawmakers are seeking to reinforce Congress's authority to declare war amid rising tensions between Iran and Israel and amid U.S. military actions that, according to critics, may exceed presidential powers. The House initiative mirrors concurrent moves in the Senate, where Democratic Virginia Senator Tim Kaine and others have advanced parallel resolutions to restrict executive military action in Iran without legislative consent. This legislative surge reflects mounting concerns about the scope and legality of recent U.S. military activity abroad. United States Capitol Building, Washington DC, October 27, 2024. United States Capitol Building, Washington DC, October 27, 2024. Getty What To Know Massie introduced the War Powers Resolution on Tuesday, emphasizing that the U.S. Constitution vests the power to declare war with Congress, not the President. Massie invited participation from lawmakers across the aisle, underscoring bipartisan concern about unauthorized military actions, Newsweek previously reported. Khanna quickly co-sponsored the measure and publicly called for Congress to reconvene and vote. "Stopping Iran from having a nuclear bomb is a top priority, but dragging the U.S. into another Middle East war is not the solution," Khanna said in a press release. "Trump's strikes are unconstitutional and put Americans, especially our troops, at risk," Khanna said. "Congress needs to come back to DC immediately to vote on Rep. Thomas Massie and my bipartisan War Powers Resolution to ensure there is no further conflict and escalation." "Americans want diplomacy, not more costly wars. We need to deescalate and pursue a path of peace," Rep. Khanna concluded. The resolution has garnered support from 50 House members, including Representatives Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Rashida Tlaib, and Pramila Jayapal. The list remains heavily Democrat, though more Republicans may break with the party in the coming days as the aftermath of Trump's military strikes continue to play out. What People Are Saying Rep. Ro Khanna, Democrat of California, said in an official statement "Stopping Iran from having a nuclear bomb is a top priority, but dragging the U.S. into another Middle East war is not the solution. Trump's strikes are unconstitutional and put Americans, especially our troops, at risk. Congress needs to come back to DC immediately to vote on Rep. Thomas Massie and my bipartisan War Powers Resolution to ensure there is no further conflict and escalation. Americans want diplomacy, not more costly wars. We need to deescalate and pursue a path of peace." President Donald Trump wrote in a Truth Social post, in part: "Congressman Thomas Massie of Kentucky is not MAGA, even though he likes to say he is. Actually, MAGA doesn't want him, doesn't know him, and doesn't respect him. He is a negative force who almost always Votes "NO," no matter how good something may be. He's a simple minded "grandstander" who thinks it's good politics for Iran to have the highest level Nuclear weapon, while at the same time yelling "DEATH TO AMERICA" at every chance they get." What Happens Next The House War Powers Resolution is scheduled for a mandatory floor vote within 15 days under the chamber's rules. Parallel debates are ongoing in the Senate. As U.S. lawmakers weigh the resolution, the outcome may set new precedents for executive military authority and the balance of war powers between Congress and the White House.

Chicago Tribune

31 minutes ago

• Chicago Tribune

US boosts emergency Middle East evacuations and travel warnings after Trump orders strikes in Iran

WASHINGTON — The State Department has doubled the number of emergency evacuation flights it is providing for American citizens wishing to leave Israel, ordered the departure of nonessential staff from the U.S. Embassy in Lebanon and is stepping up travel warnings around the Middle East amid concerns Iran will retaliate against U.S. interests in the region. In internal and public notices, the department over the weekend significantly ramped up its cautionary advice to Americans in the Mideast. In a notice on Sunday, after American strikes against Iran's nuclear facilities, the department said it had ordered nonessential personnel and the families of staff at the U.S. Embassy in Beirut to leave Lebanon 'due to the volatile and unpredictable security situation in the region.' The notice made no mention of any potential evacuation flights or other assistance for private Americans wanting to leave Lebanon but said those who want to should try to use existing commercial services to depart. At the same time, the department issued warnings to U.S. citizens in Saudi Arabia and Turkey to take extra security precautions given the uncertainty. 'Given reports of regional hostilities, the U.S. Mission to Saudi Arabia has advised its personnel to exercise increased caution and limit non-essential travel to any military installations in the region,' the department said in its notice for Saudi Arabia. In Turkey, the department said U.S. personnel 'have been cautioned to maintain a low profile and instructed to avoid personal travel to the U.S. Consulate Adana consular district,' which includes the NATO airbase at Incirlik. 'Negative sentiment toward U.S. foreign policy may prompt actions against U.S. or Western interests in Turkey,' the statement said. Late Saturday, the department said it was stepping up evacuation flights for American citizens from Israel to Europe and continuing to draw down its staff at diplomatic missions in Iraq. But even before the U.S. airstrikes on Iran were made public by President Donald Trump on Saturday evening in Washington, the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem had announced the start of evacuation flights for private Americans from Israel. Sixty-seven American citizens left Israel on two government flights bound for Athens, Greece on Saturday and four more evacuation flights to Athens were planned for Sunday, according to internal State Department document seen by The Associated Press. A nongovernment charter flight is scheduled to depart Israel for Rome on Monday. In addition to the flights, a cruise ship carrying more than 1,000 American citizens, including several hundred Jewish youngsters who had been visiting Israel on an organized tour, arrived in Cyprus, according to the document. It also said the evacuation of non-essential personnel at the U.S. embassy in Baghdad and consulate in Erbil is continuing. Those staffers had been ordered to leave even before Israel began its military operation in Iran more than a week ago. 'As part of our ongoing effort to streamline operations, additional personnel departed Iraq on June 21 and 22,' the department said. 'These departures represent a continuation of the process started on June 12.' As of Saturday, more than 7,900 Americans had asked for assistance in leaving Israel and more than 1,000 had sought help in leaving Iran, where the U.S. has no diplomatic presence, the document said. There are roughly 700,000 Americans, many of them dual U.S.-Israeli citizens, in Israel and many thousands of Americans, most of them dual in Iran. It was not clear how many Americans had successfully made it out of Iran through overland routes, although the document said more than 200 had entered neighboring Azerbaijan as of Saturday since the conflict began. After the U.S. strikes in Iran, security officers at all U.S. embassies and consulates have been instructed to conduct reviews of their post's security posture and report back to the State Department by late Sunday.

Newsweek

32 minutes ago

• Newsweek

DHS Issues Heightened Terror Threat for Americans

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued a threat summary in a National Terrorism Advisory System Bulletin Sunday following Saturday's strikes on three key-nuclear facilities in Iran. "The ongoing Iran conflict is causing a heightened threat environment in the United States," the DHS statement said. DHS also said, "low-level cyber attacks against US networks by pro-Iranian hacktivists are likely, and cyber actors affiliated with the Iranian government may conduct attacks against US networks." The warning came amid escalating tensions between the US, its allies, and Iran and its supporters. President Donald Trump authorized the strikes on nuclear weapons facilities because he felt that Iran was no longer negotiating in good faith and instead was waiting out the clock to continue to build up their nuclear power, Vice President JD Vance said during an interview on Meet The Press Sunday. The department has issued information on resources to stay safe, outlining who to call and how to report concerns. This is a breaking news story. Updates to come.