logo
Kneecap's Mo Chara placed on unconditional bail as hundreds support star at court

Kneecap's Mo Chara placed on unconditional bail as hundreds support star at court

Yahoo3 days ago

Kneecap's Mo Chara has been unconditionally bailed after facing a terror charge.
After being greeted by hundreds of supporters outside Westminster Magistrates' Court on Wednesday (18.06.25), the court heard that the issue was with the member of the Irish rap trio - whose real name is Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh - "displaying a flag in support of proscribed organisation Hezbollah" at their O2 Forum Kentish Town gig in London in November 2024, not voicing his opinions on Israel and Palestine, which he's "well within his rights" to do.
Prosecutor Michael Bisgrove told the court: 'It's not about Mr Ó hAnnaidh's support for the people of Palestine or his criticism of Israel.
'He's well within his rights to voice his opinions and solidarity, as is anybody else.
'The allegation in this case is a wholly different thing and deals with a video recording showing that, in November of last year, Mr Ó hAnnaidh wore and displayed the flag of Hezbollah, a proscribed terrorist organisation, while saying 'up Hamas, up Hezbollah'.
'Of course, support for the one is not the same as support for the other.
'So the issue in this case, and the reason it has come to court, it centres on the apparent support by Mr O hAnnaidh of a proscribed terrorist organisation.'
Ó hAnnaidh was subsequently released on unconditional bail until his next hearing on August 20.
Not only was he supported by his bandmates - Naoise Ó Cairealláin and JJ Ó Dochartaigh - at the court, but hundreds of supporters turned up to stand in solidarity with the star, with calls of "Free Palestine" heard as he left the building.
In a statement on Instagram regarding the terror charge, Kneecap wrote: "We deny this 'offense' and will vehemently defend ourselves.
'This is political policing. This is a carnival of distraction.
"14,000 babies are about to die of starvation in Gaza, with food sent by the world sitting on the other side of a wall, and once again the British establishment is focused on us.
'We are on the right side of history. You are not. We will fight you in court. We will win.'
Kneecap had shows cancelled as a result of the backlash but are still set to play Glastonbury's West Holts stage at Worthy Farm on Saturday, June 28 at 4pm - despite calls from MPs for them to be banned.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The US commemorates 250th anniversary of the 'great American battle,' the Battle of Bunker Hill

timean hour ago

The US commemorates 250th anniversary of the 'great American battle,' the Battle of Bunker Hill

NEW YORK -- As the U.S. marks the 250th anniversary of the Battle of Bunker Hill, it might take a moment — or more — to remember why. Start with the very name. 'There's something percussive about it: Battle of Bunker Hill,' says prize-winning historian Nathaniel Philbrick, whose 'Bunker Hill: A City, A Siege, A Revolution' was published in 2013. 'What actually happened probably gets hazy for people outside of the Boston area, but it's part of our collective memory and imagination.' 'Few 'ordinary' Americans could tell you that Freeman's Farm, or Germantown, or Guilford Court House were battles,' says Paul Lockhart, a professor of history at Wright University and author of a Bunker Hill book, 'The Whites of Their Eyes," which came out in 2011. "But they can say that Gettysburg, D-Day, and Bunker Hill were battles.' Bunker Hill, Lockhart adds, 'is the great American battle, if there is such a thing.' Much of the world looks to the Battles of Lexington and Concord, fought in Massachusetts on April 19, 1775, as the start of the American Revolution. But Philbrick, Lockhart and others cite Bunker Hill and June 17 as the real beginning, the first time British and rebel forces faced off in sustained conflict over a specific piece of territory. Bunker Hill was an early showcase for two long-running themes in American history — improvisation and how an inspired band of militias could hold their own against an army of professionals. 'It was a horrific bloodletting, and provided the British high command with proof that the Americans were going to be a lot more difficult to subdue than had been hoped,' says the Pulitzer Prize-winning historian Rick Atkinson, whose second volume of a planned trilogy on the Revolution, 'The Fate of the Day,' was published in April. The battle was born in part out of error; rebels were seeking to hold off a possible British attack by fortifying Bunker Hill, a 110-foot-high (34-meter-high) peak in Charlestown across the Charles River from British-occupied Boston. But for reasons still unclear, they instead armed a smaller and more vulnerable ridge known as Breed's Hill, 'within cannon shot of Boston,' Philbrick says. "The British felt they had no choice but to attack and seize the American fort.' Abigail Adams, wife of future President John Adams, and son John Quincy Adams, also a future president, were among thousands in the Boston area who looked on from rooftops, steeples and trees as the two sides fought with primal rage. A British officer would write home about the 'shocking carnage' left behind, a sight 'that never will be erased out of my mind 'till the day of my death.' The rebels were often undisciplined and disorganized and they were running out of gunpowder. The battle ended with them in retreat, but not before the British had lost more than 200 soldiers and sustained more than 1,000 casualties, compared to some 450 colonial casualties and the destruction of hundreds of homes, businesses and other buildings in Charlestown. Bunker Hill would become characteristic of so much of the Revolutionary War: a technical defeat that was a victory because the British needed to win decisively and the rebels needed only not to lose decisively. 'Nobody now entertains a doubt but that we are able to cope with the whole force of Great Britain, if we are but willing to exert ourselves,' Thomas Jefferson wrote to a friend in early July. 'As our enemies have found we can reason like men, now let us show them we can fight like men also.'

