‘Let Kansans live free': Leaked emails to efficiency portal call for abortion rights, school funding

Kansas Reflector obtained leaked copies of suggestions that were sent to the Senate Committee on Government Efficiency. They urge lawmakers to maintain abortion rights, reject school vouchers, expand Medicaid, stop harming trans kids, and legalize marijuana. (Sherman Smith/Kansas Reflector)
TOPEKA — A 'defeated' single mother seeking health coverage, a disabled Navy veteran who wants to move to Kansas but can't afford the taxes and a former state internal auditor fed up with corruption and bureaucracy were among the suggestions submitted to Kansas' GOP-led Senate Committee on Government Efficiency.
The majority of submissions to the committee's public suggestion portal, which debuted Jan. 31 and was the subject of public records requests, included complaints that do not align with the policy priorities of the majority party. Instead, top suggestions included maintaining abortion rights, leaving school vouchers out of public education funding, critiques of leadership, expanding the state's Medicaid program, focusing on substantial policy issues instead of legislation targeted at trans kids, and more than 60 references to legalizing marijuana.
Kansas Reflector obtained leaked copies of the more than 1,500 submissions sent to officials between Feb. 3 and March 28 containing specific public input from across the state alongside sarcastic replies, spam and suggestions in jest. A significant portion of those submissions showed a sense of disillusionment with Kansas politics, politicians and government. A few submissions contained personal stories of inefficiencies in state government. Even fewer included complaints or opinions in line with Republican policy.
Sen. Renee Erickson, a Wichita Republican and chair of the efficiency committee, has promised that the committee will meet outside of the legislative session to review the submissions. Republican leadership created the Senate Committee on Government Efficiency, or COGE, earlier this year in response to the similar federal effort from billionaire Elon Musk called the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE. The committee sponsored 11 bills this session, many of which targeted public assistance programs, public employees or spending cuts. Little, if any, of the committee's work this year aligned with what Kansans suggested.
Suggestions could be submitted in one of two ways: via email or a standardized form in a public portal that includes the submitter's first and last name, an age range and their county, city and zip code. The form notes that submissions are public records. Kansas Reflector did not independently verify the names provided with submissions.
Kansas Reflector submitted a request for the public records to Erickson in February. Erickson said she would deliver them to journalists on April 9, even though she delivered them to a legislator on March 17 in response to his formal records request. Under the Kansas Open Records Act, public records are required to be provided as soon as possible.
One suggestion from Ben Carmichael, a Wichita resident in his 30s, detailed concerns that the Legislature has morphed into a 'full-time machine, expanding its power and influence without corresponding checks in accountability, transparency, or fiscal restraint.' He pointed to continued meetings among legislators outside of the session and the consolidation of power within the Legislative Coordinating Council, which is made up of the governor and legislative leadership.
The line is blurred, he said, between 'part-time service and full-time rule.'
'Instead of trusting Kansans to govern their own lives and communities, the state has taken on a paternalistic posture, eroding both personal freedom and local governance,' Carmichael wrote. 'This is not only inefficient government — it is unjust government.'
Carmichael added that in times of national division and economic uncertainty, Kansans don't need more laws, rules or interference.
'They need a Legislature that knows its limits and remembers its mandate: to serve, not to rule,' Carmichael wrote. 'Shrink the footprint of government. Restore the citizen Legislature. Let Kansans live free.'
Around 300 submissions included mention of abortion. Most begged legislators to leave the issue alone, as voters made their opinions clear in the August 2022 primary, during which a constitutional amendment to eliminate abortion rights failed by a 59-41 margin.
Bethany Quesnell, a 30-something in Wamego, said elected officials could be most effective if they listened to the stories of the constituents in their districts.
