- Malaysia and ASEAN Are Right to Engage Russia Deeply – Despite the War in Ukraine

15/05/2025 04:21 PM
Opinions on topical issues from thought leaders, columnists and editors.
By Phar Kim Beng
As the geopolitical tremors of the Ukraine war continue to reshape global alignments, it may appear counterintuitive that Malaysia and ASEAN are seeking to deepen engagement with Russia. After all, ASEAN as a regional organisation has collectively expressed concern over the violation of Ukraine's sovereignty, following the Russian invasion on February 24, 2022.
The Chairman's Statement of the ASEAN Foreign Ministers Meeting in 2022 emphasised 'respect for sovereignty, territorial integrity, and peaceful resolution of disputes'.
But ASEAN's embrace of diplomacy – even toward contentious actors – is not naiveté. Rather, it is a principled realism shaped by decades of navigating major power rivalries. The path forward is not disengagement, but deeper engagement – one that encourages Russia to act not merely as a great power, but as a responsible power capable of contributing constructively to the peace and prosperity of East Asia.
ASEAN was never meant to be a military alliance or a tribunal for disciplining major powers. It is, instead, a convening platform designed to keep open channels of communication among actors with vastly different worldviews. Its architecture -anchored in ASEAN+1, ASEAN+3, the East Asia Summit (EAS), and the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) – functions precisely because it welcomes all parties, including rivals and antagonists.
Engaging Russia within this framework is not a sign of approval of its actions in Ukraine, but a recognition that global peace requires the inclusion, not isolation, of great powers. The East Asia Summit scheduled for October 2025 in Kuala Lumpur is an opportunity for Russia to return to the table, to listen, to reflect, and to re-engage with Asian partners beyond the shadow of war.
Moreover, Malaysia and ASEAN share a long-term vision of a multipolar world order, one not defined solely by U.S.-China competition. The Indo-Pacific is not destined to be a bipolar arena. ASEAN's own Indo-Pacific Outlook promotes inclusivity, balance, and cooperation. Strategic diversity in this region – through the presence of India, Japan, South Korea, Australia and Russia – helps to prevent the domination of any single power, preserving ASEAN's autonomy and policy space.
This is why Russia's continued involvement is valuable. Not because ASEAN condones aggression, but because it recognises the dangers of exclusion, polarisation, and bloc politics. Malaysia, as a neutral, trade-dependent country with a tradition of non-alignment, sees engagement as the wiser path. The East Asia Summit is a test of whether Russia is willing to conduct itself in line with the norms and principles of regional stability.
Economic, Energy, and Defence Ties with Russia Are Still Relevant
Despite Western sanctions, Russia remains a major energy producer, a source of advanced defence technology, and a critical member of global food and fertilizer supply chains. For countries like Vietnam, Laos, and even Indonesia, Russian arms and military cooperation remain significant. Malaysia itself operates Russian-origin Su-30MKM fighter jets, which require sustained technical collaboration.
Cutting off ties would not only be impractical but potentially dangerous – forcing ASEAN states into greater dependency on a single supplier or bloc. Pragmatic cooperation, without legitimising aggression, is the wiser path.
Russia's Role in Eurasian Integration and the Arctic May Impact ASEAN
While distant in geography, Russia's activities in Central Asia, the Northern Sea Route (NSR), and Arctic energy development hold long-term implications for ASEAN's connectivity and climate resilience goals. China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) increasingly intersects with Russia's Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), shaping transcontinental trade routes that could complement ASEAN's interests.
ASEAN wants Russia to play a thoughtful role in this Eurasian architecture – one that enhances regional integration rather than reproduces Cold War-style blocs. Engagement allows ASEAN to influence, however subtly, the evolution of this role.
Russia at the East Asia Summit 2025: A Test of Maturity
The East Asia Summit (EAS) in Kuala Lumpur this October will serve as a litmus test for Russia. Will it continue to define itself primarily through antagonism and historical grievances? Or will it embrace the spirit of the EAS – openness, cooperation, and strategic restraint?
ASEAN is extending the invitation not as a reward, but as a challenge. It hopes Russia will rise to the occasion, to prove it can be more than a revisionist power – perhaps even a civilisational interlocutor.
Malaysia, as host, is uniquely positioned to deliver this message with moral clarity. Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's long-standing emphasis on justice, dialogue among civilisations, and inclusive governance offers a template for what a better Russia can look like – if it chooses to be one.
Conclusion: From Power to Purpose
ASEAN's engagement with Russia does not condone war; it calls for wisdom. It does not validate violence; it invites transformation. At a time when Russia is increasingly portrayed in zero-sum terms, ASEAN offers a third way: principled pragmatism anchored in peace.
Malaysia and ASEAN are not naïve. They understand power. But they also understand purpose. The East Asia Summit in October 2025 is a chance for Russia to demonstrate that it, too, can understand both. And perhaps, act accordingly.
-- BERNAMA
Phar Kim Beng, PhD, is Professor of ASEAN Studies, International Islamic University Malaysia.
(The views expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not reflect the official policy or position of BERNAMA)

