Pentagon looks to leverage AI in fight against drones

The Pentagon's new strategy focused on countering drones aims to respond to the future of warfare as autonomous unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) are set to dominate the battlefield in the years ahead, but the defense industry faces a long road ahead to field new and emerging technologies to meet the U.S. ambition.
The Replicator 2 initiative looks to counter-UAS and leverage next-generation technology, such as artificial intelligence (AI), to defend against swarms of attack drones.
While the effort is still young and has time to evolve, industry players are just now exploring new technology and a vision for the new era has yet to fully emerge, including which technologies might shape the new drone defense landscape.
Set to lead this initiative are smaller defense tech firms that are testing a range of ways to counter these swarms, from lasers to portable guns and tracking systems.
Mary-Lou Smulders, chief marketing officer at Dedrone, said modern warfare 'has been completely and irrevocably changed' by drones, underscoring the need to rise and meet the new threat.
'If we as the United States want to maintain aerospace superiority, I think we've got to be very much on our toes and very focused on getting it right — not just how much money you put into it, but equally important, how quickly you can execute and continue to innovate,' she said.
Global conflicts have already created something of a road map for the Pentagon as it looks toward the future.
In Ukraine, drones have dominated the battlefield, as both Russian and Ukrainian forces blast each other's positions with explosive unmanned flying vehicles. AI drones that are just around the corner from full-scale deployment are expected to dramatically raise the threat level.
But the U.S. military has already struggled to defend against these types of drone threats in the Navy's yearlong Red Sea fight against the Iranian-backed Houthis.
While the U.S. has shot down the majority of the rebel group's rockets, the Navy is spending millions of dollars using one interceptor to shoot down a drone that costs just thousands of dollars to make.
The discrepancy in the Red Sea battle is heightening the need for new, cheaper and more effective solutions.
Dedrone is one of the leading companies in the counterdrone space, with a software system called DedroneTracker.AI that uses sensors to pull together data for analysis on drone threats. The software can also integrate with a jammer device called DedroneDefender.
Smulders said Dedrone, which has 120 public safety agencies and 15 federal agencies as customers, including the Pentagon, wants to move into the future with 'bigger, better' radars and cameras, along with leveraging AI for more sophisticated algorithms for tracking drones.
'We don't actually have a picture of this yet. But it could happen where there's something coming in, but there's a helicopter also in the frame, and [the goal is] labeling and teaching the software these [different] cases through synthetic data,' she said.
The Biden administration in 2023 created the Replicator initiative, the first phase of which focuses on fielding thousands of autonomous drones within two years. The deadline is set for August of this year.
The second phase of Replicator, centered on countering those systems, was announced in October 2024.
A more detailed plan for the future of counter-UAS was released in December by former Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, who said the Pentagon would focus on defending critical infrastructure from autonomous drones and against the 'rapid evolution' of evolving new weapons.
'These cheap systems are increasingly changing the battlefield, threatening U.S. installations, and wounding or killing our troops,' Austin wrote. 'The character of war is changing, and we will change with it.'
Austin's strategy outlined several key priorities: restructuring force positions and infrastructure to prepare for the threat, developing new defensive systems and working to rapidly field them, and disabling enemy drone threats by accessing their shared networks.
The Trump administration will not make any changes to the basic contours of Replicator, according to Eric Pahon, a public affairs adviser to the deputy secretary of defense.
'There are no changes to announce regarding the Replicator 1 and Replicator 2 initiatives or their timelines,' he said in a statement.
The work is already being done to meet the demands of the second Replicator phase, with factories, research labs and testing areas whirring to life across the country.
Virginia-based Advanced Technology Systems Company is known for its DroneSting Scout, a packet of counter-UAS components used by troops for detection and disabling of drones.
Paul Debs, president at Advanced Technology Systems, said the company will focus on more autonomy in future systems to take the 'workload off of individual operators.'
'Because resources are finite, no matter who you are, and so the more of that load we can take off individuals, I think the more efficient we will be encountering these threats,' he said. 'Autonomy writ large is going to be huge.'
Debs added that while autonomous technology is there, integrating more AI takes time and is a process at the Defense Department, which wants to test systems to ensure accuracy and safety.
He added, however, that it can be scaled up to meet demand. And Debs argued that smaller companies like his are best positioned to lead innovation on this new and emerging defense technology, similar to how they are leading the Replicator 1 initiative.
'There are advantages to size,' Debs said. But 'in my experience, small and medium sized companies tend to be able to respond and adapt quicker.'
Another company focused in this direction is Drone Shield, which has a handheld technology called a drone gun that can jam drone frequencies. The DroneGun Mk4 is provided to soldiers to carry with them on their person.
Tom Branstetter, director of business development at Drone Shield, said his company wants to improve the drone gun to make it more high performing and more easily adopted by a soldier, along with realtime sensing capabilities.
