Ukrainian delegates arrive in Istanbul for next round of peace talks with Russia
The Ukrainian delegation arrived in Istanbul for peace talks with Russia, which are scheduled for the afternoon of June 2, Ukrinform reported, citing Foreign Ministry spokesperson Heorhii Tykhyi.
Their Russian counterparts have also already arrived.
The negotiations follow the first round of Istanbul talks, which concluded on May 16 with an agreement on the largest prisoner exchange of the war but without any progress toward a peace deal.
Russia has not officially submitted its memorandum outlining peace terms, but Ukraine plans to present a detailed roadmap aimed at securing a lasting settlement.
According to the proposal, the process would begin with a minimum 30-day ceasefire, followed by a full exchange of prisoners and the return of Ukrainian children taken to Russian-held areas, ultimately leading to a potential meeting between President Volodymyr Zelensky and Russian President Vladimir Putin. The plan was reported on June 1 by Reuters, which reviewed a copy of the document.
Russia's U.N. Ambassador Vasily Nebenzya reiterated on May 30 that Moscow would only consider a ceasefire if Ukraine halts mobilization and stops receiving foreign military aid.
Speaking ahead of the June 2 talks, Zelensky reminded that Russia has not submitted its so-called peace memorandum to Ukraine, Turkey, or the U.S.
"Despite this, we will try to achieve at least some progress on the path toward peace," he added.
Defense Minister Rustem Umerov is leading Ukraine's 14-member delegation, which includes several figures from Ukraine's military, human rights, and legal sectors who did not take part in the May 16 negotiations.
Russian delegates will be led by presidential aide Vladimir Medinsky, who represented Moscow both during the first unsuccessful peace talks in Istanbul in 2022 and then again in May this year.
Security advisors from the U.S., U.K., France, and Germany also plan to attend, according to U.S. President Donald Trump's special envoy for Ukraine, Keith Kellogg.
Talking to the Russian state media, Medinsky confirmed that the Russian side had received Ukrainian peace proposals. Russia plans to present its memorandum only during the talks, Russian pro-state news agency Interfax reported, citing its sources.
While the U.S. and Ukraine have pushed for an unconditional ceasefire, the Kremlin has rejected it.
Instead, Moscow has regularly voiced maximalist demands that are unlikely to be accepted by Kyiv, such as recognition of Russia's illegal annexation of Ukrainian regions and withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from the parts of these regions remaining under Kyiv's control.
Trump has expressed frustration with Russia's reluctance to make concessions and its intensifying and deadly attacks on Ukraine. He has so far refused to impose additional sanctions on Russia.
The talks are taking place only a day after the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) launched a mass drone attack against Russian air bases, allegedly hitting 41 Russian bombers and disabling 34% of Russia's cruise missile air fleet.
Read also: As Trump fails to sanction Moscow, few expect breakthrough during upcoming Russia-Ukraine talks
We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
16 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Putin Sending Dead Russian Soldiers to Ukraine To Hide Losses: Zelensky
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Russia sent to Ukraine some of its dead troops in a prisoner and body exchange to hide Moscow's true battlefield losses, according to Volodymyr Zelensky. The Ukrainian president said that Vladimir Putin was using the return of war dead to obscure the scale of military losses from the Russian public. "Putin is afraid to admit how many people have died," Zelensky told the media briefing, according to the Kyiv Independent. Newsweek has contacted the Russian defense ministry for comment. Vladimir Putin is pictured at the 28th Saint Petersburg International Economic Forum SPIEF 2025, June 20, 2025, in Saint Petersburg, Russia. Vladimir Putin is pictured at the 28th Saint Petersburg International Economic Forum SPIEF 2025, June 20, 2025, in Saint Petersburg, Russia. Why It Matters Ukraine's General Staff said on Saturday Russian forces have sustained over 1,010,000 casualties—killed and wounded—since the start of the full-scale invasion. While both sides keep tight-lipped about losses, Zelensky is accusing Moscow of hiding the scale of losses from the Russian public for fear of undermining any future mobilization. What To Know Zelensky's comments follow a prisoner and body exchange agreement in Istanbul on June 2 which was the most extensive of the full-scale war. Ukraine recovered 6,057 bodies of its fallen soldiers while Russia took back only 78, according to Kremlin aide Vladimir Medinsky. Zelensky has said the vast majority of Russian soldiers killed on the battlefield remain in Russian hands. But at least 20 of the bodies Russia returned as Ukrainian were actually Russian soldiers, some of whom had Russian passports according to Zelensky as part of a policy by Moscow to "break the reality in which we live." The Ukrainian president also cited the case of an Israeli citizen who had died fighting on Russia's side whom Moscow had passed off as a Ukrainian soldier. Ukrainian Interior Minister Ihor Klymenko had said on Thursday the remains of Alexander Viktorovich Bugaev, from Russia's 39th Separate Guards Motorized Rifle Brigade, had been returned to Ukraine disguised as a Ukrainian casualty. Independent Russian outlet Mediazona, along with the BBC Russian Service, has verified the identities of 111,387 Russian soldiers killed but with the caveat that the official proof required meant actual number is likely much higher. What People Are Saying Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, per Kyiv Independent: "Putin is afraid to admit how many people have died. Because if the moment comes when he needs to mobilize, his society will be afraid." Ukrainian Interior Minister Ihor Klymenko: "This shows how little human life means to Russia. Or maybe it's just a way to avoid paying compensation to the families." What Happens Next Russia is likely to continue to suffer huge losses amid marginal battlefield gains. It comes as Ukraine's military intelligence (HUR) reported on Saturday that Moscow is recruiting migrant workers from Central Asia as "cannon fodder." Migrant workers from Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and other countries in the region are joining Russia's armed forces under duress and are used in the most dangerous areas of the front line.
