Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning Review
Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning opens in theaters Friday, May 23.
For nearly 30 years, the stunts and action sequences of Mission: Impossible have been synonymous with big-screen spectacle. And as expected, the franchise's newest entry finds Tom Cruise's alter ego Ethan Hunt risking life, limb, and the fates of millions, this time in pursuit of stopping The Entity, the evil A.I. introduced in 2023's Mission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning Part One. But the way I see it, the sequel – which stopped being Dead Reckoning Part Two sometime in the last two years – might be trying a little too hard to top the IMF's greatest hits.
First thing you should know about me is that I've always been a huge mark for James Bond movies. I've got a lot of formative movie memories from growing up with those films. So I was, frankly, thrilled to see all the things I loved about Bond captured perfectly in 2016's Mission: Impossible – Rogue Nation, the first of now four Ethan Hunt adventures written and directed by Christopher McQuarrie.
Rogue Nation nails the combination of go-for-broke practical stunts, grinning self-awareness, and just the right touch of believability that make up the most important parameters for a successful IMF mission – Fallout nails it slightly less, and I think Dead Reckoning misses by a wider margin. The Final Reckoning, unfortunately, has gone farther afield.
My biggest takeaway from the eighth and very evidently not final film starring Cruise as fate's chosen lucky boy is that it's extremely sober. The Final Reckoning veers into melodrama whenever there is story to be told. The cast, which is an assembling of familiar franchise faces and newcomer cameos, whisper-talk their way through soap-opera levels of tension. Nearly every scrap of dialogue is invested in no less than the end of all life on the planet.But my first litmus test for these movies is how serious they treat Ethan Hunt getting the mission. Rogue Nation was a flirty encounter at a record shop, Fallout's knock on the door woke him up from a dream where a nuclear blast interrupted his wedding, and Dead Reckoning was some kind of dramatic poetry slam with the IMF Oath and a new recruit. The Final Reckoning features a lo-fi delivery method thanks to the Entity's infiltration of all things digital – and it's honestly kinda fun. But the message is the most dire and serious thing. This is a story point introduced by Dead Reckoning: The Entity as a villain capable of literally every bad thing imaginable, like a laundry list of vague shorthand threats – any one of which could've been enough to carry a movie. Instead, they've all been lumped together in the form of a nebulous digital boogeyman, and reiterating that in the 'this message will self destruct' section of the movie sets a very somber tone for everything that follows. Save for a few bits of humor here and there, it's never shaken (or stirred).
Absurdly astronomical stakes are one of the biggest issues with The Final Reckoning. A good-old fashioned nuke or biological weapon – those live in Mission: Impossible's sweet spot: life-and-death at a massive scale, while also real enough to be relatably scary. But all life on planet Earth is just too much to plausibly wrap your head around, particularly with how seriously everyone takes everything else compared to say, Rogue Nation or Fallout.
I know I keep swerving away from The Final Reckoning and back into the rest of the franchise but, for better and worse, this is a part eight that's very aware that it's a part eight. You can't call a movie The Final Reckoning without delivering some degree of, well, finality, and oh boy does this one try.
It's not merely planting Easter eggs from the earlier films so much as picking entire story points – largely unnecessary ones, I would argue. It's a nice nod to the diehards, but when you consider the nearly three-hour run time and the relative lack of importance these moments have to the overall movie, I'm not sure what McQuarrie and Cruise were trying to accomplish. This is all to say, The Final Reckoning is impossible to review out of the context of the other seven Missions: Impossible, which is why I keep recapping my feelings for the franchise as a whole.
One of the callbacks that I really did enjoy, though, is a guy we've seen in the trailers for The Final Reckoning: William Donloe (Rolf Saxon), the poor bastard working in the CIA black vault whose nose Ethan stole the NOC list out from under way back in the '90s. His part in The Final Reckoning is spot on. He's a meaningful character for Ethan and the IMF to encounter who also speaks to the themes of the movie: Our lives are the sum of our choices. He's fun, which is short supply here, and I would've loved it if he'd have been the only bit of retconning this movie tried to do.
But I've been talking a lot about the things I didn't like – it's important to note that there are some things The Final Reckoning very much did right. The action is predictably excellent, with the highlight being Ethan's infiltration of the Sevastopol, the MacGuffin of a submarine that sank at the start of Dead Reckoning. It is incredibly tense and intricate and claustrophobic and all the other nail-biting things you want from a thriller. More than that, there's clearly a huge chunk of the reported $400 million budget on screen, and Christopher McQuarrie is getting all the nautical miles he can out of it. The set is equal parts Avatar and the hallway fight from Inception.
The fight choreography is also elevated from previous entries, as other countries send their most special forces after the same prize Ethan is after. The fights are a little more brutal and legitimately feel like the IMF could lose. At this point in the franchise, that's a difficult tightrope to walk, and McQuarrie and Cruise deserve a lot of credit for that.
