logo
Construction, utilities, and oil and gas: Skilled trades dominate LinkedIn's fastest-growing jobs for grads

Construction, utilities, and oil and gas: Skilled trades dominate LinkedIn's fastest-growing jobs for grads

Yahoo07-05-2025

LinkedIn released data on Wednesday that reveals construction is the fastest-growing industry for new college grads.New LinkedIn data reveals construction is the fastest-growing industry for new college graduates.
Other skilled trades are also rising, with utilities in second place, and oil, gas, and mining in third.
LinkedIn's head of economics said a slowdown in hiring is expected to hit the construction industry.
Don't be surprised if you start seeing "day-in-the-life" videos of construction workers pop up on your feed — the industry is having a moment.
LinkedIn released data on Wednesday that reveals construction is the fastest-growing industry for new college grads. Other skilled trades are also on the rise among entry-level workers, with utilities coming in second place and oil, gas, and mining in third.
"Construction is topping the list," LinkedIn head of economics Kory Kantenga shared at a company event on Tuesday. "Construction has had a really good few years."
Kantenga said that momentum in construction is driven by the Inflation Reduction Act. The IRA provides tax incentives for clean energy and energy-efficient investments, which could lead to more projects. The initiative also resulted in improved wages for clean energy workers.
Growth in the industry is also a result of high interest rates for mortgages, which has led to fewer people selling their houses, and increased interest in building homes, Kantenga said.
Growth in oil, gas, and mining among entry-level workers is likely tied to migration toward the Sunbelt, specifically Texas, Kantenga said.
"As the nation's top oil producer, Texas has drawn many entry-level workers since the pandemic, thanks to its lack of state income tax, lower cost of living, and milder weather compared to northern coastal regions," Kantenga said.
New opportunities in skilled trade industries may also be a result of the AI boom. Efforts to develop AI have led to increased demand for energy infrastructure and policies.
Google recently wrote in a blog post that there's a "demand for trade skills that can construct electrical infrastructure." The tech giant announced in the post that it would support an effort to train 100,000 electrical workers and 30,000 apprentices in the US.
"A shortage of electrical workers may constrain America's ability to build the infrastructure needed to support AI, advanced manufacturing and a shift to clean energy," the announcement said.
While college degrees aren't required to work in many skilled-trade industries, a job in construction or mining doesn't necessarily mean working in a position on the ground. For example, those graduating with law degrees might not be considering construction, but there are also opportunities for legal roles in the field, Kantenga said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Apple needs an AI magic pill, but I'm not desperate for it on macOS
Apple needs an AI magic pill, but I'm not desperate for it on macOS

