Just good neighbors? What nations helping Syria really want – DW – 06/11/2025
Aid, money, political cover — Syria's neighbors are providing a lot to the war-torn country. But the likes of Turkey, Saudi Arabia and the US are obviously not just helping Syria because they're benevolent and kind.
With strings attached — that is how almost all the recent foreign aid and assistance into Syria should be seen. After the December 2024 rebel offensive that toppled the country's decades-long Assad family dictatorship, various neighboring states have stepped in to help Syria recover from 14 years of brutal civil war.
There is a lot of vaunted talk of humanitarian assistance, Arab unity, international development and regional security. But as in any other diplomatic sphere, most of the countries involved are also acting in their own self-interest. So, what are they doing in Syria and why?
Turkey: Biggest winner
Turkey has often been described as the "biggest winner" after the ousting of the Assad regime in a lightning offensive led by the rebel group, Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, or HTS.
"The [HTS] group had long cultivated a close working relationship with Ankara because the rebels controlled Idlib, a province on the Turkish border in northern Syria," Asli Aydintasbas, a senior policy fellow and expert on Turkey at the European Council on Foreign Relations, or ECFR, explained recently .
HTS has gone on to form an interim government, keeping some of the most powerful ministries — such as defense, foreign affairs and interior — for its own members or close associates. This puts the Turkish government, with existing ties to HTS, in a powerful position.
"Turkey, first and foremost, in the mid- and long term, is interested in the stabilization of Syria," Sinem Adar, a researcher at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs, told the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies . "It doesn't want a failed state at its border."
Earlier this month, Turkish defense minister Yasar Guler (pictured) said Turkish soldiers will stay in Syria for the time being Image: SIMON WOHLFAHRT/AFP
There are currently around 20,000 Turkish troops in northern Syria, there has been talk of a Turkish-Syrian defense pact, as well as plans to set up Turkish air and naval bases inside Syria. Earlier this month, Turkish Defense Minister Yasar Guler told journalists his country will help train the new Syrian military.
In the shorter term, one of Turkey's primary objectives was to counter Syrian Kurdish forces, who controlled large parts of Syria's northeast during the war. Turkey considers these to be allied with the militant Kurdish Worker's Party, or PKK. For decades, the latter was engaged in a violent, armed struggle against Turkey, for Kurdish rights, but announced the end of their insurgency earlier this year.
This is why Turkey has backed the formation of a centralized government in Syria, rather than a federation of semi-autonomous areas run by different Syrian communities, including the Kurds. For now, Turkey appears to have got its way: Syria's Kurds have agreed to be part of the central, HTS-led interim government and say their troops will join the new Syrian army.
There are also economic opportunities for Turkey in Syria. The neighboring country was already providing a lot of consumer goods in HTS-controlled areas and also has a large construction sector that would benefit from rebuilding in Syria. In fact, stock prices for Turkish construction sector businesses rose around 3% after the ouster of the Assad regime.
A more prosperous Syria would also mean Syrian refugees in Turkey, who have become a tricky political issue, would be more likely to return home Image: Ahmed Deeb/dpa/picture alliance
The Gulf states: Money and power
Various Gulf states have come to Syria's financial and reputational rescue over the past few months. Saudi Arabia and Qatar paid off its $15.5 million (€13.6 million) debt to the World Bank, Qatar will pay around $87 million in salaries for Syrian public servants and some of Syria's first major development deals have been with United Arab Emirates, Qatari and Turkish companies. Saudi Arabian leaders also successfully pushed for the lifting of sanctions on Syria and, although it was never officially confirmed, the UAE allegedly helped defuse tensions between Syria and neighboring Israel.
"The [Gulf] states are exerting their leverage on Syria's need of financial resources to entrench economic and political alliances with the new leadership in Damascus," Eleonora Ardemagni, a senior research fellow at the Italian Institute for International Political Studies, explained in a June analysis .
"[Gulf] states' interest lies in strengthening their political, security and economic ties with Damascus and using this to address questions that matter to them, such as trafficking of the Captagon drug and counterterrorism," Emily Tasinato, an ECFR fellow researching the Gulf region, also wrote recently.