But Branstetter acknowledged there were 'big challenges' for the industry and the Pentagon to meet, including meeting production capacity, innovating new technology and integrating new systems for a variety of different military needs. He called for an 'an overhaul of the way that these projects are rolled out.'
'It's a very slow procurement process,' he said of the Pentagon adopting new tech. 'And these tactics and procedures are moving so fast, by the time you roll back a piece of technology that went through … the standard procurement channels, it's already obsolete because the threat is moving so fast.'
Branstetter also argued it will be vital for varied counter-UAS tech systems to be in the hands of the common warfighter and not just in command-and-control systems.
'You need to identify different formations that are able to accommodate different technology into their day-to-day activities,' he added.
The U.S. military will also need to ensure it can track threats from drones, an area that will require even more AI integration in the future to improve detection.
Netherlands-based Robin Radar is one company that is leading this initiative and has big plans for the future.
Marcel Verdonk, chief commercial officer at Robin Radar, said the company is working to meet the demands of Replicator 2 with technology that goes beyond its traditional 360-degree radar detection system that can track very small objects.
One idea is exploring AI to build smarter radars and to integrate with more technology, like cameras and disabling weapons.
'We need to get better and better at detecting and tracking and catching and destroying drone threats,' said Verdonk, 'and that simply means we have to build better radars that are better at seeing and keeping track of the drones.'
Verdonk said the Pentagon is also exploring on-the-move technology for radar systems, which his company is developing.
'What's also going to be critical is that the radar itself becomes a target by the enemy,' he said. 'They are very concerned that the radar [will] have active transmissions. It has a GPS signal, and if the enemy can detect that, then it can try to destroy our radar.'
Verdonk said they have tested an initial version of a system that can perch in the back of a truck driving up to 70 miles per hour.
AgEagle Aerial Systems, while not a traditional counter-UAS company, also sees opportunity in addressing the new industrial wave in the defense industry ushered in by Replicator.
AgEagle imagines its drones used for mapping terrain and collecting intelligence can be a part of the future of counter-UAS.
Matthew Parsons, head of defense at AgEagle, said they hope their drones will eventually be 'adaptable to multiple mission sets,' outlining a vision to build-in electronic warfare and sensor tools.
'It just becomes another role for an already existing piece of equipment,' he said, adding that AgEagle's technology aims to boost the average soldier on the battlefield. 'The entire purpose of this to enable the tactical warfighter without a huge level of a headquarters echelon above them.'
Israel, which is threatened by the Houthis and several other Iranian-backed groups, is also exploring what the next frontier of counter-UAS will look like.
Israeli-based Rafael, one of the largest defense contractors in the country, is developing a system called Iron Beam, a high energy laser designed to hit targets miles away. Iron Beam is expected to be deployed later this year for Israel, but Rafael also has an agreement with Lockheed Martin for a future deployment in the U.S. market.
Daniel Tsemach, international media manager for Rafael, said the laser system can be integrated into Israeli defenses like Iron Dome to supplement it and take out drone threats if that's needed instead of traditional interceptors.
'The whole world is looking to find the most cost-effective solution to counter-UAS, because of how disproportionate of a cost we're looking at here,' he said. 'It is clear that there's a need to fill a void with a more affordable solution. And laser technology absolutely is relevant when we're looking at that.'
The U.K. also tested a laser system called DragonFire last year, pointing to strong movement globally for what is generally called a directed energy weapon.
In the U.S., directed energy weapons have not yielded any tangible results yet, but the technology is being explored in multiple arenas by the military branches. The Navy has fielded some experimental laser systems on Destroyer ships, including Lockheed Martin's HELIOS system.
It's not all lasers. Other companies see the benefit of strong defense systems that use more traditional munitions to take out drones.
Large defense contractors like BAE Systems are working in this direction.
BAE has a system called the Mk 38 MGS deployed aboard Navy ships. It fires 25mm rounds and has an electro-optical/infrared sensor for 330-degree surveillance.
Jim Miller, vice president of business development at BAE, said there is ongoing work to turn the Mk 38 into a more lethal and accurate drone-killing machine with an upgrade called counter-air plus that includes technical modifications.
'The technical modifications are about the greater elevation, which [we] really need to get after those air targets as they get close, and then [also] the greater magazine depth,' he said.
BAE is also rolling out more of its Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System (APKWS), which uses laser-guidance to turn Hydra 2.75-inch rockets into precision-guided munitions.
APKWS, intended to be a low-cost and effective solution to taking out threats like drones, is already at full-rate production of up to 25,000 units per year, and the military has integrated it into vehicles and aircraft.
BAE describes the system as a strong counter-UAS system because it comes at a lower cost point, closing the gap between the high cost of interceptor missiles to cheap drones, while it can also be produced to meet high demand.
Matthew Chrobak, technical director at BAE, said 'our low cost and small form factor make this weapon ideal' to counter UAS threats and swarming targets.
'Threats are constantly changing, the threshold for new one-way attack drones entering service against our warfighters is increasingly less,' he said in an email, 'so we need to be agile and predict where they're going and be effective against them.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Business Insider