They also deserve a fair bit of credit bringing the team together again. I felt that was one part of the Mission: Impossible formula that was a little absent from the last film. The climax of The Final Reckoning gives every team member a job – it's reminiscent of Fallout in that respect, and very important for the IMF. Because it's less fun when Ethan is running around doing everything himself. An abiding trust in his team is part of Ethan's allure – in addition to being, as Shea Whigham's Jasper Briggs puts it in Dead Reckoning, a mind-reading, shape-shifting incarnation of chaos.The climactic biplane sequence is great, too. It's thrilling in parts, funny in others, and most importantly, all the effort and planning that goes into a stunt like that is apparent. The only question I have about it is, would The Final Reckoning be worse if it were a stunt double walking out on the wing of that plane instead of Tom Cruise? Or would it just have one less interesting thing going for it?
A lot of how I feel about this movie, though, comes down to that subtitle. The Final Reckoning can't be officially final with the way it ends, and I don't think there are any of us who believe Tom Cruise is done risking his life for our entertainment. So it's either the best subtitle for this movie, or the worst. Maybe they completely missed the mark on the 'Final' part of the equation, and it's not a representative title at all. Maybe its not-entirely-successful attempt at tying a neat and all-encompassing bow is the Final Reckoning for the franchise and the path it laid out across 8 movies. From a real world perspective, maybe a messy and self-serious capstone to an otherwise iconic franchise is exactly what they deserve and it's a perfect subtitle.
For my part, because again, I'm a big fan of this kind of movie, I'm rooting for the latter. Threads have been picked up and tugged on in different directions throughout the course of these eight films. That's just the cost of doing business with a 30-year juggernaut of a franchise. Their mission now, should they choose to accept, is to take the clean slate they've created with all those threads tied up, however clumsily, and get back to what Mission: Impossible does best: not take itself so seriously.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Materialists' Totally Set Dakota Johnson's Character for Up Failure and You Can't Convince Us Otherwise
Materialists poses the question of whether or not we should be going for love or for money and the choice Dakota Johnson's character makes has people on internet divided The film also stars Pedro Pascal and Chris Evans Materialists is in theaters nowMovies have long wanted to convince us that we should be marrying for love. From The Notebook to Titanic, films have always suggested that women should follow their hearts and go for the sweet charmer with no money instead of the well-established gentleman who has financial stability. (Granted, Billy Zane's character in Titanic was awful, but stay with me here.) Well, Materialists has repurposed that trope once again, and the internet is seething. The film follows Lucy (played by Dakota Johnson), a successful matchmaker who has managed to find love for everyone except for herself. Her skills are immediately tested when she finds herself in a love triangle with Harry (played by Pedro Pascal), a successful billionaire who errs on the side of superficiality but is offering her the world, vs. John (played by Chris Evans), her ex-boyfriend, who offers her lots of love and affection, but works from gig to gig while trying to get an acting career off the ground. The film takes us through all the hijinks of a romcom as both men have their pros and cons and try to woo her. In the end, Lucy goes for John, the broke boy who loves her dearly, but can't provide her with the lifestyle she always dreamed of. And while the internet is upset over the fact that Pedro Pascal doesn't get the girl, the truth of the matter is, Lucy was set up for failure from the jump. As PEOPLE editor Bailey Richards pointed out. Regardless of whom she was going to end up with, Lucy was going to be settling. "I don't think she should have ended up with either of them," Richards says, considering Bailey's options. "Marry this hot, caring man who will pay for everything for you for the rest of your life — any materialistic whim you may have. He doesn't love you, but he will pay anything. Or a hot, caring man who does love you, but makes no money ... he will drop anything, at any given moment to do whatever for you." We can all agree that the only real winners are Lucy's children (if she wants any), who will 100% win the genetic lottery regardless of which guy she chooses. However, when it comes to meeting the standards Lucy deeply desires, she's bound to lose regardless. So, instead of settling for the loverboy with no money, Richards believes Lucy should have actually axed both men. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. "After everything that she, as a matchmaker, as a woman, goes through in that movie, she just needs to break from romance altogether and do some introspection, the kind that requires you to be single and be alone," says Richards. Personally, the right choice for me is always Pedro Pascal. But I have to agree with my colleague here. Relationships are hard, even when you find everything you want in a person, so why give yourself more heartache by settling for someone who doesn't meet your standards? Read the original article on People
Associated Press
32 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Beyond Entertainment: World Culture Film Festival 2025, Los Angeles, June 26-29