'Don't just stop listening after one person who matches your personal beliefs, either,' Quesnell wrote.
And if an issue has been voted on in recent years, Quesnell suggested officials refrain from bringing that issue up again.
'Abortion is a great example,' Quesnell said. 'Kansans made their opinions known and we don't want to hear about it anymore.'
Submitters characterized the Legislature's continued focus on abortion regulation as a waste of time and money.
'The amount of times transgender healthcare and abortion have come up in this legislature is downright wasteful,' said Kat Stucky, a Cheney resident in her 30s.
More than 130 suggestions told lawmakers to stop legislating trans issues.
Stucky, and several other commenters, said trans people make up a tiny fraction of Kansas' population but have received a significant amount of focus, particularly this legislative session.
Pamela Sturm, a septuagenarian from Kansas City, Kansas, said the state could save money if the Legislature focused on issues guided by voter's actions.
'The legislature has decided that attacking transgender kids is a more legitimate target for their attention than dealing with real issues for Kansans, just as they've decided to deny Kansas residents legitimate access to cannabis and that it's okay for rural hospitals to close because they refuse to honor the will of the people by expanding Medicaid in our state,' Sturm wrote.
A 'very frustrated and defeated' single mother of three, Ashlie Bruner, wrote to legislators in February detailing a recent denial of health care coverage under the state's Medicaid program. Bruner is caught in what is known as the Medicaid gap.
Her employer doesn't offer health insurance. She said she earns $1,200 a month while the state Medicaid income cap for a household of four is $880 a month.
'This has left me in a position where I can not afford health insurance or do not qualify for lower rates or state insurance as my income is either too high or too low,' she said. 'The system is flawed.'
Average rental prices, bills and necessities make up a majority of Bruner's spending, and, as a single parent, she said she struggles to pay those costs.
'I know I'm not the only person with this problem,' she said. 'And it leaves the question of what am I supposed to do?'
Bruner begged legislators for a solution because she cannot seek medical care without paying out of pocket, leaving her 'suffering through illnesses or medical conditions unable to afford the help I need.'
The vast majority of the roughly 180 submissions that mentioned Medicaid supported expansion or opposed further cuts to the program. Kansas is one of 10 states that hasn't expanded Medicaid. Roger Smith, a Wichita resident in his 70s, suggested the Legislature ensure Medicaid fraud isn't taking place by reviewing and confirming that Medicaid participants are appropriately using allocated funds.
'Let us all be responsible for supplying the resources needed to those that truly need it,' Smith said. 'Being a good steward at all levels is very important for everyone's survival.'
Suggestions on education were varied. Legislators in recent years have attempted to impose influence on education typically reserved for the Kansas State Board of Education. The Legislature controls funding for public schools and has the ability to create voucher programs.
Sandra Kirby, a 40-something from Pittsburg, asked legislators to oppose any legislation that would eliminate the Kansas State Department of Education. Kirby said taxpayers shouldn't support any religious institution or school.
'If a person wanted to send their kids to a private or religious school- so be it,' Kirby wrote, 'but leave the rest of Kansans alone.'
Kirby added: 'NO VOUCHERS.'
Ryan Patton, a Hutchinson resident in his 40s, said the Kansas education system costs taxpayers around $18,000 annually per student, which is true according to KSDE data. Homeschooling produces better results, he said.
'The Kansas education system is far beyond repair and needs to be dismantled,' Patton wrote. 'There is extreme amounts of waste of these funds that never reach the teachers let alone the children.'
Rick Ruppe, who did not include an age or location in his email to the committee, applauded the Legislature's proposal to shift the Kansas Supreme Court judicial selection process to a popular vote instead of the current nomination and appointment system.
It's long overdue, he said.
State education funding, Ruppe said, is one area that has been part of a series of 'bad outcomes in decisions being made by the court, which have been politically and ideologically slanted towards liberal and progressive viewpoints.'
