'Disturbing': Putin on World War III risk; flags concern over Israel-Iran conflict
Russian President Vladimir Putin (AP photo)
Russian President
Vladimir Putin
on Friday said he was worried when asked whether he feared the world was moving towards a potential World War III, reported news agency Reuters.
Speaking at an economic forum in St.
Petersburg, Putin noted that global conflict risks were increasing.
He pointed to Russia's own war in Ukraine and the ongoing tensions between Israel and Iran. Putin also raised concerns about developments around nuclear facilities in Iran, where Russian specialists are currently constructing two new nuclear reactors for Tehran.
"It is disturbing. I am speaking without any irony, without any jokes. Of course, there is a lot of conflict potential, it is growing, and it is right under our noses, and it affects us directly," said Putin.
He added, "And this requires, of course, not only our careful attention to the events taking place, but also the search for solutions, the search for solutions, preferably by peaceful means, in all directions."
Putin also said that Russia plans to expand military and technical cooperation with "friendly countries" by jointly producing weapons and training military personnel.
The Russian President said Moscow aimed to modernise its own armed forces by equipping them with the latest weapons and technology.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Eat 1 Teaspoon Every Night, See What Happens A Week Later [Video]
getfittoday
Undo
"We will harness new technology to improve the combat capabilities of the Russian armed forces, modernise military infrastructure facilities, (and) equip them with the latest technology and weapons and equipment," he said.
Putin emphasised that Russia's cooperation with friendly nations would go beyond arms supplies or equipment upgrades.
"At the same time, we intend to develop military-technical co-operation with friendly countries.
And we are talking not only about supplies or the modernisation of equipment and weapons, but also about joint development, personnel training, and the creation of turn-key enterprises and production facilities," he said, according to Reuters.
On the economic front, Putin said Russia planned to strengthen trade ties with its partners by removing barriers, opening new market opportunities, and deepening investment cooperation.
Putin has already offered to mediate between Iran and Israel amid escalating tensions in the Middle East. He claimed that Moscow's longstanding ties with both countries make it uniquely positioned to help broker peace.
'We are not imposing anything on anyone; we are simply talking about how we see a possible way out of the situation,' he said.
'But the decision, of course, is up to the political leadership of all these countries, primarily Iran and Israel.' Putin acknowledged the complexity of the crisis, saying 'it's a delicate issue,' but said that a solution to the conflict is possible.
'In my view, a solution could be found," the Russian president said. His comments come at a time of growing concern that Israeli strikes on Iranian targets and the potential for a wider war could draw in other regional and global powers.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
35 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
When America joins Israel's war with Iran
The US bombing of key Iranian nuclear facilities Sunday will have significant geopolitical implications for regional stability, global geopolitics, and India's immediate and medium-term interests. However, for now, it doesn't appear that the US-Israeli attack on Iran is likely to go all the way, making it improbable that Iran will be completely denuclearised or that the Islamic regime in Tehran will fall. A severely weakened Iranian regime is likely to respond with military and grey-zone tactics, increasing political and economic instability in the region. Moreover, neither Israel nor the US appear to have an endgame in mind in this war. The US-Israel attack will deepen divisions and sharpen existing global geopolitical fault lines (REUTERS) There are at least six key implications of this ongoing war. First, West Asia is likely to revert to a period of chaos, conflict, and uncertainty, at least for some time. Despite Iran's strained relations with many of its neighbours, the US decision to bomb Iranian nuclear facilities and join Israel's military campaign will make it difficult for other regional powers to resume efforts to normalise relations with Tel Aviv. Iran and its regime may not be popular in the Sunni strongholds of West Asia, but neither is Israel, especially given its actions in Gaza and the ongoing humanitarian tragedy there. Russia and China are likely to increase their geopolitical influence in the region, and neither will miss opportunities to challenge Israel and the US, making the regional balance even more complex and unpredictable. Second, the attack will deepen divisions and sharpen existing global geopolitical fault lines. While the US and Israel may achieve immediate military gains, many others will be dissatisfied: With their geopolitical standing threatened, they might seek to undermine the dominance established by the US-Israel alliance in the region. Many in the Global South are likely to condemn the unilateral actions and violations of international law by the US and Israel. Meanwhile, China will look to exploit the emerging regional fractures, while Moscow will seek to recover the influence it lost in West Asia — due to the fall of the Assad regime in Syria and now, through the attack on Iran — and spot an opportunity in the post-war scene. Interestingly, Europe has maintained a curious silence. However, it will inevitably ask why the US, which wanted its Nato partners to pay for their defence and abandoned Ukraine thus increasing Europe's insecurity, would resort to force in a distant country. Clearly, Trump has prioritised Israel over Nato allies; that rude reality won't be lost on Europe. Third, the American and Israeli attacks on Iran lack legitimacy under international law, and as a result, these will further undermine the credibility of the United Nations and weaken the influence of international law worldwide. For America's western partners, this presents several dilemmas. It will test their commitment to international legal frameworks as condemning the attack risks alienating Trump further, and not condemning it risks being seen as tacit support for an illegal action. Moreover, if they do not condemn the US action, the moral ground to criticise Russia will be considerably weakened. It also undermines the geopolitical standing of key western States, which were actively engaged in negotiations with the Iranian foreign minister in Geneva to end the conflict. They face the risk of losing credibility considering how Trump went ahead and bombed Iran ignoring the talks. Fourth, American engagement