Digital Trends

timean hour ago

  • Digital Trends

Apple needs an AI magic pill, but I'm not desperate for it on macOS

Over the past few months, all eyes have been fixated on Apple and what the company is going to do with AI. The pressure is palpable and well deserved. Google has demonstrated some really compelling AI tools, especially with Project Astra and Mariner, that turn your phone into something like an all-knowing, forever-present digital companion. The likes of Microsoft, OpenAI, Claude, and even Amazon have shown some next-gen AI chops that make Siri feel like an old prototype. But there is a fine distinction between using AI on phones and how they flesh out on a computing machine, like a MacBook Air. Recommended Videos You don't really talk to an assistant like Siri on a desktop I often run into scenarios where AI is useful on a phone, like Visual Intelligence, which can make sense of the world around you based on what you see through the camera feed. The Mac doesn't really need it, primarily because it lacks a world-facing camera. And second, you can't ergonomically point the Mac's webcam at an object — especially in a public place — like you would with a phone in your hand. But the problem with the whole 'Apple must do AI better' is suited well for mobile devices, and not really Macs, which rely on a fundamentally different mode of input-output, and how we get work done in apps and software. I've used my fair share of AI-first Copilot+ laptops running Windows, and I feel strongly that Apple's AI efforts don't need an urgent focus on macOS, as much as they do on mobile devices, for a few reasons. The Mac is already well fed Bloomberg's Mark Gurman, in the latest edition of his PowerOn newsletter, argued that Perplexity is a nice target for Apple to scoop up an AI lab of its own and get its hands on a ready-made AI stack. Perplexity's answering engine is pretty rewarding, it's not too expensive (by Apple standards), and it works beautifully on iPhones. Over the past couple of quarters, the company has launched a whole bunch of integrations across Telegram and WhatsApp, Deep Research mode, a reasoning AI model, a shopping hub in partnership with Amazon, media generation and image uploads, search through audio and video files, among others. There are just two problems, especially with accessing Perplexity on a Mac. First, it can already do everything in its role via the Mac app and web dashboard, so an integration at a deeper level with Mac won't be solving too many computing problems. Second, ChatGPT is already integrated deeply within Siri and the Apple stack, and it's only a matter of time before both of them step up. Let's be honest here. Perplexity is a cool product, but not exactly revolutionary in the sense that it can elevate the macOS experience significantly. Enterprise AI is a different beast, but for an average user, every AI tool out there — Gemini, ChatGPT, Copilot, Claude, or Perplexity — exists as its own web tool (or app) where you truly get the best out of it. So, what about integrations? Well, they would depend on the tools at hand. A huge chunk of the computing market either relies on Microsoft and its Office tools or Google's Workspace products, such as Docs, Drive, Sheets, and more. From Windows to Office, Copilot is now everywhere. Similar is the situation with Gemini and Google software. Now, millions of Mac users actually use these tools on a daily basis, and Apple doesn't offer a viable replacement of its own. Moreover, there isn't a chance that Google will allow Apple's AI to penetrate deeper into its Workspace than Gemini. Microsoft won't do any different with Copilot and Office. Plus, it's hard to imagine an external AI working better in Docs or PowerPoint than Gemini and Copilot, respectively. The space is already tight, but more importantly, well-fed. And let's not forget, OpenAI and its GPT stack are very much baked at the heart of macOS. If Apple wanted to build integrations, OpenAI offers arguably the most advanced AI tech stack out there. Adding any more AI at the system level would only add to the confusion for an average Mac user, without solving any real problems. The space of an extra AI player on the Mac is tighter for another reason: Apple's Foundation Model framework, which works on-device as well as in cloud-linked format, but with utmost privacy. Apple says it will allow developers to build a 'personal intelligence system that is integrated deeply into iPhone, iPad, and Mac, and enables powerful capabilities across language, images, actions, and personal context.' In a nutshell, Apple's own foundation models are available to developers so that they can build AI experiences in their apps. The best part? It's free. It's not nearly as powerful as the models from OpenAI or Google, but for getting work done locally — like cross-app workflow, intelligent file search, and more — they should come in handy without any privacy scares. The productivity question The M4 MacBook Air is my daily driver these days, and it's a fantastic machine. And I use AI tools heavily on a daily basis. Yet, I have never felt macOS to be an AI bottleneck for me. Every AI tool that I rely on is either already integrated within the software of my choice or available as its dedicated app or website. Yet, the whole notion of turning a product into an AI product baffles me. It makes sense for a phone, like the Pixel 9, but not so much for a laptop. I have tested five Copilot+ Windows machines so far. Yet, the core benefits they offer — snappy performance, instant wake, and long battery life — have little to do with user-facing AI. I was able to use Gemini or Copilot just as fine on a regular Windows laptop as I was able to extract their benefits on a Copilot+ machine with a minimum 45 TOPS AI capability. The Mac is no slouch, and interestingly, all the AI tools in my productivity workflow can be accessed just fine on macOS as they are available on Windows. There are a few exclusive perks, like Windows Recall, but they are not a must-have for the average computer user out there. And let's not forget that Apple already has the foundations ready, and we are going to see the results next year. When Apple introduced the M4 MacBook Air, the company focused on its AI chops, but what flew under the radar was Apple's App Intents Framework, which integrates effortlessly with Apple Intelligence. In simple terms, any app — whether AI or not — can embrace the benefits of on-device AI processing, such as awareness of on-screen content, in a native macOS environment. Now, it's valid to criticize Apple for its AI missteps. I am at a stage where I use Gemini everywhere on my iPhone, from the lock screen widgets to the dedicated app, instead of Siri. But that's not the situation with Macs. For my workflow, and a whole bunch of Mac users' out there, they're not gasping for a next-gen Apple AI. What they need is a reliable machine to run the AI of their choice. Even the cheapest Mac can meet those requirements.