For Gulf leaders, there is also emphasis on filling the geopolitical power vacuum that arose after the end of the Assad regime. Previously Iran and Russia were Assad's biggest supporters and Gulf states, with mostly Sunni Muslim leaderships, were happy to see Iran, a Shiite Muslim theocracy and perennial foe, pushed out. Saudi Arabia is also concerned about Turkey's influence, Ardemagni suggested.
After meeting with Syrian leader Ahmad al-Sharaa (right) in Saudi Arabia, President Trump (center) said he would lift sanctions on Syria partially because Saudi prince Mohammed bin Salman (left) asked him to Image: IMAGO
US: A brand new alliance?
US President Donald Trump previously called for American troops to get out of Syria. "This is not our fight," he wrote on social media last December.
But that attitude seems to have changed following talks with the leaders of Saudi Arabia and Turkey, both of whom Trump professes to like personally.
During the civil war, around 2,000 US soldiers were stationed alongside Syrian Kurds, in the ongoing fight against the extremist "Islamic State," or "IS," group. Currently a drawdown is underway, with 500 having already left as Syrian-Kurdish fighters integrate into the general Syrian army.
However, this month, there have also been reports that a US military delegation will soon come to Damascus to make a deal to transition the previously unauthorized American presence into an authorized one.
In an interview with Syria TV last month, US State Department spokesperson Michael Mitchell said it was too early for the US to withdraw completely because of ongoing concerns about the "IS" group. The US was ready to begin a "new era" in its relationship with Syria, Mitchell added.
Observers have speculated the US could actually take on an even bigger role in Syria in the future. This would, they argue, counter Russian influence and potentially even lead to some kind of Syrian-Israeli detente.
Iran, Russia: The biggest losers
Both countries are often described as having lost the most after the ousting of the Assad regime. Both previously had a significant presence in Syria, and this has been significantly reduced. But that does not mean either is gone for good.
Russian diplomats retain a presence in Syria, Russia has controversially positioned itself as a "protector" of Syria's minorities and also has close economic ties to Syrian allies like Turkey and the UAE.
As for Iran, its "influence in Syria is no longer contingent on the Assad regime's survival," Egyptian security analyst Mohamed ELDoh wrote for specialist US outlet, Global Security Review , this month. "It is embedded in paramilitary networks, ideological infrastructure and narco-trafficking cartels."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
13 hours ago
- DW
Are Jordan and Saudi Arabia defending Israel? – DW – 06/21/2025
Jordan shot down Iranian missiles and drones crossing overhead and Saudi Arabia likely allowed Israel to use its airspace to do so. That's despite both expressing opposition to Israel's attacks on Iran in public. The 21 Arab and Muslim-majority countries made it clear where they stood in the Iran-Israel conflict. In a statement published earlier this week, they expressed their "categorical rejection and condemnation of Israel's recent attacks on the Islamic Republic of Iran," which started on June 13. The countries spoke of the need to halt "Israeli hostilities against Iran" and expressed "great concern regarding this dangerous escalation, which threatens to have serious consequences on the peace and stability of the entire region." The signatories included both Jordan and Saudi Arabia. But their stated opposition to Israel's attacks on Iran has not prevented them from intervening in the conflict, at least indirectly. Jordan, for example, has shot down missiles flying from Iran towards Israel. The Jordanian military confirmed they had done this in a statement, explaining that missiles and drones could have fallen onto Jordan, "including in populated areas, causing casualties." As with any other sovereign state, missiles or other unauthorized objects crossing a country's airspace are often deemed violations of either domestic or international law. The Saudi Arabians have not issued a similar statement, but experts say it's likely they've allowed