in the West Asian conflict could divert attention from Ukraine's ongoing war with Russia. The Iran war would be disastrous for Ukraine, especially as the US has been unable to bring Russia to the negotiating table. Meanwhile, Russia's gains on the battlefield are growing and Moscow shows no enthusiasm to negotiate a ceasefire with Kyiv. Fifth, the attempted denuclearisation of Iran will likely have the opposite effect internationally, prompting several other countries to consider developing their own nuclear weapons for after all those who possess nuclear weapons have little to fear. Rather than strengthening the global nuclear order, the US and Israel's military action to denuclearise Iran will end up weakening it, encouraging more States to pursue nuclear arms as insurance against potential threats. Ukraine gave up its nuclear arsenal, while Iran failed to reach the finish line; both faced significant consequences. Israel developed its nuclear programme secretly, North Korea built its nuclear weapons at great domestic cost, and India and Pakistan developed theirs despite sanctions and US pressure. The lessons are many, and will not be lost on nuclear aspirants around the world. Finally, for India, the war in West Asia will likely unsettle the country's grand plans for broader engagement with the region. Energy prices are likely to spike, while heightened geopolitical divides will challenge India's ability to manage regional fault lines. If the war spreads or persists, it could also impact Indian nationals in the region and the remittances they send home. Moreover, the Iran conflict will, at least for the moment, stall India's regional plans for the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC) and the Chabahar port in Iran, projected as India's gateway to central Asia. Happymon Jacob teaches India's foreign policy at Jawaharlal Nehru University and is the editor of INDIA'S WORLD magazine. The views expressed are personal
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
Did Steve Bannon know about Operation Midnight Hammer? His 'party is on' dropped the first clue
Steve Bannon dropped the first clue of a possible US attack on Iran when he said this was going to be a big weekend. Donald Trump's former advisor Steve Bannon dropped the first clue of something big happening this weekend in his podcast Saturday when he said 'the party is on'. 'I'm just reporting what I'm hearing from pretty good sources. The party is on," Steve Bannon said when Trump officially bought two weeks time to decide on joining Israel in its attack on Iran. 'So another big weekend in this unfolding aspect of the Third World War, and no, anyone that's telling you that the Third World War is not here absolutely does not understand the development and evolution of kinetic energy," Steve Bannon who earlier urged the president to not get involved in the Israel-Iran war said. Bannon visited the White House earlier this week, just hours before the president announced the two-week deadline for himself to make a decision on his next steps in Iran. It was, however, after Trump apparently approved the attack plan, going by the report of the Wall Street Journal. Reports said Bannon arrived at the White House armed with specific talking points, including that Israeli intelligence was unreliable, that the bunker-buster bomb might not work as planned, and the risk an attack posed to American troops stationed in the Middle East. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Get Matched with a Licensed Therapist Today Affordable Online Counseling | Search Ads Learn More Undo Pentagon Sunday announced that Operation Midnight Hammer was very classified and only a few people had the knowledge about it. Top Republicans were briefed about the operation According to multiple GOP sources, the top two Republicans in Congress who were briefed about the US strikes on three Iran nuclear plans ahead of time were House Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune. But Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries received notifications shortly before the public announcement. 'Leaders in Congress were aware of the urgency of this situation and the Commander-in-Chief evaluated that the imminent danger outweighed the time it would take for Congress to act,' Mike Johnson wrote on X, defending Trump's decision. 'The President fully respects the Article I power of Congress, and tonight's necessary, limited, and targeted strike follows the history and tradition of similar military actions under presidents of both parties. '
Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
Mamata's Jagannath prasad drive sparks row as BJP accuses her distributing 'stale' sweets
Kolkata: Amid allegations against West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee trying to woo the Hindu votebank before 2026, the West Bengal government has started distributing 'prasad' from the new Jagannathdham temple in Digha at the doorsteps of more than 10 million households across the state. BJP attacked West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee on the issue. The door-to-door delivery of the prasad started from June 17 and the process is likely to continue till July 4. The state government is making use of the network of ration shops and ration dealers to deliver the prasad at the door-step of the households. However, a fresh controversy has erupted over the government's initiative of distributing prasad from the temple. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Accounting Automation Software Might Help You To Earn More Accounting Automation Software | Search ads Undo Leader of Opposition (LoP) in state assembly Suvendu Adhiakri said that instead of original prasad, 'stale' sweets are procured from local sweetmeat shops. Adhikari even said that the state government has no authority to distribute such 'prasad'. Banerjee will participate in the Rath yatra in Digha's newly constructed temple on April 27. Live Events Earlier, a series of controversies had erupted over the Jagannath temple in Digha, a brainchild of the chief minister, was inaugurated on April 30. The West Bengal chief minister had inaugurated the newly constructed Jagannath Temple in the coastal town of Digha in West Bengal on the auspicious day of Akshay Tritiya on April 30. Modelled on Puri Jagannath temple, the Jagannath Dham , built at a cost of Rs 250 crore, was consecrated. While the TMC-led West Bengal government aims to boost religious tourism with the new Jagannath dham modelled on Puri's temple, touching Hindutva sentiments ahead of 2026 assembly polls, the Jagganath Dham is seen as Chief Minister's Hindu outreach by opposition BJP. BJP had gone on an all-out attack over the inauguration of a temple complex using state government funds, Chief Minister trying to woo Hindus ahead of polls next year and absence of the Chief Minister in Kolkata during the major fire which took 15 lives.