The Kansas Supreme Court has repeatedly determined the Legislature is not adequately funding education. Ruppe characterized the wording of the Kansas State Constitution that has been used to determine funding requirements as vague.
'This has led to this issue becoming a political football, with the punting of a real solution, much like kicking a can down the road, with no clear criteria for what 'sufficient or adequate' funding is,' he said.
He added that the court also erred in ruling the state constitution includes implicit rights that allow legal abortions.
Nearly 60 submissions included criticism of the Kansas Attorney General's performance. Many claimed Kris Kobach's 'frivolous lawsuits' have cost Kansas taxpayers millions, and others called for him to be fired.
Amy Warfield, a Hays resident in her 30s, said 'a more efficient Kansas state government would better seek to reign in vanity lawsuits' from Kobach, which include banning abortion drug mifepristone, blocking immigrants without citizenship from being counted in the Census, and limiting Title IX protections for youths.
'In fact, the list of confrontations and lawsuits is so long and such a tangled web, it's difficult to parse through what is even in the best interest of the people of this state and its funds, or just ideological check boxes,' Warfield said.
Brice Cronn, a Colby resident in his 40s, suggested the Legislature refrain from passing any legislation having to do with Kobach.
'Millions in litigation costs are unacceptable,' Cronn wrote.
'This culture war stuff makes you popular with a certain voting block, but it is a nonsensical money pit that doesn't do anything to improve the wellbeing of Kansans,' he said.
Kari Nilson, an Andover resident in her 40s, said the best way to cut government spending would be to 'get Kris Kobach to quit filing lawsuits that the people of Kansas don't want to be part of.'
Roberta Hill, who identified herself as a disabled Navy veteran, began her email by giving credit to the state of Kansas for taking care of its veterans.
'I as a 100% disabled female veteran would move to Kansas, yet I financially could not afford to own a home,' Hill said.
In her current state, which she did not disclose, she doesn't have to pay property taxes on the home she owns.
'I don't abuse my taxes exempt status,' she said. 'I believe in paying taxes on a lot of things. If Kansas allowed veterans to own homes and not pay property taxes. You would have them in your state paying taxes on other things. Helping the economy of Kansas!'
Bills aimed at providing tax relief for veterans did not progress this session.
A handful of submissions requested greater transparency from Kansas government.
Jadie Chauncey, a Junction City resident, submitted a list of three issues, each with a clear proposal aimed at making Kansas government more open, fair and accessible. The three suggestions included eliminating 'gut and go' bills, which allow legislators to entirely overhaul the content of a bill with unrelated legislation.
'This process confuses voters and allows bills to pass without proper review,' Chauncey said.
The second item suggested the Legislature make it easier for Kansans to submit testimony and establish a mandatory 72-hour notice before testimony submission deadlines. Chauncey called the current system 'confusing and outdated.'
'Some committees give very short notice for hearings, change their rules often, and require paper copies of testimony,' Chauncey said. 'This makes it hard for people who live far from Topeka or have jobs during the day to participate.'
Lastly, Chauncey noticed special interest groups tend to get more time than citizens and suggested ensuring all speakers at hearings get equal time to testify.
Mark Ummel, a Burlingame resident in his 60s, said he performed internal audits and investigations for 15 years at one of the state's largest agencies. He retired not because he was ready but because he 'became fed up with various senior leaders at the agency who would use their position of power to hire their personal friends for high paying jobs without advertising publicly, review audits only to hide the malfeasance or illegal activity and position their personal needs above what is best for the agency.'
State government operations could become more efficient, Ummel said, with improved audit practices that evaluate internal processes, wasteful spending and potential fraud.
'If the legislative process can be described as 'making sausage,' ' he said, 'the inner workings inside the agencies could be describe(d) as the 'slaughterhouse.' '