Israel to shoot missiles down in their airspace and may have cooperated on surveillance too. But just as it has done in the recent past, this kind of military action could cause domestic tensions. Among the people of both nations, there is a historical antipathy towards Israel based on past wars and conflicts. That's especially true for Jordan, where at least one in five locals, including the country's queen, are of Palestinian descent. It's difficult for Jordan's government to justify shooting down Iranian missiles headed for Israel, which is why the explanation of self-defense was given. "This message — 'we are only defending ourselves' — is being repeated on all channels," says Edmund Ratka, head of the Konrad Adenauer Foundation's office in Amman, Jordan. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Ratka says this is also due to the Jordanian political scene at the moment. In April, the country's government banned the country's largest political opposition movement, the Muslim Brotherhood, over connections to an alleged plot to destabilize the country. "The [ban] seems carefully calibrated and intended to stem rising popular support for the [Muslim brotherhood] movement as the kingdom navigates a difficult regional backdrop," Neil Quilliam, an associate fellow with British think tank Chatham House's Middle East and North Africa program, wrote at the time, as well as "undermine its growing appeal among a population incensed by Israel's war in Gaza." This makes it all the more important for the Jordanian government to make sure that taking down Iranian missiles is not seen as solidarity with Israel, says Stefan Lukas, founder of the Germany-based consultancy, Middle East Minds. "Still, the decision [to do so] further escalates tensions," he told DW. There's no way Jordan wants to be seen as defending Israel, Ratka confirms, "Because the Jordanian people largely perceive Israel as the aggressor." But, he adds, they feel the same about Iran, too. "We regularly conduct surveys in Jordan, and for years, they've shown there isn't much sympathy for Iran in Jordan," Ratka noted. "Because Iran is seen as a state that repeatedly interferes in Arab affairs with the intent to destabilize." Jordan also has other reasons for shooting down the Iranian missiles, Lukas says. Jordan can't directly oppose the US, he says, referring to a 2021 defense cooperation agreement between the US and Jordan, which allows US forces, vehicles and aircraft to enter and move around Jordan freely. Jordan "is far too dependent on the US and, to some extent, on Israel too — both financially and in terms of security policy." It's a difficult argument for the Jordanians to make. If they were that concerned about protecting domestic airspace, then the government would have to protest the presence of Israeli forces overhead, too. As Ratka points out, though, Israel hasn't violated Jordanian airspace with its attacks on Iran. "So the Jordanian leadership can, with some justification, claim it would combat any airspace violation," he says. "Even if, in fact, it's only fighting the Iranians." Saudi Arabia is also in a tricky spot. It signed the same declaration as 20 other Arab and Muslim-majority countries did, and even before that, had referred to Iran as a "brotherly nation" in a statement condemning Israeli attacks on the nation of around 92 million. The use of the word "brotherly" was seen as noteworthy by analysts because it's usually reserved for fellow Arab-majority countries, whereas the Iranians are mostly Persians. But beyond the official rhetoric, Saudi Arabia is pursuing a completely different course, Lukas says. "Unofficially, Saudi Arabia is participating in the action against Iran," he confirms. There's security cooperation between the Saudis and Israelis, Lukas states. "Saudi Arabia provides radar data and tolerates [airspace] access by Israeli aircraft, especially in the northern part of the country where Iranian missiles primarily fly through. We've seen that Saudi Arabia is actually very accommodating to Israel." Saudi Arabia also depends heavily on the US for security, especially during years of antipathy toward Iran. Although the two nations recently reconciled, their relationship is still delicate. Saudi Arabia would likely turn to the US for protection when in doubt.
