Should water companies should be nationalised? Have your say
Yahoo UK's poll of the week lets you vote and indicate your strength of feeling on one of the week's hot topics. After the poll closes, we'll publish and analyse the results each Friday, giving readers the chance to see how polarising a topic has become and if their view chimes with other Yahoo UK readers.
The government has refused to be drawn on whether it plans to nationalise Thames Water, after a US private equity giant pulled out of plans for a rescue deal to keep the struggling provider afloat.
Britain's biggest water supplier, which has 16 million customers, chose KKR at the end of March to be its preferred bidder under plans to invest around £4bn of new equity.
Now, however, Thames Water says KKR is not 'in a position to proceed' and that its preferred bidder has dropped out.
KKR's withdrawal comes just days after talks with Downing Street officials, with sources close to the deal telling Sky News that the firm's New York-based executives were not comfortable with the risk of propping up Thames Water, which has about £19bn in debt.
Thames Water said it is instead taking forward talks with 'certain senior creditors' on an alternative plan, while consulting with regulator Ofwat.
These creditors are the bondholders who effectively own the firm after the High Court approved a financial restructuring loan of up to £3bn to keep the company running until summer 2026.
While the government has not abandoned helping to secure a new private-sector deal, the latest development raises the spectre of temporary nationalisation of Thames Water once more.
Environment Secretary Steve Reed insisted that 'Thames itself remains stable', but added: 'The government is clearly keeping a very close eye on what's going on.'
Water companies have faced public and political outrage over the extent of pollution, rising bills, high dividends, and executive pay and bonuses.
Thames Water hiked consumer water bills for customers by an average of 31% in April and incurred further wrath over plans to pay senior bosses large bonuses linked to the water company securing a £3bn emergency loan, which were later dropped.
Calls for the government to step in and take Thames Water into public hands have mounted further after the latest setback with KKR, with Lib Deb MP Charlie Maynard claiming: "The company is now at the end of the road.
'The government needs to bite the bullet and put Thames Water into special administration so its unsustainable debt can be written down and the interests of Thames Water's 16 million customers can be protected.'
Russ Mould, investment director at AJ Bell, said that Thames Water "has been like a sponge, soaking up debt and getting into a financial mess", and that it is looking increasingly like it will have to be nationalised.
He said that if the government did step in, it "would represent a soggy end to what's been a failed privatisation".
However, not everyone believes that nationalising water companies will serve the public's interests, including Lord Howard, who led the privatisationof the industry more than 30 years ago under Margaret Thatcher.
Defending payouts to investors as crucial to maintaining critical water infrastructure, he told BBC Radio 4 in 2023: "You can pay for them by borrowing, in which case interest has to be paid to the lenders, or you can pay for them by raising private capital, in which case dividends have to be paid to the people who provide that capital.
"That is the only choice available, there is no free lunch."
Water UK argues that before privatisation, England's water system was "underfunded, inefficient, with poor service and a disastrous environmental record which left rivers and beaches badly polluted", adding that investment "doubled" afterwards.
Environment Secretary Steve Reed has said nationalisation was 'not the answer' to a failed bid to rescue Thames Water, claiming public ownership could pull money away from the NHS.
Speaking in Parliament today, Reed said 'We are not looking at nationalisation because it would cost over £100bn of public money that would have had to be taken away from other public services like the National Health Service to be given to the owners of the water companies.
'It will take years to unpick the current model of ownership, during which time pollution would get worse and we know that nationalisation is not the answer – you only have to look at the situation in Scotland to see that."
However, the government's £100bn figure has been called into question, with The Guardian reporting in September last year that the number was based in a 2018 report by the Social Market Foundation think tank, which was commissioned by United Utilities, Anglian Water, Severn Trent and South West Water.
Economist Sir Dieter Helm described the analysis as 'economically illiterate', while Moody's rating agency estimated that nationalisation could cost a £14.5bn – nearly a tenth of the government's estimate.
Looking at Thames Water specifically, consultancy firm Teno has suggested temporary nationalisation, over an 18-month period, could cost between £3.4bn and £4.1bn.
So, what do you think? Is it time to nationalise the UK's water industry? Let us know in the poll below?
Should water companies should be nationalised and run in the public sector?Come back on Friday to read the results and analysis via the link below.