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

San Francisco Chronicle​

2 hours ago

• San Francisco Chronicle​

Former S.F. Mayor London Breed reveals her post-City Hall career plans

Former San Francisco Mayor London Breed has been quiet about her professional plans since she left office in January, but that's starting to change. The Aspen Policy Academy announced Wednesday that Breed and G.T. Bynum, the Republican former mayor of Tulsa, are its first bipartisan 'civic innovation' advisers-in-residence. The academy, a Bay Area-based operation of the Washington, D.C. think tank Aspen Institute, said Breed and Bynum will spend six months mentoring fellows on policy projects, representing the academy at events and working on projects about policy subjects of their choosing. It's not a full-time job, though it does come with a stipend, and Breed is believed to be exploring other unspecified career opportunities as well. Still, the academy's announcement provided the first public indication of how San Francisco's former mayor is spending some of her time following 12 years as an elected official in the city. 'This program is about more than learning how government works — it's about inspiring a new era of civic leadership,' Breed said in a statement released by the academy. Aspen Institute CEO Dan Porterfield said in a statement that mayors 'bring distinctive insights to the work of policymaking given their proximity to the people and communities they serve.' Breed and Bynum 'will be an invaluable resource to future policy leaders,' Porterfield said. The Aspen Institute has connections to Bloomberg Philanthropies, the charitable organization tied to former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg. He was one of Breed's top benefactors when she ran for reelection last year. Breed also appointed a former Bloomberg staffer to the board of supervisors during her final weeks in office. Breed was elected mayor in 2018 and served in the role for more than six years, until she was unseated in November by Daniel Lurie. A native of the city who grew up in public housing in the Western Addition, she was the first Black woman mayor of San Francisco. Her tenure at City Hall was marked by a series of overlapping crises, including the pandemic, which hurt the city's economy and upended the agenda on which she campaigned. Breed won praise for her early response to COVID-19, but her tenure quickly became dominated by public outrage over rampant drug use on city streets and record overdose deaths driven by the rise of fentanyl. As downtown offices emptied out, major retailers fled Union Square and viral videos of brazen property crimes spread online. San Francisco's reputation took a nosedive, further complicating Breed's fight for another term. Her reelection campaign last year centered around a hopeful message, pointing to a drop in reported crime and other developments as evidence that she was leading San Francisco out of its pandemic doldrums. But Lurie, a political outsider who'd never held elected office before, ultimately defeated her by 10 points

Newsweek

2 hours ago

• Newsweek

LA Mayor Rips JD Vance for Calling Senator Padilla 'Jose': 'How Dare You'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Los Angeles Democratic Mayor Karen Bass ripped Vice President JD Vance on Friday after he referred to Democratic U.S. Senator Alex Padilla as "Jose." Newsweek reached out to the office of Bass for additional comment Friday night. Why It Matters Republican President Donald Trump has prioritized immigration control as a key pillar of his second administration. The president campaigned in 2024 on the promise of mass deportations and appointed Tom Homan as his administration's border czar to execute his agenda. Protests broke out this month in Los Angeles in reaction to numerous U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids in the area. Trump sent National Guard troops and U.S. Marines to Los Angeles amid the strife, against the wishes of California Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom. The move was ultimately reversed by a judge, restoring Newsom's control over the state's Guard forces. What To Know Kristi Noem, secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), scheduled a news conference in Los Angeles last week regarding the ongoing protests, and Padilla, a California Democrat, was in attendance. Video footage from the incident showed Padilla pushed to the ground and handcuffed outside the door while attempting to speak to Noem during the conference. Noem stopped speaking for a brief moment during the commotion, then immediately continued. The DHS said she met with Padilla for 15 minutes after the gathering. Vance on Friday landed in Los Angeles amid the Trump administration's ramped up ICE raids in the city. While speaking to reporters, he was asked a question in reference to Padilla's forced removal from Noem's briefing. "The New York Times just did a story" about lawmakers who "keep getting handcuffed, suggesting that ... the Trump administration is cracking down on Democrats," a reporter said. "Can you comment on that?" "Well, I was hoping Jose Padilla would be here to ask a question, but unfortunately, I guess he decided not to show up because there wasn't the theater," the vice president said. "And that's all it is. I think everybody realizes that's what this is." Bass afterward called out Vance, saying, "Mr. Vice President, how dare you disrespect our senator. You don't know his name," Bass questioned. "But yet you served with him before you were vice president and you continue to serve with him today, because the last time I checked, the vice president of the United States is the president of the U.S. Senate." Bass continued, "You serve with him today and how dare you disrespect him and call him 'Jose.' But I guess he just looked like anybody to you. Well, he's not just anybody to us. He is our senator." When asked about the incident, a Vance spokesperson previously told Newsweek that "He must have mixed up two people who have broken the law." Bass has been a stanch critic of the Trump administration amid the ICE raids throughout the City of Angels and vowed to stand in solidarity with immigrant communities in her city. The mayor has also called for peaceful protests and condemned any violence in reaction to immigration initiatives set in motion by the White House. She also set a curfew for a portion of downtown Los Angeles amid the ongoing unrest. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass speaks at a candlelight vigil on June 10 in Los Angeles. (Photo by) Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass speaks at a candlelight vigil on June 10 in Los Angeles. (Photo by) What People Are Saying Newsom on X, formerly Twitter, on Friday: "JD Vance served with Alex Padilla in the United States Senate. Calling him 'Jose Padilla' is not an accident." Padilla posted to X on Friday: "I asked a question—and ended up in handcuffs. If this is how the Trump administration treats a U.S. Senator in broad daylight, imagine what they're doing to immigrants behind closed doors. We cannot stay silent. We will not back down." California Democratic Senator Adam Schiff wrote on X Friday: "JD Vance served alongside Alex Padilla, and knows better. He's taking this cheap shot to distract from the real fear and havoc this Administration is creating. It's pathetic." What Happens Next It is believed that the Trump administration will continue executing his campaign promise of mass deportations throughout the country.