3 hours ago

• Business Insider

The US military struck Iran with some of its most elusive weapons — stealth bombers and a hidden submarine

The US military relied on two of its most elusive and secretive combat platforms to carry out strikes on Iran's top nuclear facilities, a top general revealed Sunday. Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said on Sunday that seven US Air Force B-2 Spirit stealth bombers dropped 14 heavy bunker-buster bombs on the facilities as part of a secret, highly complex operation the previous night. The flying-wing B-2, built by US aerospace company Northrop Grumman, features a unique low-observable stealth design that gives it the ability to penetrate enemy airspace heavily defended by surface-to-air missiles without being spotted. Caine told reporters that a US Navy guided-missile submarine also launched more than two dozen Tomahawk cruise missiles from an undisclosed location in the Middle East at Iranian targets. Caine didn't specify what type of submarine was involved in the mission against Iran. The Pentagon declined to disclose the name of the submarine that participated in the operation, and the Navy referred Business Insider to the White House, which did not immediately respond. Guided-missile submarine generally refers to the Navy's Ohio-class SSGNs, which can carry more than 150 BGM-109 Tomahawk Land Attack Missiles, subsonic jet-powered munitions that can be launched from the sea to strike targets over 1,000 miles away. General Dynamics Electric Boat builds the Navy's Ohio-class submarines. These stealthy undersea assets are made with streamlined hulls and quiet propulsion systems, among other technologies, for evading detection. The Ohios, however, are not the only US subs capable of launching Tomahawk missiles. The US military does not typically disclose details of its secretive missile subs, except when it is trying to send a message to adversaries and signal deterrence. President Donald Trump announced Saturday that the US had bombed the Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan nuclear facilities in what he said was a "spectacular military success" that "completely and totally obliterated" Iran's key enrichment facilities. Beyond the B-2s and the lone submarine, Caine said the operation, called Midnight Hammer, also involved dozens of fighter jets and aerial refueling tankers. He said US forces used 75 precision-guided weapons against Iranian targets. The B-2s dropped 14 bunker-buster bombs — specifically, the GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator, or MOP, developed by the Air Force Research Laboratory in partnership with Boeing. The big 15-ton weapon is the US military's largest non-nuclear bomb and is regarded as the bomb best suited for hitting Iran's more protected nuclear facilities. The B-2 is the only operational aircraft that can carry the heavy MOP, though the new B-21 Raider will be able to as well. The Spirit can carry two of these munitions. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said the strikes "devastated the Iranian nuclear program." The operation comes as Israeli forces have pounded Iran with relentless strikes over the past 10 days, with fighter jets targeting the country's nuclear program and military capabilities, including air defenses and missile launchers. Tehran has retaliated by launching hundreds of missiles and drones at Israel. Trump, over the past few days, had been weighing whether to join Israel in its bombing campaign. His administration has been tied up in efforts to reach a new nuclear deal with Iran, while Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has preferred a military approach. He later praised Trump for the US strikes. The US involvement is an escalation in the conflict that could see Iran retaliate against US forces in the Middle East. The Pentagon has a large presence across the region, including warships, aircraft carriers, fighter jets, and ground troops that it says is intended to protect US interests. The president and Pentagon leadership is urging Iran to pursue peace and threatening continued attacks if they do not. It remains to be seen how Iran responds.