Los Angeles Times
32 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Belarus frees key opposition figure Siarhei Tsikhanouski after U.S. envoy visit
TALLINN, Estonia — Belarus has freed Siarhei Tsikhanouski, a key dissident and the husband of exiled opposition leader Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya, following a rare visit by a senior U.S. official, Tsikhanouskaya's team announced on Saturday. Tsikhanouski, a popular blogger and activist who was jailed in 2020, arrived in Vilnius, Lithuania, alongside 13 other political prisoners, his wife's team said. The release came hours after Belarusian authorities announced that authoritarian President Alexander Lukashenko met with President Trump's envoy for Ukraine, Keith Kellogg, in the capital of Minsk. A video published on his wife's official Telegram account showed Tsikhanouski disembarking a white minibus, with a shaved head and broad smile. He pulled Tsikhanouskaya into a long embrace as their supporters applauded. 'My husband is free. It's difficult to describe the joy in my heart,' Tsikhanouskaya told reporters. But she added that her team's work is 'not finished,' as more than 1,100 political prisoners remain behind bars in Belarus. Tsikhanouski was jailed after announcing plans to challenge Lukashenko in the 2020 election. Following his arrest, his wife ran in his stead, rallying large crowds across the country. Official results of the election handed Lukashenko his sixth term in office but were denounced by the opposition and the West as a sham. As unprecedented protests broke out in the aftermath of the vote, Tsikhanouskaya left the country under pressure from the authorities. Her husband was later sentenced to 19½ years in prison on charges of organizing mass riots. Other prominent dissidents remain in Belarusian jails, among them Nobel Peace Prize winner Ales Bialiatski, a human rights advocate serving a 10-year prison sentence on charges widely denounced as politically motivated. Also behind bars is Viktor Babaryka, a former banker who was widely seen in 2020 as Lukashenko's main electoral rival, and Maria Kolesnikova, a charismatic leader of that year's mass protests. Released alongside Tsikhanouski was longtime Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty correspondent Ihar Karnei, the U.S. government-funded broadcaster confirmed. Karnei, who had also worked with prominent Belarusian and Russian newspapers, had been serving a three-year service on extremism charges he rejected as a sham. RFE/RL's Belarusian service had been designated extremist in the country, a common label assigned to anyone who criticizes Lukashenko's government. As a result, working for it or spreading its content has become a criminal offense. 'We are deeply grateful to President Trump for securing the release of this brave journalist, who suffered at the hands of the Belarusian authorities,' the broadcaster's chief executive, Stephen Capus, said Saturday in a news release. Karnei was detained several times while covering the 2020 protests. Unlike many of his colleagues, he chose to stay in Belarus despite the ensuing repression. He was arrested again in July 2023, as police raided his apartment, seizing phones and computers. Belarus also freed an Estonian national who had set up a nongovernmental organization to raise funds for Belarusian refugees. According to the Estonian Foreign Ministry, Allan Roio was detained in January and sentenced to 6½ years in prison on charges of establishing an extremist organization.