A Cinematic Celebration of Humanity Returns to Los Angeles LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA / ACCESS Newswire / June 20, 2025 / This summer, Los Angeles welcomes the return of the World Culture Film Festival (WCFF), a celebration not just of cinema, but of the human spirit itself. From June 26-29, 2025, the City of Angels will once again play host to this transformative cultural event, curated to showcase entertainment that Breakers - World Culture Film Festival Opening Night Screening and Red Carpet Event Now in its second year, the festival stands apart in a crowded landscape of film gatherings by focusing on stories that illuminate, unite, and inspire. An initiative of the globally respected Art of Living Foundation, the WCFF is rooted in the mission of its visionary founder, Gurudev Sri Sri Ravi Shankar, whose work toward a stress-free, violence-free world has touched over 800 million people in more than 180 countries. The WCFF builds on the enormous global impact of the World Culture Festival, a transcendent cultural gathering that drew over 1.1 million people to the National Mall in Washington, D.C., in 2023, with the support of DC Mayor Muriel Bowser. That momentum now flows into the world of cinema, bringing together international filmmakers, artists, thinkers, and changemakers for four unforgettable days. This year's lineup is both deeply meaningful and impressively star-powered. The festival opens with a special screening of Rule Breakers, followed by an exclusive Q&A with lead actors Amber Afzali, Nina Hosseinzadeh, and Sara Malal Rowe. Gurudev Sri Sri Ravi Shankar himself will deliver a featured address, marking one of the festival's most anticipated moments. Among the cinematic highlights is Laapataa Ladies, the Oscar-shortlisted breakout film directed by Kiran Rao and produced by Aamir Khan, whose artistic contributions to Indian cinema continue to resonate globally. Audiences will also experience The Performance, with special guests Chet Lowe and Jeremy Piven in attendance. Art lovers will find a special treat in The View Beyond, a stunning new aerial photography exhibition by Sahil Rohira, presented in collaboration with WCFF. This immersive experience transcends traditional visual storytelling, inviting visitors to witness the world from the still, sacred space of the skies. Rohira's lens captures landscapes as meditative poetry, each frame a quiet revolution in perspective. In addition to screenings, the festival will host a range of vibrant panels, international film blocks, and live performances, creating space for deep dialogue, joy, and creative exchange. The red carpet will shine even brighter with a growing list of celebrity attendees, including Jeremy Piven, Sam Asghari, Utkarsh Ambudkar, Richa Moorjani, Poorna Jagannathan, Cory Hardrict, Sarayu Blue, Preity Zinta, Tamanna Roashan, Punam Patel, Liza Koshy, and many more. The World Culture Film Festival isn't just a festival, it's a movement. A reminder that film can be more than art or entertainment: it can be an act of healing, of hope, of profound connection. The full program and ticket information can be found at Contact Information Aleksandar Tomovic EIC [email protected] SOURCE: World Culture Film Festival by Art of Living Foundation press release
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Legendary '70s Actor Seen in Rare Outing With Much Younger Girlfriend
Legendary '70s Actor Seen in Rare Outing With Much Younger Girlfriend originally appeared on Parade. Robert De Niro, 81, has been acting for over 60 years and shows no signs of slowing down — but when he's not working, he often spends time with his family and girlfriend Tiffany Chen, 45. Though the couple tends to keep a low profile, they were recently spotted leaving a restaurant in Los Angeles. On Thursday, June 19, De Niro and Chen were photographed enjoying a quiet dinner at Nobu, in photos obtained by Backgrid. The 81-year-old actor kept it casual in a blue jacket and green cap, while Chen wore an oversized jumper and sunglasses. Best known for his iconic roles in Goodfellas and A Bronx Tale, De Niro has made a few red carpet appearances with Chen, but the pair mostly stay out of the spotlight. The Academy Award winner was first linked to Chen — a trained dancer and martial arts instructor — in August 2021 following his split from ex-wife Grace Hightower. However, they've known each other much longer. The two reportedly met in 2015 on the set of The Intern, where Chen had a role. Speculation about their relationship began after PDA-filled photos of the pair went viral, leading fans to believe they were more than just friends. In May 2023, De Niro revealed in an interview with ET Canada that he had welcomed his seventh child, though he didn't initially share who the mother was. It was his About My Father costar Kim Cattrall who reportedly spilled and confirmed that Chen had given birth to their daughter, Gia. Since becoming parents, De Niro has praised Chen for her role as a mother. 'I mean, I don't do the heavy lifting,' he told The Guardian. 'I'm there, I support my girlfriend. But she does the work. And we have help, which is so important.' While the actor is grateful for the experience of raising a newborn again, he admits it comes with challenges. 'It doesn't get easier…It is what it is. It's OK.' The Golden Globe recipient has seven children in total — his eldest, daughter Drena De Niro, is 57. As for expanding their family, the couple haven't said whether they plan to have more children together. Legendary '70s Actor Seen in Rare Outing With Much Younger Girlfriend first appeared on Parade on Jun 21, 2025 This story was originally reported by Parade on Jun 21, 2025, where it first appeared.