Miami Herald

17 hours ago

• Miami Herald

Trump's ‘2 weeks' pause on Iran strikes comes with high stakes

President Donald Trump often suggests that something will happen in "two weeks" when he's looking to buy himself some time. But his latest two-weeks declaration - on possible U.S. military strikes in Iran - comes with unusually high stakes. The pause, after days of bellicose rhetoric and social posts about evacuating Tehran, rattled markets in the region, triggered new threats from the Iran-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen, led Iranian officials to call the U.S. Israel's "partner in crime" and left Israel in a holding pattern. Because by now the world knows that Trump's "two weeks" could mean two days, two months or never, his delay this time only fed the uncertainty. Regional equities slid on Friday, despite a sustained surge in oil prices that would typically support sentiment in Gulf economies. Israel - a U.S. ally with particularly close ties to Trump - has been placed in a holding pattern. It launched its attacks arguing that Iran's nuclear capabilities must be neutralized. But experts say it will be hard for Israel to destroy Iran's most fortified uranium enrichment facility, the Fordow plant, without the bunker-busting bombs only the U.S. has. The U.S. military launched several long-range stealth B-2 bombers - the kind that could carry the 30,000-pound bombs - from Missouri over the Pacific, according to media reports, possibly positioning them in case of a strike. The Wall Street Journal cited officials saying that no order has been given to ready an operation. "For the Israelis it does put them in a bind," said Illan Goldenberg, a former White House and Pentagon official who worked on Iran issues. "They'd prefer this not go on for weeks and months." "My guess is they have some kind of option for Fordow, but it's not as good as our option for Fordow," said Goldenberg, a senior vice president at J Street, a liberal Israel lobbying group focused on creating a two-state solution. The Israelis "put themselves in this limbo by launching a war and putting their faith in Donald Trump to come and finish the job." Israeli officials told the White House in what was described as a tense phone call on Thursday that two weeks is too long to wait for Iran to reach a deal to dismantle its nuclear program, Reuters reported Saturday. Iran, meanwhile, could seek to disrupt oil shipments through the Strait of Hormuz, a choke point for roughly 20% of global crude flows. Even without a direct move by Tehran, nearly 1,000 vessels daily have reported GPS jamming near the narrow passage separating Iran from its Arab neighbors, according to the French naval liaison body MICA Center. The Houthis, an Iran-backed militia in Yemen, threatened on Saturday to target U.S. vessels and battleships if the U.S. joins Israeli attacks. The conflict started June 13 when Israel, saying it had evidence that Iran was close to achieving nuclear weapons capability, launched a series of missile attacks on Iran, which has returned missile attacks. Keeping the world guessing Trump for years has had a penchant for setting two-week deadlines, sometimes following through and at other times missing them or never acting at all, making "within two weeks" a stock phrase for pending decisions in both his White House terms. On Friday, Trump kept the world guessing on his next steps. Speaking to reporters in New Jersey, he called himself a "peacemaker" and dismissed the idea of sending in ground troops. He both suggested he wanted a diplomatic path and said he might support a ceasefire, but also kept a military threat alive, describing the two-week time frame as a maximum. "I'm giving them a period of time," he declared. Israel