New York Post
37 minutes ago
- New York Post
Why the US needs Israel to win in Iran just as much as Israel needs it
It turns out there isn't a whole lot of difference between the far left and far right, at least when it comes to the Iran war. Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, Minnesota Congresswoman Ilhan Omar, Georgia Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor-Greene and commentator Tucker Carlson don't agree on much, but they insist the United States has no stake in the outcome of Israel's preemptive war against the Iranian revolutionary regime. America should stay far away. Involvement offers no upsides, but plenty of downsides, they all agree. Referring to Iran, Omar asserted that 'no one is attacking or has attacked Americans.' Advertisement 5 President Trump greets Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu meet at the White House on April 7, 2025. Zuma / Not to be outdone, Greene claimed that 'we've watched our men and women in uniform go all over the world and fight in wars that most Americans don't think that our country should be in. Americans are very sick and tired of that.' Sounds like echoes of the appeasers and isolationists in the 1930s, who made the case that Nazi Germany posed no threat whatsoever to the US. After all, wasn't there a vast distance between us and Europe? And anyway, let Europe deal with its own problems. They're of no concern to Americans. Advertisement We have our own issues to deal with, from high unemployment to farm foreclosures. Yet, on Dec. 11, 1941, Berlin declared war on the United States. President Trump was elected in 2024 on an America First agenda. But does America First mean American withdrawal from the world? Does it suggest we can wall ourselves off and safely turn our backs on everyone else? Does it assure that we can be secure irrespective of what goes on elsewhere on the planet? Not at all. Rather, the president says that America First means what he chooses it to mean, and not, say, how Carlson tries to spin it. Advertisement 5 Protesters in Mexico City supporting the Palestinian cause. REUTERS And herein lies one of the most consequential decisions faced by any American leader in decades. Iran has been an implacable enemy of the US since 1979, when the mullahs seized power in Tehran. Despite Congresswoman Omar's astonishing claim that no Americans have been attacked by Iran, the exact opposite is true. Iran and its proxies, including Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis, have kidnapped scores of Americans; killed hundreds of US soldiers; attacked American installations in the Middle East; plagued our shipping in the Straits of Hormuz; plotted to assassinate an American president and other top officials; pursued Iranian dissidents on American soil; and planned to blow up a popular restaurant in Washington. Advertisement All this while the regime cries 'Death to America,' and seeks weapons of mass destruction and the means to deliver them with precision. 5 Conservative pundit Tucker Carlson has spoken against American intervention in Iran. AFP via Getty Images Moreover, Iran has provided drones to Russia to be used to kill and maim Ukrainians in Moscow's war of aggression, not to mention seeking the annihilation of Israel, one of America's closest allies. It undermines the American-sponsored Abraham Accords, and its expansionist agenda has sought to destabilize US friends from Morocco to Kurdistan, from Egypt to Saudi Arabia. It cooperates with North Korea, another American foe, on advanced missile development. And it has been the principal sponsor of international terror, triggering deadly attacks across the globe, including in the Western Hemisphere. So, the central question today is whether the United States should consider military action, which reportedly only it has the power to do, to ensure that Iran's buried nuclear program never sees the light of day. 5 Bernie Sanders has echoed Carlson, but from the Left. AFP via Getty Images Those opposed argue it will draw us into endless war and put Americans in harm's way, and, again, that it's not America's fight. They also claim diplomacy can solve the problem, so why resort to kinetic action? But the truth is that Americans have been in harm's way since the Shah of Iran was ousted in 1979. Moreover, Israel, which has bravely taken on the fight against Iran, though far smaller and acting alone, has never asked for American boots on the ground. Advertisement Rather, it sees an historic opportunity to end a 46-year-threat to regional and global peace, while making the world safer by severely weakening a messianic, aggressive regime. And American aerial assistance could thereby decisively change the course of history. 5 The current conflagration in Iran is the result of decades of refusal by the Islamic regime to halt its nuclear program, despite endless rounds of international diplomacy and negotiations. AFP via Getty Images As for diplomacy, it's been tried repeatedly. Each time, Iranian negotiators have proved masterful at lying, bamboozling, slow-walking and hoodwinking their Western counterparts — including Washington — most spectacularly in the disastrous 2015 deal known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). Moments of historic opportunity may come along once in a generation. Decisions of such magnitude are never without risks. The chorus of naysayers will always prefer the pathways of appeasement, nonintervention, wishful thinking or stasis. Advertisement But the potential rewards are tantalizing and far outweigh the risks: A transformed Middle East; expanded Abraham Accords; reduced prospect of a regional nuclear arms race; an end to Iranian destabilization in the neighborhood; and perhaps, if the Iranian people take matters into their own hands, a more democratic and prosperous country of their own. American interests at home and abroad will be incalculably advanced if President Trump makes the right decision. I pray he will. David Harris is executive vice chair of the Institute for the Study of Global Antisemitism and Policy (ISGAP).
