Trump joins Iran war: US bombs nuke sites-But did the Ayatollah just win?

AI image for representation only.
At 2:00am Tehran time, American B-2 bombers unleashed the most direct attack on Iran since the Islamic Republic was founded in 1979. Three nuclear sites-Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan-were pummeled with over 75 precision-guided munitions and Tomahawk missiles in a campaign US President
Donald Trump
claimed 'completely and totally obliterated' Iran's nuclear infrastructure.
But the impact wasn't only military. It was psychological. It was political. And it was, perhaps, paradoxical.
Why it matters
Trump's dramatic decision to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities may have delivered a powerful message to Tehran but also an unintended gift: strengthening Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his regime that was increasingly isolated, domestically unpopular, and weakened by years of internal dissent.
Trump's move, aimed at crushing Iran's nuclear ambitions and demonstrating American might, also reshaped the internal dynamics of the Islamic Republic. In the face of foreign aggression, even Iranians who oppose the regime found themselves rallying behind the flag - handing Khamenei a rare nationalist boost at a time of political fragility.
A group of prominent Iranian civil society figures - long-time critics of the regime - condemned the attacks, calling them 'detrimental to the human rights and democracy-seeking efforts of Iranian civil society.'
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Envie de tuer le temps sur l'ordinateur ? Ce jeu de l'an 2025 est un must !
Forge Of Empires
Jouer
Undo
The big picture
The US military, led by B-2 bombers and Tomahawk missiles, struck three major Iranian nuclear facilities:
Fordo
, Natanz, and Isfahan. These facilities were at the heart of Iran's uranium enrichment program.
Trump declared 'monumental damage' to the sites, writing on Truth Social that the deepest damage occurred 'far below ground level. Bullseye!!!'
Israel followed up with its own barrage, including strikes on missile sites and suspected command centers in Tehran, Kermanshah, and Bushehr.
But satellite imagery and expert assessments tell a more complicated story: while Iran's nuclear infrastructure took a hit, much of its enriched uranium and centrifuges may have been relocated ahead of the attack.
The road to Fordo
The nuclear facility at Fordo was built deep in a mountain, out of reach of most conventional weapons-except America's 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs. Trump deployed them for the first time in combat, declaring the target a 'bullseye.' Satellite imagery showed gaping craters at the site.
But what about what was inside?
Iranian officials, including those from the Atomic Energy Organization, claimed their most enriched uranium had already been moved.
Intelligence experts can't confirm the extent of underground damage, and some believe Iran's nuclear assets are now more dispersed-and harder to target-than ever.
'This is an incomplete strike,' Jeffrey Lewis, a weapons expert and professor at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies, told AP. 'If this is all there is, here's what's left: the entire stockpile of 60% uranium, which was stored at Isfahan in tunnels that are untouched,' Lewis added.
What they're saying
'Mr Trump, the gambler, you may start this war, but we will be the ones to end it,' declared Iranian military spokesman Ebrahim Zolfaqari.
Trump doubled down on social media: 'If the current
Iranian Regime
is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change???'
Richard Haass, president emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations, told CNN: 'This never would have happened had they had nuclear weapons … They may now sprint toward one.'
Zoom in
The nationalist reflex Trump triggered is deeply rooted in Iran's modern history. Since the CIA-backed coup in 1953 that toppled a democratically elected government, suspicion of foreign interference - especially from the US - has been a defining theme in Iranian politics.
Even during the recent mass protests against the clerical regime, few demonstrators called for Western intervention. That ethos flared again after the strikes. A mural in Tehran was repainted recently: the American flag, with stars replaced by skulls and stripes as falling bombs, towers over a main boulevard. The 'Death to America' slogan remains etched into public spaces.
The result: a regime many Iranians despise was suddenly able to posture as the protector of the nation.
Between the lines
There's a profound irony in the timing. Before the attack, Tehran's regime faced growing unrest. The once-vibrant reform movement had long since faltered. Crackdowns on protests in cities and small towns had turned many Iranians against their rulers. Trust in the ballot box was gone. Ayatollah Khamenei - aging and reportedly nominating his own successors - was presiding over a brittle system.
But by launching military strikes on Iranian soil, the US - and Israel - allowed the Islamic Republic to reclaim a narrative it had lost: that of resisting imperial aggression.
This sentiment is not just theoretical. In practice, it has meant increased government control, tighter censorship, and the silencing of opposition voices - now easier to justify under the guise of national defense.
The intrigue
The attack has sparked geopolitical ripple effects far beyond Iran:
Russia: Hosting Iranian officials, Moscow warned of 'Pandora's box' being opened by US aggression.
The UN: Secretary-General António Guterres feared a 'rathole of retaliation.'
Global oil markets: Prices surged to their highest levels since January amid fears of wider conflict.
What Trump wanted vs. what he got:
Trump aimed to eliminate Iran's nuclear capability, deter future threats, and perhaps even force a regime change.
He invoked strength, promising peace through overwhelming power.
But what he may have achieved
Reigniting anti-American fervor inside Iran.
Rallying Iranians around a regime they otherwise loathed.
Escalating a conflict that could outlast his presidency - and potentially ensnare the US in another Middle East quagmire.
Vice President JD Vance tried to reassure Americans that the US does not seek regime change. But Trump undercut that message himself, posting: 'Why wouldn't there be a Regime change???'
What's next
Iran's next steps could define the region's future - and Trump's legacy.
The regime's military options:
Missile retaliation:
Already underway with strikes on Tel Aviv and threats against US bases.
Strait of Hormuz closure: I
ran could throttle one-fifth of the world's oil supply, sparking a global crisis.
Proxy attacks:
From Lebanon to Yemen, Iran's network of allies could be activated, though many have been degraded by Israel's recent offensives.
But there's another, quieter possibility: a dash to the bomb.
Experts fear that humiliation on the global stage may convince Iranian leaders that only a nuclear deterrent can ensure their survival.
Darya Dolzikova, a nonproliferation expert at the Royal United Services Institute, warned that Iran may have 'already moved' critical nuclear materials to unknown sites. The IAEA has yet to inspect the bombed facilities to confirm the extent of the damage.
The bottom line
Trump's strikes may have damaged centrifuges, but they didn't decapitate the Iranian regime. Instead, they may have reinvigorated it - uniting a fractured society against a common foreign enemy and setting the stage for a prolonged and dangerous confrontation.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Business Standard