Int'l Business Times
2 days ago
- Int'l Business Times
World Bank And IMF Climate Snub 'Worrying': COP29 Presidency
The hosts of the most recent UN climate talks are worried international lenders are retreating from their commitments to help boost funding for developing countries' response to global warming. This anxiety has grown as the Trump administration has slashed foreign aid and discouraged US-based development lenders like the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund from focussing on climate finance. Developing nations, excluding China, will need an estimated $1.3 trillion a year by 2035 in financial assistance to transition to renewable energy and climate-proof their economies from increasing weather extremes. But nowhere near this amount has been committed. At last year's UN COP29 summit in Azerbaijan, rich nations agreed to increase climate finance to $300 billion a year by 2035, an amount decried as woefully inadequate. Azerbaijan and Brazil, which is hosting this year's COP30 conference, have launched an initiative to plug the shortfall that includes expectations of "significant" contributions from international lenders. But so far only two -- the African Development Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank -- have responded to a call to engage the initiative with ideas, said COP29 president Mukhtar Babayev. "We call on their shareholders to urgently help us to address these concerns," he told climate negotiators at a high-level summit in the German city of Bonn this week. "We fear that a complex and volatile global environment is distracting" many of those expected to play a big role in bridging the climate finance gap, he added. His team travelled to Washington in April for the IMF and World Bank's spring meetings hoping to find the same enthusiasm for climate lending they had encountered a year earlier. But instead they found institutions "very much reluctant now to talk about climate at all", said Azerbaijan's top climate negotiator Yalchin Rafiyev. This was a "worrisome trend", he said, given expectations these lenders would extend the finance needed in the absence of other sources. "They're very much needed," he said. The United States, the World Bank's biggest shareholder, has sent a different message. On the sidelines of the April spring meetings, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent urged the bank to focus on "dependable technologies" rather than "distortionary climate finance targets." This could mean investing in gas and other fossil fuel-based energy production, he said. Under the Paris Agreement, wealthy developed countries -- those most responsible for global warming to date -- are obligated to pay climate finance to poorer nations. But other countries, most notably China, do make their own voluntary contributions. Finance is a source of long-running tensions at UN climate negotiations. Donors have consistently failed to deliver on past finance pledges, and committed well below what experts agree developing nations need to prepare for the climate crisis. The issue flared again this week in Bonn, with nations at odds over whether to debate financial commitments from rich countries during the formal meetings. European nations have also pared back their foreign aid spending in recent months, raising fears that budgets for climate finance could also face a haircut. At COP29, multilateral development banks (MDBs) led by the World Bank Group estimated they could provide $120 billion annually in climate financing to low and middle income countries, and mobilise another $65 billion from the private sector by 2030. Their estimate for high income countries was $50 billion, with another $65 billion mobilised from the private sector. Rob Moore, of policy think tank E3G, said these lenders are the largest providers of international public finance to developing countries. "Whilst they are facing difficult political headwinds in some quarters, they would be doing both themselves and their clients a disservice by disengaging on climate change," he said. The World Bank in particular has done "a huge amount of work" to align its lending with global climate goals. "If they choose to step back this would be at their own detriment, and other banks like the regionally based MDBs would likely play a bigger role in shaping the economy of the future," he said. The World Bank did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
DW
2 days ago
- DW
Germany updates: Population growth on the decline – DW – 06/20/2025
06/20/2025 June 20, 2025 German population growth slows In 2024 Germany's population rose by 0.1% which is a drop from the 0.4% growth witnessed the year before, according to preliminary figures released by the Federal Statistical Office on Friday. As a result, the population for the EU's largest economy now stands at 83.6 million. The figures showed that, as in previous years, more people died than were born in Germany, but the population growth came about due to immigration. Population growth concentrated in Germany's western states, which saw an increase of 0.2%, while the eastern states, excluding the city-state of Berlin, recorded a decline of 0.3%. The largest increase for a state came in Bavaria, with population numbers up by 73,000. The biggest population losses occurred in the eastern states of Thuringia (down 15,000 or 0.7%), Saxony (down 12,000 or 0.3%), and Saxony-Anhalt (down 9,000 or 0.4%). The number of people aged 60 to 79 rose by 2.2%, primarily due to the aging of the baby boomer generation. The 80-and-over population also grew slightly, by 0.2%. As of the end of 2024, 30.5% of Germany's population was aged 60 or older. The number of foreign nationals living in Germany rose by 2.3% to 12.4 million in 2024, with the largest diaspora being Turkish nationals (1.403 million). The next largest diaspora in Germany, according to the preliminary figures, is the Ukrainian diaspora (1.085 million), followed by nationals from Syria (889,000), Romania (771,000) and Poland (723,000).