The US commemorates 250th anniversary of the 'great American battle,' the Battle of Bunker Hill
The US commemorates 250th anniversary of the 'great American battle,' the Battle of Bunker Hill

San Francisco Chronicle​

time2 hours ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

The US commemorates 250th anniversary of the 'great American battle,' the Battle of Bunker Hill

NEW YORK (AP) — As the U.S. marks the 250th anniversary of the Battle of Bunker Hill, it might take a moment — or more — to remember why. Start with the very name. 'There's something percussive about it: Battle of Bunker Hill,' says prize-winning historian Nathaniel Philbrick, whose 'Bunker Hill: A City, A Siege, A Revolution' was published in 2013. 'What actually happened probably gets hazy for people outside of the Boston area, but it's part of our collective memory and imagination.' 'Few 'ordinary' Americans could tell you that Freeman's Farm, or Germantown, or Guilford Court House were battles,' says Paul Lockhart, a professor of history at Wright University and author of a Bunker Hill book, 'The Whites of Their Eyes," which came out in 2011. "But they can say that Gettysburg,D-Day, and Bunker Hill were battles.' Bunker Hill, Lockhart adds, 'is the great American battle, if there is such a thing.' Much of the world looks to the Battles of Lexington and Concord, fought in Massachusetts on April 19, 1775, as the start of the American Revolution. But Philbrick, Lockhart and others cite Bunker Hill and June 17 as the real beginning, the first time British and rebel forces faced off in sustained conflict over a specific piece of territory. Bunker Hill was an early showcase for two long-running themes in American history — improvisation and how an inspired band of militias could hold their own against an army of professionals. 'It was a horrific bloodletting, and provided the British high command with proof that the Americans were going to be a lot more difficult to subdue than had been hoped,' says the Pulitzer Prize-winning historian Rick Atkinson, whose second volume of a planned trilogy on the Revolution, 'The Fate of the Day,' was published in April. The battle was born in part out of error; rebels were seeking to hold off a possible British attack by fortifying Bunker Hill, a 110-foot-high (34-meter-high) peak in Charlestown across the Charles River from British-occupied Boston. But for reasons still unclear, they instead armed a smaller and more vulnerable ridge known as Breed's Hill, 'within cannon shot of Boston,' Philbrick says. "The British felt they had no choice but to attack and seize the American fort.' Abigail Adams, wife of future President John Adams, and son John Quincy Adams, also a future president, were among thousands in the Boston area who looked on from rooftops, steeples and trees as the two sides fought with primal rage. A British officer would write home about the 'shocking carnage' left behind, a sight 'that never will be erased out of my mind 'till the day of my death.' The rebels were often undisciplined and disorganized and they were running out of gunpowder. The battle ended with them in retreat, but not before the British had lost more than 200 soldiers and sustained more than 1,000 casualties, compared to some 450 colonial casualties and the destruction of hundreds of homes, businesses and other buildings in Charlestown. Bunker Hill would become characteristic of so much of the Revolutionary War: a technical defeat that was a victory because the British needed to win decisively and the rebels needed only not to lose decisively. 'Nobody now entertains a doubt but that we are able to cope with the whole force of Great Britain, if we are but willing to exert ourselves,' Thomas Jefferson wrote to a friend in early July. 'As our enemies have found we can reason like men, now let us show them we can fight like men also.'