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

New Straits Times

5 hours ago

• New Straits Times

Putin T-shirts, robots and Taliban, but few Westerners at Russian economic forum

RUSSIA'S flagship economic forum kicked off on Wednesday with stalls selling Vladimir Putin-themed merchandise and humanoid robots, but Westerners were few and far between — despite warming ties between Moscow and Washington under Donald Trump. Once dubbed "Russia's Davos", the annual Saint Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF) is designed to attract foreign investment and is the biggest showcase of Russian technology and business. Some 20,000 guests from 140 countries took part in the four-day forum, both online and in person, according to the Kremlin. But for the fourth year running high-profile European and American representatives were absent amid Moscow's offensive on Ukraine, a stark contrast to before the conflict, when some Western leaders would attend. Among the states that sent high-level government figures this year were China, Vietnam, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, the Central African Republic and Burkina Faso. Taliban officials were also spotted at the expo, amid Russia's push to normalise ties with the Islamist group. Russian officials said some Western executives attended it. A panel on Thursday, titled simply "Russia-USA", featured the head of the American Chamber of Commerce in Russia, some private investors, the founder of a microphone manufacturer and head of a crypto project. But in one high-profile win for Putin, Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto skipped an invitation to the G7 in Canada, choosing instead to meet Putin and attend SPIEF. Among the events on the first day of the forum were panels focused on artificial intelligence and investment in the Global South. Russia has channelled its economic interests away from the West and towards emerging markets in Asia and Africa due to sanctions over the Ukraine conflict. One stand handed out T-shirts featuring quotes from Vladimir Putin and other government officials. Technology was also on display. A humanoid robot flaunting a Dior handbag was seen walking around the exhibits. The forum came amid intense speculation in Russia about the prospect of sanctions relief and the return of Western firms that left the country after Moscow launched its offensive on Ukraine in February 2022. Hundreds of companies sold off, abandoned or gave away their Russian operations, ranging from McDonald's and Nike to Ford and Goldman Sachs. Putin has at times blasted them for departing, warned they would not be allowed to return and said Russia is better off without them. He has also introduced punitive counter-sanctions, restricting the ability of firms from so-called "unfriendly" countries from accessing their profits and imposing huge exit fees and taxes on any wishing to leave. Trump's return to the White House and opening of diplomacy with Russia led to a frenzy of headlines in Russian media about whether he would ease US sanctions. Russia's top economic negotiator, Kirill Dmitriev, said on Wednesday that the United States may "in the next couple of months" announce joint projects with Russia in the Arctic, without elaborating. Once a fixture of Europe's business calendar, SPIEF was where Western leaders, CEOs and major investors gathered to seal deals on entering and expanding their footprint in Russia. Then-German chancellor Angela Merkel attended in 2013, as did Mark Rutte, the Dutch prime minister and now the secretary general of Nato — the man marshalling the military alliance's response to Putin's Ukraine offensive. Its prestige started to dip after 2014, when Russia annexed the Crimean peninsula from Ukraine and was hit with the first tranche of Western sanctions. But even as recently as 2018, French President Emmanuel Macron and Japan's then-prime minister Shinzo Abe sat on stage alongside Putin.

The Star

6 hours ago

• The Star

Sign of sovereignty: Prabowo skips G-7 for Russia, drawing scrutiny over Indonesia's neutrality