24 minutes ago

• Business Standard

Did he casually use 'N' word? Trump slams Medvedev over Iran nuke comments

US President Donald Trump has hit out at former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev for suggesting that some countries may be ready to supply nuclear warheads to Iran in response to recent American airstrikes. In a strongly worded post on Truth Social, Trump said: "Did I hear Former President Medvedev, from Russia, casually throwing around the 'N word' (Nuclear!), and saying that he and other Countries would supply Nuclear Warheads to Iran? Did he really say that or, is it just a figment of my imagination? If he did say that, and, if confirmed, please let me know, IMMEDIATELY," he wrote. "I guess that's why Putin's 'THE BOSS,' he added. Trump also highlighted the technological edge of the United States in nuclear weaponry. He said US nuclear submarines are '20 years advanced over the pack' and expressed gratitude to the submarine crews involved in the recent strikes on Iranian nuclear targets. 'Russia has no intention of supplying nuclear weapons to Iran' Responding to Trump's concern, Medmedev, in a post on X, said, "Regarding President Trump's concerns: I condemn the US strike on Iran – it failed to achieve its objectives. However, Russia has no intention of supplying nuclear weapons to Iran because, unlike Israel, we are parties to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty." — Dmitry Medvedev (@MedvedevRussiaE) June 23, 2025 He added, "I know quite well what this would entail, having overseen our nuclear forces as president. But other countries might – and that's what was said. And we definitely shouldn't be arguing over who has more nukes. All the more so because the New START treaty, which I once signed with a US president, is still in force — for now. The question is: what comes next?" Strikes failed to damage Iran's nuclear programme: Medvedev The Trump-Medvedev comes after a series of posts by Dmitry Medvedev on X (formerly Twitter), where he claimed that the US-led strikes failed to cause serious harm to Iran's nuclear infrastructure. He argued that the attacks might have strengthened Iran's position and escalated tensions in the Middle East. 'Critical infrastructure of the nuclear fuel cycle appears to have been unaffected or sustained only minor damage. The enrichment of nuclear material — and, now we can say it outright, the future production of nuclear weapons — will continue. A number of countries are ready to directly supply Iran with their own nuclear warheads,' Medvedev wrote. 'US now entangled in new conflict' Medvedev painted a grim picture of the situation in the region: 'Israel is under attack, explosions are rocking the country, and people are panicking. The US is now entangled in a new conflict, with prospects of a ground operation looming on the horizon.' In his posts, Medvedev blamed Trump for pushing the US into yet another war and mocked any chances the American president might have had of receiving international recognition for peace efforts. 'Iran's political regime has survived — and in all likelihood, has come out even stronger. The people are rallying around the country's spiritual leadership, including those who were previously indifferent or opposed to it. Donald Trump, once hailed as 'president of peace,' has now pushed the US into another war,' he stated. 'The vast majority of countries around the world oppose the actions of Israel and the United States. At this rate, Trump can forget about the Nobel Peace Prize — not even with how rigged it has become. What a way to kick things off, Mr. President. Congratulations!' Medvedev added.

Hindustan Times

27 minutes ago

• Hindustan Times

Iran-Israel conflict: What are the key US military bases in Middle East?