JoJo Siwa claims she felt ‘pressured' into coming out as a lesbian: ‘I kind of boxed myself in'
JoJo Siwa claims she felt ‘pressured' into coming out as a lesbian: ‘I kind of boxed myself in'

New York Post

time4 hours ago

  • New York Post

JoJo Siwa claims she felt ‘pressured' into coming out as a lesbian: ‘I kind of boxed myself in'

JoJo Siwa has shared some surprising details about her coming out experience. The former 'Dance Moms' star, 22, has revealed that she felt 'pressured' into coming out as a lesbian in an interview with the Daily Mail's YOU Magazine published on Friday, June 20. 'When I came out at 17, I said: 'I'm pansexual, because I don't care,'' Siwa explained. 'But then I kind of boxed myself in and I said: 'I'm a lesbian.' And I think I did that because of pressure.' 8 JoJo Siwa has shared some surprising details about her coming out experience. This Morning/YouTube 8 'But then I kind of boxed myself in and I said: 'I'm a lesbian.' And I think I did that because of pressure,' she revealed. Paige Kahn for Page Six Siwa claimed that she felt 'pressured' to come out as a lesbian from people she knew and members of the LGBTQ+ community. 'From people I know, from partners I've had,' she continued. 'You just get put in this world where you feel like, because you now have said, 'Oh, I'm a lesbian,' you have to be a lesbian. And the truth is, sexuality is fluid.' Siwa, who came out publicly in 2021, previously reflected on her sexuality earlier this year while competing on 'Celebrity Big Brother UK.' 8 Siwa came out publicly in 2021 when she was 17. Getty Images for GLAAD 8 Siwa realized she no longer identified as a lesbian while competing on 'Celebrity Big Brother UK' earlier this year. Christopher Peterson / Although she initially identified as a lesbian, it wasn't until competing on the show that she realized she was queer. 'I feel, like, so queer, do you know what I mean?' she told fellow contestant and 'RuPaul's Drag Race UK' alum Danny Beard. 'I've always told myself I'm a lesbian, and I think being here I've realized: 'Oh, I'm not a lesbian, I'm queer.' And I think that's really cool.' 'I've dropped the L and I've gone to the Q baby!' Siwa added at the time. 'That's what I love about sexuality.' 8 The 'Dance Moms' alum recently confirmed that she is dating her 'Celebrity Big Brother UK' co-contestant Chris Hughes. 8 Siwa and Hughes' relationship was rumored to be the main reason behind her split from ex-partner Kath Ebbs in April. Instagram/@kathebbs More recently, the reality star-turned-musician revealed that she was dating 'Love Island UK' star Chris Hughes. The pair met while they were both competing on 'Celebrity Big Brother UK,' and there were rumors that Siwa's 'beautiful' relationship with Hughes was what led to her split from her previous partner, Kath Ebbs, during the show's season finale afterparty on April 26. 'In terms of Mr. Christopher, I don't know,' Ebbs, who identifies as non-binary, said in a fiery TikTok clip shared after their split from Siwa. 8 Siwa confirmed she was dating Hughes during an interview published on June 2. chrishughesofficial/Instagram 8 'It's not platonic anymore, and it's been a beautiful development, a beautiful connection, and I'm absolutely head over heels for him, and he's the same way,' Siwa said of Hughes. 'I have opinions,' Ebbs added in the since-deleted video. 'I'm not gonna say them now. In terms of their relationship, that's their journey, enjoy.' Siwa later confirmed she was dating Hughes, 32, during an interview with The Guardian published on June 2. 'It's not platonic anymore, and it's been a beautiful development, a beautiful connection, and I'm absolutely head over heels for him, and he's the same way,' she said of her new boyfriend.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store