JAKARTA (The Straits Times/ANN): Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto's decision to skip the recent Group of Seven (G-7) summit in favour of visiting Russia was not a blunt snub to the West, but a clear signal of his assertive and personalised approach to foreign policy, analysts said. The move underlined Jakarta's intent to chart a more independent course and elevate its diplomatic profile, the experts noted. But they cautioned that leaning too visibly towards Moscow could cast doubt on Indonesia's longstanding commitment to neutrality, especially amid deepening global divides. 'This is a signal of sovereignty – that Indonesia does not want to be tied to one power,' Dr Hendra Manurung, a lecturer in defence diplomacy at the Indonesia Defence University, told The Straits Times. He said the Russia visit reflects Jakarta's broader strategy of agile, multipolar diplomacy – maintaining relations with all major powers rather than aligning with one camp. Dr Fitriani Bintang Timur, a defence analyst at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, said India offers a useful parallel. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi met Russian President Vladimir Putin in October 2024, but India remains part of the Quad – a grouping with the US, Japan and Australia – which has condemned Russia's invasion of Ukraine. 'I think Modi-like engagement is something that Prabowo is striving for Indonesia to broaden the country's partnership reach beyond the traditionally Western region,' she told ST. Indonesia is not a member of the G-7 – comprising Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom and the US – but had been invited as a guest. Russia, once part of the grouping, was expelled in 2014 following its annexation of Crimea. 'Mr Prabowo's move to visit Russia instead of G-7 may certainly raise some eyebrows. Geopolitical signalling matters, particularly in this era of heightened competition between global powers. Indonesia, at the very least, should have sent a representative to G-7 if possible,' said Mr Pieter Pandie, an international relations researcher at the Jakarta-based Centre for Strategic and International Studies. 'It signals Prabowo's more personal and hands-on approach to foreign affairs, differing significantly from his predecessor (Joko Widodo), who was mostly uninterested in foreign affairs and was comfortable in leaving it in the hands of the Foreign Ministry,' Mr Pieter told ST. Analysts, however, noted that in May, Mr Prabowo separately hosted Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and President Emmanuel Macron of France – a G-7 member – in Jakarta, reflecting that his ties with the West remain intact. He also had a phone call with US President Donald Trump on June 12. Beyond great power politics, the visit to Russia also showed Indonesia's quiet support for Iran and the Palestinians amid the Middle East conflict, the analysts said. While not explicitly articulated, the visit was seen as reinforcing Indonesia's solidarity with countries critical of Israel, noted Dr Hendra. 'Besides bilateral ties, the bigger point is to show that in the current geopolitical situation, Indonesia wants to support Iran in its war with Israel, and also show support for Palestine,' he said. Dr Fitriani added: 'I think one of the reasons why Prabowo didn't go to the G-7 was because of the concern over conflict in the Middle East as the G-7 members mostly supported Israel.' While in Russia from June 18 to 20, Mr Prabowo met Mr Putin and delivered a keynote speech at the annual St Petersburg International Economic Forum, where the Indonesian leader clarified that his decision to skip the G-7 summit was not due to disrespect, but because of an earlier commitment to attend the forum. 'So please do not read too much into the event… Indonesia, by tradition, has always been non-aligned. We respect all countries. Our foreign policy is very simple – one phrase: A thousand friends are too few, one enemy is too many. We want to be friends with everybody,' he said. 'One of the big mistakes of many countries in South-east Asia is that we tend to always follow the biggest and the most powerful power in the world.' Mr Prabowo said the world must shift from a unipolar to a multipolar order. He also expressed respect for the leadership of Russia and China. The two countries 'have never had double standards', he said. 'Russia and China have always defended the downtrodden… the oppressed, (they) have always fought for the justice of all peoples of the world.' During the visit, Mr Putin described Indonesia as one of Russia's 'key partners' in the Asia-Pacific and reaffirmed support for Jakarta's full membership in the Brics grouping, which took effect earlier in 2025. The grouping, which is spearheaded by Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, aims to strengthen cooperation among emerging economies and amplify the influence of the Global South. Mr Prabowo and Mr Putin signed a declaration on strategic partnership, formalising closer ties. Russia offered to boost oil and liquefied natural gas supplies to Indonesia. A €2 billion (S$2.96 billion) investment fund was also announced between Indonesia's sovereign wealth fund Danantara and the Russian Direct Investment Fund. Dr Fitriani noted that Mr Prabowo visited Beijing in November 2024 and signed deals worth about US$10 billion (S$12.87 billion), demonstrating his willingness to engage with countries based on economic interests. 'This shows a pattern of Prabowo following the money,' she said. One notable offer from Russia was in nuclear cooperation. 'We are open to cooperation with Indonesian partners in the nuclear field. We also wish to implement peaceful nuclear projects', including in healthcare, agriculture and training of human resources, Mr Putin said in a joint statement after his meeting with Mr Prabowo on June 19. Indonesia plans to add nuclear power to its energy mix, with a small-scale plant slated to begin operations by 2032 as part of its push towards net-zero emissions. The Prabowo administration has also announced plans to open the door to foreign investors to help develop 75GW of renewable energy capacity over the next 14 years. Analysts said Russia's offer reflects the country's intent to deepen its footprint in South-east Asia and aligns with Mr Prabowo's push for energy resilience. Dr Hendra noted that while Russia has shown interest in nuclear cooperation, Indonesia must proceed cautiously as accepting such an offer could unsettle its neighbours. 'Russia made such an offer to show it wants to increase its presence in South-east Asia, but any real development depends on formal agreements. For now, it's likely a no,' he said. Mr Pieter called the proposal 'certainly significant' but added that 'how it will play out concretely is difficult to gauge', adding that Indonesia must tread carefully in dealing with major powers to avoid appearing biased towards any side. Dr Fitriani warned that nuclear cooperation remains politically sensitive. 'Indonesia doesn't want to be the next Iran that the world fears for its lack of transparency in managing nuclear energy capabilities,' she said. Still, Mr Prabowo's engagement with Russia – and his silence on Ukraine – could risk undermining Jakarta's neutrality in the eyes of Western partners. Mr Pieter said Mr Prabowo's visit was a win for Russia, as it signalled that some countries are still willing to engage with Moscow despite Western sanctions and condemnation over its invasion of Ukraine. 'Indonesia has always emphasised its commitment to international law, territorial integrity and sovereignty. By being seen as tilting to Moscow, some may question Indonesia's commitment to those values and norms,' he added. Dr Fitriani noted that 'Mr Prabowo risked signalling tacit approval or at least indifference towards Russia's invasion of Ukraine'. She said the Indonesian leader should now seek to rebalance ties, including by visiting G-7 countries or hosting international meetings that affirm Indonesia's commitment to global norms. 'President Prabowo needs to show that he leads Indonesia based on values,' she added. - The Straits Times/Asia News Network