As tensions surge in the Middle East, Iran has warned of 'severe consequences' for the United States after US and Israeli forces launched coordinated strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. Iranian state television declared that every American citizen or military personnel in West Asia is now on Tehran's radar, per Reuters. The warning came after US airstrikes hit key sites in Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. This handout satellite photo obtained from Planet Labs PBC and dated May 20, 2025, shows a view of the Natanz nuclear enrichment facility in central Iran.(AFP) Iranian editor Hossein Shariatmadari, a close associate of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, reportedly wrote an editorial urging immediate retaliation. 'We must launch a missile strike on the US naval fleet in Bahrain and simultaneously close the Strait of Hormuz,' he wrote. With Washington bracing for likely retaliation, here's a breakdown of major US military bases across the Middle East: Bahrain Bahrain hosts the US Navy's Fifth Fleet and the US Naval Forces Central Command. The Gulf kingdom provides deep-water port access for large US vessels, including aircraft carriers. It also houses four anti-mine ships, two logistical support ships, and several US Coast Guard vessels. The facility has been used by the US Navy since 1948, initially operated by Britain's Royal Navy. Qatar Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar is the largest American military installation in the Middle East. It houses CENTCOM's forward headquarters, US Air Force elements, and special operations units. The base also supports the 379th Air Expeditionary Wing and routinely hosts rotating combat aircraft. Iraq US military installations in Iraq include Al Asad Air Base in Al-Anbar Governorate and Al Harir Air Base in Erbil. Approximately 2,500 US troops are stationed here under the anti-ISIS coalition. Al Asad was previously targeted by Iranian missiles in 2020, following the killing of General Qasem Soleimani. ALSO READ: US strikes on Iran: What are Tehran's options against Donald Trump-led nation? Syria In southern Syria, near the borders with Iraq and Jordan, the US maintains Al Tanf Garrison. The base has served as a strategic point for operations against the Islamic State. It also plays a role in monitoring regional movements of Iranian-linked militias. Kuwait Kuwait's Ali Al-Salem Air Base is situated around 20 miles from the Iraqi border. It is used by the 386th Air Expeditionary Wing for airlift operations. Camp Arifjan, another key site, serves as the forward headquarters of the US Army's CENTCOM component and hosts prepositioned military equipment. UAE Al Dhafra Air Base in the UAE is home to the 380th Air Expeditionary Wing. The facility operates F-22 Raptor fighter jets, MQ-9 Reaper drones, and surveillance aircraft. It also hosts the Gulf Air Warfare Centre, which supports air and missile defense training for US and allied forces. FAQs: 1. Why has Iran threatened US military bases in the Middle East? Iran issued the threat after US and Israeli airstrikes targeted three of its nuclear facilities. 2. Which is the largest US military base in the Middle East? Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar is the largest US military installation in the region. 3. Has Iran attacked any US base before? Yes, Iran targeted Iraq's Al Asad Air Base in 2020 after the killing of General Qasem Soleimani. 4. What is the role of the US base in Bahrain? Bahrain hosts the US Navy's Fifth Fleet, responsible for key naval operations across the Persian Gulf and surrounding waters.

Time of India

29 minutes ago

• Time of India

Iran Israel war: Why has Iran attacked US military base Al Udeid air base in Qatar? Here are reasons

Iran Israel war witnessed a massive escalation as Tehran attacked US military base in Qatar -- Al Udeid Air Base. While, Iranian authority has multiple options, why did it target Al Udeid Air Base. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian attends a protest following the U.S. attacks on nuclear sites in Iran, in Tehran, Iran, Sunday, June 22, 2025. (AP Photo/Vahid Salemi) Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads US military base in Qatar -- Al Udeid Air Base -- was attacked on Monday by Iran. Tehran said that Iran launched missiles in answer to the American bombing of its nuclear enrichment facilities at Fordo, Isfahan, and Natanz. Earlier, Iran sent a stringent warning to Washington that it would target US military assets anywhere. Reports said that they saw missiles in the skies, followed by explosions, but it wasn't clear if there was any damage, AP the past, Iran has threatened American forces at Al Udeid Air Base, which hosts the forward headquarters of the U.S. military's Central Command. Al Udeid is also home to the Combined Air Operations Center, which provides command and control of airpower across the region as well as the 379th Air Expeditionary Wing, the largest expeditionary wing in the reporter on X tweeted that trump administration was aware of in advance of Iran's attack on Al-Udeid across the Persian Gulf from Iran, maintains diplomatic relations with Iran and shares a massive offshore natural gas field with announced on state television that it attacked American forces stationed at Qatar's Al Udeid Air Base. A caption on screen called it 'a mighty and successful response" to "America's aggression' as martial music attack came shortly after Qatar closed its airspace as a precaution amid threats from before the explosions, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian wrote on the social platform X: "We neither initiated the war nor seeking it. But we will not leave invasion to the great Iran without answer."A1. Al Udeid Air Base is located in Qatar. Al Udeid is also home to the Combined Air Operations Center, which provides command and control of airpower across the region as well as the 379th Air Expeditionary Wing, the largest expeditionary wing in the world.A2. Qatar, across the Persian Gulf from Iran, maintains diplomatic relations with Iran and shares a massive offshore natural gas field with Tehran.