has pressed Trump to offer support, but in return Trump has only offered a run of tough commentary. European diplomats have stepped in to try to de-escalate tensions by talking to Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi with little to show for it but a dismissive remark from Trump. Trump won the presidency twice promising not to get the U.S. involved in the kinds of intractable Middle East wars he savaged his predecessors over. His most fervent MAGA supporters have been urging him publicly and privately to avoid military action in keeping with his "America First" position. Since Israel's assault on Iran started, Israelis have faced hundreds of ballistic missiles and 1,000 drone attacks launched by Tehran. Iran has lost a slew of military officials, with more than 400 people dead and several nuclear facilities and related infrastructure destroyed or damaged. Israel, which has been waging a military campaign in Gaza since Hamas militants attacked the country on Oct. 7, 2023, may struggle to sustain a war against Tehran. The U.S. is already working to replenish Israel's defenses as they deplete their stock of interceptors. And Israeli officials say Trump's pause means the war will last even longer. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu insisted the Jewish state will "achieve all of our objectives," including rendering Fordow inoperable. Trump cited hopes for negotiations as part of his aim for the "two-week" pause. But Iranians refuse to negotiate with the U.S. while an Israeli assault continues, and the talks with European leaders appeared to make little progress. Trump expressed skepticism about those efforts Friday, saying: "Iran doesn't want to speak to Europe. They want to speak to us. Europe is not going to be able to help them." Yet Iran refuses to talk to the U.S. while the Israeli assault continues. Peter Krause, a Boston College professor who specializes in Middle Eastern politics, argued that if Trump is doing "coercive diplomacy" with Iran, then his "hand is strengthened" the more damage Israelis do to Iran. Krause said the next two weeks will likely see a "ramping up with more of the same militarily, but simultaneously, attempted diplomacy led by the Europeans and maybe the United States and the Turks to see if we can get an off-ramp before things get worse." Trump has also long hurled ultimatums at opponents that he often quickly reverses as he pushes them to make concessions - as the world saw with his tariffs regime in the spring - demanding exorbitant tariffs only to back off once the trading partner arrived at the negotiating table. But taking that approach here may not work. The latest signals from the White House suggest a demand for zero uranium enrichment in Iran, a condition Tehran sees as fundamentally unacceptable. Iranian officials maintain they have no intention of pursuing nuclear weapons, but argue that some level of enrichment, under clear restrictions and oversight, is a sovereign right. Stripping that away, they contend, would amount to capitulation rather than compromise. --- (With assistance from Ethan Bronner.) Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.

Wall Street Journal

18 hours ago

• Wall Street Journal

Was It Scrap Metal or an Alien Spacecraft? The Army Asked an Elite Defense Lab to Investigate

The Pentagon man gathered top technology executives from the six largest defense contractors in 2022 to ask an unusual question: Have any of your companies ever gained access to alien technology? 'It would just make my job easier if one of you would 'fess up, give me the UFO, or help me find them,' said Sean Kirkpatrick, who had been tapped by the Defense Department to investigate whether Washington had ever had a secret alien program.