The Sun

7 hours ago

• The Sun

Russia's Sechin says China is moving towards exporting energy

ST PETERSBURG (Russia): Rosneft CEO Igor Sechin, one of the most influential men in Russia's energy sector, said on Saturday that China was seeking complete energy independence and that in the foreseeable future it could become a major energy exporter. China's economic and military rise over the past 45 years is considered to be one of the most significant geopolitical events of recent times, alongside the 1991 fall of the Soviet Union which ended the Cold War. Sechin said that a massive increase in electricity consumption was changing the entire landscape of the global energy markets as populations soared in Africa and Asia and the digital revolution triggered massive demand for power. Speaking at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum, Sechin said that China accounted for a third of global investment in the energy sector, was ramping up renewable energy capacity and was now one of the leaders in nuclear power. 'China, which has already ensured its energy security, is confidently moving towards complete energy independence, forming a stable energy balance based on its own resources,' Sechin said in a speech which referenced both Greek mythology and Niccolo Machiavelli. 'There is no doubt, taking into account the persistence and professionalism of our Chinese comrades, that in the foreseeable future they will achieve the desired result, which will turn China from an importer of energy resources into a major energy exporter.' China is currently the world's largest importer of crude oil and a major importer of natural gas. Russia is the world's second largest oil exporter and holds the world's largest reserves of natural gas. Sechin, who worked alongside Vladimir Putin in the former imperial capital of St Petersburg and later under the president in the Kremlin, has run Rosneft since 2012. Rosneft accounts for about 40% of Russian oil production, 14% of the country's gas production and 32% of the refinery market. It is also the biggest Russian exporter of oil to China. Sechin said that the decision by OPEC+ to speed up an output increase now looked far-sighted and justified in the light of the confrontation between Israel and Iran. He added that the OPEC+ group could bring forward its output hikes by around a year from the initial plan. He drew attention to the vast U.S. debt pile, warning that great powers from Habsburg Spain and pre-Revolutionary France to the Ottoman Empire and Britain had declined due to high levels of public debt. The expansion of the Western military-industrial complex was diverting enormous resources away from productive sectors and unlikely to be a panacea for the problems in Europe or the United States, Sechin said. 'There is always an asymmetrical answer,' he added. But his focus was on China's role, giving the example how the growth in the sales of electric vehicles had resulted in significant slowdown in motor fuel demand over the last year. 'If this trend continues – it may have a significant reverse impact on the oil market balance,' Sechin said. He added than an important part of China's strategy to reduce dependence on energy imports was the processing of coal into synthetic fuels and chemical products. About 40 million tons of coal is used to produce synthetic fuels and more than 260 million tons for ammonia and methanol production, he said.