Read more of Yahoo UK's Poll of the Week articles
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
25 minutes ago
- Washington Post
On Dobbs anniversary, Senate Democrats aim to restart abortion conversation
Just weeks after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, Nancy Davis learned that her fetus had a fatal cranial condition. She sought an abortion in her home state of Louisiana, but a 'trigger law' took effect shortly after the June 2022 decision. The law banned nearly all abortions in the state, and doctors were unsure if Davis's case fell within its few exceptions, forcing her to travel to New York to have an abortion. Now, three years post-Roe, Davis worries for patients who may still face the kind of excruciating decisions about their pregnancies that she did. On Tuesday, she will help Senate Democrats as they try to bring abortion and reproductive health care back to the forefront on the anniversary of the Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization. 'I know these women who are currently going through it need someone to say 'I see you,'' Davis told The Washington Post. ''I believe you.'' In a forum designed to resemble a congressional hearing at the Capitol, Davis will share her story with an audience of Senate Democrats and members of the press alongside other witnesses, including two abortion providers. They will speak about their experiences in the three years since the high court eliminated the nearly 50-year constitutional right to an abortion — part of an ongoing effort from some Democrats to keep steadfast attention on the issue. The event, known as a shadow hearing, allows for a public forum to be held without conducting an official Senate hearing, which would've required approval from Republican leaders who chair committees. The move comes at a time when abortion appears to have drifted away from where it once stood as a key political issue. Though President Donald Trump has repeatedly taken credit for appointing the justices who solidified the landmark Dobbs decision, he said on the campaign trail last year that he would veto a federal abortion ban and leave abortion law up to the states. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment Sunday. When Roe fell in 2022, conservatives claimed it as a massive victory. For liberals, it served as a sign of the ground the GOP gained while the Democratic Party struggled to muster enough votes to pass national abortion legislation over the past decade. Sen. Patty Murray (D-Washington), one of the four Democratic lawmakers leading the Dobbs anniversary messaging, said that since Trump took office, his administration has steadily launched smaller scale antiabortion efforts, which she said amount to a 'national abortion ban behind the scenes.' 'Because there's so much going on, and because it's little by little and piece by piece, women don't collectively see what is coming at them,' Murray told The Post. Among the efforts Murray referenced is the GOP's budget bill, which includes a provision that would halt Medicaid payments to abortion providers who received more than $1 million in federal reimbursements in 2024 — a measure that would mean funding cuts to Planned Parenthood, one of the biggest reproductive health care providers in the United States. Senate Republicans are racing to meet Trump's July 4 deadline to pass their version of the bill. Leading the Democratic messaging on this year's Dobbs anniversary alongside Murray are Sens. Elizabeth Warren (Massachusetts), Tammy Baldwin (Wisconsin) and Tina Smith (Minnesota), all of whom have been vocal about the need to protect abortion access and other reproductive health advocacy. Murray said they will highlight a medley of actions from the Trump administration related to reproductive health over the past six months — some of them undoing Biden-era efforts to protect abortion access. Within days of assuming the presidency, Trump pardoned 23 people who were convicted of blocking access to reproductive health clinics, many of them during the Biden administration for violating the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act, or Face Act. This month, Republicans prepared a bill that if passed would repeal the Face Act altogether. Also in January, Trump overturned two executive orders signed by President Joe Biden that aimed to expand access to reproductive care. And in early June, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services rescinded Biden-era guidance that required hospitals to provide emergency abortions when needed to stabilize patients, regardless of the state where they were receiving treatment. For Davis, who still lives in Louisiana and has become a reproductive health advocate, the ongoing changes have made her afraid that more patients will be unable to receive the care they choose in a timely manner. It's a fear that's been on her mind constantly, she said, especially as a mother to three girls, one of whom was born in the time since her 2022 nonviable pregnancy. Sharing her story again this week, Davis said, 'gives us a chance to stand up before any more harm is done.' 'For me, it's about protecting the next woman, the next family, the next mother,' she said.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Oil rises and US stock futures slide as markets react to US strike on Iran nuclear sites
NEW YORK (AP) — The price of oil rose and U.S. stock futures fell as global markets react to the U.S. strike against nuclear targets in Iran. The price of Brent crude oil, the international standard, rose 3.9% to $80 a barrel. U.S. crude rose 4.3% to $77 a barrel. Futures for the S&P 500 fell 0.6%. Treasury yields fell slightly. On Saturday, U.S. forces attacked three Iranian nuclear and military sites, further increasing the stakes in the war between Israel and Iran. The conflict has sent oil prices yo-yoing over the last week, which has in turn caused see-saw moves for the U.S. stock market, because of rising and ebbing fears that the war could disrupt the global flow of crude. Iran is a major producer of oil and also sits on the narrow Strait of Hormuz, through which much of the world's crude passes. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Who is running in the Rochester mayoral race? Here's what to know