3 hours ago

Rhode Island lawmakers pass bill to ban sales of assault weapons

PROVIDENCE, R.I. -- Rhode Island's Democratic-controlled state House on Friday approved legislation that would ban the sale and manufacturing of many semiautomatic rifles commonly referred to as assault weapons. The proposal now heads to the desk of Democratic Gov. Dan McKee, who has said he supports assault weapons bans. If the bill is signed into law, Rhode Island will join 10 states that have some sort of prohibition on high-powered firearms that were once banned nationwide and are now largely the weapon of choice among those responsible for most of the country's devastating mass shootings. Gun control advocates have been pushing for an assault weapons ban in Rhode Island for more than a decade. However, despite being a Democratic stronghold, lawmakers throughout the country's smallest state have long quibbled over the necessity and legality of such proposals. The bill only applies to the sale and manufacturing of assault weapons and not possession. Only Washington state has a similar law. Residents looking to purchase an assault weapon from nearby New Hampshire or elsewhere will also be blocked. Federal law prohibits people from traveling to a different state to purchase a gun and returning it to a state where that particular of weapon is banned. Nine states and the District of Columbia have bans on the possession of assault weapons, covering major cities like New York and Los Angeles. Hawaii bans assault pistols. Democratic Rep. Rebecca Kislak described the bill during floor debates Friday as an incremental move that brings Rhode Island in line with neighboring states. 'I am gravely disappointed we are not doing more, and we should do more," she said. "And given the opportunity to do this or nothing, I am voting to do something.' Critics of Rhode Island's proposed law argued that assault weapons bans do little to curb mass shootings and only punish people with such rifles. 'This bill doesn't go after criminals, it just puts the burden on law-abiding citizens,' said Republican Sen. Thomas Paolino. Republican Rep. Michael Chippendale, House minority leader, predicted that if the legislation were to become law, the U.S. Supreme Court would eventually deem it unconstitutional. 'We are throwing away money on this," he said. It wasn't just Republicans who opposed the legislation. David Hogg — a gun control advocate who survived the 2018 school shooting in Parkland, Florida — and the Rhode Island Coalition Against Gun Violence described the proposed ban as the 'weakest assault weapons ban in the country.' 'I know that Rhode Islanders deserve a strong bill that not only bans the sale, but also the possession of assault weapons. It is this combination that equals public safety,' Hogg said in a statement. Elisabeth Ryan, policy counsel at Everytown for Gun Safety, rejected claims that the proposed law is weak. 'The weakest law is what Rhode Island has now, no ban on assault weapons,' Ryan said. 'This would create a real, enforceable ban on the sale and manufacture of assault weapons, just like the law already working in Washington state, getting them off the shelves of Rhode Island gun stores once and for all.' Nationally, assault weapons bans have been challenged in court by gun rights groups that argue the bans violate the Second Amendment. AR-15-style firearms are among the best-selling rifles in the country. The conservative-majority Supreme Court may soon take up the issue. The justices declined to hear a challenge to Maryland's assault weapons ban in early June, but three conservative justices — Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas — publicly noted their disagreement. A fourth, Brett Kavanaugh, indicated he was skeptical that the bans are constitutional and predicted the court would hear a case 'in the next term or two.'