Is ChatGPT Catching Google on Search Activity? [Infographic]
Is ChatGPT Catching Google on Search Activity? [Infographic]

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Is ChatGPT Catching Google on Search Activity? [Infographic]

This story was originally published on Social Media Today. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Social Media Today newsletter. Is Google at risk of losing its online discovery crown to ChatGPT? Well, not yet. As you can see in this overview of online search traffic, put together by the team at Visual Capitalist, OpenAI's chatbot still lags Google by a significant margin, and with Google also incorporating its own AI answers, it may still be able to fend off rising competition from ChatGPT, and maintain its place as king of the heap. Based on data presented which was presented by NP Digital at Web Summit 2025, Google still leads the way in overall web search activity, facilitating some 13.7 billion searches per day. Instagram comes in second (6.5 billion searches per day), though interestingly, Snapchat and LinkedIn also rank high for daily search activity, higher than Facebook, Microsoft's Bing and Pinterest. I would have assumed that all of these would see more search activity than Snap, but NP Digital says that the data has been sourced from multiple sources. Which could also point to variances in tracking process. Either way, the topline note is that ChatGPT still has a long way to go to become the key search engine, though it is growing fast, and as more and more people converse with AI chatbots, it's quickly becoming a more habitual search process. Sign in to access your portfolio

傳蘋果將捨棄Google合作 將收購AI搜尋黑馬Perplexity
傳蘋果將捨棄Google合作 將收購AI搜尋黑馬Perplexity

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

傳蘋果將捨棄Google合作 將收購AI搜尋黑馬Perplexity

科技中心/李宜樺報導 ▼▲蘋果傳新併購消息!恐捨棄Google,轉密會AI搜尋新星Perplexity。(圖/翻攝自YT@Apple) AI戰升溫,科技巨頭火力全開!繼Meta投資Scale AI後,如今傳出蘋果也悄悄布局,要收購AI搜尋新貴「Perplexity AI」,甚至傳出考慮放棄Google作為預設搜尋引擎。這場看似平靜的搜尋戰場,已悄然掀起風暴! 根據《彭博》知名科技記者Mark Gurman爆料,蘋果併購部門主管Adrian Perica已在內部討論是否收購Perplexity,雖仍處於早期階段,但若交易成真,將是蘋果史上最大規模併購案──該公司估值高達140億美元,遠超2014年30億美元收購Beats的紀錄。 除了併購,蘋果也考慮另一合作模式,將Perplexity整合至Safari與Siri,作為替代Google搜尋的AI解決方案。畢竟蘋果與Google的搜尋合作協議,正面臨美國反壟斷調查威脅,恐有被迫拆夥的可能。 Perplexity成立僅兩年,卻以AI驅動搜尋技術嶄露頭角,透過自動總結、引文標示等功能挑戰Google霸主地位,甚至已與三星展開深度合作,成為蘋果收購計畫的潛在障礙。 Perplexity對收購傳聞低調回應,稱「目前沒有相關消息」,但該公司近期與多家科技巨頭接觸頻繁,包括Meta也曾試圖收購、並挖角其CEO Aravind Srinivas,顯示AI搜尋市場人才爭奪戰已進入白熱化。 當AI搜尋成為下一代搜尋引擎的競爭主戰場,蘋果此舉無疑是對Google發出重大威脅。科技巨頭的版圖重組已開始,誰能掌握搜尋流量與AI技術,誰就能主宰未來。 更多三立新聞網報導2025報稅必知/報稅倒數9天 你真的報完了嗎?「這一步」沒做=白報!美軍參戰 介入以伊戰爭!衝突升級 冷靜異常的黃金現補漲行情?全球熱錢瘋搶亞洲 高盛曝對沖基金5年最大買盤新光金、新壽5月再虧破百億 靠準備金撐盤仍難止血?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store