As we enter primary election season residents will have three Democratic candidates to choose from for mayor of Rochester. The three candidates going up against each other for the upcoming primary are incumbent Mayor Malik Evans, City Councilmember Mary Lupien and IT Executive Shashi Sinha. This election comes at a time when residents are concerned about the city's sanctuary policy, the cost of living, transparency efforts and the overall future of Rochester. As part of the Democrat and Chronicle's effort to introduce voters to their mayoral candidates, we reached out to each nominee for their input and opinions on the issues most important to them. The answers of candidates who responded are presented in their entirety and have been lightly edited only where necessary for clarity. What makes you a qualified candidate? I have served as mayor for the past four years. Prior to serving as mayor I spent over 20 years in the Financial Services Industry helping people build a strong financial future. I have a long record of service to the Rochester community. As mayor I have expanded housing access, launched the Office of Violence Prevention and the Office of Financial Empowerment. What would be your primary area of emphasis in office? We would continue to expand a broad array of housing options for residents, expand economic opportunity, continue to make public safety a priority, focus on mental health and address the opioid crisis. What's a change in direction you would work toward in office? We would expand our Ambassador Program related to the opioid epidemic. The opioid epidemic has been ravaging communities across the country and Rochester-Monroe is no different. We will expand this direction to stop the scourge of the opioid epidemic which has become a silent killer. What makes you a qualified candidate? I'm a single mom, a teacher and a city councilmember who's been on the frontlines of Rochester's biggest challenges. I've spent the last 20 years working in housing, food security and education and the last five years passing bold policies that invest directly in our people like the Person in Crisis Team, tenant protections and violence prevention. I live in a working-class neighborhood, my daughter attends the RCSD and I know firsthand how our systems fail our families. I'm not backed by wealthy donors or political insiders. I'm backed by neighbors who are tired of broken promises. I've proven I have the courage to stand up to powerful interests and the passion to co-govern with our people. I'm running for mayor because Rochester needs leadership rooted in lived experience, not status quo politics. We deserve a city that works for all of us and I'm ready to deliver on that vision. What would be your primary area of emphasis in office? My primary focus as mayor will be investing directly in our people. For too long, our city has prioritized developers and flashy projects while our neighborhoods go underfunded and underserved. I will launch an Affordable Housing Action Plan that ends encampment sweeps, accelerates Housing First strategies, and breaks down barriers to homeownership. I'll create a Public Safety Transformation Team to expand community responders so residents get the right help in a crisis and police can focus on serious crime. I'll expand youth programming like jobs, mentoring, arts and sports so every young person sees a future for themselves in Rochester. And I'll push to replace RG&E with a public utility and launch a public bank so our city's money works for us. These are not just policies they are investments in the people who make Rochester home. What's a change in direction you would work toward in office? A key change I'll bring is reimagining the role of mayor from a gatekeeper of the status quo to a true advocate for the people. In times of crisis, residents shouldn't face punishment for being poor. No more encampment sweeps. No more waiting for outside investment to trickle down. Our community deserves a mayor who stands up for our most vulnerable, puts people before profit and demands accountability from every system that serves us. I will also fight for democracy in all its forms-protecting voting rights, defending our sanctuary status and making government more accessible and responsive. That means co-governing with the people of Rochester. We'll make decisions together, through participatory processes that center those most impacted. It's time to raise the bar for leadership with transparency, compassion and the courage to act boldly for the common good. What makes you a qualified candidate? I am not a career politician. I am a small business owner and a technology leader in corporate world where I define strategy and manage large budget. I have been living in Rochester for 14 years, raising my family and investing in the resurgence of old buildings other people gave up on. I am an immigrant, so I know firsthand the challenges. Now I am prepared to apply my experience to implement bold, actionable solutions that will address housing, crime, education and grow our economy. Others are managing decline. I am going to reverse it and lead this city forward. What would be your primary area of emphasis in office? My priority is fixing Rochester's public safety, housing crisis and education. These three foundational need are tightly interconnected and we can not get out of the current decline without addressing all three at the same time. My focus will also be growing our economy. I will build 4,000 affordable houses for ownership, not rent, with the city earning some revenue in the process. Property taxes would be gradually reduced by 40% over four years to relieve the burden of working families and seniors. I plan to drastically reduce crime. While no other mayoral candidate is talking about RCSD, I will not take a back seat. I am all about delivering results, not more studies or ribbon cuttings. I bring a bold, common-sense plan for the people, putting Rochester back on the map as a place families can call home again. What's a change in direction you would work toward in office? Rochester needs to stop managing decline and start building a future. I would shift the city's focus from reactive programs to bold proactive investment. My city run building effort to create 4,000 affordable homeownership units without any subsidies. So that residents can gain stability and wealth. I intend to cut property taxes by 40% over the next four years as a means of making it easy for families to keep going and stay here. I will also restore accountability in city government; enough ribbon cuttings with our streets still unsafe and our schools still underperforming. I will work instead of talk. This is what Rochester needs. — Kerria Weaver works as the Government and You reporter for the Democrat and Chronicle, with a focus on how government actions affect communities and neighborhoods in Rochester and in Monroe County. Get in touch at kweaver@ This article originally appeared on Rochester Democrat and Chronicle: Rochester 2025 mayoral primary race: Here's who the candidates are
