Vaughan 'staggered' by England decision to bowl
Former captain Michael Vaughan said he was "staggered" by England's decision to field first after India piled on 359-3 on day one of the first Test at Headingley.
Despite hot temperatures and a pitch offering no obvious assistance to the bowlers, England captain Ben Stokes chose to bowl on winning the toss.
Advertisement
Stokes' choice gave the opportunity for opposite number Shubman Gill to stroke an unbeaten 127, while opener Yashasvi Jaiswal cracked 101. In Stokes' defence, Gill also admitted he would have bowled first.
But Vaughan, who played all of his domestic cricket for Yorkshire, told Test Match Special: "I am an old school traditionalist. Here at Leeds, when the sun is shining, with dry weather, you bat."
England have made a habit of fielding first since Stokes became captain in 2022.
In nine previous home Tests in which England have won the toss in that period, they have batted first only once. From those nine matches, they have won six and probably would have had a seventh had it not been for rain in Manchester during the fourth Ashes Test of 2023.
Advertisement
Recent history also favours fielding first at Headingley. The previous six Tests on this ground were won by the team that fielded first.
There can be justification for fielding first in good batting conditions. In order to win a Test a team needs to bowl the opposition out twice, and therefore gives themselves the maximum amount of time to do that by fielding first.
Some pitches also get better for batting as a Test progresses, making a run chase in the fourth innings the best time to score runs.
Vaughan, who famously captained England to victory in the 2005 Ashes, believes Stokes should have given more credence to conditions on Friday morning when he made his decision.
Advertisement
"You always have to pick your decisions on that moment, and not things that you did here years ago or at other times. It can't affect what the decision is today," he said.
"You look at the England side and their strength is in the batting. And there is inexperience in the bowling at the moment. Ben clearly had a gut feeling, and sometimes it has worked."
England fast bowling consultant Tim Southee explained the decision was partly affected by the green colour of the pitch on Thursday.
"With the colour of the wicket yesterday, and a little bit of moisture left in it if there was a little bit of help in it, it was probably going to be this morning," said the New Zealander. "That was the thinking behind the decision.
Advertisement
"You look at the surface and make the decision on what you think will give you the best chance. Not all the time do you get it right."
There are infamous examples of England captains choosing to field first, only for the decision to backfire.
Nasser Hussain did so in the first Ashes Test against Australia in Brisbane in 2002 and England never recovered. David Gower inserted the Australians on this ground in 1989, only for the tourists to rack up 601-7 declared.
In contrast, Stokes himself asked New Zealand to bat first at Trent Bridge in 2022. The Black Caps piled on 553, but England completed a fourth-innings run chase courtesy of Jonny Bairstow, the first example of 'Bazball'.
Advertisement
Therefore, the wisdom of Stokes' decision in this Test will be revealed over the following four days and will be heavily influenced by how England play India pace-bowling maestro Jasprit Bumrah.
"It was a good pitch, so it's not easy to restrict runs," said Vaughan. "Ben Stokes is still positive and he will come back tomorrow saying let's get seven wickets.
"We won't know that for sure until we see Jasprit Bumrah bowl on it. He can bowl you out with anything. Until I see that, I will hold my judgement on how flat this pitch is."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Florian Wirtz joins list of most expensive soccer signings in history
Florian Wirtz became one of the most expensive players in soccer history when the Germany playmaker joined Liverpool from Bayer Leverkusen on Friday for a fee of up to 116 million pounds ($156 million). Neymar: $262 million (222 million euros) Advertisement Paris Saint-Germain shattered the world-record transfer fee by signing the Brazil superstar from Barcelona in August 2017. It was more than double the outlay of Manchester United to sign Paul Pogba from Juventus for $116 million a year earlier. It remains the record transfer fee. ___ Kylian Mbappé: $216 million (180 million euros) A few weeks after buying Neymar, PSG also secured a loan deal for Mbappé — then the rising star of French soccer playing for Monaco — that included the option to make the move permanent in 2018. PSG did so, making it an outlay of nearly $500 million on two players. ___ Philippe Coutinho: $192 million (160 million euros) Advertisement Flush with cash after selling Neymar a year earlier, Barcelona spent most of it in a deal to buy Brazil playmaker Coutinho from Liverpool for a Spanish record fee. ___ Moises Caicedo: $146 million (115 million pounds) The Ecuador midfielder's move was previously the most expensive deal by a British club, with Chelsea buying him from Brighton in August 2023. ___ João Félix: $140 million (126 million euros) Atletico Madrid triggered a buyout clause in Félix's contract to sign the Portugal forward from Benfica in August 2019. ___ Jude Bellingham: $139 million (128.5 million euros) The England star got his big move to Real Madrid from Borussia Dortmund in June 2023, for an initial up-front fee of 103 million euros plus add-ons linked to performance. Advertisement ___ Antoine Griezmann: $134 million (120 million euros) Atletico could afford to sign Félix after selling France forward Griezmann to Barcelona for a similar fee a few weeks earlier. ___ Neymar: $98 million (90 million euros) Outside from Europe, the biggest transfer deal also involved Neymar when he joined Al Hilal, a team in the Saudi Pro League, from Paris Saint-Germain in August 2023. That came at the height of Saudi Arabia's push to sign high-end soccer talent to ignite the oil-rich state's domestic league. ___ AP soccer: Steve Douglas, The Associated Press
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Potential record deal puts Elliott's name back in the headlines as Albion are linked
Harvey Elliott, pictured with Yasin Ayari, could be on the move (Image: Simon Dack) Harvey Elliott's name is being linked with Albion again – after Liverpool clinched a record deal. The champions' move for Florian Wirtz will set them back an initial £100 million. That will become a British record £116 million if various clauses are met. Advertisement It also appears to affect Elliott's potential to play significant minutes for the Reds. Albion were believed to be interested in Elliott during the January transfer window and probably before that. That might at least partly explain why The Sun report him to be of interest to the Seagulls in the current window. He would command a sizeable fee and comes with some uncertainty over what he can produce in the Premier League on a consistent basis. But Elliott, who is currently with England under-21s at the Euros, has shown plenty of promise. He scored for Liverpool at the Amex towards the end of the season. Advertisement There is no suggestion that Albion have bid for Elliott but there is a theory the presence of his former Anfield mentor James Milner could help persuade the 22-year-old to move. Albion have an array of options in attacking midfield areas but plenty of outward activity is expected during the summer transfer window.
Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
Candidates Revealed For Cricket's All-Important Chief Executives' Committee Election
The CEC election will be part of the AGM in Singapore (Photo by Steve Bardens-ICC/ICC via Getty ... More Images) Eight candidates will contest the upcoming Chief Executives' Committee election, with three coveted Associate Member spots up for grabs amid changing dynamics among cricket's powerbrokers. The deadline for nominations was on June 17, with the election to take place on July 17 to kick-start the International Cricket Council's Annual General Meeting in Singapore. Incumbent Sumod Damodar (Botswana) will recontest, but Rashpal Bajwa (Canada) and Denmark's Umair Butt have decided not to. Former Hong Kong chief Tim Cutler (Vanuatu) and ex USA cricket governing body administrator Sankar Renganathan (Sierre Leone), are the high-profile candidates running. Tim Cutler will run for the CEC (Photo by Nora Tam/South China Morning Post via Getty Images) Gurumurthy Palani (France), Stella Siale (Somoa), Gurdeep Klair (Canada), Anuraag Bhatnagar (Hong Kong), Sarah Gomersall (Jersey) have also put their hands up. The CEC is supposed to promote and develop cricket worldwide, while governing and regulating the sport at the international level. Being on it is highly coveted for Associate chiefs, who get to mix with the top bosses from the Full Members and the CEC is often seen as a stepping stone to get onto the ICC board – where the real power lies in global cricket. The grips of power is tightening for mighty India after the ascension of all-powerful Jay Shah as ICC chair - with much eyebrows raised over apparent glorification of him since he stepped into the role- and with Indian Sanjog Gupta, the head of live sports at JioStar, set to take over as chief executive, as I first flagged in January. There are continual fears of the health of smaller cricket nations, particularly Associates who are granted less funding, power and fixturing compared to the 12 Full Member nations in cricket's archaic tiered system of governance. The Indian governing body currently receives most of the ICC's revenue distribution model, 38.5 per cent or about $600 million annually, dwarfing the share of the 96 Associates who get about two per cent. Jay Shah has been a prominent ICC chair (Photo by) There will be a reshaping of the CEC with several well-known administrators and prominent figures behind the scenes eying spots. Damodar is a veteran of three terms on the CEC and he returned late last year after Mubashshir Usmani, a rising administrator at the helm of the Emirates Cricket Board, was elected to the ICC board. The outspoken Damodar, a former chair of the African Cricket Association, has been behind ambitious proposals such as reviving the Afro-Asia Cup and pushing more marquee events for Associate nations. He also wants to see the much-discussed high performance programme finally established in a revival after it ran for over 15 years before being scrapped late last decade. The programme for top Associates included player development pathways and specialized administrative structures to help professionalize those deemed close to Full Member level. The new high performance programme, in a point of difference, would involve some of the smaller Full Members, such as Ireland, Afghanistan and Zimbabwe, along with top Associates. 'There are many things that are currently on the cards and of agreed upon but not put into place, like the high performance programme,' Damodar told me. 'There are also lots of on-field issues that need to be sorted like better pathways for umpires at the Associate level and smoothing procedures for those cited for suspect bowling actions.' Renganathan looms as a wildcard and he has been well know as an outspoken critic of embattled USA Cricket, which has had issues complying with its ICC Associate membership. But he has kept busy helping develop cricket in Sierre Leone, a small West African nation ravaged by civil war from 1991-2002. Renganathan unsuccessfully ran in last year's ICC board Associate Member Directors election. Sankar Renganathan is running for the CEC. 'I want to make sure we have the right people sitting in the room, so that the 96 countries are properly voiced,' he said. 'It's important to be transparent and try to spread funds to all members and try to develop cricket because great things can happen like what we're seeing in Sierre Leone.' Voters from 40 Associate Members and five regional representatives (Americas, Asia, Europe, East Asia-Pacific and Africa) will select one candidate each. Under ICC rules, candidates have to be a representative of an Associate Member or a current/past ICC director. Newly elected members will have two-year terms and will also be part of the Associate Member Committee helping govern and regulate the Associate level.
